Life After Energy: What if fossil fuels disappeared tomorrow?

There is an anti-human TV program on the History Channel called Life After People, which portrays the aftermath of the imaginary scenario where all people on Earth suddenly vanished in a rapture-like event tomorrow.

Life_after_people

I’ve often seen it flipping channels, and it has always been my impression that it represents the ultimate utopian vision of radical environmentalists, who see people as a scourge on the planet, sort of a Fear and self loathing in Las Vegas applied to Gaia.

I get word from Dr. David Deming, Geologist at the University of Oklahoma, of an essay he has composed asking about what would happen to people if fossil fuel based energy disappeared tomorrow. Deming asks this simple question: What would happen if we gave the environmentalists what they want?

It is an eye opener for those that really don’t think much about where the energy they use daily comes from. I’ve excerpted parts of it below, and I have a few observations of my own that follow. 

What If Atlas Shrugged?

by David Deming

Atlas Shrugged is the title of Ayn Rand’s 1957 novel in which the world grinds to a halt after the productive segment of society goes on strike. Tired of being demonized and exploited, the world’s innovators and entrepreneurs simply walk away.

What would happen to the US today if the fossil fuel industry went on a strike of indefinite duration? What would happen if we gave the environmentalists what they want?

Within 24 hours there would be long lines at service stations as people sought to purchase remaining stocks of gasoline. The same people who denounce oil companies would be desperately scrounging the last drops of available fuel for their SUVs. By the third day, all the gasoline would be gone.

With no diesel fuel, the trucking industry would grind to a halt. Almost all retail goods in the US are delivered by trucks. Grocery shelves would begin to empty. Food production at the most basic levels would also stop.

With no trains or trucks running there would be no way to deliver either raw materials or finished products. All industrial production and manufacturing would stop. Mass layoffs would ensue. At this point, it would hardly matter. With virtually all transportation systems out, the only people who could work would be those who owned horses or were capable of walking to their places of employment.

Owners of electric cars might smirk at first, but would soon be forced to the unpleasant reality that the vehicle they thought was “emission free” runs on coal. Forty-two percent of electric power in the US is produced by burning coal.

us_elect_generation-large

With natural gas also out of the picture, we would lose another 25 percent. The environmentalist’s favorite power sources, wind and solar, could not fill the gap. Wind power currently generates about 3 percent of our electricity and solar power accounts for a scant 0.04 percent. The only reliable power sources left would be hydroelectric and nuclear. But together these two sources could only power the grid at 27 percent of its normal capacity. With two-thirds of the electric power gone, the grid would shut down entirely.

Read his full essay here. (note: this link does not imply endorsement of the website on which the essay resides – Anthony)

============================================================

Here are a few observations of my own about what would happen if fossil fuels disappeared tomorrow:

  • After elevated tanks of municipal water systems were depleted of drinking water in a few days, there would be no more water supply. This would force people to start looking for alternate sources, and we’d be back to a time when water treatment was unknown. Disease and death would follow for many as tainted water spreads disease. People with water wells would have to tear out electric pumps and install hand pumps or windmills to get water.
  • Related to the first point, toilets would be useless without water to flush them. Fecal matter disposal becomes an issue as gravity fed sewage systems eventually clog, and eventually fecal matter will end up in streams and rivers contributing to the spread of diseases much like the Great Stink in old London.
  • Garbage collection becomes a thing of the past. Garbage will be piled high in the streets.
  • People that have grid tied solar power systems would be no better off than their neighbors, because the DC to AC inverters require an AC power grid presence signal. Otherwise they shut off for safety. Some people with electrical skills might be able to rewire them, but then they’d only have electricity during daytime.
  • People who may have working solar energy might be targeted by the have-nots. They might wish they had paid attention to the Second Amendment to protect their home based energy source. People who still have gasoline in their cars trying to escape cities might find themselves victims of mob attacks as the have-nots look for the last remaining bits of energy. Mad-Max world ensues.
  • Windmill farms (that also need grid presence to operate) will stand as icons of folly, unusable, and cursed by the populace since they can’t make use of them. Eventually they’ll all look like these wind farms or fall down.
  • Radical climatologists like Mike Mann and James Hansen will no longer be able to communicate their apocalyptic visions of the future to us, since there will be no Internet or radio/TV networks or newspapers printed to disseminate their views.
  • Along the same lines, thankfully, we’d never see another episode of Here Comes Honey Boo-Boo.
  • Climate modelers like Kevin Trenberth would never be able to run another computer model telling us how hot our future apocalypse might be, since his NCAR computer is run by Wyoming coal. Likewise, NOAA’s Gaea supercomputer will be DOA since it can’t run on recycled vegetable oil.
  • Al Gore will no longer be able to jet around the world to tell us how the world will end soon if we don’t pay attention to his new book about The Future. He’ll be reduced to holing up in one of his many properties and hoping the Mad-Maxers don’t come for his solar panels.
  • Congress would be reduced to debating in hot, sweaty, non air-conditioned rooms, just like the founders of our country did at the first Continental Congress and as they did in the summer of 1988, when Dr. James Hansen and his sponsor, Senator Tim Wirth, turned off the A/C in the hearing room for effect while they sold the idea of global warming to the Senators.
  • Without air conditioning, city dwellers would truly experience the Urban Heat Island effect in the summer, that is when they weren’t scrounging for food and water, and fighting off the Mad-Maxer gangs who would take anything they could from them, including their life.
  • Wood burning to stay warm during the winter becomes all the rage again. Smoke pollution returns to cities, especially in winter.
  • Real climate refugees start streaming south from high latitude countries as people run out of fuel. Many towns in Alaska and Siberia that survive only because of regular supplies of heating oil and gasoline would be abandoned.
  • Global warming, environmentalism, politics;  all would be a thing of the past, since survival trumps everything.
  • Paul Ehrlich wanders the streets near Stanford, dressed in rags shouting at people “I was right! I was right!

I could go on and on, but you get the picture.

So which is the worse future, a slightly warmer one with fossil fuels or one without them?

2.3 3 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

216 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brian H
February 7, 2013 11:58 am

The perfect food, long pig, would return to favour, as it has in previous global or regional famines. Talk about Stone Soup!

DirkH
February 7, 2013 12:19 pm

humpy says:
February 7, 2013 at 11:43 am
“I can only imagine where things would go if there was no hope of the power coming back and no emergency radio broadcast to listen to with your precious emergency batteries, no one nearby to come and rescue you and your last bit of water and battery power had gone!!”
Handcrank radio and flashlight, great invention! Got a flashlight from Philips, use it as bicycle lamp.
Also, for all your post apocalyptic needs:
http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/

Austin
February 7, 2013 12:19 pm

Just read this book to find out what really happens.
http://www.amazon.com/One-Second-After-William-Forstchen/dp/0765356864

Dodgy Geezer
February 7, 2013 12:20 pm

I suspect things would not be so bad in Europe. France, for instance, is almost all nuclear, and pretty much all European train lines are electrified, so mass transportation of goods and food would still be possible. It would be a bit tough for a while – like wartime rationing – while we were urgently making new nuclear power stations. I suspect that these can be made in under a year if there are no protests or regulations.
After that we would be back to (reasonably) normal. We probably wouldn’t work ships and aeroplanes with batteries – we would synthesise fuel. If, for some reason, no ‘fossil’ fuel could ever be used again, even if synthesised, I suspect we would see the return of clipper sailing ships…

DirkH
February 7, 2013 12:22 pm

Don K says:
February 7, 2013 at 11:40 am
“So how long does the human race have for a civilization based on burning fossil fuels? I make it a century. Maybe not too much more than that.”
A little too pessimistic. More like 1,500 years.
http://www.bgr.bund.de/EN/Home/homepage_node_en.html
Click on the “Annual Report” top right.

M. Jeff
February 7, 2013 12:25 pm

…. Until such time as Homo Sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.” …
The “beautiful balance of nature”? 99.9% of species that have ever lived are now extinct. Vaccinations, medicines, efficient production of food, etc,, (although a result of natural evolution), should be banned so as to implement the imaginary “beautiful balance of nature”?

February 7, 2013 12:26 pm

Nuclear power is in its infancy, but seems to be shunted aside by those who should be able to appreciate its benefits the most. It certainly won’t be going away. No matter the investment in wind, solar, and other “renewables” it will soon be painfully obvious how inadequate they are. China and India are investing heavily in liquid fluoride thorium reactor research, having received great benefit from more than half a century of research the United States already has accumulated and discarded. Anyone who cannot appreciate abundant, low cost, non polluting, non nuclear weapons proliferating, nuclear hazard waste consuming instead of generating, compact and reliable, fail safe, is a zealot with a core of quasi-religious beliefs that would shame a fundamentalist. I meet them every day.

February 7, 2013 12:28 pm

Didn’t watch the super bowl? No light, no phones,no motor cars not single luxury. Hello Gilligan.
NOLA during/after Katrina was close enough.

DirkH
February 7, 2013 12:29 pm

Gail Combs says:
February 7, 2013 at 10:27 am
“Then again rotten officers in Nam died from American bullets in the back….”
Nam also gave us the term “fragging”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragging

Gail Combs
February 7, 2013 12:30 pm

mib8 says:
February 7, 2013 at 11:34 am
….There’s a high probability that some form of neo-feudalism would be imposed, though it seems many in governments just love that idea even now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Do you really think any of the bureaucrats would actually survive? Aside from the fact I do not think they have the brains to wipe their own behinds, the outcome of the French revolution comes to mind. All those inner city welfare types of which Washington DC has a great number, are NOT going to be happy and if the politicians and bureaucrats make the mistake of staying in DC too long they are going to be in big trouble.
I am also afraid you will see massive book burning and anger turned toward universities.
One of the little items politicians forget is the US armed forces swear an oath to the Constitution and NOT to a person and also swear to protect from enemies foreign and domestic….
The neo-feudalism will be military based in my opinion since they are the ones best equipped to handle such a situation.

Ian W
February 7, 2013 12:30 pm

I am really surprised that no-one sees the major connotation of sudden loss of power as the grid goes down. Anyone who has lived through a hurricane/earthquake knows that the main effect is loss of communications – -very very limited radio and no TV. So all the people in New York may feel that this is a problem that only they have – and flood out to Newark or Philadelphia. All of a sudden finding out what is happening in DC from New York is a 3 day delay (if the messenger is not stopped and eaten on the way!) California is a couple of weeks even if some wood powered steam locomotives are somehow put back on the tracks.
The isolation would lead to even worse atrocities as there is no way to call for assistance. This is the world where 2nd amendment rights are really important.
Perhaps this discussion explains why DHS is ordering so many million boxes of hollow point ammunition.
“The Department of Homeland Security has put out yet another solicitation requesting hundreds of millions of hollow point rounds, this time 200 million rounds of .223 and .308 for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, to be obtained over two years, with 40 million the first year and 160 million the second.”
http://www.examiner.com/article/department-of-homeland-security-buys-even-more-hollow-point-rounds
are they preparing for just this scenario?

February 7, 2013 12:31 pm

In preparation for a transpacific trip from San Francisco to Austrailia and back my sailing associates and I did some lengthy and serious preparation for the possibility of sailing permanently with zero engine, zero fuel and zero electricity (including no batteries).
No radio, no phones, no GPS, nada.
We practiced that scenario along the coast of CA for many days.
We all became very proficient with our sextant and each of us had our own very expensive ultra accurate mechanical chronometers for longitude calculation.
It was actually more rewarding when sailing in the no engine, no fuel and no electricity mode. : )
John

Reply to  John Whitman
February 7, 2013 12:54 pm

I can imagine it would be quite a nice adventure – no engine, no fuel, no electricity sailing. However, if it was a no food trip because the food you want to take with you couldn’t be produced (no power for canning) and you couldn’t get transportation for it to the dock, that could be a different matter. Canned foods need energy to produce. Water pumped and stored. Without fuel, I suppose you ate all cold meals. Or did you have a solar oven? Wood fires don’t go well with ship travel.

Radical Rodent
February 7, 2013 12:39 pm

I have tried a little thought experiment; this seems a good chance to publish it. Here is a simple comparison of having a cup of tea supplied with and without the help of Big Oil. I have tried to keep it simplistic, and with information that most of us are quite familiar with. If you work, or have worked, in the industry, you will undoubtedly find many flaws; should you do so, only highlight them if they are in direct contradiction to reality.
Tea is grown in tropical and sub-tropical highland areas, mostly in the less developed countries, providing vital income and employment for a large number of people in those locales.
Management of the tea plantations has been greatly enhanced by the use of machinery, though the harvesting of the leaves is still labour-intensive, as it can only be done manually.
Processing of the harvest is enhanced by the use of machines, the leaves requiring sorting, shredding and drying before packing.
Transporting the prepared tea to the export points – usually ports – is either by rail or road. Depending upon the quality and condition of the road, truck transport could take several hours. For greater distances, it may be more economical to use the railways, where the cargo from many trucks can be transported several hundred miles within a day.
At the port, the tea is loaded onto a ship by crane, several tonnes at a time. Most tea will be transported in containers, so loading will be completed within a few hours. This container ship will probably be a “feeder”, with a crew as small as 12, transporting the tea to a terminal within a few days’ steaming, where it will be transferred to a larger ship, allowing the transport of huge quantities of goods with crews as small as 20. For these ships, the journey time from the “Far East” to Europe will be about 10 days. A single leaf may make the journey from plant to teapot in as little as two weeks.
Tea has become a staple of many people, who enjoy its rich, invigorating variety at modest cost.
Remove “Big Oil” in all its forms from the process:
Tea is grown in tropical and sub-tropical highland areas, mostly in the less developed countries, providing vital income and employment for a large number of people in those locales.
Management of the plantations is manual, requiring the use of a larger work-force for the quantity of tea harvested; the harvesting of the leaves remains labour-intensive, as it can only be done manually.
Processing of the harvest also becomes labour-intensive, the leaves requiring shredding manually and drying naturally; the product will take longer to prepare for export.
Horse, mule or ox-drawn vehicles transport the prepared leaves to the port for export. Without the benefit of tarmacadamed roads, a journey of 100 miles will take several days, after which, the tea is loaded onto ships manually; most tea will be packed in sacks or chests, light enough to be transported short distances by one person; alternatively, manually-powered cranes might help to speed the process. Whichever method is used, loading will take from a few to several days to complete. The ships carrying this cargo will be the fastest available, and, being the largest that can be built with the available technology, will travel directly from the (final) port of loading to Europe. Being sailing ships, they will be limited in size, as they are made from wood that has been hand-cut, moulded and carved. Crew size will be around 100, possibly more, to handle the vast expanse of organically-sourced sails. While fast, the journey time is dependent upon the wind and weather, but can be expected to be at least 20 days, assuming the Suez Canal remains open. The journey of a single tea leaf, from plant to teapot, will take at least one month, though will probably be at least twice as long.
As can be seen, the latter of the two processes does provide employment for considerably more people for considerably longer per unit of tea transported. This, of course, will be reflected in the price of tea for the consumer. No longer will it be a staple of most people’s diets, but will become a status symbol amongst the wealthy, as it was in the days of the Cutty Sark, and other romantic tea-clippers.
With the consumer base drastically reduced, there will be less production of tea, so reducing the number of people employed in the industry, as well as those transporting it. This will have one advantage of enabling areas of tea plantation to revert to natural flora, providing more habitat for the local fauna. However, it is possible that the local population may wish to convert this to farmland, so that they may return to the subsistence farming that the plantations had raised them out of. It is probable that there will be drastic population shrinkage.
Consider similar comparisons with crops such as coffee, oranges and sugar; and remember, bananas would be one crop no longer available. Those, and similar, will become luxury items, and once more, an orange or tangerine will be an important gift at Christmas; the more basic items, such as grain and corn, will have risen in price such that food will return to being the major part the household budget. It is probable that there will be drastic population shrinkage in the consumer country.

Bryan A
February 7, 2013 12:44 pm

Dont delude yourselves into thinking that Fossil Fuels couldn’t be made to disappear tomorrow though they still remain in the ground. I certainly don’t have my own personal oil well or refinery. All that is needed is to force the price of it’s use to untenable to the masses. Imagine Gas at $30 or $40 per liter or electricity produced by fossil fuels to be taxed at a rate to produce Electric prices at dollars per KWH instead of pennies. It wouldn’t take much in the way of taxation to cause Fossil Fuels to become effectively unuseable

February 7, 2013 12:48 pm

We had this in the UK back in 2000 .
Lorry driver blockaded the oil refinaries.Protest about rising fuel costs.
Tony Blair had to go to the Queen to almost declare a state of emergency.
If it had persisted it would brought down the government.
There was a lot of support for the drivers including from me .They were Blue Collar ordinary working class people fighting unfair taxation from an uncaring Elitist Labour Authoritarian government..

Gail Combs
February 7, 2013 12:52 pm

There is the Amish folks favorite catalog: Lehman’s non-electric
well points for hand drilling wells and non-electric Water Pumps

Chuck Nolan
February 7, 2013 12:53 pm

I believe the biggest group of people on earth who don’t need oil to survive are the Arabs.
If you do away with oil they could still fight. Could we?
cn

Chuck Nolan
February 7, 2013 12:54 pm

Not just could but would. Would we?
cn

Jon
February 7, 2013 12:55 pm

MarkW Says: “I’ve always loved the way those who hate religion go out of their way to prove their ignorance of it.”
Tell that to the Taliban!

Mike
February 7, 2013 1:01 pm

Just finished reading “perfect storm — energy, finance and the end of growth” (http://www.tullettprebon.com/Documents/strategyinsights/TPSI_009_Perfect_Storm_009.pdf). The 5th part of this paper promotes surplus energy as the real economic driver (the first 4 parts are a pretty depressing analysis of the financial mess we are in). The authors posit that the decreasing energy returns on energy invested (EROEI) and deliverability we are seeing will have the same effects without the science fiction of “life after …”.
It also has an interesting analysis of the economic value of fossil fuels:
“The exercise of putting one gallon of fuel into a car, driving it until the fuel
runs out and paying someone to push it back to the start-point also illustrates
the huge difference between the price of energy and its value in terms of
work done. According to the US Energy Information Administration, one
(US) gallon of gasoline equates to 124,238 BTU of energy, which in turn
corresponds to 36.4 kwh. Since one hour of human physical labour
corresponds to between 74 and 100 watts, the labour-equivalent of the
gasoline is in the range 364 to 492 hours of work. Taking the average of
these parameters (428 hours), and assuming that the individual is paid
$15 per hour for this strenuous and tedious activity, it would cost $6,420
to get the car back to the start-point. On this rough approximation, then, a
gallon of fuel costing $3.50 generates work equivalent to between $5,460
and $7,380 of human labour.”

February 7, 2013 1:05 pm

Been 10 years since we invaded Iraq.The West takes what ever action is necessary to secure its Oil supply.Even consider invading Saudi Arabia to protect itnot just from Al Qida from Middle East Politcal Turmoil generally.Not just Saudi but Libya Algeria Egypt Syria Morocco Arab Spring still going.
Just looked up the spot price for a barrel of crude oil its about 98 dollars.So the question is supposed the Middle East went into complete break down and the price of Oil went up double .Not just the western world but how the developing world would survive.

Joel Upchurch
February 7, 2013 1:30 pm

I’m curious about where MarkW thinks we have centuries of fossil fuels remaining. I would say the remaining fossils fuels is measured in decades not centuries. You should read the articles on peak oil and peak coal. in wikipedia. Keep in mind we can’t use fossil fuels if there is no net energy benefit from extracting the fuels. Even in the United States where we have cheap coal and fairly cheap logistics we can’t use Wyoming coal in some places. because it is too expensive. MarkW seem to be making the same mistake as Warmists who think we can keep burning fossil fuels for 100s of years, when is actual fact we are going to start running out of fossil fuels before the end of the end of the century.

February 7, 2013 1:33 pm

The Hermit says:
February 7, 2013 at 11:17 am
Just as an aside, I’ve never noticed an anti-human bent to the show “Life After People”. If anything, it seems to be a strong reminder of the insignificance of human activity when viewed against the forces of nature. That’s a lesson climate-alarmists should really take to heart.

=======================================================================
“Life After People” is fantasy with a bit of science theory thrown in. I mean, “The History Channel” postulating the future? An interesting concept to contemplate but no more grounded in reality than Hansen’s original climate models.

MattS
February 7, 2013 1:34 pm

Gail Combs says:
February 7, 2013 at 12:52 pm
There is the Amish folks favorite catalog: Lehman’s non-electric
well points for hand drilling wells and non-electric Water Pumps
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Does the catalog include engineering drawings and blueprints needed to build one yourself? Under postulated conditions getting one delivered from more than 100 miles away would not be possible in anything approaching a reasonable amount of time if it was possible at all.

February 7, 2013 1:36 pm

PS Hermit, I’m not disagreeing with you at all. That was just a thought your comment sparked.