Name 3 clear signs of the coming Thermageddon

thermageddon

OK, so my art is a bit tongue in cheek. But it does fit the disaster theme of the topic.

This op-ed piece in the Herald Sun is interesting, because it touches on many of the points covered here on WUWT. This is the first time I’ve seen all these collected in one article in a major newspaper. Andrew Bolt routinely uses material from WUWT, and this is the first time I’ve been able to reciprocate. There are some truly unique points raised by Bolt that are indigenous to Australia that we haven’t discussed here, but they are valid for discussion nonetheless. In cases where we have covered a point on WUWT, I’ve made a footnote link [in brackets] – Anthony


From Andrew Bolt, The Herald Sun

Global Warming Alarmists Out in the Cold

April 29, 2009 12:00am

IT’S snowing in April. Ice is spreading in Antarctica. The Great Barrier Reef is as healthy as ever.

And that’s just the news of the past week. Truly, it never rains but it pours – and all over our global warming alarmists.

Time’s up for this absurd scaremongering. The fears are being contradicted by the facts, and more so by the week.

Doubt it? Then here’s a test.

Name just three clear signs the planet is warming as the alarmists claim it should. Just three. Chances are your “proofs” are in fact on my list of 10 Top Myths about global warming.And if your “proofs” indeed turn out to be false, don’t get angry with me.

Just ask yourself: Why do you still believe that man is heating the planet to hell? What evidence do you have?

So let’s see if facts matter more to you than faith, and observations more than predictions.

MYTH 1

THE WORLD IS WARMING

Wrong. It is true the world did warm between 1975 and 1998, but even Professor David Karoly, one of our leading alarmists, admitted this week “temperatures have dropped” since – “both in surface temperatures and in atmospheric temperatures measured from satellites”. In fact, the fall in temperatures from just 2002 has already wiped out a quarter of the warming our planet experienced last century. (Check data from Britain’s Hadley Centre, NASA’s Aqua satellite and the US National Climatic Data Centre.)

Some experts, such as Karoly, claim this proves nothing and the world will soon start warming again. Others, such as Professor Ian Plimer of Adelaide University, point out that so many years of cooling already contradict the theory that man’s rapidly increasing gases must drive up temperatures ever faster.

But that’s all theory. The question I’ve asked is: What signs can you actually see of the man-made warming that the alarmists predicted?

[ Ian Plimer, Temperature trends]

MYTH 2

THE POLAR CAPS ARE MELTING

Wrong. The British Antarctic Survey, working with NASA, last week confirmed ice around Antarctica has grown 100,000 sq km each decade for the past 30 years.

Long-term monitoring by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports the same: southern hemisphere ice has been expanding for decades.

As for the Arctic, wrong again.

The Arctic ice cap shrank badly two summers ago after years of steady decline, but has since largely recovered. Satellite data from NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Centre this week shows the Arctic hasn’t had this much April ice for at least seven years.

Norway’s Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre says the ice is now within the standard deviation range for 1979 to 2007.

[Antarctic Ice Growth, Arctic Ice Recovery ]

MYTH 3

WE’VE NEVER HAD SUCH A BAD DROUGHT

Wrong. A study released this month by the University of NSW Climate Change Research Centre confirms not only that we’ve had worse droughts, but this Big Dry is not caused by “global warming”, whether man-made or not.

As the university’s press release says: “The causes of southeastern Australia’s longest, most severe and damaging droughts have been discovered, with the surprise finding that they originate far away in the Indian Ocean.

“A team of Australian scientists has detailed for the first time how a phenomenon known as the Indian Ocean Dipole – a variable and irregular cycle of warming and cooling of ocean water – dictates whether moisture-bearing winds are carried across the southern half of Australia.”

MYTH 4

OUR CITIES HAVE NEVER BEEN HOTTER

Wrong. The alleged “record” temperature Melbourne set in January – 46.4 degrees – was in fact topped by the 47.2 degrees the city recorded in 1851. (See the Argus newspaper of February 8, 1851.)

And here’s another curious thing: Despite all this warming we’re alleged to have caused, Victoria’s highest temperature on record remains the 50.7 degrees that hit Mildura 103 years ago.

South Australia’s hottest day is still the 50.7 degrees Oodnadatta suffered 37 years ago. NSW’s high is still the 50 degrees recorded 70 years ago.

What’s more, not one of the world’s seven continents has set a record high temperature since 1974. Europe’s high remains the 50 degrees measured in Spain 128 years ago, before the invention of the first true car.

MYTH 5

THE SEAS ARE GETTING HOTTER

Wrong. If anything, the seas are getting colder. For five years, a network of 3175 automated bathythermographs has been deployed in the oceans by the Argo program, a collaboration between 50 agencies from 26 countries.

Warming believer Josh Willis, of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, reluctantly concluded: “There has been a very slight cooling . . .”

[Ocean cooling]

MYTH 6

THE SEAS ARE RISING

Wrong. For almost three years, the seas have stopped rising, according to the Jason-1 satellite mission monitored by the University of Colorado.

That said, the seas have risen steadily and slowly for the past 10,000 years through natural warming, and will almost certainly resume soon.

But there is little sign of any accelerated rises, even off Tuvalu or the Maldives, islands often said to be most threatened with drowning.

Professor Nils-Axel Moerner, one of the world’s most famous experts on sea levels, has studied the Maldives in particular and concluded there has been no net rise there for 1250 years.

Venice is still above water.

[Sea Level in the Maldives, Sea Level satellite data]

MYTH 7

CYCLONES ARE GETTING WORSE

Wrong. Ryan Maue of Florida State University recently measured the frequency, intensity and duration of all hurricanes and cyclones to compile an Accumulated Cyclone Energy Index.

His findings? The energy index is at its lowest level for more than 30 years.

The World Meteorological Organisation, in its latest statement on cyclones, said it was impossible to say if they were affected by man’s gases: “Though there is evidence both for and against the existence of a detectable anthropogenic signal in the tropical cyclone climate record to date, no firm conclusion can be made on this point.”

[Ryan Maue and Hurricane energy, Hurricane landfall trends]

MYTH 8

THE GREAT BARRIER REEF IS DYING

Wrong. Yes, in 1999, Professor Ove Hoegh-Gulberg, our leading reef alarmist and administrator of more than $30 million in warming grants, did claim the reef was threatened by warming, and much had turned white.

But he then had to admit it had made a “surprising” recovery.

Yes, in 2006 he again warned high temperatures meant “between 30 and 40 per cent of coral on Queensland’s Great Barrier Reef could die within a month”.

But he later admitted this bleaching had “minimal impact”. Yes, in 2007 he again warned that temperature changes of the kind caused by global warming were bleaching the reef.

But this month fellow Queensland University researchers admitted in a study that reef coral had once more made a “spectacular recovery”, with “abundant corals re-established in a single year”. The reef is blooming.

MYTH 9

OUR SNOW SEASONS ARE SHORTER

Wrong. Poor snow falls in 2003 set off a rash of headlines predicting warming doom. The CSIRO typically fed the hysteria by claiming global warming would strip resorts of up to a quarter of their snow by 2018.

Yet the past two years have been bumper seasons for Victoria’s snow resorts, and this year could be just as good, with snow already falling in NSW and Victoria this past week.

[New low temp record at Australian ski resort this year]

MYTH 10

TSUNAMIS AND OTHER DISASTERS ARE GETTING WORSE

Are you insane? Tsunamis are in fact caused by earthquakes. Yet there was World Vision boss Tim Costello last week, claiming that Asia was a “region, thanks to climate change, that has far more cyclones, tsunamis, droughts”.

Wrong, wrong and wrong, Tim. But what do facts matter now to a warming evangelist when the cause is so just?

And so any disaster is now blamed on man-made warming the way they once were on Satan. See for yourself on www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm the full list, including kidney stones, volcanic eruptions, lousy wine, insomnia, bad tempers, Vampire moths and bubonic plagues. Nothing is too far-fetched to be seized upon by carpetbaggers and wild preachers as signs of a warming we can’t actually see.

Not for nothing are polar bears the perfect symbol of this faith – bears said to be threatened by warming, when their numbers have in fact increased.

Bottom line: fewer people now die from extreme weather events, whether cyclones, floods or blinding heatwaves.

Read that in a study by Indur Goklany, who represented the US at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: “There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

[Going down – death rates due to extreme weather events]

So stop this crazy panic.

First step: check again your list of the signs you thought you saw of global warming. How many are true? What do you think, and why do you think it?

Yes, the world may resume warming in one year or 100. But it hasn’t been warming as the alarmists said it must if man were to blame, and certainly not as the media breathlessly keeps claiming.

Best we all just settle down, then, and wait for the proof — the real proof. After all, panicking over invisible things is so undignified, don’t you think?

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
344 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Squidly
May 1, 2009 9:54 pm

groweg (20:53:17) :

DJ is lucky to have a site like WUWT where he can express his views and even though they are contrary to those of most at this site, he is treated with respect. That does not happen if you don’t believe in global warming and post at one of the other sides’ sites. Love ‘ya WUWT!

And, we are lucky that people like DJ do indeed post here, as I believe this is a huge reason for the success of this site. The fact that people can discuss, bat ideas, data and information back and forth at each other, is what makes this site great. For without DJ’s participation (and other like him/her), we would not have nearly the quality and volume of ideas and information being presented. IMHO…
Thank you DJ for joining in the conversations, sincerely…

John F. Hultquist
May 1, 2009 9:55 pm

MikeN (20:48:58) : “. . .are you really arguing that CO2 doesn’t cause an increase in temperatures? If the sun is responsible for the cooling, . . .”
Some researchers believe CO2 contributes a small amount of warming and humans contribute a small amount of the CO2 in the atmosphere. If it were possible to double the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere then that small amount of temperature (dT) change could double. As doubling a very small dT is still a very small amount (and doubling the CO2 in the atmosphere isn’t something humans can do anyway), what’s the problem?
As for ol’Sun, great minds have been studying this fiery object for many years, draw opposite conclusions, and leave it to amateurs to state unequivocal positions. Stay tuned.

May 1, 2009 9:58 pm

Anthony,
Just to make it clear – when the global warming panic finally collapses, we need to make it clear that the scientific enterprise must not go down with it.

anna v
May 1, 2009 10:15 pm

Maybe they reduce the volcano corrections so as to keep the slope for the final curve?
One can expect anything in data maniputaltions, and CO2 measurements have not had the intense scrutiny that was given to temperature measurements.

May 1, 2009 10:22 pm

MYTH 6
THE SEAS ARE RISING
Wrong. . . .
Venice is still above water.

At least when the tide is out.
The Florida sea level risk chart from the “Sea Level Graphs from UC and some perspectives” WUWT post looks pretty scary until you check out the color scale. At the recently current rate of 3.2 mm/yr, that’s 3.2 meters per millennium, which doesn’t even get you out of the black on the color scale.
Still, that’s a hefty rise, so here’s how much Florida we lose a thousand years from now.
http://i41.tinypic.com/qx8hmw.jpg
We sure won’t be laughing then.

Squidly
May 1, 2009 10:29 pm

What’s this? The History Channel International is broadcasting “Little Ice Age:The Big Chill”
I thought the Little Ice Age didn’t exist!

kuhnkat
May 1, 2009 10:38 pm

DJ,
even if your claims were true, and they have been debunked thouroughly by previous posters, why would you consider extrapolating the WEATHER of one small area to the entire globe??
Oh yeah, Mann, Steig, Hansen…………..
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Evan Jones
Editor
May 1, 2009 10:48 pm

DJ: My take is that CO2 warming is probably about 10% of what the IPCC says. They have a 4-part equation (all parts multiplied) and seem to have exaggerated each factor by around two. Thus their error.
I do think that about a quarter of CO2 currently in the atmosphere was put there by us. We put out about 3% of CO2 exuded each year: A bit less than half has accumulated in the atmosphere and the rest has gone into land and ocean sinks. It does add up over the years.
When we finally determine what the true persistence rate of CO2 is we will know the rest of the equation. There is huge dispute over this issue. Some seem to think it is near-immortal; others say it is gone PDQ.
So I think there has been a teeny bit of CO2 warming, but I do credit mankind with the recent increase.
BTW, those who believe in AGW are welcome here. All of our readers add value. (Well, okay, nearly all . . .)

Ray
May 1, 2009 10:53 pm

Oh yeah, you can see it now… the MSM are backpedling over this Global Insanity. You can bet they will have a major Global Amnesia, and a Global Denial.

Fuelmaker
May 1, 2009 11:41 pm

I would like to echo the above and elaborate on the “factors” in the GCM’s the IPCC approved.
The additional greenhouse effect from a CO2 doubling is only 1 deg C, with a lot of hand-waving. The physics is very complex and simplifying assumptions and linearizations are just plain wrong.
The models added factors to try and fit the few years of warming to the small rises in CO2. While this is a reasonable hypothesis, when you look deeper, it is clear that there is no basis in physics to believe that there are ANY positive feedbacks to amplify the temperature increase from CO2. It certainly does not interfere with cloud formation, which is the hidden assumption in most of the GCM’s. Positive feedbacks are pretty rare in nature on large systems, otherwise they would “blow up” and destroy the unique conditions and get “stuck” in a different, stable regime.
Even the well known ice-albedo feedback is very weak. When snow and ice are on the ground outside of temperate zones, there is not much sunshine to reflect back into space, especially in winter. If the arctic ice melts and ocean currents keep the ice out, the arctic will act as a much better radiator and will not absorb enough extra solar energy to offset this.

MikeN
May 1, 2009 11:49 pm

Joel Shore, Squidly
There are plenty of skeptical statements on the RealClimate site, however, many get deleted, and these we never see.
Try asking them what happened to the peer review, that they couldn’t spot any errors in Michael Mann’s hockey stick? Would they have been just as credible if instead of a hockey stick, someone found that temperatures are lower than in the recent past?
Such a comment will never show up on their site. Plus look at the blog links. WUWT links to realclimate, realclimate don’t link to here.

MikeN
May 1, 2009 11:52 pm

>As doubling a very small dT is still a very small amount (and doubling the CO2 in the atmosphere isn’t something humans can do anyway), what’s the problem?
Actually this is about 1.2C of warming, plus feedback effects which could take it to 6C. If you have a negative feedback overall, then the warming is not a problem.

May 2, 2009 12:04 am

Joel Shore (18:56:59) :
That doesn’t actually prove anything. I have seen plenty of comments from the “skeptic” point of view over at RealClimate.

Give it a rest. That’s complete nonsense and you know it. RC does not let any legitimate criticism through. They merely pick and choose the straw arguments to beat them down and pat themselves on the back.
Mark

Mike Bryant
May 2, 2009 12:35 am

I hope this isn’t too off topic, but we have been discussing data, and therefore, truth manipulation.
Arthur C. Clarke said, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. ”
Magic can be used to illuminate or to confuse. Computers can give us knowledge and power, but to gain wisdom we have to be able to sift the truth from the rubbish. A computer can be made to persuade instead of to enlighten. How many times have we seen graphs and algorithms twisted and molded to produce a desired outcome instead of the mere truth?
Canon is developing a product that will mix reality and the virtual world. When you wear the goggles, you can see fish swimming all about your house. Of course, they might also let you see people with jetpacks and silver jumpsuits from the future. What would they show you to convince you of AGW? They call it “mixed reality”, a confused reality brought to you by the computer. There is a video at this site:
http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/01/canon-gets-all-steve-zissou-with-its-mixed-reality-aquarium/#continued
Mixed reality, or augmented reality, can be a tool of those who want to convince people of a reality that just does not exist.
Now some are creating graphs and changing graphs and data, but they are also using the powerful persuasion techniques of movies and advertising. What techniques will we be seeing next?
Here is a short video:

May 2, 2009 12:39 am

To Just Want Truth… (21:39:15) :
Well, the Australian Government also used a variation of Mann’s Hockey Stick graph in their justification (background information) for its proposed ETS (Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme). Their “expert”, an economist Mr Ross Garnot, thought that this evidence was clear proof of the AGW problem. No mention about its having been widely ridiculed. Unfortunately, such scientifically dishonest papers as Mann et al. and Steig et al just keep getting regurgitated.

Mike Bryant
May 2, 2009 12:46 am

“anna v (20:56:35) :
In the second list you posted, have you noticed what is currently happening with CO2?
Seems like we are measuring the lag between temperature stasis and ocean out gassing.”
http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/keyIndicators/index.cfm#GlobalTemperature
That site is pure propaganda mixed with bad graphs. They also talk about the huge land ice losses at Greenland, which have reversed in the last couple of years, while ignoring the even larger land ice gains at Antarctica. On sea ice they do the same thing, ignoring the sea ice gains in the Antarctic while highlighting the smaller losses in the Arctic. The whole website leaves me with a sick feeling.
Mike

David LM
May 2, 2009 12:58 am

“When was the last time snow fell simultaneously (or nearly so) in Australia, and California?”
Due to the lack of any land mass between the Australian continent and Antarctica there can be snow in the southern mountain areas of NSW, Victoria and Tasmania even in mid summer. All it takes is for pressure systems to align themselves accordingly and draw cold air from a long way south. However, summer snowfalls are brief and any accumulation usually melts within a day or two. I have been at Charlotte Pass on a New Years day and there was a substantial snow fall of several inches that really comfused some of the Canadian Tourists.
In those parts it can be almost 30C (84F) one day and close to 0C (32F) the next. Such extreme changes during summer are probably much less common at similar latitudes in the NH.

Jerry
May 2, 2009 12:59 am

“That said, the seas have risen steadily and slowly for the past 10,000 years through natural warming, and will almost certainly resume soon.”
Not quite so. There’s been nothing steady about sea level rise since the last deglaciation. (See Blanchon P and Shaw J “Reef drowning during the last deglaciation: Evidence for catastrophic sea-level rise and ice sheet collapse” Geology, vol 23 no.1 January 1995, pp 4-8). And yet reefs survive!

anna v
May 2, 2009 1:21 am

Peter Jones (23:22:56) :
Well, we do see that the Maldives will actually be gone soon.
A total PR f road, imo. No measurements, just huge handwavings to support the claim of the islands who are trying to get subsidized by the rest of us.
Have a look at what a person who measures sea levels is saying.
http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2007/2007_20-29/2007-25/pdf/33-37_725.pdf
Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner is the head of the Paleogeophysics and
Geodynamics department at Stockholm University in Sweden.
He is past president (1999-2003) of the INQUA Commission
on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution, and
leader of the Maldives Sea Level Project. Dr. Mörner has
been studying the sea level and its effects on coastal areas for
some 35 years.

He gives 10 cm as a possible rise in the next century.
There is also a picture of
A famous tree in the Maldives shows no evidence of having been swept away by rising sea
levels, as would be predicted by the global warming swindlers. A group of Australian
global-warming advocates came along and pulled the tree down, destroying the evidence that their “theory” was false

May 2, 2009 1:22 am

.
Can I suggest that everyone sends this link to every media outlet they can think of.
.

May 2, 2009 1:55 am

When the BBC does a piece in a similar vein to this Sun Herald article, then we will know that sense and rationality will have returned to mankind. At present, however, the BBC is still riding high with the Greens, Hippies, Anarchists and Loons.
.

May 2, 2009 2:21 am

.
>>Just to make it clear – when the global warming panic
>>finally collapses, we need to make it clear that the scientific
>>enterprise must not go down with it.
Agreed, but we might legitimately discuss the role of government in funding science, and thus the role of political interest groups determining the outcome of science. The funding needs to be more independent of government.
.

Flanagan
May 2, 2009 2:23 am

This is probably the best piece of disinformation I’ve seen in my all life. In every point, there is a mix of truth and lies.
Myth 1
“In fact, the fall in temperatures from just 2002 has already wiped out half the warming our planet experienced last century.” Completely false – anyone can check data by him/herself and see it’s complete bulls….
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/mean:12
Myth 2
“THE POLAR CAPS ARE MELTING” The trye prediction being that Arctic is melting.
“The Arctic ice cap shrank badly two summers ago after years of steady decline, but has since largely recovered.” I guess we’re not talking about the same Arctic
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seasonal.extent.1900-2007.jpg
etc etc. I could go on, but damn I can’t stand such a level of hypocrisy. Are some people then really ready to do anything in the name of political beliefs?

UK Sceptic
May 2, 2009 2:29 am

Maybe more people ought to grill Al Gore about his green credentials?
http://www.thebulletin.us/articles/2009/04/30/top_stories/doc49f94461cae7e846121174.txt