Name 3 clear signs of the coming Thermageddon

thermageddon

OK, so my art is a bit tongue in cheek. But it does fit the disaster theme of the topic.

This op-ed piece in the Herald Sun is interesting, because it touches on many of the points covered here on WUWT. This is the first time I’ve seen all these collected in one article in a major newspaper. Andrew Bolt routinely uses material from WUWT, and this is the first time I’ve been able to reciprocate. There are some truly unique points raised by Bolt that are indigenous to Australia that we haven’t discussed here, but they are valid for discussion nonetheless. In cases where we have covered a point on WUWT, I’ve made a footnote link [in brackets] – Anthony


From Andrew Bolt, The Herald Sun

Global Warming Alarmists Out in the Cold

April 29, 2009 12:00am

IT’S snowing in April. Ice is spreading in Antarctica. The Great Barrier Reef is as healthy as ever.

And that’s just the news of the past week. Truly, it never rains but it pours – and all over our global warming alarmists.

Time’s up for this absurd scaremongering. The fears are being contradicted by the facts, and more so by the week.

Doubt it? Then here’s a test.

Name just three clear signs the planet is warming as the alarmists claim it should. Just three. Chances are your “proofs” are in fact on my list of 10 Top Myths about global warming.And if your “proofs” indeed turn out to be false, don’t get angry with me.

Just ask yourself: Why do you still believe that man is heating the planet to hell? What evidence do you have?

So let’s see if facts matter more to you than faith, and observations more than predictions.

MYTH 1

THE WORLD IS WARMING

Wrong. It is true the world did warm between 1975 and 1998, but even Professor David Karoly, one of our leading alarmists, admitted this week “temperatures have dropped” since – “both in surface temperatures and in atmospheric temperatures measured from satellites”. In fact, the fall in temperatures from just 2002 has already wiped out a quarter of the warming our planet experienced last century. (Check data from Britain’s Hadley Centre, NASA’s Aqua satellite and the US National Climatic Data Centre.)

Some experts, such as Karoly, claim this proves nothing and the world will soon start warming again. Others, such as Professor Ian Plimer of Adelaide University, point out that so many years of cooling already contradict the theory that man’s rapidly increasing gases must drive up temperatures ever faster.

But that’s all theory. The question I’ve asked is: What signs can you actually see of the man-made warming that the alarmists predicted?

[ Ian Plimer, Temperature trends]

MYTH 2

THE POLAR CAPS ARE MELTING

Wrong. The British Antarctic Survey, working with NASA, last week confirmed ice around Antarctica has grown 100,000 sq km each decade for the past 30 years.

Long-term monitoring by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports the same: southern hemisphere ice has been expanding for decades.

As for the Arctic, wrong again.

The Arctic ice cap shrank badly two summers ago after years of steady decline, but has since largely recovered. Satellite data from NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Centre this week shows the Arctic hasn’t had this much April ice for at least seven years.

Norway’s Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre says the ice is now within the standard deviation range for 1979 to 2007.

[Antarctic Ice Growth, Arctic Ice Recovery ]

MYTH 3

WE’VE NEVER HAD SUCH A BAD DROUGHT

Wrong. A study released this month by the University of NSW Climate Change Research Centre confirms not only that we’ve had worse droughts, but this Big Dry is not caused by “global warming”, whether man-made or not.

As the university’s press release says: “The causes of southeastern Australia’s longest, most severe and damaging droughts have been discovered, with the surprise finding that they originate far away in the Indian Ocean.

“A team of Australian scientists has detailed for the first time how a phenomenon known as the Indian Ocean Dipole – a variable and irregular cycle of warming and cooling of ocean water – dictates whether moisture-bearing winds are carried across the southern half of Australia.”

MYTH 4

OUR CITIES HAVE NEVER BEEN HOTTER

Wrong. The alleged “record” temperature Melbourne set in January – 46.4 degrees – was in fact topped by the 47.2 degrees the city recorded in 1851. (See the Argus newspaper of February 8, 1851.)

And here’s another curious thing: Despite all this warming we’re alleged to have caused, Victoria’s highest temperature on record remains the 50.7 degrees that hit Mildura 103 years ago.

South Australia’s hottest day is still the 50.7 degrees Oodnadatta suffered 37 years ago. NSW’s high is still the 50 degrees recorded 70 years ago.

What’s more, not one of the world’s seven continents has set a record high temperature since 1974. Europe’s high remains the 50 degrees measured in Spain 128 years ago, before the invention of the first true car.

MYTH 5

THE SEAS ARE GETTING HOTTER

Wrong. If anything, the seas are getting colder. For five years, a network of 3175 automated bathythermographs has been deployed in the oceans by the Argo program, a collaboration between 50 agencies from 26 countries.

Warming believer Josh Willis, of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, reluctantly concluded: “There has been a very slight cooling . . .”

[Ocean cooling]

MYTH 6

THE SEAS ARE RISING

Wrong. For almost three years, the seas have stopped rising, according to the Jason-1 satellite mission monitored by the University of Colorado.

That said, the seas have risen steadily and slowly for the past 10,000 years through natural warming, and will almost certainly resume soon.

But there is little sign of any accelerated rises, even off Tuvalu or the Maldives, islands often said to be most threatened with drowning.

Professor Nils-Axel Moerner, one of the world’s most famous experts on sea levels, has studied the Maldives in particular and concluded there has been no net rise there for 1250 years.

Venice is still above water.

[Sea Level in the Maldives, Sea Level satellite data]

MYTH 7

CYCLONES ARE GETTING WORSE

Wrong. Ryan Maue of Florida State University recently measured the frequency, intensity and duration of all hurricanes and cyclones to compile an Accumulated Cyclone Energy Index.

His findings? The energy index is at its lowest level for more than 30 years.

The World Meteorological Organisation, in its latest statement on cyclones, said it was impossible to say if they were affected by man’s gases: “Though there is evidence both for and against the existence of a detectable anthropogenic signal in the tropical cyclone climate record to date, no firm conclusion can be made on this point.”

[Ryan Maue and Hurricane energy, Hurricane landfall trends]

MYTH 8

THE GREAT BARRIER REEF IS DYING

Wrong. Yes, in 1999, Professor Ove Hoegh-Gulberg, our leading reef alarmist and administrator of more than $30 million in warming grants, did claim the reef was threatened by warming, and much had turned white.

But he then had to admit it had made a “surprising” recovery.

Yes, in 2006 he again warned high temperatures meant “between 30 and 40 per cent of coral on Queensland’s Great Barrier Reef could die within a month”.

But he later admitted this bleaching had “minimal impact”. Yes, in 2007 he again warned that temperature changes of the kind caused by global warming were bleaching the reef.

But this month fellow Queensland University researchers admitted in a study that reef coral had once more made a “spectacular recovery”, with “abundant corals re-established in a single year”. The reef is blooming.

MYTH 9

OUR SNOW SEASONS ARE SHORTER

Wrong. Poor snow falls in 2003 set off a rash of headlines predicting warming doom. The CSIRO typically fed the hysteria by claiming global warming would strip resorts of up to a quarter of their snow by 2018.

Yet the past two years have been bumper seasons for Victoria’s snow resorts, and this year could be just as good, with snow already falling in NSW and Victoria this past week.

[New low temp record at Australian ski resort this year]

MYTH 10

TSUNAMIS AND OTHER DISASTERS ARE GETTING WORSE

Are you insane? Tsunamis are in fact caused by earthquakes. Yet there was World Vision boss Tim Costello last week, claiming that Asia was a “region, thanks to climate change, that has far more cyclones, tsunamis, droughts”.

Wrong, wrong and wrong, Tim. But what do facts matter now to a warming evangelist when the cause is so just?

And so any disaster is now blamed on man-made warming the way they once were on Satan. See for yourself on www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm the full list, including kidney stones, volcanic eruptions, lousy wine, insomnia, bad tempers, Vampire moths and bubonic plagues. Nothing is too far-fetched to be seized upon by carpetbaggers and wild preachers as signs of a warming we can’t actually see.

Not for nothing are polar bears the perfect symbol of this faith – bears said to be threatened by warming, when their numbers have in fact increased.

Bottom line: fewer people now die from extreme weather events, whether cyclones, floods or blinding heatwaves.

Read that in a study by Indur Goklany, who represented the US at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: “There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

[Going down – death rates due to extreme weather events]

So stop this crazy panic.

First step: check again your list of the signs you thought you saw of global warming. How many are true? What do you think, and why do you think it?

Yes, the world may resume warming in one year or 100. But it hasn’t been warming as the alarmists said it must if man were to blame, and certainly not as the media breathlessly keeps claiming.

Best we all just settle down, then, and wait for the proof — the real proof. After all, panicking over invisible things is so undignified, don’t you think?

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

344 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Will
May 1, 2009 7:56 pm

hareynolds,
I’ve been wondering were I could relate this:
Years ago I worked with two pilots in northern Alaska…one a Englishman and the the other Australian. So I says to the Brit one day, “For a foreigner your English is really coming along”. The response included considerably less humor than a sharp stick in the eye. Having such success, I figured I’d try the same thing on the Aussie. He thought is was hilarious and thanked me for the compliment.

Global Snowing
May 1, 2009 8:07 pm

Hey DJ
Here are some news reports re the Australian snow season:
The Victorian ski season might still be six weeks away, but the state’s two main ski resorts are already reporting snowfalls of up to 20 centimetres.
“If these weather predictions are correct, 2009 looks like being the third bumper ski season in a row. This would be great news for all Australian ski resorts,” Mt Hotham weather forecaster Pete Taylor said.
http://globalfreeze.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/ski-resorts-welcome-early-snow-dumps
Also last year Australia had snow one week away from Summer!
http://anhonestclimatedebate.wordpress.com/2008/11/27/snow-hits-australia-one-week-away-from-summer

Alan Wilkinson
May 1, 2009 8:09 pm

DJ: “Snow has shown drastic declines of near 50% since the 1950s in Australia.”
Did you even look at the data you provided the link to?
Compare the earliest data available, 1954 Spencer’s Creek vs 2008. Your claim is obviously nonsense since the 2008 depths substantially exceeded the depths in 1954, 1957, 1959, … etc.

Gerard
May 1, 2009 8:12 pm

The mere presence of the great president Obama means that global warming has been solved. After 100 days in office the world has cooled and we can move on to our next armageddon – swine flu!

crosspatch
May 1, 2009 8:15 pm

In the next glaciation the Great Barrier Reef will, as it did in the last glaciation, be completely dead as it will be hundreds of feet above sea level. There will be nothing we can do to “save” it. The same will be true for practically every other coral reef we know of today, too.

Robert Bateman
May 1, 2009 8:32 pm

Ok. 3 items.
1.) Sea level dramatic rise…no, can’t see a darned inch or rise along Ca. coast.
2.) Hotter temps cooking brain out …. nope, been lookin’ at weather records since the 60’s. The old records from the 20’s & 30’s still rule the roost.
3.) Record 3rd year of drought…are you mad, Arnold? Shasta Res. had 600,000 ac.ft. in Nov 77. By April 78 it was 4,000,000 ac. ft. They currently have 2,998,247 ac. ft., and it’s pouring outside. The cup runneth over, and the Trinity Dam is now starting it’s spring release for the 1st salmon run.
Oh well, sucks to be a fire-breathing alarmist these days.

Robert Bateman
May 1, 2009 8:35 pm

Gerard (20:12:55) our next armageddon – swine flu!
Now THAT is a problem.
People getting sick.
Not like that fake problem of lobbyists getting sick at the feeding trough from overgorging.

kim
May 1, 2009 8:45 pm

Joel 18:56:59
Way too many serious scientists have had legitimate criticisms never posted at real climate. That some skeptical opinions get posted there means little; the truly telling comments have never been allowed. And the attitude? Why do realclimate, Open Mind, Pharyngula, and Climate Progress all have the same tenor of snark and hatefulness by the moderators. Something is seriously rotten with your paradigm and I can smell it all the way over here.
=============================================

May 1, 2009 8:48 pm

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/OceanCooling/printall.php
“Models are not perfect,” says Syd Levitus. “Data are not perfect. Theory isn’t perfect. We shouldn’t expect them to be. It’s the combination of models, data, and theory that lead to improvements in our science, in our understanding of phenomena.”
What kind of science is that?

MikeN
May 1, 2009 8:48 pm

This whole thing about global warming stopping in 1998, or that half the warming has been erased, are you really arguing that CO2 doesn’t cause an increase in temperatures? If the sun is responsible for the cooling, and overwhelming the CO2 trend, then wouldn’t a more active sun just restart the warming?

groweg
May 1, 2009 8:53 pm

Of course it isn’t just in Australia that winters have been colder and snowier. The last two winters here in Michigan have also been great for skiing with much above average snowfall and colder than average.
Whenever you discuss cooler local weather conditions the global warmists cry that how weather is in one locale is not necessarily representative of global conditions. But I suspect that at least ten consecutive years of seeing no evidence of warming in one location (true for Michigan) is at least some evidence that there is no upward trend in temperatures globally, just as we did indeed see warming here in the 1980’s and 90’s – a trend that was also present in global temperatures for that period.
With so many places around the world seeing cooler temperatures I believe that the public may be more receptive to the viewpoint expressed in Bolt’s article. One or two good documentary programs airing some of the truths presented on this webpage and we may see a “the emperor has no clothes” phenomenon regarding the global warming myth and a snowballing (ha ha) of disbelief in it.
DJ is lucky to have a site like WUWT where he can express his views and even though they are contrary to those of most at this site, he is treated with respect. That does not happen if you don’t believe in global warming and post at one of the other sides’ sites. Love ‘ya WUWT!

May 1, 2009 8:55 pm

Mark_0454 (18:59:17) :
“Since these are the EPA’s own findings, would this be an effective outline for a letter as part of the EPA’s call for comments?
thanks”

I believe it would, and thank you for the kind words. My comment letter will include the points I outlined above, because attorneys must, when rebutting the opponent’s argument, address each and every point put forth by the opponent. Failure to rebut even one point may result in losing the case.
Then, I intend to add more points to my argument, chief among which is the non-correlation between CO2 concentration and “global” temperature since 1800. Under irrefutable control theory, CO2 cannot be, and never will be, an independent variable by which global temperature may be controlled.
Despite what some commenters on WUWT have written, my case is airtight on that point. To believe otherwise is to deny that a cruise control on a car functions properly, or a temperature control on a refrigerator maintains a desired temperature, or a rocket places a satellite into a precise orbit. In each case, the desired result is achieved by adjusting the appropriate independent variable.
I will also rebut their claim that CO2 has never been higher than now, as that is a complete lie. (but I will say it in a nicer way).
One of the (potentially) most devastating points of all is the fact of multiple ice ages that occurred after a period when CO2 was much higher than now. If a tipping point is imminent today, with a bare 400 ppm CO2 (I rounded off to one significant digit), and that tipping point will inevitably push us into a horror chamber of global warming, how exactly did that ice age occur after the high-CO2 period? I need to conduct more research into that issue, as there seems to be a good argument that the dinosaur-killer meteor blasted enough dirt and fine particles into the sky to induce a rapid cooling due to insufficient sunlight reaching the earth.
Another good point related to glacier retreat is the recent discovery of the prehistoric man’s body in the Alps, who apparently died while walking across a pass. Later the snows covered him and a glacier formed. How could it have been warm enough then for that pass to be ice-free, with so little CO2 in the air?
There are many, many other good points to bring to the argument, such as the correlation between temperature and sunspots, periodicity of ocean temperatures, and the failure of so many IPCC predictions.
But for me, the primary and indisputable Achilles heel in the AGW argument is the non-correlation between CO2 and global temperature. I intend to pontificate on that point, and pound it home.
With all the ammunition at hand, writing a comment to EPA should be fun (at least, for me it will be).
I hope everyone writes a comment to EPA and lets them know your opinion, for or against. This is freedom of speech at its finest.

anna v
May 1, 2009 8:56 pm

Mike Bryant (16:47:58) :
In the second list you posted, have you noticed what is currently happening with CO2?
Seems like we are measuring the lag between temperature stasis and ocean out gassing.
http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/keyIndicators/index.cfm#GlobalTemperature

CodeTech
May 1, 2009 9:00 pm

[snip -OT]
And hey, I notice a distinct lack of response from hit-and-run DJ. I wonder if his monicker is also his profession?

dhogaza
May 1, 2009 9:01 pm

When was the last time snow fell simultaneously (or nearly so) in Australia, and California?

Spring snowstorms in the Sierra Nevada are quite common.

May 1, 2009 9:05 pm

I’ll see your 10 myths and raise you 5:
http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/top-15-climate-myths.html
This has been an open tab on my browser for a while, and I mentioned it because I thought how fun it would be to make an “I ‘heart’ CO2” logo to put on one of my vehicles… Then I realized the banner on the website uses a green leaf as the heart, and my whole idea was just a subliminal message, surreptitiously implanted into my brain by an evil oil and gas consortium.
Crap, I hate it when that happens. I still want an “I ‘heart’ CO2” logo, but I just can’t get past the idea that I didn’t think of it myself. Now I have to get copyright permission on a green leaf. The horror.
Smokey, great post, I guess I missed a couple of days on the ice extent. I think I’ll pass on the canoe trip next year…

Squidly
May 1, 2009 9:05 pm

Bob Wood (18:15:02) :
Obviously, the reason for the the cooling going on now is because we changed our incendenscant light bulbs to florescent! Amazing the effect such a small change can make to the climate and its sparing effect on the ice of the polar regions!

Then change them back!!! I’m getting tired of the cold!!!

jorgekafkazar
May 1, 2009 9:13 pm

Remember, DJ was the one who claimed he saved $500 a year by installing left wing lightbulbs at his place. Hey, DJ! How are things down at the Bijou Theater? Did you find that switch for the marquee, yet?

Squidly
May 1, 2009 9:31 pm

Joel Shore (18:56:59) :
…That doesn’t actually prove anything. I have seen plenty of comments from the “skeptic” point of view over at RealClimate…

Really? Granted, I primarily stay away from there, but I do drop in occasionally just to see what is new. I am pretty reserve in most of my postings on any site, and I once questioned Gavin about their lack of software controls, source control, change release management and peer review processes for developing their GCM’s (GCM=General Circulation Model, not Global Climate Model .. btw). This was in response to his own posting basically saying how they don’t bother with such controls and how they are useless, blah, blah. Well, they (or he) evidently didn’t like my questions regarding, as I never saw my response posted.
My only comment left on the subject of GCM’s is .. “what a joke” .. and to think they are so lacksidasical with the development of such important software that has so many trillions of dollars hanging in the balance, that gets funding beyond my wildest imagination, and to do so with my money, is beyond appalling.
I was actually much nicer than this on RC, but was still ignored.
So, I disagree with you completely, and I have seen others that have been batted down just as easily. They are complete cowards at RC and completely unwilling to “discuss” anything. IMHO…

JP
May 1, 2009 9:35 pm

The cross-country skiing season at Falls Creek, Victoria, where the Australian cross-country skiing team does its training during the southern winter, lasted until September 25th, 2008, which was 3 1/2 weeks after the official season ended!
In Sydney, the month of August 2008 was the coldest since the 1940s.
In the snowfalls of this past week, Falls Creek already received 1m of snow, 6 weeks before the official season begins.
At Charlottes Pass, NSW, the record low for the month of April took place this past week.
This past summer in Sydney, our beautiful giant jacarunda tree did not flower because of the incredibly cold months of October and November 2008.
I still meet people who think I eat children for breakfast when I tell them that global warming is a hoax, but I am finding that more and more people are willing to discuss the issue rationally, and many are allowing themselves to be persuaded.

Just Want Truth...
May 1, 2009 9:37 pm

Speaking of temperature graphs…
I just read this from a commenter here named Steven Kopits. He pointed out that he saw Steven Chu use the Mann Hockey Stick in his ““Energy Problem” presentation.
See page 7 of this presentation :
http://www.eia.doe.gov/plenary/Chu.pdf
from this link :
http://www.eia.doe.gov/plenary/plenary_main.html#DrChu

Just Want Truth...
May 1, 2009 9:39 pm

For those who missed what I’m saying :
STEVEN CHU USES THE MANN HOCKEY STICK GRAPH!

anna v
May 1, 2009 9:42 pm

Something I am not reading right?
http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/keyIndicators/index.cfm#GlobalTemperature
has as subtitle that the data for CO2 that it is from
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/
The two plots do not agree. Rats got in?

Claude Harvey
May 1, 2009 9:42 pm

All you folks hammering on DJ just don’t understand that AGW “facts” are not like regular facts. Regular facts must be documented and defended. Now that the man made global warming debate is “over”, AGW facts are whatever folks like DJ wish them to be and it is clear that DJ wishes the snow to be gone from down under. We’re all going to burn up and die!

Squidly
May 1, 2009 9:47 pm

MikeN (20:48:58) :
This whole thing about global warming stopping in 1998, or that half the warming has been erased, are you really arguing that CO2 doesn’t cause an increase in temperatures? If the sun is responsible for the cooling, and overwhelming the CO2 trend, then wouldn’t a more active sun just restart the warming?

Well, if nobody else will say it, I will … no, CO2 does not cause warming, in fact I truly believe it is to the contrary, as it creates a net negative feedback with water vapor, one reason the tropics are cooler than the desert in the mid-day sun.