NGO pleads for $15 billion "ocean acidification" monitoring system

Via Eurekalert, from the NGO Partnership for Observation of the Global Oceans (POGO), a press release that says, “panic! please send money”. Here’s the punch line:

The Foundation says the average level of pH at the ocean surface has dropped from 8.2 to 8.1 units, “rendering the oceans more acidic than they have been for 20 million years,”

Note that any pH lower than 7.0 is considered “acidic”. Distilled (pure) water has a pH of 7.0. Right now the ocean with a pH of 8.1 is considered “basic”.

Even more interesting is this map below from WikiMedia showing the change in global ocean pH over the last two hundred years. The map information says:

Estimated change in annual mean sea surface pH between the pre-industrial period (1700s) and the present day (1990s). Δ pH here is in standard pH units. Calculated from fields of dissolved inorganic carbon and alkalinity from the Global Ocean Data Analysis Project climatology and temperature and salinity from the World Ocean Atlas (2005) climatology using Richard Zeebe’s csys package . It is plotted here using a Mollweide projection (using MATLAB and the M_Map package). Note that the GLODAP climatology is missing data in certain oceanic provinces including the Arctic Ocean, the Caribbean Sea, the Mediterranean Sea and the Malay Archipelago.

click to enlarge

So, with accuracy like this, and such small pH changes obviously measurable, and the pH not yet anywhere near acidic, why do we need a global $15 billion pH measurement system again? It seems all they need is a few places covered to infill some data.

Here’s the press release:

Speed installation of system to monitor vital signs of global ocean, scientists urge

‘It is past time to get serious about measuring what’s happening to the seas around us’

The ocean surface is 30 percent more acidic today than it was in 1800, much of that increase occurring in the last 50 years – a rising trend that could both harm coral reefs and profoundly impact tiny shelled plankton at the base of the ocean food web, scientists warn.

Despite the seriousness of such changes to the ocean, however, the world has yet to deploy a complete suite of available tools to monitor rising acidification and other ocean conditions that have a fundamental impact on life throughout the planet.

Marine life patterns, water temperature, sea level, and polar ice cover join acidity and other variables in a list of ocean characteristics that can and should be tracked continuously through the expanded deployment of existing technologies in a permanent, integrated global monitoring system, scientists say.

Caption: A mooring with a suite of ocean acidification and other environmental sensors at Heron Island on the Great Barrier Reef is the latest tool in an expanding global network of ocean measurements, informing scientists of changes in ocean chemistry.

Credit: Dr. Bronte Tilbrook, CSIRO, Australia

The Partnership for Observation of the Global Oceans (POGO), representing 38 major oceanographic institutions from 21 countries and leading a global consortium called Oceans United, will urge government officials and ministers meeting in Beijing Nov. 3-5 to help complete an integrated global ocean observation system by target date 2015.

It would be the marine component of a Global Earth Observation System of Systems under discussion in Beijing by some 71 member nations of the intergovernmental Group on Earth Observations.

The cost to create an adequate monitoring system has been estimated at $10 billion to $15 billion in assets, with $5 billion in annual operating costs.

Some 600 scientists with expertise in all facets of the oceans developed an authoritative vision of characteristics to monitor at a 2009 conference on ocean observations, (www.oceanobs09.net).

Furthermore, as documented in the forthcoming proceedings of the 2009 conference (to be published shortly by the European Space Agency), the value of such information to the world’s financial interests and to human security would dwarf the investment required.

“Although the US and European Union governments have recently signaled support, international cooperation is desperately needed to complete a global ocean observation system that could continuously collect, synthesize and interpret data critical to a wide variety of human needs,” says Dr. Kiyoshi Suyehiro, Chairman of POGO.

“Most ocean experts believe the future ocean will be saltier, hotter, more acidic, and less diverse,” states Jesse Ausubel, a founder of POGO and of the recently completed Census of Marine Life. “It is past time to get serious about measuring what’s happening to the seas around us.”

The risks posed by ocean acidification exemplify the many good reasons to act urgently.

Caption: Scientists explore on and beneath polar ice. Their aircraft remotely sense animals through properties of scattered light. Marine animals themselves carry tags that store records of their travels and dives and communicate with satellites. Fish carry tags that revealed their migration past acoustic listening lines. Sounds that echoed back to ships portray schools of fish assembling, swimming, and commuting up and down. Standardized frames and structures dropped near shores and on reefs provide information for comparing diversity and abundance. Manned and unmanned undersea vehicles plus divers photograph sea floors and cliffs. Deep submersibles sniff and videotape smoking seafloor vents. And nets and dredges catch specimens, shallow and deep, for closest study.

Credit: E. Paul Oberlander / Census of Marine Life

POGO-affiliated scientists at the UK-based Sir Alister Hardy Foundation for Ocean Science recently published a world atlas charting the distribution of the subset of plankton species that grow shells at some point in their life cycles. Not only are these shelled plankton fundamental to the ocean’s food web, they also play a major role in planetary climate regulation and oxygen production. Highly acidic sea water inhibits the growth of plankton shells.

The Foundation says the average level of pH at the ocean surface has dropped from 8.2 to 8.1 units, “rendering the oceans more acidic than they have been for 20 million years,” with expectations of continuing acidification due to high concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Because colder water retains more carbon dioxide, the acidity of surface waters may increase fastest at Earth’s high latitudes where the zooplankton known as pteropods are particularly abundant. Pteropods (see links to images below) are colorful, free-swimming pelagic sea snails and sea slugs on which many animals higher in the food chain depend. Scientists caution that the overall global marine impact of rising carbon dioxide is unclear because warming of the oceans associated with rising greenhouse gases in the air could in turn lead to lower retention of carbon dioxide at lower latitudes and to potential countervailing effects.

Says Foundation Director Dr. Peter Burkill: “Ocean acidification could have a devastating effect on calcifying organisms, and perhaps marine ecosystems as a whole, and we need global monitoring to provide timely information on trends and fluxes from the tropics to the poles. Threatened are tiny life forms that help the oceans absorb an estimated 50 gigatonnes of carbon from Earth’s atmosphere annually, about the same as all plants and trees on land. Humanity has a vital interest in authoritative information about ocean conditions and a global network of observations is urgently needed.”

Ocean conditions that require monitoring can be divided into three categories:

  • Chemical – including pollution, levels of oxygen, and rising acidity;
  • Physical / Geological – including sound, tide and sea levels, as well as sudden wave energy and bottom pressure changes that could provide precious minutes of warning before a tsunami; and
  • Biological – including shifts in marine species diversity, distribution, biomass and ecosystem function due to changing water conditions.

Benefits of the comprehensive ocean system envisioned include:

  • Improved short-term and seasonal forecasts to mitigate the harm caused by drought, or by severe storms, cyclones, hurricanes and monsoons, such as those that recently put one-fifth of Pakistan temporarily underwater and left 21 million people homeless or injured. International lenders estimate the damage to Pakistan’s infrastructure, agriculture and other sectors at $9.5 billion. Improved weather forecasting would also enhance the safety of the fishing and shipping industries, and offshore operations such as wind farms and oil drilling. Sea surface temperature is a key factor in the intensity and location of severe weather events;
  • Early identification of pollution-induced eutrophication that spawns algal blooms responsible for health problems in humans and marine species, and harm to aquaculture operations;
  • Timely alerts of changes in distributions of marine life that would allow identification of areas needing protective commercial re-zoning, and of immigration by invasive species;
Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
201 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 1, 2010 3:37 am

They must keep the grant money flowing!
Ecotretas

ImranCan
November 1, 2010 3:40 am

Whats even more amazing is that pH varies with latitude and also with water depth ….. to a much greater degree than o.1 units. And given that CO2 levels have risen and fallen in the past, one must ask – is there a perfect ocean pH ?

Athelstan
November 1, 2010 3:40 am

Absolute madness, (POGO) they want locking up.

Anoneumouse
November 1, 2010 3:41 am

The pH of urine is close to neutral (7) but can normally vary between 4.4 and 8.
Any takers?

November 1, 2010 3:52 am

http://www.americanthinker.com/%231%20CO2EarthHistory.gif
Where is the imminent threat to coral reefs, if they had survived thousands ppm of atmospheric CO2? What was the pH of oceans then? How long have I to read “scientists believe”, “scientists urge”, “scientists warn”?

David Spurgeon
November 1, 2010 4:04 am

Amazing! It all comes down to the dreaded “poison” CO2. It’s much ‘much worse than we thought’ – panic now! Tomorrow will be too late.

Joe Lalonde
November 1, 2010 4:11 am

And these people have absolutely NO vested interest in this project.
The monkey madness continues…

November 1, 2010 4:11 am

15 billion for something we already know and measure? They really have no shame at all do they?
BTW: I am still waiting for my Big-Oil paycheck.

November 1, 2010 4:13 am

Cold water holds more CO2 than warm. Warm water releases it, making the it less acidic. So to “save the oceans” it seems we need to let the climate warm up a bit.

UK Sceptic
November 1, 2010 4:14 am

*cough* rent seeking *cough*

Stu
November 1, 2010 4:16 am

How much was spent on ARGO? And yet no one will touch that data with ten foot pole…

UK Sceptic
November 1, 2010 4:19 am

Alarmists don’t like the ocean temperatures the Argo buoys record so why should Project Alka Seltzer, designed to monitor non-existent acidification, be any different?

rbateman
November 1, 2010 4:19 am

14.9 billion dollar idea:
Instead of spending $15 billion on constant ocean pH monitoring, spend $0.1 billion on a second reading using more traditional methods. $15 B is a lot of dough to satisfy the curious.

Brian Johnson uk
November 1, 2010 4:25 am

Quick buy shares in litmus paper! Ocean acidification hype is another utter waste of money that could be usefully spent on almost anything not to do with biodiversity/wind/solar/climate………
When will the penny drop with these morons? They probably scoff at Alchemy/Witches and Fool’s Gold and they are from the same pathetic mould.

Sean
November 1, 2010 4:26 am

A question, don’t the Argo bouys have pH monitoring already? (I know they have both pH and salinity.) As far as monitoring goes, remeber the Argo bouys were deployed with the expectation that they would show heat building in the world’s oceans. Much to the chagrin of the alarmists, the oceans were found to have a stable heat content since their deployment in 2003. Despite much effort to “correct” the results, Trenbreth knew the data was of sufficient quality that he was confounded about the fact that the heat allegedly being added to the system from green house gases could not be accounted for. So while I am suspicious about the need for special pH monitoring system in addition to what is aready available, the amount of variability in climate data is what leads to shenigans like adjustments to suit a pet theory. Thorough, accurate and precise data, well distributed through the oceans is how things will really be settled.

Neil
November 1, 2010 4:32 am

And we’re surprised by this?
Science went out the window years ago…

H.R.
November 1, 2010 4:37 am

I can think of better things to do with$15 billion.
Is monitoring global ocean pH one of the core responsibilities of government? I don’t think so. But if someone is going to do it, could it be done for a lot less than $15 billion? I’m pretty sure it could.

Jackie
November 1, 2010 4:50 am

The important environmentalist marketing tool being used again, we need “to act urgently”.

wayne
November 1, 2010 4:52 am

Let’s see, that is ** 15,000 million of dollars **, they like it short, $15B, basically for litmus paper !!!!… and I thought the DOD’s paying of $420 for toilet seats was a crime!

Casper
November 1, 2010 5:00 am

Another version of the novel “Use of a dragon” written by Stanislaw Lem-the industry & Co-workers need some money for performing of useless activities.
Reply: In all my years I’ve never seen a public reference to what is probably my favorite writer…until now. ~ ctm

Gareth
November 1, 2010 5:07 am

What happens to the pH of seawater when it rains? I’m thinking if coral can survive coastal rainfall they can survive a slight overall reduction in pH.

Editor
November 1, 2010 5:08 am

Sean says:
November 1, 2010 at 4:26 am
> A question, don’t the Argo bouys have pH monitoring already? (I know they have both pH and salinity.)
I think you meant “temperature and salinity.”
I think that’s all they measure (and depth and surface position). I imagine it wouldn’t be too hard to add pH, though some care is warranted as they have to measure it very precisely.
http://gosic.org/ios/MATRICES/ECV/OCEAN/SUB-SURFACE/ECV-GCOS-OCEAN-SUB-SURFACE-ocean-acidity.htm
has some interesting notes:

Indications of climate variability are present at all depths in the ocean. Argo can document change in temperature and salinity in the upper 2000 m of the ice-free ocean. The only effective current approach to observing the full suite of ocean sub-surface ECVs involves reference-type repeat deep-ocean surveys. Accurate deep-ocean time series observations are essential for determining long-term trends. Ocean water column surveys from research vessels are also our only present means for determining the large-scale decadal evolution of the anthropogenic CO2 inventory on a global and basin scale. Several overarching Actions are proposed that the international ocean community should take to ensure that a global sub-surface ocean observing system is implemented that will satisfy climate requirements.
Ocean Acidity: Ocean acidification, commonly referred to as the ongoing decrease in the pH of the Earth’s oceans caused by their uptake of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, is a major and growing threat to marine ecosystems, particularly to marine calcifying organisms such as corals and calcifying plankton. It is mainly determined by the prevailing equilibrium in solution of calcium (as carbonates and bicarbonates) and CO2. In order to fully characterise this chemical state of the inorganic carbon system in the surface ocean, a second property, in addition to pCO2, needs to be measured, i.e., either dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), alkalinity (Alk %G–% a measure of the content of carbonate or bicarbonate), or pH. These measurements need to be undertaken with high accuracy and precision, otherwise wrong conclusions about critical properties, such as the saturation state of the seawater with regard to CaCO3, will be drawn. High accuracy and precision measurements systems have been available for all parameters for quite some time already, i.e., pH, Alk, and DIC, but continuous systems are currently available only for pH. However, these continuous pH systems are generally not accurate enough. Development activities are currently underway, but need to be substantially enhanced.
Current network activities include a small number of ship-board-based time series sites where at least two of the four inorganic carbon properties are regularly measured, a small number of mooring sites and a few underway systems, where either pH or DIC is regularly measured.
Since no plans currently exist for a scale-up of these activities, a major development effort is required in order to
1. Develop the technology/automation for autonomous systems that pay attention to careful calibration.
2. Development of an internationally-agreed implementation strategy to identify priorities for the sustained system.
3. Start a pilot trans-basin sustained observing programme, and develop new programmes according to implementation strategy priorities.

Werner Weber
November 1, 2010 5:09 am

There exists the Monaco Declaration, which worries about CO2 input to the ocean. One argument there also is acidification. It is true that presently 5 Gigatons of Carbon is deposited per year as CO2 – adding to the 40000 GtC already in the ocean.
It is also a fact that 100 Million ton of sulfur is added per year to the ocean in the form of sulfuric acid. One way to distribute sulfur very efficiently is to allow heavy fuel oil for ships to carry 4.5 % sulfur. As sulfur dioxide has the reputation to generate aerosols which are supposed to cool and to counter global warming, it seems to be pardonable to do so.

Richard111
November 1, 2010 5:23 am

“”Manned and unmanned undersea vehicles plus divers photograph sea floors and cliffs.””
And if they just happen to be under the Arctic ice they can keep an eye on what the Russians are doing.

November 1, 2010 5:29 am

Note that any pH lower than 7.0 is considered “acidic”.
At 25ºC, at lower temperatures the neutral pH is higher, 7.47 at 0ºC.
Also -0.1 is an increase in [H+] of 25%.

1 2 3 9