Climategate—The CTM story

Me ~ ctm

by charles the moderator

Many of you know me by my sometimes flippant moderation comments here.  Sometimes concern is expressed over my anonymity since Anthony occasionally berates some who comment here for hiding behind anonymous Internet handles.  Anthony long ago accepted my personal reasons for maintaining my anonymity and I have personally contacted others who expressed concerns and have given them explanations to which no one to date has refused to accept.

I am the head moderator here, with administrative as well as moderation privileges.  I supervise the other moderators and sometimes publish posts, or correct typos as needed.  Despite the accusations from Drs. Mann, Hansen et al., I have yet to meet my corporate overlords, view my directives from above, or receive a single cent for my hundreds of hours of services.

Here’s the story of how I was one of the very first to see the CRU files and what transpired.

On Tuesday November 17th I was at my desk, browsing the web and moderating at the same time when the now infamous post came in from user FOIA at 6:25 PST.

We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to be kept under wraps.

We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code, and documents.

Hopefully it will give some insight into the science and the people behind it.

This is a limited time offer, download now:

http://ftp.tomcity.ru/incoming/free/FOI2009.zip

Sample:

0926010576.txt * Mann: working towards a common goal

… and so on.

As I noted previously in The CRUtape Letters™, an Alternative Explanation, when I saw this comment I immediately embargoed the comment and placed warning brackets around it for the other moderators. I have been a ‘net user long enough to be very very concerned about downloading files off a Russian server, so the first thing I was concerned about was that this was an attack on us and our users. I downloaded the file and scanned it for viruses and Trojans and it came up clean. Then I stated viewing the contents and once I saw what we had, I started firing off emails to Anthony who was in Europe at the time – such as this one less than 2 hours later:

From me:

It looks real. It looks like it contains code from MBH 98 to CRU indexes. It has over a thousand emails.

And this a few minutes later.

From me:

No bad stuff detected. This from a real mole or one of the most elaborate hoaxes ever produced.

emails from Mann, Briffa, Jones.

Reviews of papers by Jones. Code and much much more.

Anthony Watts – wrote:

ok you’ve opened it I take it? No virus or trojan detected?

A

I talked to Anthony on the phone and we decided not to go public until Anthony returned, for all sorts of reasons including potential legal issues. In this first couple of hours I also burned a CD for Steven Mosher and gave it to him, and I also contacted Steven McIntyre.  I swore both of them to secrecy until Anthony returned from Europe and he could be fully involved in the process. At this time none of us knew of the upload to realclimate.org or had noticed the “a miracle just happened” post on climateaudit.org. We believed we were exclusively sitting on The Pentagon Papers of our decade and had no knowledge that links were disseminated elsewhere.

For the next day the two Steve’s were constantly on the phone, with Mosher reading email after email to McIntyre.  I had not given the link to Mosher as I was trying to control any traceable spread of the information. We had no idea where this was all headed and caution was in order.  I made Steven Mosher promise to not electronically send a copy to Steve McIntyre, but I gave him a CD he could ship to McIntyre as long as it arrived after Anthony had returned from Europe.  They were extremely anxious to go public and Mosher kept begging me for permission and my response was very low key. “If this is as important as it appears to be, then two or three days won’t make any difference, besides, we need to keep my word to Anthony”.

Then on the morning of the 19th we became aware that CRU was in lockdown mode and sending word that files were circulating on the Internet. I immediately found the comment on Jeff ID’s site by simply doing a Google search on the ftp site link.  Jeff hadn’t noticed this post because he was out hunting during the above period. This was a game changer, CRU was trying to lock down the files and we were not exclusively in possession. Anthony was in the air about to land in Dulles but the cat was now out of the bag and Steve Mosher started posting on Lucia’s blog and about the same time I posted an email on Bishop Hill’s blog in the Caspar and the Jesus paper thread under the username devilinthedetails.  I believe Steve Mosher may have contacted Tom Fuller around the same time.

Just as this was all breaking open, our anonymous leaker expressed concern that their revelations were being ignored or missed, a comment which I no longer have as I overwrote it  with the following:

FOIA (13:16:16) : edit

[A lot is happening behind the scenes. It is not being ignored. Much is being coordinated among major players and the media. Thank you very much. You will notice the beginnings of activity on other sites now. Here soon to follow. ~ ctm]

Now I get to go all Andy Rooney Paul Harvey [D’0h! ~ ctm]  on y’all. Many wonder why I selected Steven Mosher to be the first recipient of the files. Well, I knew he was eminently qualified to examine them, much more qualified than myself. Proximity was also a factor.  Steve Mosher is my roommate. So I saw him sweating on the phone with Steve McIntyre for a day and a half while I was calmly making coffee in the kitchen espousing patience. And since this story is too important to have any contributors remain anonymous, my name is Charles Rotter and I live in San Francisco. And that’s the rest of the story.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
226 Comments
John Andrews
January 13, 2010 9:45 pm

CTM, this is a compliment! You have earned it. Thank you.
John Andrews, Knoxville, Tennessee

Editor
January 13, 2010 10:01 pm

Are there still people who claim Climategate is no big deal? And if so, do they still believe it?
ctm == Charles The Moderator(tm) Was I supposed to figure that or am I just clueless about some things?
Hmm, I’m trying to use CA Assistant now that the Tips and Notes page is small again. I’m not sure its preview handled ™ right, but we’ll see.
Oh – you and the other other moderators do a remarkably good job of staying on a balance point (or is that knife edge?) between losing control of a thread and stifling discussion.

anna v
January 13, 2010 10:08 pm

Thanks Charles
You kept a cool head in a crisis and the boat steady.
Keep up the good work done here. It is very much appreciated as the continuous growth of readers shows.32,082,289 hits and counting.

Richard G.
January 13, 2010 10:11 pm

Thank you Charles. I have been a lurker for years and have only started speaking up in the last 2 months. I know the feeling of shedding the cloak of anonymity.
A hearty thank you to Anthony and the rest of you as well.

January 13, 2010 10:15 pm

CTM,
You look a lot like I did when I was your age. When you get old (relatively) you will probably look a lot like Steve McIntyre. I do.
Oh, yeah. Good job. I was blown away by the news. And I was one of he first non-science (exclusively) blogs to get the word out. It drove a LOT of traffic my way.
Funny thing is – I sent Instapundit links right away and it took him many days to get on board.
I also sent a link to Mosher and he never let on his involvement. The Dawg. 😉
Reply: I’m 51. How old are you? ~ ctm

savethesharks
January 13, 2010 10:15 pm

CTM…..you and your gang have really done MUCH for the advancement of the scientific truth in a world that is muddied by ****.
Your efforts are MUCH appreciated.
I personally have learned so very much on this site…and am most grateful for this forum.
Thank you.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

hotrod
January 13, 2010 10:16 pm

Great story — it is nice to hear the details!
As everyone else has stated, I am so glad I found this blog and very much appreciate the efforts of you and your co-moderators.
Larry

January 13, 2010 10:18 pm

And Charles,
Give your newest moderator my regards. We miss him at his old haunts but I understand he may be otherwise occupied these days. 😉

J.Peden
January 13, 2010 10:22 pm

Great work, Charles! Mann o Mann o Mann!

DirkH
January 13, 2010 10:37 pm

ctm, thanks for your great work!

Dave F
January 13, 2010 10:39 pm

Flippant? Noooooo….. You have never written anything flippant, have you? Specially not in the Tips&Notes thread when people cut and paste…. Naaaahhhh
[learn to post a link ~ ctm]
😉

adamskirving
January 13, 2010 10:42 pm

So it was Charles that got the scoop, and consequently the kudos. Well Charles you deserve it. I salute you sir.
Reply: I did very little except perhaps to enforce some restraint in others. ~ ctm

Leon Brozyna
January 13, 2010 10:44 pm

Thanks for sharing an object lesson in professional journalism. It is so amazing to read how this story was sat on for a couple days while everyone was checking and rechecking the information. And then reading the early comments when the story was finally released with so many cautionary objections that had already been considered.
It is appropriate that this be named Climategate — it’s like the early Watergate story as it was researched and bits and pieces of that story were checked and rechecked by Woodward & Bernstein. It should prove to be a source of continuing revelations as other investigations proceed (Mann at PSU & the release from CRU). Anything that even hints at whitewash is sure to spark quite an uproar. This is nowhere near done.

Richard deSousa
January 13, 2010 10:51 pm

Congrats! I hope Climategate is the last nail in the coffin so we can [forget] Jones, Hansen, Mann, Gore and company forever.

John Wright
January 13, 2010 10:52 pm

Just to add my thanks, it must be a comfort to Anthony to know he can rely on such companions in arms when he’s away.

Peter G
January 13, 2010 10:55 pm

Charles,
Fantastic work. That was also when my friends starting emailing me about climate stories versus me sending the links to them. I think a lot of people woke up that day, and the people like you helped to stall the huge taxation through Copenhagen that was about to happen.

stan stendera
January 13, 2010 11:03 pm

My name is Stanley Thomas Stendera, Jr. and I am proud to stand with Charles Rotter.

jef
January 13, 2010 11:04 pm

I’ll just add my kudos at well over 100 comments:
A great story all around, so many backstories, so much teamwork.
So cool.
Thank you

Roger Knights
January 13, 2010 11:24 pm

Reply: It’s “ensure” ~ charles the, occasional-grammar-nazi-when-one-of-my-pet-peeves-is-tweaked, moderator

That’s one of my peeves too, as listed in a couple of collections of annoyances I posted on the Seeking Alpha site here:
http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/259051-roger-knights/34743-common-usage-errors-on-the-seeking-alpha-site
http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/259051-roger-knights/35454-common-usage-errors-on-the-seeking-alpha-site-2

photon without a Higgs
January 13, 2010 11:25 pm

hotrod (22:16:27) :
Great story — it is nice to hear the details!
One more detail would make it nicer—who released it? HARRY_READ_ME? David Palmer, Information Policy & Compliance Manager, University of East Anglia?

January 13, 2010 11:38 pm

Charles looks exactly as I expected. One thing is not clear for me, when you wake up and go to sleep (if at all).
Reply: It’s not clear for me either. ~ ctm

Andrew P
January 13, 2010 11:47 pm

Charles – well done and thanks for all your great work. And lets not forget Anthony who gave us WUWT. It could not have been easy for him on being on a long flight over the Atlantic without a web connection while all this was breaking. FWIW, I think most definitely a whistleblower not a hacker. But whether it was a disaffected scientist or IT guy (or partnership) I have no idea.

Indiana
January 13, 2010 11:56 pm

Nice to see the light shining on the deserved. Two thumbs up!

January 13, 2010 11:58 pm

One more piece in the puzzle. Thanks Charles!
Ecotretas

January 14, 2010 12:03 am

I heard that Charles the Moderator doesn’t actually need glasses, and only wears them to look more ‘sciency’!
Just kidding :). Great work in helping to bring this scandal to the masses, CTM.

1 4 5 6 7 8 10