Name 3 clear signs of the coming Thermageddon

thermageddon

OK, so my art is a bit tongue in cheek. But it does fit the disaster theme of the topic.

This op-ed piece in the Herald Sun is interesting, because it touches on many of the points covered here on WUWT. This is the first time I’ve seen all these collected in one article in a major newspaper. Andrew Bolt routinely uses material from WUWT, and this is the first time I’ve been able to reciprocate. There are some truly unique points raised by Bolt that are indigenous to Australia that we haven’t discussed here, but they are valid for discussion nonetheless. In cases where we have covered a point on WUWT, I’ve made a footnote link [in brackets] – Anthony


From Andrew Bolt, The Herald Sun

Global Warming Alarmists Out in the Cold

April 29, 2009 12:00am

IT’S snowing in April. Ice is spreading in Antarctica. The Great Barrier Reef is as healthy as ever.

And that’s just the news of the past week. Truly, it never rains but it pours – and all over our global warming alarmists.

Time’s up for this absurd scaremongering. The fears are being contradicted by the facts, and more so by the week.

Doubt it? Then here’s a test.

Name just three clear signs the planet is warming as the alarmists claim it should. Just three. Chances are your “proofs” are in fact on my list of 10 Top Myths about global warming.And if your “proofs” indeed turn out to be false, don’t get angry with me.

Just ask yourself: Why do you still believe that man is heating the planet to hell? What evidence do you have?

So let’s see if facts matter more to you than faith, and observations more than predictions.

MYTH 1

THE WORLD IS WARMING

Wrong. It is true the world did warm between 1975 and 1998, but even Professor David Karoly, one of our leading alarmists, admitted this week “temperatures have dropped” since – “both in surface temperatures and in atmospheric temperatures measured from satellites”. In fact, the fall in temperatures from just 2002 has already wiped out a quarter of the warming our planet experienced last century. (Check data from Britain’s Hadley Centre, NASA’s Aqua satellite and the US National Climatic Data Centre.)

Some experts, such as Karoly, claim this proves nothing and the world will soon start warming again. Others, such as Professor Ian Plimer of Adelaide University, point out that so many years of cooling already contradict the theory that man’s rapidly increasing gases must drive up temperatures ever faster.

But that’s all theory. The question I’ve asked is: What signs can you actually see of the man-made warming that the alarmists predicted?

[ Ian Plimer, Temperature trends]

MYTH 2

THE POLAR CAPS ARE MELTING

Wrong. The British Antarctic Survey, working with NASA, last week confirmed ice around Antarctica has grown 100,000 sq km each decade for the past 30 years.

Long-term monitoring by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports the same: southern hemisphere ice has been expanding for decades.

As for the Arctic, wrong again.

The Arctic ice cap shrank badly two summers ago after years of steady decline, but has since largely recovered. Satellite data from NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Centre this week shows the Arctic hasn’t had this much April ice for at least seven years.

Norway’s Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre says the ice is now within the standard deviation range for 1979 to 2007.

[Antarctic Ice Growth, Arctic Ice Recovery ]

MYTH 3

WE’VE NEVER HAD SUCH A BAD DROUGHT

Wrong. A study released this month by the University of NSW Climate Change Research Centre confirms not only that we’ve had worse droughts, but this Big Dry is not caused by “global warming”, whether man-made or not.

As the university’s press release says: “The causes of southeastern Australia’s longest, most severe and damaging droughts have been discovered, with the surprise finding that they originate far away in the Indian Ocean.

“A team of Australian scientists has detailed for the first time how a phenomenon known as the Indian Ocean Dipole – a variable and irregular cycle of warming and cooling of ocean water – dictates whether moisture-bearing winds are carried across the southern half of Australia.”

MYTH 4

OUR CITIES HAVE NEVER BEEN HOTTER

Wrong. The alleged “record” temperature Melbourne set in January – 46.4 degrees – was in fact topped by the 47.2 degrees the city recorded in 1851. (See the Argus newspaper of February 8, 1851.)

And here’s another curious thing: Despite all this warming we’re alleged to have caused, Victoria’s highest temperature on record remains the 50.7 degrees that hit Mildura 103 years ago.

South Australia’s hottest day is still the 50.7 degrees Oodnadatta suffered 37 years ago. NSW’s high is still the 50 degrees recorded 70 years ago.

What’s more, not one of the world’s seven continents has set a record high temperature since 1974. Europe’s high remains the 50 degrees measured in Spain 128 years ago, before the invention of the first true car.

MYTH 5

THE SEAS ARE GETTING HOTTER

Wrong. If anything, the seas are getting colder. For five years, a network of 3175 automated bathythermographs has been deployed in the oceans by the Argo program, a collaboration between 50 agencies from 26 countries.

Warming believer Josh Willis, of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, reluctantly concluded: “There has been a very slight cooling . . .”

[Ocean cooling]

MYTH 6

THE SEAS ARE RISING

Wrong. For almost three years, the seas have stopped rising, according to the Jason-1 satellite mission monitored by the University of Colorado.

That said, the seas have risen steadily and slowly for the past 10,000 years through natural warming, and will almost certainly resume soon.

But there is little sign of any accelerated rises, even off Tuvalu or the Maldives, islands often said to be most threatened with drowning.

Professor Nils-Axel Moerner, one of the world’s most famous experts on sea levels, has studied the Maldives in particular and concluded there has been no net rise there for 1250 years.

Venice is still above water.

[Sea Level in the Maldives, Sea Level satellite data]

MYTH 7

CYCLONES ARE GETTING WORSE

Wrong. Ryan Maue of Florida State University recently measured the frequency, intensity and duration of all hurricanes and cyclones to compile an Accumulated Cyclone Energy Index.

His findings? The energy index is at its lowest level for more than 30 years.

The World Meteorological Organisation, in its latest statement on cyclones, said it was impossible to say if they were affected by man’s gases: “Though there is evidence both for and against the existence of a detectable anthropogenic signal in the tropical cyclone climate record to date, no firm conclusion can be made on this point.”

[Ryan Maue and Hurricane energy, Hurricane landfall trends]

MYTH 8

THE GREAT BARRIER REEF IS DYING

Wrong. Yes, in 1999, Professor Ove Hoegh-Gulberg, our leading reef alarmist and administrator of more than $30 million in warming grants, did claim the reef was threatened by warming, and much had turned white.

But he then had to admit it had made a “surprising” recovery.

Yes, in 2006 he again warned high temperatures meant “between 30 and 40 per cent of coral on Queensland’s Great Barrier Reef could die within a month”.

But he later admitted this bleaching had “minimal impact”. Yes, in 2007 he again warned that temperature changes of the kind caused by global warming were bleaching the reef.

But this month fellow Queensland University researchers admitted in a study that reef coral had once more made a “spectacular recovery”, with “abundant corals re-established in a single year”. The reef is blooming.

MYTH 9

OUR SNOW SEASONS ARE SHORTER

Wrong. Poor snow falls in 2003 set off a rash of headlines predicting warming doom. The CSIRO typically fed the hysteria by claiming global warming would strip resorts of up to a quarter of their snow by 2018.

Yet the past two years have been bumper seasons for Victoria’s snow resorts, and this year could be just as good, with snow already falling in NSW and Victoria this past week.

[New low temp record at Australian ski resort this year]

MYTH 10

TSUNAMIS AND OTHER DISASTERS ARE GETTING WORSE

Are you insane? Tsunamis are in fact caused by earthquakes. Yet there was World Vision boss Tim Costello last week, claiming that Asia was a “region, thanks to climate change, that has far more cyclones, tsunamis, droughts”.

Wrong, wrong and wrong, Tim. But what do facts matter now to a warming evangelist when the cause is so just?

And so any disaster is now blamed on man-made warming the way they once were on Satan. See for yourself on www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm the full list, including kidney stones, volcanic eruptions, lousy wine, insomnia, bad tempers, Vampire moths and bubonic plagues. Nothing is too far-fetched to be seized upon by carpetbaggers and wild preachers as signs of a warming we can’t actually see.

Not for nothing are polar bears the perfect symbol of this faith – bears said to be threatened by warming, when their numbers have in fact increased.

Bottom line: fewer people now die from extreme weather events, whether cyclones, floods or blinding heatwaves.

Read that in a study by Indur Goklany, who represented the US at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: “There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

[Going down – death rates due to extreme weather events]

So stop this crazy panic.

First step: check again your list of the signs you thought you saw of global warming. How many are true? What do you think, and why do you think it?

Yes, the world may resume warming in one year or 100. But it hasn’t been warming as the alarmists said it must if man were to blame, and certainly not as the media breathlessly keeps claiming.

Best we all just settle down, then, and wait for the proof — the real proof. After all, panicking over invisible things is so undignified, don’t you think?

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
344 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
May 2, 2009 3:33 am

Lots of records broken in OZ this week…the Jose Minimum is gaining Momentum.
Andrew Bolt is one of the few over here in the media battling against the likes of Karoly (who makes my skin crawl more than Gore). I recently helped a friend do an interview with Bolt which has been published in a network of education newspapers. The younger crew need to be informed too.

Paul R
May 2, 2009 3:54 am

I’m more comfortable with MSM journo’s ignoring the truth, I get totally confused and a little distrustful when they pop up after “the debate is over” telling people what they already know all too late.

May 2, 2009 4:06 am

The Sun’s eruptional activity has nearly stopped, the global temperature is dropping, the Pacific temperature is dropping and the Artic and Antarctic ice sheets are increasing and we are probably heading into a little ice age. Who is brave enough to tell this to Obama?

maz2
May 2, 2009 4:13 am

“Peter Foster: The Dark Lord Sir Nicholas Stern says there will be ‘no powerful carbon policemen.’ Don’t bet on it. It was once said of Maurice Strong, the Canadian envirocrat who masterminded the current United Nations-centred climate change policy mess, that you wouldn’t pick him out of a crowd of two. If the other person were Nicholas Stern, Chairman Mo might have a shot.
Lord Stern, who was at the Economic Club of Toronto yesterday peddling his new book, The Global Deal, has other things in common with Mr. Strong besides bureaucratic blandness. These include apocalyptic environmental visions, a burning desire to help developing countries, preferably by bashing the rich ones, a belief that those with alternative views should be silenced and a quasi-religious faith in big — and I mean really big — government.”
urlm.in/chsl

Nigel Sherratt
May 2, 2009 4:32 am

Slightly off topic but so were all the amusing jokes about Gallipoli and after all we are discussing myths.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/Gerard-Henderson/The-lingering-myth-of-Anzac-Day/2005/04/18/1113676698825.html
Far from fighting to the last man the withdrawal was (ironically) a brilliant success.
A little research into one of the main sources of the myths will uncover a name familiar to viewers of Fox.
Casualties (from Wiki)
Died Wounded Total
Total Allies 44,092 96,937 141,029
– United Kingdom 21,255 52,230 73,485
– France (est.) 10,000 17,000 27,000
– Australia 8,709 19,441 28,150
– New Zealand 2,721 4,752 7,473
– India 1,358 3,421 4,779
– Newfoundland 49 93 142

Ed Fix
May 2, 2009 4:39 am

Per Strandberg (04:06:17) :
…we are probably heading into a little ice age.
What evidence do you have that the coming ice age will be “little”?

Nigel Sherratt
May 2, 2009 4:44 am

http://www.diggerhistory.info/pages-battles/ww1/anzac/gallipoli-facts.htm
Has this
Propaganda
Distorted propaganda is usually at its height during wars but corrected in later years. In the case of Gallipoli the opposite occurred. The official Australian war historian, Charles Bean, was reluctant to hint that Australians were ever less than heroic, and in the interests of maintaining good relationships with Australia, Cecil Aspinall-Oglander, the official British war historian, toned down even implied criticisms of any Australian action. As Rhodes James observed, the result of massaging the truth was an ‘Australian mythology that Gallipoli was an Australian triumph thrown away by incompetent British commanders’. 
Far worse distortions disfigure the Peter Weir film Gallipoli, which seeks to contrast cowardly and idle British troops with ANZAC heroes. Some British troops did bathe and drink tea at Suvla Bay whilst horrific fighting was taking place a few miles to the south, but others were as fully engaged in that conflict as New Zealanders and Australians. 
Rhodes James noted that the ‘suicidal assault’ of the Australian Light Horse at The Nek on 7 August 1915 ‘had nothing to do with the British landing at Suvla, but was intended to help the New Zealanders, as the film’s military advisers knew’. 
However, ‘the principal Australian sponsor of the film (Rupert Murdoch) wanted an anti-British ending, and got it’, with ‘the deliberately inaccurate final scenes’ of the film, a potent source of Australian republican sentiments. 
Few Australians realise that ‘the British, French and Indian causalities were far greater than those of the Anzacs, and that the British bore the brunt of the fighting – and the losses.’
Far from covering up British errors, British historians exposed them at every level, from Kitchener, Churchill, Fisher and Hamilton down. The indecisiveness of the naval commanders , the muddle at Imbros, the incapacity of Sir Frederick Stopford, and every other British failing, were laid bare to the world. This is as it should be, if anyone is to benefit from past errors, but in 2001 British people, no more or less than Australians and New Zealanders, can take pride in heroic deeds at Gallipoli, as indeed can French, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi people. We should not allow latter-day propagandists to sow seeds of unwarranted resentment between peoples whose ancestors fought with great courage in a common cause.

slowtofollow
May 2, 2009 4:47 am

Just Want Truth… (21:39:15) :
Noted – stands out as an unreferenced graph amongst most of the others which have sources quoted. US citizen should FOI requesting a ref.?

Flanagan
May 2, 2009 4:59 am

Per: the global temperature is dropping?
http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/execute.csh?amsutemps+001

SOYLENT GREEN
May 2, 2009 5:00 am

Nice to have all these myths in such a concise form–including the references to vampires and the plague. It will help in constructing my rebuttal to Waxman-Markey.

Just Want Truth...
May 2, 2009 5:18 am

Alan from Australia (00:39:43) :
I thought it would be big news here at WUWT that Steven Chu uses the Mann Hockey Stick. But it didn’t create much of a stir.
Is it cold in your part of Australia?

H.R.
May 2, 2009 5:20 am

Ok. Here’s one clear sign of impending “Thermageddon.” When the MSM stops writing about it – WHAM! – we’re all gonna fry because they always get it backwards nowadays ;o)
Seriously, the geologic record doesn’t really show any Thermageddons of the Venus or Mars type. All of the severe climate impacts (from a human survival POV) have been cold events. Why would anyone bet against millions of years of earth history?
My $2.00 Perfecta bet is that the next three severe global climate change events that threaten humanity will bring cold conditions.

Just Want Truth...
May 2, 2009 5:22 am

“Per Strandberg (04:06:17) : Who is brave enough to tell this to Obama?”
I am. But President Obama wouldn’t call on a non-reporter at a press conference. Also, he doesn’t call on reporters who could be antagonistic toward him. They could raise their hand all day and he wouldn’t point at them.
I also would inform him that Steven Chu is using flawed science since he uses the Mann Hockey Stick.

Just Want Truth...
May 2, 2009 5:28 am

slowtofollow (04:47:50) :
That would be one of the problems with global warming—people not checking to see if it’s actually real.

Paul R
May 2, 2009 6:12 am

Dr Andrew Glikson has had a crack at the 10 myths presented by Andrew Bolt.
Here’s an example for your amusement.
“MYTH 1 — THE WORLD IS WARMING:
BOLT: Wrong. It is true the world did warm between 1975 and 1998, but even Professor David Karoly, one of our leading alarmists, admitted this week “temperatures have dropped” since – “both in surface temperatures and in atmospheric temperatures measured from satellites”. In fact, the fall in temperatures from just 2002 has already wiped out a quarter of the warming our planet experienced last century. (Check data from Britain’s Hadley Centre, NASA’s Aqua satellite and the US National Climatic Data Centre.)
Some experts, such as Karoly, claim this proves nothing and the world will soon start warming again. Others, such as Professor Ian Plimer of Adelaide University, point out that so many years of cooling already contradict the theory that man’s rapidly increasing gases must drive up temperatures ever faster.
But that’s all theory. The question I’ve asked is: What signs can you actually see of the man-made warming that the alarmists predicted?
GLIKSON: As has been projected by climate science over the last 20 years, the increase in atmospheric energy level associated with global warming results in greater variability, including: greater frequency and stronger amplitude of the ENSO (El-Nino – La-Nina) cycle and extreme weather events (hurricane intensity, floods, extreme droughts and fires) and, most particularly, rapid melt rates of large parts of the Arctic Sea ice, Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets and shelves — as is in fact happening around the world, including the recent Australian droughts, mega-bush fires and floods Australia.”
http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/29/climate-myths-andrew-bolts-claims-scientifically-tested/

Editor
May 2, 2009 6:31 am

Michael D Smith (21:05:13) :

I’ll see your 10 myths and raise you 5:
http://ilovecarbondioxide.com/2009/01/top-15-climate-myths.html
This has been an open tab on my browser for a while, and I mentioned it because I thought how fun it would be to make an “I ‘heart’ CO2″ logo to put on one of my vehicles… Then I realized the banner on the website uses a green leaf as the heart, and my whole idea was just a subliminal message, surreptitiously implanted into my brain by an evil oil and gas consortium.

This would be a cute variation for Canadiens: “I CO2” implying both that the bearer likes staying warm in winter and (should there be some connection) a longer growing season.

RW
May 2, 2009 7:03 am

It’s really depressing to see the same tired arguments trotted out time and time again. Let’s consider these “top 10 global warming myths”.
1. Yes, the world is warming. The problem is that sceptics cannot, or will not, understand the concept of statistical significance. There is a statistically significant, ongoing warming trend.
2. Yes, arctic ice is melting. It has not ‘largely recovered’ since the dramatic 25% drop in its minimum extent in 2007; 2008’s minimum was also 25% lower than anything seen before 2007.
3. Not global.
4. Not global, except for the last paragraph which mistakes outliers for trends. The global temperature trend is upward.
5. Yes, the seas are getting hotter. You have to learn to look at the long term; short periods, like a decade or less, are more or less meaningless. “four years with no warming in the upper ocean does not erase the 50 years of warming we’ve seen since ocean temperature measurements became widespread. Nor does it erase the eight inches of sea level rise we’ve experienced in the past 100 years. Both of these are important indicators of human-kind’s effect on the climate.”
6. Yes, sea levels continue to rise.
7. Well now, this one’s actually quite interesting. Certainly, the temperature of the upper ocean is one of the major drivers of hurricane activity, and if ocean surface temperatures rise, one expects hurricane activity to become more intense. The equatorial Pacific is warmer than the equatorial atlantic, and so tropical cyclones in the Pacific are on average more intense than those in the Atlantic. But sea surface temperatures are not the only factor in determining hurricane intensity. A drop in hurricane activity may raise questions about our understanding of how hurricanes form and develop, so this is interesting and worth discussing.
8. Not global.
9. Not global.
10. An odd statement made by a baptist minister is entirely irrelevant. To describe this as a ‘global warming myth’ is pretty laughable.
So, of these 10 ‘global warming myths’, 4 are in fact true, 4 relate only to Australia, 1 is not and has never been seriously claimed, and 1 is an interesting observation from which wildly overblown conclusions have been drawn.
0.5/10. Pretty poor.

Jim Papsdorf
May 2, 2009 7:08 am

OTs: I believe that it was Ian Wilson who published “Which came first, the chicken or the egg ?” which dealt with the role of planetary gravitational forces, especially Jupiter, and its correlation with changes in length of day which correlated with the PDO and AMO. He promised some exciting follow up in Jan of ’09, but I have seen nothing yet-anyone know what has happened with it ?

Richard M
May 2, 2009 7:09 am

Ed Fix (04:39:20) :
‘What evidence do you have that the coming ice age will be “little”?’
Very good point. In figure 5 of Frank Lansner’s spahgetti reconstruction of our current interglacial period, a fairly constant temperature range has given way to more extreme bumps (MWP and LIA). This corresponds to similar bumps that appeared as we came out of the last ice age. If the climate is bumpier the closer we get to an ice age then that next drop may be REALLY big.
If Frank’s reconstruction is valid then we should be spending money understanding the MWP and LIA and why we are seeing these relatively quick changes in climate. Otherwise we may be in for some very cold times.

John Galt
May 2, 2009 7:20 am

What are you gonna believe — these lyin’ facts or my computer models?

Douglas DC
May 2, 2009 7:20 am

What are we to do? I don’t see warming-but cooling.We go down the warming rabbit
hole and find out -when we pop out the other end- that the ground is now covered in
snow and ice.BTW the argument for an approaching ice age is real-the 11-12,000
year clock is about hit midnight.The warmists yet pursue heretics at the expense of
reality.Reality has a very expensive way of getting people’s attention…

M White
May 2, 2009 7:37 am

MikeN (23:52:52) :
“Actually this is about 1.2C of warming, plus feedback effects which could take it to 6C. If you have a negative feedback overall, then the warming is not a problem.”
“plus feedback effects” What are they and how do they work. More importantly WHERE is the actual data to support them, as opposed to what appears in computer models.

M White
May 2, 2009 7:45 am

A previous entry about the Maldives

From U-Tube

MikeN
May 2, 2009 8:11 am

M White, my point is that many people here are denying the first order 1.2C warming. Somehow people here, including Anthony Watts, think that because there has been some cooling, global warming has stopped completely. If the sun is the dominant factor, which I believe it is, then it is overwhelming a CO2 warming trend. However, if the sun goes back into a warming phase, then with the added CO2 trend, things will get much warmer, and Watts and Co will look like fools. What’s strange is he has posted graphs that show this exact same warming, yet he continues to deny it.

Tim Clark
May 2, 2009 8:30 am

DJ (16:21:12) :
I get so tired of having to check AGW links. I doubt that anybody is interested , but here is the link DJ gave, except comparing 2008 to 1979 or 80 or something like that, I got cross-eyed thumbing through them. Really nothing to see, move along.
http://www.snowyhydro.com.au/snowDepth.asp?pageID=46&parentID=6&mode=submitted

1 3 4 5 6 7 14