Here’s the view of the future in a new science museum according to the Telegraph. No mention if NYC’s West Side Highway will be underwater or not. They call it the “Day after tomorrow map”.
The article by Louise Gray says:
The apocalyptic map was launched by Government ministers at the opening of a new exhibition at the Science Museum.
‘Prove it – everything you need to know to believe in climate change’ is aimed at educating the public about the dangers of uncontrollable global warming.
The ‘Day After Tomorrow’ map shows what the world will look like if temperatures rise beyond four degrees C (7 degrees F). It was produced by the Met Office, that predicts temperature rises may reach the dangerous tipping point by 2060 unless more is done to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
The map is designed to get the public behind a global deal on climate change to be agreed in Copenhagen this December. It will also be used by the Foreign Office to persuade other countries to sign up to a deal that will see all major economies forced to cut their emissions.
It shows the threat of global warming around the world. In the UK temperatures could rise above 40 degrees C (104 degrees F) in the summer, droughts will threaten crops in the South East, sea levels rises will affect coastal areas and floods will be commonplace in the winter.
The Government has recently been criticised for “scaremongering” the public in a £6 million advertising campaign that warns man-made climate change will risk the future of our children unless action is taken.
Read the complete article here
Readers are welcome to submit their own names for this map.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Well,Louise Gray does have a certain approach to her ‘reporting’.Why does the Telegraph persist with a Guardian view?Any comments from other UK folk?
I was very interested in what Don Keiller had to say about Professor Chris Rapley. How dreadful. I have just read Ian Plimer’s Heaven and Earth. A great read. I also read the 46 page criticism of the book by Prof Ian Enting, and then discovered that Ian Enting was one of the lead writers of the IPCC report on Climate Change, so of course he would be bitchy about Plimer, who deserves some kind of Nobel Prize for courage in the face of overwhelming propaganda.