Life After Energy: What if fossil fuels disappeared tomorrow?

There is an anti-human TV program on the History Channel called Life After People, which portrays the aftermath of the imaginary scenario where all people on Earth suddenly vanished in a rapture-like event tomorrow.

Life_after_people

I’ve often seen it flipping channels, and it has always been my impression that it represents the ultimate utopian vision of radical environmentalists, who see people as a scourge on the planet, sort of a Fear and self loathing in Las Vegas applied to Gaia.

I get word from Dr. David Deming, Geologist at the University of Oklahoma, of an essay he has composed asking about what would happen to people if fossil fuel based energy disappeared tomorrow. Deming asks this simple question: What would happen if we gave the environmentalists what they want?

It is an eye opener for those that really don’t think much about where the energy they use daily comes from. I’ve excerpted parts of it below, and I have a few observations of my own that follow. 

What If Atlas Shrugged?

by David Deming

Atlas Shrugged is the title of Ayn Rand’s 1957 novel in which the world grinds to a halt after the productive segment of society goes on strike. Tired of being demonized and exploited, the world’s innovators and entrepreneurs simply walk away.

What would happen to the US today if the fossil fuel industry went on a strike of indefinite duration? What would happen if we gave the environmentalists what they want?

Within 24 hours there would be long lines at service stations as people sought to purchase remaining stocks of gasoline. The same people who denounce oil companies would be desperately scrounging the last drops of available fuel for their SUVs. By the third day, all the gasoline would be gone.

With no diesel fuel, the trucking industry would grind to a halt. Almost all retail goods in the US are delivered by trucks. Grocery shelves would begin to empty. Food production at the most basic levels would also stop.

With no trains or trucks running there would be no way to deliver either raw materials or finished products. All industrial production and manufacturing would stop. Mass layoffs would ensue. At this point, it would hardly matter. With virtually all transportation systems out, the only people who could work would be those who owned horses or were capable of walking to their places of employment.

Owners of electric cars might smirk at first, but would soon be forced to the unpleasant reality that the vehicle they thought was “emission free” runs on coal. Forty-two percent of electric power in the US is produced by burning coal.

us_elect_generation-large

With natural gas also out of the picture, we would lose another 25 percent. The environmentalist’s favorite power sources, wind and solar, could not fill the gap. Wind power currently generates about 3 percent of our electricity and solar power accounts for a scant 0.04 percent. The only reliable power sources left would be hydroelectric and nuclear. But together these two sources could only power the grid at 27 percent of its normal capacity. With two-thirds of the electric power gone, the grid would shut down entirely.

Read his full essay here. (note: this link does not imply endorsement of the website on which the essay resides – Anthony)

============================================================

Here are a few observations of my own about what would happen if fossil fuels disappeared tomorrow:

  • After elevated tanks of municipal water systems were depleted of drinking water in a few days, there would be no more water supply. This would force people to start looking for alternate sources, and we’d be back to a time when water treatment was unknown. Disease and death would follow for many as tainted water spreads disease. People with water wells would have to tear out electric pumps and install hand pumps or windmills to get water.
  • Related to the first point, toilets would be useless without water to flush them. Fecal matter disposal becomes an issue as gravity fed sewage systems eventually clog, and eventually fecal matter will end up in streams and rivers contributing to the spread of diseases much like the Great Stink in old London.
  • Garbage collection becomes a thing of the past. Garbage will be piled high in the streets.
  • People that have grid tied solar power systems would be no better off than their neighbors, because the DC to AC inverters require an AC power grid presence signal. Otherwise they shut off for safety. Some people with electrical skills might be able to rewire them, but then they’d only have electricity during daytime.
  • People who may have working solar energy might be targeted by the have-nots. They might wish they had paid attention to the Second Amendment to protect their home based energy source. People who still have gasoline in their cars trying to escape cities might find themselves victims of mob attacks as the have-nots look for the last remaining bits of energy. Mad-Max world ensues.
  • Windmill farms (that also need grid presence to operate) will stand as icons of folly, unusable, and cursed by the populace since they can’t make use of them. Eventually they’ll all look like these wind farms or fall down.
  • Radical climatologists like Mike Mann and James Hansen will no longer be able to communicate their apocalyptic visions of the future to us, since there will be no Internet or radio/TV networks or newspapers printed to disseminate their views.
  • Along the same lines, thankfully, we’d never see another episode of Here Comes Honey Boo-Boo.
  • Climate modelers like Kevin Trenberth would never be able to run another computer model telling us how hot our future apocalypse might be, since his NCAR computer is run by Wyoming coal. Likewise, NOAA’s Gaea supercomputer will be DOA since it can’t run on recycled vegetable oil.
  • Al Gore will no longer be able to jet around the world to tell us how the world will end soon if we don’t pay attention to his new book about The Future. He’ll be reduced to holing up in one of his many properties and hoping the Mad-Maxers don’t come for his solar panels.
  • Congress would be reduced to debating in hot, sweaty, non air-conditioned rooms, just like the founders of our country did at the first Continental Congress and as they did in the summer of 1988, when Dr. James Hansen and his sponsor, Senator Tim Wirth, turned off the A/C in the hearing room for effect while they sold the idea of global warming to the Senators.
  • Without air conditioning, city dwellers would truly experience the Urban Heat Island effect in the summer, that is when they weren’t scrounging for food and water, and fighting off the Mad-Maxer gangs who would take anything they could from them, including their life.
  • Wood burning to stay warm during the winter becomes all the rage again. Smoke pollution returns to cities, especially in winter.
  • Real climate refugees start streaming south from high latitude countries as people run out of fuel. Many towns in Alaska and Siberia that survive only because of regular supplies of heating oil and gasoline would be abandoned.
  • Global warming, environmentalism, politics;  all would be a thing of the past, since survival trumps everything.
  • Paul Ehrlich wanders the streets near Stanford, dressed in rags shouting at people “I was right! I was right!

I could go on and on, but you get the picture.

So which is the worse future, a slightly warmer one with fossil fuels or one without them?

2.3 3 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

216 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gail Combs
February 7, 2013 10:56 am

CD (@CD153) says:
February 7, 2013 at 9:57 am
…. Where is Bill Gates when we need him?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Firmly aligned with those who think they want this to happen.

Bill Gates vs. Global Warming: The philanthropist recently donated $700,000 to fight a proposition that would repeal a California law meant to reduce global warming.
http://www.hellocotton.com/bill-gates-vs-global-warming-the-philanthropist-802478

John Bell
February 7, 2013 10:58 am

I listen to NPR sometimes on the radio, and a few weeks ago I heard some program, the guest, an environmentalist, I forget the name, said that we could all have clean green renewable energy for “just one or two percent more cost” over what we have now. I doubt that is possible.

John F. Hultquist
February 7, 2013 10:59 am

Mod, Can you alert Willis to look at the Bing image today. Thanks, John.

Reply to  Anthony Watts
February 7, 2013 11:51 am

@Anthony – Bing dot com always has a picture as its background on the initial screen. I think the OP was indicating Willis would love it (especially in light of a recent post).

February 7, 2013 10:59 am

I guess the downfall of Man was the invention of fire.
(Anybody got a light?)

Gail Combs
February 7, 2013 11:00 am

john robertson says:
February 7, 2013 at 10:05 am
This is an experiment I do not want to share in.
How about we give the eco-…. a chance to experience their utopia with out annoying the rest of us.
As hydrocarbon based energy is evil, all oil based goods must go and there are too many people in their world, let them move to a warming paradise in the Canadian High Arctic…..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
NAH, just ship them to Siberia. I am sure we could come up with a good exchange policy with the Russians. We take the Russians who want to be capitalists and we send then our econuts.

F. Ross
February 7, 2013 11:06 am

Anyone surviving the first couple of weeks or so may well wish they had not.

Bob
February 7, 2013 11:13 am

Anthony, the bing image that Hultquist mentions is that of a mother dolphin and her young – I guess in reference to Willi’s post last week.

Juan Slayton
February 7, 2013 11:14 am

People that have grid tied solar power systems would be no better off than their neighbors… Some people with electrical skills might be able to rewire them, but then they’d only have electricity during daytime.
Hey, no problem. We cannibalize all the car batteries from the useless automobiles.
: > )

The Hermit
February 7, 2013 11:17 am

Just as an aside, I’ve never noticed an anti-human bent to the show “Life After People”. If anything, it seems to be a strong reminder of the insignificance of human activity when viewed against the forces of nature. That’s a lesson climate-alarmists should really take to heart.

Gail Combs
February 7, 2013 11:19 am

Tom O says:
February 7, 2013 at 10:25 am
…..but who’s going to bother to pick up the styrofoam and tin cans that can’t be used for any purpose what so ever….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Styrofoam burns quite nicely since it is polystyrene with chemical formula is (C8H8)n
Tin cans are not tin but steel or aluminum and would be scavenged as patching material or for other uses.

Dr. John M. Ware
February 7, 2013 11:24 am

Some excellent comments on this topic in Michael Crichton’s novel STATE OF FEAR.

Gail Combs
February 7, 2013 11:26 am

Tom E. says:
February 7, 2013 at 10:26 am
The thing that really gets me, is that the technology exists to take big leaps towards their “stated goals”…..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The actual goal is POWER and money, everything else is just window dressing.
Read some of the articles on “global govenance” by Pascal Lamy, World Trade Organization director (and a socialist)
You might want to also read my comment (with lots of links) on the Eugenics movement This is where a lot of this crap first came from.

MarkW
February 7, 2013 11:30 am

Tim Ball says:
February 7, 2013 at 9:38 am
David Graber, a research biologist with the National Park Service said,
“Somewhere along the line – at about a billion years ago – we quit the contract and became a cancer.”

A billion years ago. Wasn’t that about 750 million years before life first crawled out of the oceans?

MarkW
February 7, 2013 11:32 am

ConfusedPhoton says:
February 7, 2013 at 9:50 am

I’ve always loved the way those who hate religion go out of their way to prove their ignorance of it.

mib8
February 7, 2013 11:34 am

Elevators — human, cargo, grain — would no longer operate.
Grain threshing would have to be done by human hands and animals.
Ditto grain milling.
No more power drills, nail-guns, power-saws. A few lathes might be powered by water-wheels. We could probably have radio using solar panels or wind-mills, though, perhaps even cellular phones and wi-fi. No kerosene lamps or parafin candles or coal or natural gas furnaces. A lot less steel and even brass because you’d have to make charcoal first, and we’d quickly clear the forests for that, while what hard-woods available would be substituted for the plastics and metals where possible.
Most people, most of the time, would be stuck within a few miles of where the last of the fuel left them. A person can only carry so much on his back, or in a cart. But adventurous travelers would still range about as widely as ever, if more slowly.
There’s a high probability that some form of neo-feudalism would be imposed, though it seems many in governments just love that idea even now.

Robert M
February 7, 2013 11:37 am

Personally, I think most of you folks are exceedingly optimistic. Say all the fossil fuel gets cut off and does not come back on. In every major city the acquisition of easily available water, fuel and food would pretty much be unavailable after the first day. No more will be arriving. Many will not have the resources to last more than a few days. Most people who live in cities think that water comes from a tap, and food comes from Starbucks. By definition the power is out, and phones are out. The first night in the dark will panic half of the city. These folks will not know what to do with themselves if they cannot be distracted by a television or other urban comfort. No government help will be available, not even any reassuring messages not to panic. By the end of the second day, rioting, looting, and general lawlessness will have consumed much of the city’s population in a spasm of horrific destruction. Waves of refugees would blight the countryside, and by the third day the population of democrats in the country would be decimated. (See, there is always a silver lining!) I would guess for every city with a population over 250,000 or so, half would have perished within the first three days. Half of the remaining folks will be gone in three months, and then half of those that remain would be gone in three years. The rest would be settling into much smaller rural communities, and life would be finding a new normal. Civilization would be recovering in these areas to some extent as anyone alive at this point must be a fairly capable individual. There won’t be many kids, any seniors, or any progressives running around at this point. There will probably be a number of warlords and emerging local power structures getting going. A lot of these folks will not be nice people. Anyone left alive will be enjoying a progressive and environmental utopia… Enjoy!

MarkW
February 7, 2013 11:39 am

Joel Upchurch says:
February 7, 2013 at 10:06 am
—–
First off, we have enough fossil fuels remaining to last many hundreds of years, so no need to start planning anytime soon. Any plans we make now will be made meaningless by technological advances over that time anyway. Secondly, when the time comes, they will plan. Because it won’t be a case of one day, fossil fuels, next day none. The way any resource depletes is that the easiest to reach deposits are exploited and used up first. As these deposits are used up, the price gets more expensive which permits the exploiting of less convenient deposits. At the same time, the rising cost of the resource encourages research into alternatives for the resource, the rising prices also make existing alternatives more attractive. This cycle repeats until the resource gets so expensive that nobody uses it anymore because there are better alternatives.

Don K
February 7, 2013 11:40 am

Can an advanced civilization run without a lot of energy? Of course not. Do environmentalists have a grip on reality? For the most part, no Is the developing world going to be content with their current very minimal energy usage? I doubt it.
Are hydrocarbon fuels going to last forever? No, that’s simply not possible.
So how long does the human race have for a civilization based on burning fossil fuels? I make it a century. Maybe not too much more than that.
What then? Some combination of hydro, a little wind, quite a lot of solar, even more nuclear, an unknown amount of who knows what.
Will everyone be happy then? Of course not. So what?
Let me recommend Tom Fuller’s blogs http://3000quads.com/ and http://thelukewarmersway.wordpress.com/

Eric in SOCAL
February 7, 2013 11:42 am

Garbage not collected? The uncollected bodies will be much worse, and they won’t be scavenged.

humpy
February 7, 2013 11:43 am

Having experianced an earquake and being without food, fuel, water and power for a week I know first hand how it would go down. Most sewer systems need power to run (pumping stations) and without them sewers would back and either flood out of manholes into the street, or if your lucky and the environmentalists have let you keep them, the sewage would overflow out of formed overflow strcutures to rivers to at least stop your street flooding with it. This would not occur everywhere, but low lying areas near pump stations would become flooded. However, with no water this would soon end as people use up the 200l odd of water in their header and water tanks, than nothing. Water pressure either comes from tanks or below ground bores which are pumped or in some cases from rivers. The tanks typically only hold 24 hours of storage and would go dry in a few days (people would use less water). Pumped supplies would stop immediately, though if there is some artesian pressure you may get a trickle. Head driven systems from rivers would continue to operate but without treatment. No lighting at night would encourage looting or burglers. Fuel stations would go dry within 24 hours and supermarket shelves will be stripped by panic buyers never to be replaced. When the power went out here I was glad I had my wood burner, it proivided light at night, comforted the family, cooked our dinner and warmed the house – I was soo glad I thought hard against our clean air act to keep the fire! The 220litres of water in the water tank and header tank also went surprising far when used sparingly (hand washing in a bucket, and filled bottles for drinking) when not washing (other than a weekly flannel bath) and going toilet in a long drop I dug in the garden. The long drop also worked very well if you keep the liquids out and fill it only with solids and a sprinkling of dirt each day – it never smelt bad despite warm weather. I can only imagine where things would go if there was no hope of the power coming back and no emergency radio broadcast to listen to with your precious emergency batteries, no one nearby to come and rescue you and your last bit of water and battery power had gone!!

John Whitman
February 7, 2013 11:43 am

If the scenario of an sudden absence of fossil fuels occurred, you would see me and my many ocean going sail boating associates living at many subtropical coastlines moving around with our large convoy of sailboats and living off fishing, smuggling, wholesome piracy and bartering.
Speaking of Miss Rand => you might find this fun => below is a pic of where I am right now commenting from on my iPhone. It is one of my favorite transient offices. It is a SB coffee shop in a Barnes and Noble Bookstore in San Jose CA.
http://i47.tinypic.com/fn5iz5.jpg
John

Vince Causey
February 7, 2013 11:44 am

That very outcome was the implied ending of the remake of The Day The Earth Stood Still (the Keanu Reeves version). Klatu spared the human inhabitants of Earth from death in a faustian bargain in which they were allowed to suffer to live in exchange for all forms of energy and power.
It was meant as a utopian vision, but only the insanely mad would see any kind of utopia in that hell.

Matt
February 7, 2013 11:44 am

“People with water wells would have to tear out electric pumps and install hand pumps or windmills to get water.”
Both the hand pumps and the windmills would have to be hand built from locally scrounged parts. Even just considering just people who have private wells today most wouldn’t have the skills to do this.
“Wood burning to stay warm during the winter becomes all the rage again. Smoke pollution returns to cities, especially in winter.”
With the transportation grid shut down, city dwellers wouldn’t have a chance of getting enough wood to survive the first winter in cities where the average winter temp is low enough to require heating. Even if they have access to wood, the average city home today has no means to burn wood for heat indoors without high risk of burring down the building.
By the point that the last drop of fossil fuel is gone every one who is still stuck living in a urban center in the northern half of CONUS will be dead before the next spring. Assuming they manage to survive in the face of starvation, dehydration and disease long enough to make it to the first winter they will have close to zero chance of surviving the winter.

MarkW
February 7, 2013 11:51 am

Anthony Watts says:
February 7, 2013 at 11:06 am

That would probably be http://www.bing.com. It’s a search engine site. They put background images on their front page, a different each day.

MarkW
February 7, 2013 11:53 am

“Styrofoam burns quite nicely since it is polystyrene with chemical formula is (C8H8)n”
Just make sure you do it in a well ventilated area.