Bad news for Catlin Expedition: Satellite Data Shows Arctic Cooling in February and March

Guest Post by Steven Goddard

As reported by Anthony, RSS satellite temperature data is out for March.  And as the Catlin adventurers have discovered, it has been “stupidly cold” in the Arctic.  March was the second consecutive month of below normal Arctic temperatures, and the continuation of a four year cooling trend – as seen below.   Google’s linest() function shows that since the beginning of 2005, Arctic temperatures have been cooling at a rate of 1.8 degrees C per decade, or 18C per century ( see comments).  Also note that Arctic monthly temperature anomaly now is about three degrees lower than in January, 1981.

That short term trend isn’t meaningful, except in the context of the Catlin Expedition and the cold they are experiencing.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pj0h2MODqj3gAmFVOnSFEWQ

Note in the graph below, the huge drop in temperatures since the Catlin expedition started two months ago.  Is this another example of The Gore Effect? Or, perhaps it is the “observer effect‘? Humor aside, the graph below tells the story of the cold the Catlin Expedition must be experiencing.

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pj0h2MODqj3gAmFVOnSFEWQ

This cooling is reflected in increasing amounts of winter ice since 2005.  Not surprisingly, as the temperature gets colder, the amount of ice increases.

http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/seaice/extent/AMSRE_Sea_Ice_Extent.png

http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/seaice/extent/AMSRE_Sea_Ice_Extent.png

Below is a longer term view of Arctic temperatures, as measured by Dr. Hansen’s GISS at Godthab, Greenland.  The warmest years were the 1920s through 1940s.

Click for a larger image direct from GISTEMP

How long before we start seeing stories like this one from Time Magazine again?

Another Ice Age?

Monday, Jun. 24, 1974

In Africa, drought continues for the sixth consecutive year, adding terribly to the toll of famine victims. During 1972 record rains in parts of the U.S., Pakistan and Japan caused some of the worst flooding in centuries. In Canada’s wheat belt, a particularly chilly and rainy spring has delayed planting and may well bring a disappointingly small harvest. Rainy Britain, on the other hand, has suffered from uncharacteristic dry spells the past few springs. A series of unusually cold winters has gripped the American Far West, while New England and northern Europe have recently experienced the mildest winters within anyone’s recollection.

As they review the bizarre and unpredictable weather pattern of the past several years, a growing number of scientists are beginning to suspect that many seemingly contradictory meteorological fluctuations are actually part of a global climatic upheaval. However widely the weather varies from place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age.


There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it’s only a hundred billion. It’s less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.

Richard Feynman

UPDATE: In response to questions in comments, Steve Goddard located this graph from the Danish Meteorological Institute.

Daily mean temperature and climate north of the 80th northern parallel. - source DMI
Daily mean temperature and climate north of the 80th northern parallel. - source DMI

From DMI:

Calculation of the Arctic Mean Temperature

The daily mean temperature of the Arctic area north of the 80th northern parallel is estimated from the average of the 00z and 12z analysis for all model grid points inside that area. The ERA40 reanalysis data set from ECMWF, has been applied to calculate daily mean temperatures for the period from 1958 to 2002, from 2002 to 2006 data from the global NWP model T511 is used and from 2006 to present the T799 model data are used.

The ERA40 reanalysis data, has been applied to calculation of daily climate values that are plotted along with the daily analysis values in all plots. The data used to determine climate values is the full ERA40 data set, from 1958 to 2002.

So it is a model, not an observation.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

108 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John in NZ
April 4, 2009 5:41 am

Their next sit-rep is at 1800GMT which is only 3.5 hours from now.
Pen Hadrow’s last post was at 10.40 am on April 2 but they don’t say which time zone. That may only be 40 hours ago so this might not be an indication they are in trouble.
They are to be resupplied on Sunday which may still be 20 hours away depending on which time zone they are in.
(129 west is about Vancouver.)
However would not want too much bad weather right now as they must be getting low on supplies.

Pamela Gray
April 4, 2009 5:46 am

Me thinks these folks could come back with a new respect for Mother Nature and her ability to spank us stupid, regardless of what we burn, fart, or pollute into her atmosphere. That is not to say we should. Usually this behavior does us humans more harm (think Love Canal and Bikini Island).

Bruce Cobb
April 4, 2009 5:52 am

Have no fear, the warming is “in the pipeline” (or so I hear). Maybe they could find a way to tap into that pipeline and warm their frosted tootsies.

Sam
April 4, 2009 5:55 am

I’ll first state that I am an out of the closet skeptic, no Gore worshiper here – but comeon.
Using a bit more than 3 years of data to generate a 10 year and a 100 year cooling rate? Statements like this is why the skeptic (aka realist) side gets labeled as weather watchers.
We can do better than this.

Steven Goddard
April 4, 2009 5:56 am

John,
I think the Catlin crew is OK.

Feeling the benefits of very light south westerly winds, some large, relatively smooth ice-pans and a great skating opportunity up a well placed refrozen lead that ran due north for half a mile, the team were able to cover a distance of 17.75km today.

Steven Goddard
April 4, 2009 6:12 am

Sam,
Many predictions of rapid Arctic demise were made in 2007 based on a two month trend. The predictions of Greenland ice disaster were made after a three year trend. I’m using the same high standards as the International Polar Year.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-03/01/content_7696460.htm

MA
April 4, 2009 6:24 am

But now it will get warmer. -30, -25,… etc., and they will get fuel, food and new sleeping bags from the air and the ice will disintegrate in April or in May and good photos of steaming water can be send to Guardian and BBC, and Gore can blow them up to the size 20×7 meters and use them as proof that mother Earth has a fever. The propaganda machine should be intact and in good shape (although the ears of the public hurt a bit?). Medias avoidance of this until it becomes warmer is professionalism.

April 4, 2009 6:28 am

Steven: Are your RSS graphs TLT or TLT anomaly?

Fred from Canuckistan . . .
April 4, 2009 6:34 am

in order to be successful, this expedition must get the required picture of the “stranded, doomed polar bear drifting away on a small piece of ice”.
Otherwise, all their frostbite will be for propaganda naught . . . .

ScorpionDas
April 4, 2009 6:40 am

Sam,
The 18 C extrapolation comment is poking fun at what is commonly done by those eager to scare. This is not isolated to AGW advocates. There are many people who routinely do such extrapolations – and believe seriously in the results.

Richard deSousa
April 4, 2009 6:45 am

Let’s not forget the recent vulcanism of Mt Redoubt is beginning to have an effect on the Arctic climate. The longer Mt. Redoubt erupts the greater the effect it has on the northern hemisphere’s climate. We’re probably going to have a cooler summer and possibly a cooler winter later this year.

Paul
April 4, 2009 6:54 am

O/T but Redoubt has gone into a full boil, as of about 10 am EDT. The AVO site hasn’t caught up with yet, but Kenai radar is showing it well. Plume well in excess of 45000 feet at 10:18 EDT

Steven Goddard
April 4, 2009 6:57 am

Please don’t “misunderestimate” the climatological significance of four years. According to the world’s preeminent climatologist Dr. James Hansen, four years is very significant.

Barack Obama has only four years to save the world. That is the stark assessment of Nasa scientist and leading climate expert Jim Hansen who last week warned only urgent action by the new president could halt the devastating climate change that now threatens Earth. Crucially, that action will have to be taken within Obama’s first administration, he added.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jan/18/jim-hansen-obama
In fact, it appears from the Guardian article that four years is the most significant time frame during the last 4.5 billion years.

Steven Goddard
April 4, 2009 6:59 am
phydeaux
April 4, 2009 7:06 am

speaking of Redoubt, AVO just reported “a signifcant explosive event” at 0600 ADT. The new ash cloud spread to 50,00ft, and the alerts have been upped to “warning’ and aviation code red.

atmoaggie
April 4, 2009 7:18 am

Richard: But how much ice melt will be aided by non-white ash deposition onto what is usually near-pristine white? This could change the absorptive properties enough that once the sun reaches the ice, faster melt, and sooner water albedo in melt areas (rather than ice albedo). Not saying it is definitely going to happen, but could.

M White
April 4, 2009 7:26 am

“Another Ice Age?
Monday, Jun. 24, 1974”
Today that’s proof of global warming

April 4, 2009 7:29 am

I like that Feynman quote!

April 4, 2009 7:31 am

ScorpionDas (06:40:13) :
The 18 C extrapolation comment is poking fun at what is commonly done by those eager to scare. This is not isolated to AGW advocates. There are many people who routinely do such extrapolations – and believe seriously in the results.
Using my hyper-accurate computer-controlled calculator I get 180 C per millennium.

MikeN
April 4, 2009 7:31 am

>as the temperature gets colder, the amount of ice increases.
This isn’t true, and you shouldn’t state this without qualification.
For example in Antarctica, with global warming, you get more ice,
because it is still too cold to melt the ice, but the surrounding warmer waters produce more precipitation. The sea level rise comes from expanding water. The irony is I think I read this on your site somewhere.

M White
April 4, 2009 7:36 am

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7897392.stm
Used to keep my clothes in a bag at the bottom of my sleeping. Never been in temperatures that cold though, perhaps it makes a difference.

John F. Hultquist
April 4, 2009 7:37 am

Somewhat off topic:
. . . according to the European Space Agency, warmer over the last 50 years on the Antarctic Peninsula, which leads to this:
Massive Ice Shelf About to Break Away From Antarctic Coast
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512535,00.html
“Scientist are examining whether global warming is behind the shelf’s breakup, the statement said. Average temperatures in the Antarctic Peninsula have risen by 3.8 degrees Farenheit (sic) over the past half century, the statement said — higher than the average global rise.”
What I’d like to know is how old the oldest ice is on the part that is about to break away and also the age of the youngest ice. Also, is this all sea ice or is it mostly ice that has moved off the main Antarctic mass of continental ice? Finally, there is this statement:
The Wilkins Ice Shelf “. . . had been stable for most of the last century
before it began retreating in the 1990s”, the statement said.
I don’t see the connection between “retreating”, which is a poorly chosen word anyway, and breaking up. As ice moves (or grows on) open water it is exposed to forces that will lead to its demise. There is just enough information in this story to make it sound “bad” and not enough clarity to explain what is happening.
Nothing new with that, I guess. Misspelling of “Fahrenheit” in original.

Robert Wood
April 4, 2009 7:42 am

Regarding the Catlin expedition, I would have thought they’d want to arrive at the North in Late September, when the ice would be at it’s smallest.

Editor
April 4, 2009 7:52 am

Sam (05:55:31) :

Using a bit more than 3 years of data to generate a 10 year and a 100 year cooling rate? Statements like this is why the skeptic (aka realist) side gets labeled as weather watchers.

Did you stop reading early? Note the first sentence of the next paragraph:

Google’s linest() function shows that since the beginning of 2005, Arctic temperatures have been cooling at a rate of 1.8 degrees C per decade, or 18 degrees C per century. …
That short term trend isn’t meaningful, except in the context of the Catlin Expedition and the cold they are experiencing.

You might want to check your math, too. Hint – it’s 2009! 🙂

“Climatological Cassandras”? I like it! Had to look her up though.
http://www.loggia.com/myth/cassandra.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra

John F. Hultquist
April 4, 2009 7:53 am

More interesting O/T news:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,512428,00.html
Unusually Quiet Sun Means Less Trouble for Earth
Includes this statement: “Scientists don’t know why it happens, but “for humankind it’s probably a good thing,” said David Hathaway, chief solar physicist at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala.”
So correlation is not causation and if you are only thinking of GPS units and satellites, okay; but this could be the biggest boneheaded statement of the century. Notice, I hedged there!

1 2 3 5
Verified by MonsterInsights