From Eurekalert
Sponges recycle carbon to give life to coral reefs
Coral reefs support some of the most diverse ecosystems on the planet, yet they thrive in a marine desert. So how do reefs sustain their thriving populations?

Marine biologist Fleur Van Duyl from the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research is fascinated by the energy budgets that support coral reefs in this impoverished environment.
According to van Duyl’s former student, Jasper De Goeij, Halisarca caerulea sponges grow in the deep dark cavities beneath reefs, and 90% of their diet is composed of dissolved organic carbon, which is inedible for most other reef residents. But when De Goeij measured the amount of carbon that the brightly coloured sponges consumed he found that they consume half of their own weight each day, yet they never grew. What were the sponges doing with the carbon? Were the sponges really consuming that much carbon, or was there a problem with De Goeij’s measurements? He had to find out where the carbon was going to back up his measurements and publishes his discovery that sponges have one of the fastest cell division rates ever measured, and instead of growing they discard the cells. Essentially, the sponges recycle carbon that would otherwise be lost to the reef. De Goeij publishes his discovery on November 13 2009 in The Journal of Experimental Biology at http://jeb.biologists.org.
Travelling to the Dutch Antilles with his student, Anna De Kluijver, De Goeij started SCUBA diving with the sponges to find out how much carbon they consume. ‘It is quite dark and technically difficult to work in the cavities,’ explains De Goeij, but the duo collected sponges, placed them in small chambers and exposed the sponges to 5- bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU). ‘The BrdU is only incorporated into the DNA of dividing cells,’ explains De Goeij, so cells that carry the BrdU label must be dividing, or have divided, since the molecule was added to the sponge’s water, and cells can only divide if they are taking up carbon. But when De Goeij returned to the Netherlands with his samples, he had problems finding the elusive label.
Discussing the BrdU detection problem with his father, biochemist Anton De Goeij, De Goeij Senior offered to introduce his son to Bert Schutte in Maastricht, who had developed a BrdU detection system for use in cancer therapy. Maybe he could help De Goeij Junior find evidence of cell division in his sponges.
Taking his samples to Jack Cleutjens’s Maastricht Pathology laboratory, De Goeij was finally able to detect the BrdU label in his sponge cells. Amazingly, half of the sponge’s choanocyte (filtration) cells had divided and the choanocyte’s cell division cycle was a phenomenally short 5.4 hours. ‘That is quicker than most bacteria divide,’ exclaims De Goeij.
The sponge was able to take up the colossal amounts of organic carbon that De Goeij had measured, but where was the carbon going: the sponges weren’t growing. De Goeij tested to see if the cells were dying and being lost, but he couldn’t find any evidence of cell death.
Presenting his results to the Maastricht Pathology Department, someone said ‘Lets look at this like a human intestine, then you should see shedding where old cells detach from the epithelia’. De Goeij knew that he had seen some loose cells, and thought that they were artefacts from cutting the samples, but when he and his Pathology Department colleagues went back and looked at the samples, De Goeij realised that choanocytes were shedding all over the place. And then De Goeij remembered the tiny piles of brown material he found next to the sponges in the aquarium every morning.
The sponges were shedding the newly divided cells, which other reef residents could now consume. ‘Halisarca caerulea is the great recycler of energy for the reef by turning over energy that nobody else can use [dissolved organic carbon] into energy that everyone can use [discarded choanocytes],’ explains De Goeij.
REFERENCE: De Goeij, J. M., De Kluijver, A., Van Duyl, F. C., Vacelet, J., Wijffels, R. H., De Goeij, A. F. P. M., Cleutjens, J. P. M. and Schutte, B. (2009). Cell kinetics of the marine sponge Halisarca caerulea reveal rapid cell turnover and shedding. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 3892-3900.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
So it’s true! All those sponges really DO make the sea levels drop!!!!
highlight of the article:
‘It is quite dark and technically difficult to work in the cavities,’
Actually, that’s totally cool! A whole newly discovered mechanism for preventing oceanic acidification!
And, please forgive me, but as someone who has been forced to watch untold hours of Teletoon with the kids in his life, the first thing I have to wonder is…
Do many these sponges live in a pineapple under the sea?
Interesting stuff! Spongebob is my youngest son’s hero, and now he’s mine too 🙂
LOOK OUT….. Real Scientist at work… Quick, take a picture. It might be the last one you ever see;-)
Are there pile under the wild sponges, and what is cleaning them up (eating).
Before anyone whoops too loudly this is “dissolved organic carbon” and as wikipedia says: “Occasionally, high levels of organic carbon indicate anthropogenic influences, but most DOC is natural in origin.”
But it’s still interesting especially the Journal link which has a very Pythonesque feel:
H. Schmaljohann and F. Liechti – Adjustments of wingbeat frequency and air speed to air density in free-flying migratory birds. J Exp Biol 2009 212: 3633-3642.
The last paragraph of the press release above does sound a bit sloppy – “And then De Goeij remembered the tiny piles of brown material he found next to the sponges in the aquarium every morning.” Doh!
We have a parallel here.
Ruminants cannot digest cellulose but gut bacteria can.
Many plants actually need other organisms in the soil.
Symbiotic processes are very common.
Are there pile under the wild sponges, and what is cleaning them up (eating).
The patrons of the Krusty Krab of course.
CodeTech,
Care to expand your logic?
Fleur Van Duyl wondered where all the carbon went – and then he “remembered the tiny piles of brown material he found next to the sponges in the aquarium every morning.”
Isn’t that like saying – John wondered where all the food he ate went… ‘he then remembered the little piles of brown material he found in his toilet every morning’?
Fascinating article though.
Disolved organic carbon, eh wot? Who’s been pooping that out?
This is fascinating stuff. Seems like what isn’t known about Earth’s oceans could fill a book or two.
Beyond the science presented, I found the serendipitous collaboration of interest. There are eight author-scientists listed on this paper and they didn’t all know one another when the research began.
Are there pile under the wild sponges, and what is cleaning them up (eating).
The patrons of the Krusty Krab of course.
My money would have been on Gary. hopefully Plankton doesn’t read this are he will have the secret formula.
or not are to many pirate movies
And we humans have the audacity to think that intelligence is somehow a great idea.
Now we find out that Gaia is a whole lot more clever (cleverer) than we are.
And to think that we slaughter these carbon eaters just to scrub the c*** off our backs in the shower.
I wonder if one of these sponges could be leash trained, so I could walk one in the park, or better yet in the malls, where all the yuppies, and muppies, like to trundle their Mexican rat dogs, as if they think other people want to see them; or trip over them !
“Ocean Acidification” is a straw man. If you look at atmospheric CO2 levels at the time today’s corals first appeared, you will find that they were about 5x to 7x higher than today’s levels. Increasing CO2 isn’t going to hurt those reefs a bit. They were born in higher CO2 levels.
I think this really highlights the need to understand the interactions of the biosphere and the climate. So far, the interaction we ‘understand best’ would be human contributions to the atmosphere, but can anyone say what the absorption rate is for specific parts of the biosphere when it comes to carbon? I think, allowing the opposing argument their ‘what if’, that it is important to understand mitigation strategies, including changes in the biosphere to absorb carbon. But what would we change? Add more of this, and less of that, surely, but what are the most effective ways to absorb carbon? I think this should be more fully understood.
BCC:
My logic is: Who lives in a pineapple under the sea? SpongeBob SquarePants! Absorbent and yellow and porous is he! SpongeBob SquarePants!
Although, if you’re referring to the fact that increased CO2 absorption into the ocean is causing some people to wet their square pants, a mechanism to remove carbon from its dissolved state might make them feel better.
Passerby: The last paragraph of the press release above does sound a bit sloppy – “And then De Goeij remembered the tiny piles of brown material he found next to the sponges in the aquarium every morning.” Doh
Scientific Method begins, as I recall, with observation. Not speculation first, which seems so predominate in these “modern” times.
“are he will have the secret formula.”
Krusty couldn’t have said it better himself!!!
So, if we plant sponges on rooftops AND paint them white………………
We can all wear sponge hats that eat carbon where ever we walk.
SOME RELATED MATERIAL (should have read)
http://www.rug.nl/fwn/nieuws/fwnActueel/archief/archief2009/persberichten/003_09?lang=en
http://www.aslo.org/lo/toc/vol_52/issue_6/2608.pdf
http://www.aslo.org/lo/toc/vol_53/issue_4/1376.pdf
Any efforts to reduce CO2 would likely have an adverse impact on this endangered species of sponge. I think one of the environmental groups should sue to block cap and trade because of its impact on the sponges.
Hmmm.
Scuba diving in the Dutch Antilles with his (lady) student.
It’s a tough job but someone’s gotta do it.
But if he can find out how they eat half their weight in carbs every day but still don’t grow, he’s onto a winner.