I think readers will appreciate the point by point style that this book is written in. It enables you to zero in on argument rebuttals with graphs and data. Highly recommended – Anthony
==========
Bob Tisdale announces: This Free Preview includes the Table of Contents; the Introduction; the beginning of Section 1, with the cartoon-like illustrations; the discussion About the Cover; and the Closing.

Have you searched the web, looking for information about La Niña and her big brother El Niño? You know, those colossal cooling and warming events in the tropical Pacific that cause flooding in some parts of the world, drought in others—heat waves here, cold spells there—blizzards and record snowfall in your driveway, but a snow-free winter at your favorite ski resort. Yup, those El Niño and La Niña. Scientists have given them that highfalutin name El Niño-Southern Oscillation or ENSO for short. Then, if you make a mistake and spell it ENZO with a “Z” in your search engine, you wind up watching a video from BBC’s Top Gear, of Jeremy Clarkson and The Stig driving a Ferrari F60 owned by Pink Floyd drummer Nick Mason in exchange for plugging Nick’s book. That’s a nice diversion, though. As your search continues, you keep finding technical web pages with very similar overviews, and, if you’re lucky, three schematics: one for El Niño conditions, one for La Niña and one for ENSO-neutral or “normal” conditions. Frustratingly, those three illustrations look the same to you, leaving you scratching your head. No matter where you turn, what you read, you still have no idea what they’re talking about. But you still want to know what those blasted El Niño and La Niña things are all about.
Who Turned on the Heat? begins with 29, not 3, cartoon-like illustrations, with text right there on the drawings, that explain the processes of ENSO with easy-to-understand terms.
After presenting some background information at the beginning of that section, the discussions of ENSO start with “normal” (a.k.a. ENSO-neutral) conditions in the tropical Pacific, then move on to the transition from ENSO-neutral to El Niño with an overview of what causes the El Niño to begin. That’s where the free Preview of that section ends. In the book, it continues with a presentation of El Niño conditions and the transition back to ENSO-neutral, then on to La Niña and eventually back ENSO-neutral again, providing readers with a complete overview of the ENSO phases in sequence. It discusses how La Niña is not the opposite of El Niño. The phases all fit together logically. Mother Nature’s pretty good about things like that, but she still has some tricks up her sleeves.
For those readers who haven’t looked at or read anything technical since high school, the next section discusses very basics things like how to read a graph. It presents the types of graphs used throughout the rest of the book, and a bunch of other introductory topics.
Section 3 of Who Turned on the Heat? is a more detailed overview of the phases of ENSO—it includes graphs of satellite-based sea surface temperature and other variables, color-coded maps, links to animations—all of which are furnished to support and confirm the naturally fueled processes of the ENSO-neutral, El Niño and La Niña phases. In other words, the fundamentals of ENSO are presented and documented in detail. That’s followed by a section that discusses topics that are still related to El Niño and La Niña but are beyond the basics, like what actually triggers an El Niño. Did you know that El Niño events are so big that sometimes it takes a couple of tropical cyclones (yup, the same things as hurricanes) in the western tropical Pacific just to kick-start one?
What may become your favorite section of Who Turned on the Heat? is next. In it, the sea surface temperature data presents how it accounts for global warming. The combined long-term effects of major El Niño and La Niña events are presented, discussed and documented—with satellite-based sea surface temperatures data, not climate models. Major El Niño and La Niña events are not like the smaller ones. Far from it. The big ones are responsible for the vast majority of the natural warming of the global sea surface temperatures for the past 30 years.
Yup. You’re right, that’s the time the climate models used by the IPCC say that only greenhouse gases could have caused the warming. Those scientists, who must have their heads immersed in climate models, apparently haven’t bothered to come out into the real world long enough to examine the sea surface temperature records for the last 3 decades. If they had, they’d find the data doesn’t agree with the models. All the modelers would have had to do is divide the global oceans into 3 logical subsets. Then they could see why sea surface temperatures have warmed and that Mother Nature’s two rambunctious children La Niña and El Niño were the primary natural culprits. Logically, those energetic natural siblings can explain most of the warming of land surface air temperatures, too, since temperatures there simply mimic and exaggerate the short- and long-term variations in sea surface temperatures. Of course, anthropogenic global warming exists; that is, there’s a small part of the land surface air temperature warming that can’t be explained by the natural warming of sea surfaces, and that small portion is likely manmade, with a host of contributing factors. But back to the oceans: natural variables can also explain their warming to depths of 700 meters—a dataset called Ocean Heat Content.
That would have been a great section on which to end Who Turned on the Heat?
– However –
Who Turned on the Heat? continues with three more sections. One presents links to additional animations so that you can watch the cumulative effects of an El Niño and La Niña as they took place. Remember, La Niña is not the opposite of El Niño—there are some not-so-subtle differences between the two phases. The next section presents the myths and failed arguments that proponents of manmade global warming have created to try to downplay the long-term effects of major El Niño and La Niña events. The last section is Q&A. Take a look at the Preview of Who Turned on the Heat? Scroll down through the Table of Contents.
Who Turned on the Heat? weighs in at a whopping 550+ pages, about 110,000+ words. It contains somewhere in the neighborhood of 380 color illustrations. In pdf form, it’s about 23MB. It includes links to more than a dozen animations, which allow the reader to view ENSO processes and the interactions between variables.
After reading Who Turned on the Heat? you should have a better understanding of El Niño and La Niña—AND—you should understand why global surface temperatures warm during multidecadal periods when El Niño events are stronger, occur more often and endure longer than La Niña events. The most recent period with ENSO conditions weighted toward the El Niño phase started in the late 1970s, and it’s no coincidence that global surface temperatures have warmed since then. Also not by coincidence, La Niña events dominated ENSO, but just a little bit, from the mid-1940s to the late-1970s, and global surface temperatures cooled slightly. Why did surface temperatures warm from the late 1910s to the mid-1940s? Yup, ENSO was skewed toward El Niño during that period, too.
Further to that, as you’ll find, this book clearly illustrates and describes the following:
1. Sea surface temperature data for the past 30 years show the global oceans have warmed. There is, however, no evidence the warming was caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gases in part or in whole; that is, the warming can be explained by natural ocean-atmosphere processes, primarily ENSO.
2. The global oceans have not warmed as hindcast and projected by the climate models maintained in the CMIP3 and CMIP5 archives, which were used, and are being used, by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for their 4th and upcoming 5thAssessment Reports; in other words, the models cannot and do not simulate the warming rates or spatial patterns of the warming of the global oceans—even after decades of modeling efforts.
3. Based on the preceding two points, the climate models in the CMIP3 and CMIP5 archives show no skill at being able to simulate how and why global surface temperatures warmed; that is, the climate models presented in the IPCC’s 4th and upcoming 5thAssessment Reports would provide little to no value as tools for projecting future climate change on global and regional levels.
=============================================================
The book is:
Who Turned on the Heat? – The Unsuspected Global Warming Culprit, El Niño-Southern Oscillation is now on sale in pdf form for US$8.00 – Please click here to buy a copy.
Bob Tisdale adds:
For those who would prefer a Kindle edition, I haven’t decided if I’m going to publish it in that format. Due to the massive number of color illustrations, the Kindle edition price would be somewhere close to US$16.00. Personally, I think that’s a little steep for an e-book. And since other electronic versions of a book have to be priced 20% higher than the Kindle edition, that would make the pdf version about US$19.00, and that’s way too high. Right now, US$8.00 sounds like a bargain for an easy-to-read, well-illustrated, well-documented book about El Niño-Southern Oscillation and its long-term effects on global surface temperatures.
Naturally, some readers will think the price is way too low, and they’ll want to pay more for the years of research that went into preparing this book, through a tip or donation to the author. (Wishful thinking on my part.)
If you have any questions about the content, please ask them on any thread at my blog Climate Observations.
Regards,
Bob Tisdale
Dear Bob. At that price, you’ll have thousands of catastrologists buying the book so they can prove you WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!. You’ll make enough to take a holiday in Hawaii for a fortnight every week. I’ll buy a copy as soon as the site loads, which atm it is refusing to do. Must have collapsed under the custom. All the best.
I bought it and look forward to go through.
Thanks, Anthony.
Bargain of the millenium.
Nice explanation of the process Bob. Even a novice like myself can understand the basic concept of how and why the cycle happens.
Well done and good luck!
Then we come to the $64,000 question, what drives the changes in ENSO balance between nina and nino?
Information about El Niño?
This from Billy Kessler
Oceanographer
Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory / NOAA
Seattle
Frequently-(well, at least once)-asked-questions about El Niño
This page gives answers I have written to many different people asking about El Niño. Many of them came in during the excitment about the big El Niño of 1997-98, but with another (weaker) event in December 2002, interest rose again. All the questions came from real people; no plants or shills. Some of the answers go over the same ground, and they’re not in any particular order. But maybe you can find what you’re looking for here. Anybody who is interested in this subject should definitely check out the PMEL El Niño theme page, which gives access to realtime data and many links and discussions about El Niño, including a more complete FAQ page. The answers here tend to be in more depth, though.
“Your tax dollars at work”
http://faculty.washington.edu/kessler/occasionally-asked-questions.html
Bob
what is the relationship between ENSO and the jet stream which appears to be the end product that actually directly affects our weather?
tonyb
Philip Mulholland: Thanks for bringing up Bill Kessler’s “Occasionally Asked Questions” webpage. It provides a great general description of ENSO. It’s linked in the text of my book for his chicken-and-egg discussion of trade winds and sea surface temperatures and, once more, at the end of Section 3, under the heading of “Further Reading”. Unfortunately, that NOAA/PMEL webpage is very light on visual references.
My book goes into more detail with multiple cartoon-like illustrations for the interactions between the variables for each of the three basic phases and for the transitions between them, discussions of East Pacific vs West Pacific El Nino, How El Niño and La Niña are not opposites, and the like. I then reinforce that with data in Section 3. All of that should make ENSO much easier to understand.
Hi Bob. May I suggest you do the Kindle version as well? Those who think it too expensive will still have the option of PDF, so it’s not going to upset them any, and you’ll reach a larger audience by including those who prefer Kindle. For a technical book – and a nice meaty one at that – a higher price is perfectly acceptable.
anthony, CSIRO doesn’t think science should be questioned:
5 Sept: News.com.au: AAP: Science itself is being questioned: CSIRO
SCIENTISTS need to communicate with the Australian public to be heard above the voices challenging their research, the head of the national science agency says.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) chief executive Dr Megan Clark says scientists these days are working in a “fundamentally different” environment that makes it difficult for them to properly inform public debate.
Scientists whose work was subject to peer reviewing and vigorous benchmarks for integrity were being challenged by research posted online that met no such standards, she said…
“We are in a world where science itself is being questioned,” Dr Clark told the National Press Club in Canberra on Wednesday.
“Scientific evidence is often referred to as a theory, as if a theory is something to be doubted.”…
Science has faced a formidable opponent in the USA, where the creationism movement is lobbying for theories of evolution to be banned from some school curriculums.
But in Australia, despite fierce debate around climate science dominating airwaves, there is still a healthy demand for well-informed information about the issues affecting the country…
She said the CSIRO was taking a step back to ensure it was clearly communicating with the Australian public about the issues “they need to hear about”.
For example, Dr Clark said every two years the CSIRO in conjunction with the Bureau of Meteorology released its State of the Nation’s Climate report to set an agenda for informed debate…
http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/national/science-itself-is-being-questioned-csiro/story-e6frfku9-1226465769902
not only about CAGW:
VIDEO: 5 Sept: ABC: National Press Club: National Press Club: Megan Clark, CSIRO
Duration: 56min 33sec
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-05/national-press-club-megan-clark/4244598
——————————————————————————–
tonyb says: “what is the relationship between ENSO and the jet stream which appears to be the end product that actually directly affects our weather?”
The locations of the winter jet streams (Northern and Southern Hemispheres) depend on the location of the warm water in the tropical Pacific. Basically, the location of the warm water dictates the location of the convection, cloud cover and precipitation in the tropical Pacific, which impact the location of the jet streams. I use the following NOAA web pages as references for that Chapter. For the “normal” state of winter jet streams:
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensocycle/meanjet.shtml
For “typical” jet stream response during an El Niño:
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensocycle/enso_circ.shtml
For “typical” jet stream response during a La Niña:
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensocycle/lanina_circ.shtml
But I’ve taken the “normal” illustrations and placed them next to the El Niño and the La Niña illustrations for the individual discussions, so that you can see how the jet streams have changed location. You know me: It’s all about visuals.
Ally E. says: “May I suggest you do the Kindle version as well? Those who think it too expensive will still have the option of PDF…”
The problem, Ally: The pdf version has to be priced 20% higher than the Kindle edition. And that doesn’t help.
Regards
GlynnMhor says: “Then we come to the $64,000 question, what drives the changes in ENSO balance between nina and nino?”
Every indication is it’s simply a natural multidecadal variation in the state of the tropical Pacific. I understand there’s yet another paper in the works that confirms this.
punchy title…concise summary….well done, Bob
We want a Kindle edition.
Thanks, Bob!
And congratulations. This will be an interesting read.
I will post something about it and a link.
Hi Bob,
Thanks for your informative comment.
Hi Bob
Happy to pay more for Kindle
And do we have an explanation yet why this supposed ENSO process has not already cooked the planet?
After all if it started at some in specified time in the past it should be just getting hotter and hotter and hotter with no limit in sight.
If there is no defined starting or ending point for this supposdd process and there is no reason to suppose the early 21st century is special, then Bob’s hypothesis is really really weak.
LazyTeenager you are living down to your name. Try reading the book. It has lots of colour pictures so even you should be able to understand some of the content even if the words are too dificult for you …
If you dismiss the impossible ‘subduction of surface heat’ as the ENSO cause, then warming can only come from below. Earth has 2 million cubic miles of Uranium & Thorium under high heat, high pressure and variable particle bombardments. Nodes of concentrated Ur & Th are stirred by a faster rotating Iron cyrstal core and pumped by Lunar Earthtides. As these nodes decay, they are surrounded by elemental gases, allowing them to lift as heavy vegetables in a boiling stew of molten rock, causing variations in heat and pressure. The Earth is impacted by variable amounts of solar and cosmic ray particles and partially protected by a variable magnetosphere. To assume constant, laboratory half-life decay under these conditions is the height of naivete.
Lazy Teenager
The enso process is actually associated with cold and cooling climates. If you look at lake sediments on either side of the the pacific you see more stable weather when its warm and ENSO variability when its cold. I’m still not convinced that ENSO is the driver and not the response
There was a clear decline cloud cover in the mid 90s leading up the 97/98 super el nino.
I sit in the camp whereby the stratosphere drives the Balance between Meridional/zonal climate changes via jet stream. The Stratosphere seems to be driven by two main elements. The Solar UV/ozone cycle and Changes to water vapour driven by large volcanic eruptions. (Volcanoes can inject water vapor into the stratosphere or strip it out with SO2 depending on the chemical makeup of the eruption)
Allright. I hate to do this Bob, but I have to cry foul. I clicked on the Please click here to buy a copy. Got shuttled through to PayPal, made the purchase then got a big nearly empty screen with this in the upper middle:
“The page you were looking for doesn’t exist”
“You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved”
I think I will go for the first one since I didn’t type anything in except my paypal password. Can I have my money back please?
Faux Science Slayer says: “If you dismiss the impossible ‘subduction of surface heat’ as the ENSO cause, then warming can only come from below….”
ENSO is fueled by downward shirtwave radiation. This has been known for decades.