Via Eurekalert, from the NGO Partnership for Observation of the Global Oceans (POGO), a press release that says, “panic! please send money”. Here’s the punch line:
The Foundation says the average level of pH at the ocean surface has dropped from 8.2 to 8.1 units, “rendering the oceans more acidic than they have been for 20 million years,”
Note that any pH lower than 7.0 is considered “acidic”. Distilled (pure) water has a pH of 7.0. Right now the ocean with a pH of 8.1 is considered “basic”.
Even more interesting is this map below from WikiMedia showing the change in global ocean pH over the last two hundred years. The map information says:
Estimated change in annual mean sea surface pH between the pre-industrial period (1700s) and the present day (1990s). Δ pH here is in standard pH units. Calculated from fields of dissolved inorganic carbon and alkalinity from the Global Ocean Data Analysis Project climatology and temperature and salinity from the World Ocean Atlas (2005) climatology using Richard Zeebe’s csys package . It is plotted here using a Mollweide projection (using MATLAB and the M_Map package). Note that the GLODAP climatology is missing data in certain oceanic provinces including the Arctic Ocean, the Caribbean Sea, the Mediterranean Sea and the Malay Archipelago.

So, with accuracy like this, and such small pH changes obviously measurable, and the pH not yet anywhere near acidic, why do we need a global $15 billion pH measurement system again? It seems all they need is a few places covered to infill some data.
Here’s the press release:
Speed installation of system to monitor vital signs of global ocean, scientists urge
‘It is past time to get serious about measuring what’s happening to the seas around us’
The ocean surface is 30 percent more acidic today than it was in 1800, much of that increase occurring in the last 50 years – a rising trend that could both harm coral reefs and profoundly impact tiny shelled plankton at the base of the ocean food web, scientists warn.
Despite the seriousness of such changes to the ocean, however, the world has yet to deploy a complete suite of available tools to monitor rising acidification and other ocean conditions that have a fundamental impact on life throughout the planet.
Marine life patterns, water temperature, sea level, and polar ice cover join acidity and other variables in a list of ocean characteristics that can and should be tracked continuously through the expanded deployment of existing technologies in a permanent, integrated global monitoring system, scientists say.

Caption: A mooring with a suite of ocean acidification and other environmental sensors at Heron Island on the Great Barrier Reef is the latest tool in an expanding global network of ocean measurements, informing scientists of changes in ocean chemistry.
Credit: Dr. Bronte Tilbrook, CSIRO, Australia
The Partnership for Observation of the Global Oceans (POGO), representing 38 major oceanographic institutions from 21 countries and leading a global consortium called Oceans United, will urge government officials and ministers meeting in Beijing Nov. 3-5 to help complete an integrated global ocean observation system by target date 2015.
It would be the marine component of a Global Earth Observation System of Systems under discussion in Beijing by some 71 member nations of the intergovernmental Group on Earth Observations.
The cost to create an adequate monitoring system has been estimated at $10 billion to $15 billion in assets, with $5 billion in annual operating costs.
Some 600 scientists with expertise in all facets of the oceans developed an authoritative vision of characteristics to monitor at a 2009 conference on ocean observations, (www.oceanobs09.net).
Furthermore, as documented in the forthcoming proceedings of the 2009 conference (to be published shortly by the European Space Agency), the value of such information to the world’s financial interests and to human security would dwarf the investment required.
“Although the US and European Union governments have recently signaled support, international cooperation is desperately needed to complete a global ocean observation system that could continuously collect, synthesize and interpret data critical to a wide variety of human needs,” says Dr. Kiyoshi Suyehiro, Chairman of POGO.
“Most ocean experts believe the future ocean will be saltier, hotter, more acidic, and less diverse,” states Jesse Ausubel, a founder of POGO and of the recently completed Census of Marine Life. “It is past time to get serious about measuring what’s happening to the seas around us.”
The risks posed by ocean acidification exemplify the many good reasons to act urgently.

Caption: Scientists explore on and beneath polar ice. Their aircraft remotely sense animals through properties of scattered light. Marine animals themselves carry tags that store records of their travels and dives and communicate with satellites. Fish carry tags that revealed their migration past acoustic listening lines. Sounds that echoed back to ships portray schools of fish assembling, swimming, and commuting up and down. Standardized frames and structures dropped near shores and on reefs provide information for comparing diversity and abundance. Manned and unmanned undersea vehicles plus divers photograph sea floors and cliffs. Deep submersibles sniff and videotape smoking seafloor vents. And nets and dredges catch specimens, shallow and deep, for closest study.
Credit: E. Paul Oberlander / Census of Marine Life
POGO-affiliated scientists at the UK-based Sir Alister Hardy Foundation for Ocean Science recently published a world atlas charting the distribution of the subset of plankton species that grow shells at some point in their life cycles. Not only are these shelled plankton fundamental to the ocean’s food web, they also play a major role in planetary climate regulation and oxygen production. Highly acidic sea water inhibits the growth of plankton shells.
The Foundation says the average level of pH at the ocean surface has dropped from 8.2 to 8.1 units, “rendering the oceans more acidic than they have been for 20 million years,” with expectations of continuing acidification due to high concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Because colder water retains more carbon dioxide, the acidity of surface waters may increase fastest at Earth’s high latitudes where the zooplankton known as pteropods are particularly abundant. Pteropods (see links to images below) are colorful, free-swimming pelagic sea snails and sea slugs on which many animals higher in the food chain depend. Scientists caution that the overall global marine impact of rising carbon dioxide is unclear because warming of the oceans associated with rising greenhouse gases in the air could in turn lead to lower retention of carbon dioxide at lower latitudes and to potential countervailing effects.
Says Foundation Director Dr. Peter Burkill: “Ocean acidification could have a devastating effect on calcifying organisms, and perhaps marine ecosystems as a whole, and we need global monitoring to provide timely information on trends and fluxes from the tropics to the poles. Threatened are tiny life forms that help the oceans absorb an estimated 50 gigatonnes of carbon from Earth’s atmosphere annually, about the same as all plants and trees on land. Humanity has a vital interest in authoritative information about ocean conditions and a global network of observations is urgently needed.”
Ocean conditions that require monitoring can be divided into three categories:
- Chemical – including pollution, levels of oxygen, and rising acidity;
- Physical / Geological – including sound, tide and sea levels, as well as sudden wave energy and bottom pressure changes that could provide precious minutes of warning before a tsunami; and
- Biological – including shifts in marine species diversity, distribution, biomass and ecosystem function due to changing water conditions.
Benefits of the comprehensive ocean system envisioned include:
- Improved short-term and seasonal forecasts to mitigate the harm caused by drought, or by severe storms, cyclones, hurricanes and monsoons, such as those that recently put one-fifth of Pakistan temporarily underwater and left 21 million people homeless or injured. International lenders estimate the damage to Pakistan’s infrastructure, agriculture and other sectors at $9.5 billion. Improved weather forecasting would also enhance the safety of the fishing and shipping industries, and offshore operations such as wind farms and oil drilling. Sea surface temperature is a key factor in the intensity and location of severe weather events;
- Early identification of pollution-induced eutrophication that spawns algal blooms responsible for health problems in humans and marine species, and harm to aquaculture operations;
- Timely alerts of changes in distributions of marine life that would allow identification of areas needing protective commercial re-zoning, and of immigration by invasive species;
Louise says:
November 1, 2010 at 6:52 am
geochemical evidence and modeling provide
strong evidence that the average surface ocean
pH has not been much lower than about 8.2 for
millions of years. — J. Bijma
=============================================
Well thank you J. Bijma.
Now that we know that elevated atmospheric CO2 has no effect on ocean pH,
nothing to see here.
Dave in Delaware – November 1, 2010 at 6:43 am>
If it’s not a stupid question, why didn’t you just titrate manually for a reference value?
The only thing that will stop this Green inspired rent seeking is when they run out of other peoples’ money to spend.
Ric, thanks for the correction. I did mean temperature. I also appreciate the material you pasted into your response. I’m glad to see that they are looking at more than just pH as acid rain or acidic effluent from rivers will show up in the pH measurement even though it would not be from CO2. However, the CO2 measurent and calcium analysis does not look like something that is simple and straightfoward to do in an automated and continuous fashion. Perhaps that why it costs so much.
That said, its odd that we rely on a single reading of the CO2 in the atmosphere at Mona Loa to get a reading of the CO2 that has been added to the atmoshpere by fossile fuel combustion yet we also know from satellite measurements that the distribution of CO2 is not uniform even though it is a relatively well mixed gas. My next question would be if you can measure how the CO2 varies in the atmosphere via satellite, could you make a rational sampling scheme of dissolved CO2 in the oceans based on temperature and CO2 at different locations that would allow a much more efficient use of resources?
First it was global warming; then Climate Change; now Ocean Acidification. These people must think the feds have a golden goose to fund these preposterous and useless projects
So did I learn Martian Chemistry in school or what; isn’t “Baking Soda” just sodium bicarbonate. So what is it that you get when CO2 dissolves in sea water ? So why does baking soda drive the pH up, and not down. I’m about as rusty as Truk Lagoon, when it comes to how buffer solutions work ?
They derive pH from Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC), which they derive from atmospheric CO2.
Particularly since the diurnal pH variation can often be >1 (Wootton et al., 2008) and that the Pacific Ocean pH varies by about 0.5 over a PDO-coincident cycle (Pelejero et al., 2005).
Clearly POGO are.
Louise
November 1, 2010 at 6:52 am
BS! I am sorry by that is just a bunch of warmest propaganda. It is obvious that you are just regurgitating pseudo-scientific babble that you do not really understand. Ocean PH can be as low as 7.8 to as high as 8.5. Any claims of 0.1 change in global PH is nonsense as there is absolutely no way to get the data needed to produce that figure. A delta of 0.1 is also the smallest delta that can accurately be measured. On top of that there is so much chemical and biological feedback in marine systems, that even if we were trying to change the Oceans PH by adding CO2, we could not do it
Just put it on the tab and let my grand kids pay for it.
$15 billion? There has to be a way to do this much cheaper. Maybe by satellite?
Speed = Quality x Expense
““act urgently”? Get real. How about we do some sane analysis of the issue and figure out how to cost effectively. Yes that will take some time (see above) but can we do something right without the hype about urgency for once?
PS. How about taking the money saved from this and cleaning up the plastic garbage patches we have in our oceans? You know that REAL pollution stuff.
A few days back Global news out of Vancouver B.C. ran an item from the University of B.C. about ocean acidification. They used a sample of water taken out of Coal Harbour in Burrard Inlet. This inlet is in the heart of Metro Vancouver and Coal Harbour borders downtown Vancouver. I would think not a good location for a sample unless digging for money.
When a) the oceans already contain more than 50 times the CO2 of the atmosphere, and b) the surface pH of the ocean immediately surrounding a tropical atoll can vary from 8.3 to 7.9 over the course of a single day, the answer to the question is an emphatic “yes, this will have no effect on life in the oceans.”
For detailed studies, see http://www.co2science.org/data/acidification/acidification.php .
As a graduated analytical chemist, I have my doubts about measuring pH within 0.1 unit error.
Whereas;
1) No part of the constitutuion authorizes spending for that purpose.
2) The US government is over $13 trillion in debt and has $45 trillion in unfunded future liabilities. We are basically broke.
3) Our current condition of being broke is due in large part to decades of spending on programs not authorized by the constitution.
Hence;
Your request for $15 billion is denied.
This reminds me of a situation here in my city. It may sound off-topic, but bear with me:
The airport is going to be adding a new runway or extending an existing runway soon (to handle A380s, actually). Now, one of the main roads providing access to the airport will have to be closed, making it difficult to access the airport for fully 1/4 of the city. One of the suggestions is to build a tunnel under the new runway… or to put it another way, since they’re digging up ground for the runway anyway, they can just dig a little further and add some roadway.
Estimates of the cost for this modification are currently running close to a billion dollars ($800 million). In contrast, a private company built a road under our main freeway to access a shopping mall at a cost of around $20 million.
So how, exactly, can we justify a 40x higher cost for what is essentially the same thing?
How exactly can anyone justify $15B for a network of sensors when something like Argos already exists and a new sensing capability can be added to the existing system?
As was already pointed out, Argos data is poison to warmers since it stubbornly refuses to show their predetermined belief… maybe they have a blind spot to it?
Talk about screwed up priorities — the majority of bloggers on this site don’t realize the importance of tools –NOT MODELS — such as this one to monitor the oceans. My first thought was why hasn’t this testing been done before? — considering how important it is to the welfare of billions of people.
$15Billion dollars is a paltry sum for a worldwide net of monitors to measure if the oceans are acidifying and, if so, could it harm the reefs?; is it linked to the “Dead Zones”– oxygen starved pockets of water that have popped up near Oregon?, does a change in PH help predict devastating algae blooms?, does it affect phytoplankton? — an absolutely vital link in the food chain.
The “whatsupwithyourthinking” mob scream bloody murder about the unreliable models of climate and now here is a tool for actual OBSERVATIONS and you ridicule that. A lot of you are long on comment, but short on logic.
I have to find that a concentration of Hydrogen ion (strictly H3O+) changing from
pH = 8.2 = [H3O+] =0.00000000063 Molar
to
pH = 8.1 = [H3O+] =0.00000000079
Who cares about the pH! What about the Viscosity?!! We need to the know the Viscosity of Sea water and how it is changing or all the rest is just nonsense!
As it happens, I have a plan to test the Viscosity of seawater and how it is changing. Just write me a check for 1 billion dollars and I will get right on it.!
I seem to remember someone pointing out that the ph of freshwater hasn’t changed, sort of indicating that there isn’t really a problem. Freshwater sources much easier to measure I would have thought.
It’s like that old turntable that keeps go phhhuuump, phhhuuuump and won’t stop.
As for that 0.1 change in ocean pH since the 1700’s it is worth remembering that the pH scale wasn’t invented until 1909, and the formulation for it used today is from 1924.
With the oceans having warmed perhaps .6C, maybe they should start calling ocean warming (which has stalled) “ocean boilification”. It’s only a question of time before they find that rascally “missing” heat which, travestically has gone AWOL.
drewski,
Oregon dead zones have not “popped up” off Oregon and they are not related to any acidification or other AGW tall tale.
You are victim of fabricated science and the worldwide distribution of it by alarmists
without ethics.
Jane Lubchenco and her Oregon State University research team spent 5 years and a $9 million NAS grant studying Oregon’s historical & seasonal ocean dead zones and were unable to establish any link to anything AGW.
Despite this she and her peers went on to speculate about a possible link and a google search is now full of her science by fabrication. There is zero evidence supporting her fabrication.
Those supposed AGW dead zones are seasonal and cyclical and have provided record dungenus crab havests this year.
Yet she is among the unethical ilk who would like to spend endless millions supporting her hobbies and scandelous approach to science.
drewski
If you have been following this site no one is against honest research, it is how that research, tools and models always seem to be adjusted. That is where the scepticism comes in, from past practise. Oh and those adjustments always seem to bias the warming side. Coincidental?