Children just aren't going to know what hail is…

Source of title inspiration here

From NOAA Headquarters.

Colorado mountain hail may disappear in a warmer future

NOAA-led study shows less hail, more rain in region’s future, with possible increase in flood risk

Summertime hail such as this, which fell in Boulder, could all but disappear from the eastern flank of Colorado’s Rocky Mountains by 2070, according to a new modeling study by scientists from NOAA and several other institutions. Credit: Will von Dauster, NOAA

Summertime hail could all but disappear from the eastern flank of Colorado’s Rocky Mountains by 2070, according to a new modeling study by scientists from NOAA and several other institutions.

Less hail damage could be good news for gardeners and farmers, said Kelly Mahoney, Ph.D., lead author of the study and a postdoctoral scientist at NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colo. But a shift from hail to rain can also mean more runoff, which could raise the risk of flash floods, she said.

“In this region of elevated terrain, hail may lessen the risk of flooding because it takes a while to melt,” Mahoney said. “Decision makers may not want to count on that in the future.”

For the new study, published this week in the journal Nature Climate Change, Mahoney and her colleagues used “downscaling” modeling techniques to try to understand how climate change might affect hail-producing weather patterns across Colorado.

The research focused on storms involving relatively small hailstones (up to pea-sized) on Colorado’s Front Range, a region that stretches from the foothill communities of Colorado Springs, Denver and Fort Collins up to the Continental Divide. Colorado’s most damaging hailstorms tend to occur further east and involve larger hailstones not examined in this study.

In the summer on the Front Range, precipitation commonly falls as hail above an elevation of 7,500 feet. Decision makers concerned about the safety of mountain dams and flood risk have been interested in how climate change may affect the amount and nature of precipitation in the region.

Mahoney and her colleagues began exploring that question with results from two existing climate models that assumed that levels of climate-warming greenhouse gases will continue to increase in the future (for instance, carbon dioxide, which is at about 390 parts per million today, increases in the model to 620 ppm by 2070).

But the weather processes that form hail – thunderstorm formation, for example – occur on much smaller scales than can be reproduced by global climate models. So the team “downscaled” the global model results twice: first to regional-scale models that can take regional topography and other details into account (this step was completed as part of the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program). Then, the regional results were further downscaled to weather-scale models that can simulate the details of individual storms and even the in-cloud processes that create hail.

IMAGE: Summertime hail could all but disappear from the eastern flank of Colorado’s Rocky Mountains by 2070, according to a new modeling study by scientists from NOAA and several other institutions….

Click here for more information.

Finally, the team compared the hailstorms of the future (2041-2070) to those of the past (1971-2000) as captured by the same sets of downscaled models. Results were similar in experiments with both climate models.

“We found a near elimination of hail at the surface,” Mahoney said.

In the future, increasingly intense storms may actually produce more hail inside clouds, the team found. However, because those relatively small hailstones fall through a warmer atmosphere, they melt quickly, falling as rain at the surface or evaporating back into the atmosphere. In some regions, simulated hail fell through an additional 1,500 feet (~450 meters) of above-freezing air in the future, compared to the past.

The research team also found evidence that extreme precipitation events across all of Colorado may become more extreme in the future, while changes in hail patterns may depend on hailstone size — results that are being explored in more detail in ongoing work.

Mahoney’s postdoctoral research was supported by the PACE program (Postdocs Applying Climate Expertise) administered by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research and funded by NOAA, the Bureau of Reclamation and the Western Water Assessment. PACE connects young climate scientists with real-world problems such as those faced by water resource managers.

“With climate change, we are examining potential changes in the magnitude and character of precipitation at high elevations,” said John England, Ph.D., flood hydrology specialist at the Bureau of Reclamation in Denver, Colo. “The Bureau of Reclamation will now take these scientific results and determine any implications for its facilities in the Front Range of Colorado.”

###

NOAA’s mission is to understand and predict changes in the Earth’s environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and to conserve and manage our coastal and marine resources. Join us on Facebook, Twitter and our other social media channels.

Co-authors of the new paper, “Changes in hail and flood risk in high-resolution simulations over the Colorado Mountains,” include Michael Alexander (NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory); Gregory Thompson (National Center for Atmospheric Research) and Joseph Barsugli and James Scott (NOAA/Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, CIRES).

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
102 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Curiousgeorge
January 9, 2012 8:37 am

Crystal ball gazing again, guys? Maybe they should try a Ouija Board.

TFNJ
January 9, 2012 8:39 am

The UK Met Office followed up their Barbecue Summer forecast of a few years ago with a statement that UK children will never see snow again. Being arse over tit once is excusable (if not allowable for earning bonuses), but twice running?
Like this study, it all depended on the output of other climate forecasts. Why can’t they just take Phil Jones’ word for it – global temperatures stopped rising in 1995, but CO2 levels have not. “A travesty”, as Kevin Trenberth puts it, but true.

Retired Engineer
January 9, 2012 8:47 am

After I moved to Colorado in July ’88, we had a foot of hail in August. They had to get the snowplows out of storage to clear the Interstate. Good grief, what have I done? Then, perhaps a decade later, we had over 6 feet of hail at an intersection on the road to work (strange wind conditions) also in summer. Completely buried cars and a truck. No one injured. And all of this at only 6,000 feet. With many assorted hail storms in-between. almost none predicted. So I conclude that we have very strange weather and predictions 60 years out aren’t even SWAGs. In short, no one knows. Predicting that far out is safe, they won’t be around to explain why it didn’t happen.

Kaboom
January 9, 2012 8:47 am

It’s a travesty that curve fitters are still using the science moniker.

Green Sand
January 9, 2012 8:50 am

All Hail Mahoney!
Obviously there is another line, but as it is a new year, goodwill etc!

H.R.
January 9, 2012 8:53 am

“Finally, the team compared the hailstorms of the future (2041-2070)…”
Can I get a money-back guarantee if those future hailstorms don’t match the models?
My heirs will cheerfully collect from their heirs.

mojo
January 9, 2012 9:04 am

What’s the “fudge factor” count in that model, guys?

January 9, 2012 9:08 am

What are these people ingesting? It can’t be unadulterated tea or coffee. First they do not have a very good model for hail. It is what it is, useful as a predictor of potential. That is all. The remainder of this is a fairy tail.

Colin in BC
January 9, 2012 9:12 am

…according to a new modeling study…

That says it all, doesn’t it?
These “scientists” have gotten previous models monumentally wrong. Why in the hell should I believe them now? GIGO applies, here.

doug s
January 9, 2012 9:12 am

Apparently stupid is here to stay.

NetDr
January 9, 2012 9:16 am

This all depends upon global warming which has stalled this century. No warming no effect.

Taphonomic
January 9, 2012 9:17 am

Another dire warning that hail might not freeze over.

R. Craigen
January 9, 2012 9:26 am

That’s GREAT! No hail = no tornados, right?

January 9, 2012 9:26 am

Any chance of eliminating hail in Texas? I replaced my roof in North Texas 3 years ago due to hail damage, and the roof to another house in South Texas this summer for the same reason. Sounds like a good thing to me.

DesertYote
January 9, 2012 9:27 am

Whats with all these post-doctoral kids writing all of these politically biased nonsense studies the last 5 years.

Patrick
January 9, 2012 9:28 am

Tell the hundreds of people who had to replace their roofs in the foothills where I live that hail is no longer falling. What a joke.

Rob Crawford
January 9, 2012 9:29 am

“…the team compared the hailstorms of the future…”
Welcome, to the hailstorms of tomorrow!
Causality, guys. You know nothing about the “hailstorms of the future”. What you compared were the outputs of your models to the outputs of your models…

beng
January 9, 2012 9:36 am

We need to cut our emissions NOW to save the hailstones.

Resourceguy
January 9, 2012 9:38 am

Hopefully, children won’t know what NOAA funding was like instead.

Huth
January 9, 2012 9:39 am

Do we really need to worry about this?

Paul Coppin
January 9, 2012 9:42 am

Time for me to trot out the call for PhD Recall again. I willing to bet a lot of the “science” coming out about climate and environmemtal issues, is really the flush of doctoral theses overseen by supervisors that haven’t had an original thought for 20 years. Serious examination needs to be made of the current educational and degree granting processes at colleges. Doug s. has it: apparently stupid is here to stay, and I would add, it apparently has tenure.

January 9, 2012 9:43 am

TFNJ says January 9, 2012 at 8:39 am:
“The UK Met Office followed up their Barbecue Summer forecast of a few years ago with a statement that UK children will never see snow again. Being arse over tit once is excusable (if not allowable for earning bonuses), but twice running?”
===========
And all the various Council Storage Depots are full to the rafters with rock-salt and grit for the iced up roads during this very harsh UK winter which the Met Office forecast just a few months ago
Still, winter has not yet turned into spring – so there is still time –

Roger Knights
January 9, 2012 9:44 am

How does flooding (assuming there’s a way of putting a number on its severity) correlate with the frequency of hail so far? Are low hail years high-flood years and vice versa?

Ben of Houston
January 9, 2012 9:46 am

Given my intimate knowledge of hail during TEXAS summers, I will find this under “modelling results not checked against facts and then published, looking stupid” for when I retire and become a professor.

Richard deSousa
January 9, 2012 9:47 am

Green Sand: I’ll finish it for you…
“All Hail Maloney”
Thanks for the baloney!

1 2 3 5