Warm Bias: How The Met Office Misleads The British Public

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/met_office_forecast_computer-520.jpg?w=334&h=260&h=334

By Dr. Benny Peiser of the Global Warming Policy Foundation

Met Office 2008 Forecast: Trend of Mild Winters Continues

Met Office, 25 September 2008: The Met Office forecast for the coming winter suggests it is, once again, likely to be milder than average. It is also likely that the coming winter will be drier than last year.

Reality Check: Winter of 2008/09 Coldest Winter For A Decade

Met Office, March 2009: Mean temperatures over the UK were 1.1 °C below the 1971-2000 average during December, 0.5 °C below average during January and 0.2 °C above average during February. The UK mean temperature for the winter was 3.2 °C, which is 0.5 °C below average, making it the coldest winter since 1996/97 (also 3.2 °C).

Met Office 2009 Forecast: Trend To Milder Winters To Continue, Snow And Frost Becoming Less Of A Feature

Met Office, 25 February 2009: Peter Stott, Climate Scientist at the Met Office, said: “Despite the cold winter this year, the trend to milder and wetter winters is expected to continue, with snow and frost becoming less of a feature in the future.

“The famously cold winter of 1962/63 is now expected to occur about once every 1,000 years or more, compared with approximately every 100 to 200 years before 1850.”

Reality Check: Winter Of 2009/10 Coldest Winter For Over 30 Years

Met Office, 1 March 2010: Provisional figures from the Met Office show that the UK winter has been the coldest since 1978/79. The mean UK temperature was 1.5 °C, the lowest since 1978/79 when it was 1.2 °C.

Met Office July 2010: Climate Change Gradually But Steadily Reducing Probability Of Severe Winters In The UK

Ross Clark, Daily Express, 3 December 2010: ONE of the first tasks for the team conducting the Department for Transport’s “urgent review” into the inability of our transport system to cope with snow and ice will be to interview the cocky public figure who assured breakfast TV viewers last month that “I am pretty confident we will be OK” at keeping Britain moving this winter. They were uttered by Transport secretary Philip Hammond himself, who just a fortnight later is already being forced to eat humble pie… If you want a laugh I recommend reading the Resilience Of England’s Transport Systems In Winter, an interim report by the DfT published last July. It is shockingly complacent. Rather than look for solutions to snow-induced gridlock the authors seem intent on avoiding the issue. The Met Office assured them “the effect of climate change is to gradually but steadily reduce the probability of severe winters in the UK”.

Met Office 2010 Forecast: Winter To Be Mild Predicts Met Office

Daily Express, 28 October 2010: IT’S a prediction that means this may be time to dig out the snow chains and thermal underwear. The Met Office, using data generated by a £33million supercomputer, claims Britain can stop worrying about a big freeze this year because we could be in for a milder winter than in past years… The new figures, which show a 60 per cent to 80 per cent chance of warmer-than-average temperatures this winter, were ridiculed last night by independent forecasters. The latest data comes in the form of a December to February temperature map on the Met Office’s website.

Reality Check: December 2010 “Almost Certain” To Be Coldest Since Records Began

The Independent, 18 December 2010: December 2010 is “almost certain” to be the coldest since records began in 1910, according to the Met Office.

Met Office Predicted A Warm Winter. Cheers Guys

John Walsh, The Independent, 19 January 2010: Some climatologists hint that the Office’s problem is political; its computer model of future weather behaviour habitually feeds in government-backed assumptions about climate change that aren’t borne out by the facts. To the Met Office, the weather’s always warmer than it really is, because it’s expecting it to be, because it expects climate change to wreak its stealthy havoc. If it really has had its thumb on the scales for the last decade, I’m afraid it deserves to be shown the door.

A Frozen Britain Turns The Heat Up On The Met Office

Paul Hudson, BBC Weather, 9 January 2010: Which begs other, rather important questions. Could the model, seemingly with an inability to predict colder seasons, have developed a warm bias, after such a long period of milder than average years? Experts I have spoken to tell me that this certainly is possible with such computer models. And if this is the case, what are the implications for the Hadley centre’s predictions for future global temperatures? Could they be affected by such a warm bias? If global temperatures were to fall in years to come would the computer model be capable of forecasting this?

A Period Of Humility And Silence Would Be Best For Met Office

Dominic Lawson, The Sunday Times, 10 January 2010: A period of humility and even silence would be particularly welcome from the Met Office, our leading institutional advocate of the perils of man-made global warming, which had promised a “barbecue summer” in 2009 and one of the “warmest winters on record”. In fact, the Met still asserts we are in the midst of an unusually warm winter — as one of its staffers sniffily protested in an internet posting to a newspaper last week: “This will be the warmest winter in living memory, the data has already been recorded. For your information, we take the highest 15 readings between November and March and then produce an average. As November was a very seasonally warm month, then all the data will come from those readings.”

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

193 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CRS, Dr.P.H.
December 20, 2010 11:22 am

Exeter today:
“Hundreds of people have been working to minimise the disruption caused by the snow and ice in Devon but forecasters have warned there could be worse to come.
Exeter was covered by a couple of inches of snow during the early hours of Saturday morning and there was more snow on higher ground.
And the Met Office is expecting a similar amount of snow to fall today, followed by more snow later in the week. Overnight temperatures dropped to -13C (8.6F) overnight on Saturday and are expected to be around -5C (23F) during the night over the coming days.”
———
-13C? Colder than Chicago right now! My laughter at this situation with the MET is tempered by my concern for very some fine people over there. Not a very happy Advent, I fear….
http://www.thisisexeter.co.uk/news/Staff-praised-big-freeze-efforts/article-3022498-detail/article.html

jeef
December 20, 2010 11:23 am

I enjoyed the Department of Transport comments in the piece. not sure how many others on here would read Private Eye, a political satire magazine in the UK, but they regularly commute the Department (DofT) to DafT. I liked it anyway!

Dave F
December 20, 2010 11:24 am

Peter Miller says:
December 20, 2010 at 11:09 am
In the normal world, you receive bonuses for good work and getting it right.
In the grey world of ‘climate science’, you get bonuses and grants for getting it wrong and misleading the public – see below.

Wow. Economics and climate science have more similarities than I could have thought.

Dave F
December 20, 2010 11:28 am

Ryan Maue says:
December 20, 2010 at 10:58 am
Hansen is actually on to something brilliant when he uses 12-month running means for temperature, meaning he can begin to average parts of 2 summers with only one winter.

He also averages two winters with only one summer if the average rolls monthly.

Jack
December 20, 2010 11:41 am

“For your information, we take the highest 15 readings between November and March and then produce an average.”
Is this how an average is calculated?

kwik
December 20, 2010 11:43 am

Here is Dominic Lawson telling us about the MET Office’s measuring practices;
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/dominic_lawson/article6982310.ece
He also writes ;
“as one of its staffers sniffily protested in an internet posting to a newspaper last week”:
So….is it just hear-say? That really wood be good news.
Because if its true….it is ……tragic.

Ken Harvey
December 20, 2010 11:45 am

There are so many things in this world that I do not understand, and so many more that I might have understood by now if only I had applied my mind more diligently. But of all the things that I have been able to understand least, that I have not been able to come to understand at all, is how it is that so many people around the world who strike this onlooker as devoid of all understanding, manage to make a living at the expense of the public purse.

Brian H
December 20, 2010 11:45 am

latitude;
not only forthwith, but henceforth, too also! 😉

Stacey
December 20, 2010 11:45 am

The Met Office have just been awarded First Class Order of Merit for institutions not fit for purpose.
Is there anyone out there who would like to analyse Professor Manleys Central England Temperature data to 1974 for December and compare it to the spin the MET Office are placing on the low temperatures.
http://www.rmets.org/pdf/qj74manley.pdf
Sorry Mr Watts and Mr Moderator I know that the only thing worse than someone’s hobby horse is someone’s old hobby horse.
Two inches of snow and the most affluent part of the UK grinds to a standstill.

RichieP
December 20, 2010 11:49 am

David A. Evans says: December 20, 2010 at 9:55 am
‘That 15 warmest was someone having a laugh. I was surprised at Dominic Lawson picking it up when it was so obviously a piss-take of the Met Office.’
Where’s the Met’s published denial then? I’ve never seen one – and you can be sure that outfits like the Guardian and the Independent would have bigged up the story to clobber us coldists (as a greenish friend of mine politely calls me) if so.

woodentop
December 20, 2010 11:51 am

The quote from the “Met Office” has been tracked down by Misty on the Bishop Hill blog to a comment on the Daily Mail website from someone claiming to be a Met Office employee. It reads like a joke comment to me and no credibility can be given to it IMHO.
http://www.bishop-hill.net/blog/2010/12/20/cold-weather-payments.html#comments

jason
December 20, 2010 11:53 am

On a bbc news special about the weather the forecaster explained how a change in the jet stream caused last years and this years winters.
That does not sound right to me, everything I have read suggests it is the mix of high/low pressure in the arctic oscillation.
Am I wrong? If not why did he not mention it and focused on the jet stream??

stephen richards
December 20, 2010 11:53 am

The blame game has started but in normal times the news media would have called in the Met Off to explain their incompetence. They don’t do that any more, not want the gov wants to hear.

December 20, 2010 11:55 am

As long as the MSM accepts claims by Hansen that he already knows that 2010 will be the hottest year ever, and as long as the MSM accepts from Hansen that November was the hottest ever even when the other data providers show differently, this Met Office nonsense will continue. The Arcitects of Salvation speak, and we shall bow reverentially.
The alarmist bias is so blatant, consistent and (now) contrary to non-insiders that one is reminded of how the intellectuals in Soviet-age Eastern Europe championed Communism despite what they saw in their daily lives. The disconnect persevered because family and professional lives depended on supporting the lie.
If you are so inclined, a survey that says it is representative of 95% of the surveyed, 19 out of 20 times means that only 1 in 20 times has it been done correctly. Such with temperature records and “projections”: the previous were in error, the next is not.

jaymam
December 20, 2010 11:55 am

Try a Google for “we take the highest 15 readings between November and March” [about 2,520 results]
I thought this hoax was disposed of last January, here at WUWT and elsewhere.

MartinGAtkins
December 20, 2010 11:56 am

The current weather conditions in the UK are completely consistent with the Met offices climate models.
Total crap.

jorgekafkazar
December 20, 2010 11:56 am

Paul says: “You’re re-reporting something that’s becoming a bit of an urban myth there. The quote that Dominic Lawson repeated was from a comment to a blog and didn’t come from the Met Office. That’s not the way they work out seasonal averages at all, but the myth seems to be developing a life of its own.”
It’s going viral because it is perfectly consistent with the lunacy that pervades the UK bureaucracy.

Jimbo
December 20, 2010 11:57 am

“Warm Bias: How The Met Office Misleads The British Public”

The warming bias might have something to do with the following.

“Robert is also chairman of the Board of the Met Office. He was chief executive of WWF-UK, the UK arm of the World Wide Fund for Nature, from 1999 to April 2007. ”
* The Green Fiscal Commission (Chairman)
* Carbon Disclosure Project (Chairman of Trustees)
* WCMC 2000 – World Conservation Monitoring Centre (Chairman of Trustees)

So if you believe that co2 leads to warmer winters then the output of the supercomputers must reflect this expectation.
Result = FAIL! FAIL! FAIL!

Jimbo
December 20, 2010 11:59 am
Tom T
December 20, 2010 12:04 pm

“we take the highest 15 readings between November and March and then produce an average.” What the hell type of average is that, what the hell type of winter is that?
Why wouldn’t you take all the highs and all the lows from Dec 21 to March 21 and average them. Surly you can find a super computer somewhere that that is up to the task. Heck my Mac could probably do it. For that matter give me a piece of paper and pencil and I could do it for them.

December 20, 2010 12:06 pm

@Bertram:
You can find (almost) live data on pretty much every aspect of British energy production here:
http://www.bmreports.com/bsp/bsp_home.htm

December 20, 2010 12:06 pm

Interesting way of doing things.
But at the same time you can look at the opposite, take the lowest 15 readings, average those and then see if this is also (hmm at the same time too) the Coldest year on record.
Which kind of shows something I suppose.. (other than the stupidity of doing it this way..)

KnR
December 20, 2010 12:13 pm

I think you have to regard anything that someone post on blog site, when they claim to have inside knowledge to be suspect in all cases and in this case it does not even make sense.

Jockdownsouth
December 20, 2010 12:16 pm

Bertram Felden, Dec 20th 11:03am –
“where can the data about output from the UK wind farms be found?”
Look on the website below (it doesn’t work on Chrome for some reason but does work on Firefox) and scroll down near the bottom to a table headed “Current generation By Fuel Type”. As at 20:15 UK time on Sunday it shows wind 0.1% current (no pun!) and 0.2% for the last 24 hours.
http://www.bmreports.com/bsp/

Henry chance
December 20, 2010 12:24 pm

Joe Romm said the kids wouldn’t see Santa. The snow was gone forever because their parents drove gas hogs and polluted the planet. No more snow he says. No snow no sleigh.
He likes to scare kids.