Guest Post by Steven Goddard
As reported by Anthony, RSS satellite temperature data is out for March. And as the Catlin adventurers have discovered, it has been “stupidly cold” in the Arctic. March was the second consecutive month of below normal Arctic temperatures, and the continuation of a four year cooling trend – as seen below. Google’s linest() function shows that since the beginning of 2005, Arctic temperatures have been cooling at a rate of 1.8 degrees C per decade, or 18C per century ( see comments). Also note that Arctic monthly temperature anomaly now is about three degrees lower than in January, 1981.
That short term trend isn’t meaningful, except in the context of the Catlin Expedition and the cold they are experiencing.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pj0h2MODqj3gAmFVOnSFEWQ
Note in the graph below, the huge drop in temperatures since the Catlin expedition started two months ago. Is this another example of The Gore Effect? Or, perhaps it is the “observer effect‘? Humor aside, the graph below tells the story of the cold the Catlin Expedition must be experiencing.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pj0h2MODqj3gAmFVOnSFEWQ
This cooling is reflected in increasing amounts of winter ice since 2005. Not surprisingly, as the temperature gets colder, the amount of ice increases.

http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/seaice/extent/AMSRE_Sea_Ice_Extent.png
Below is a longer term view of Arctic temperatures, as measured by Dr. Hansen’s GISS at Godthab, Greenland. The warmest years were the 1920s through 1940s.
How long before we start seeing stories like this one from Time Magazine again?
Another Ice Age?
Monday, Jun. 24, 1974
In Africa, drought continues for the sixth consecutive year, adding terribly to the toll of famine victims. During 1972 record rains in parts of the U.S., Pakistan and Japan caused some of the worst flooding in centuries. In Canada’s wheat belt, a particularly chilly and rainy spring has delayed planting and may well bring a disappointingly small harvest. Rainy Britain, on the other hand, has suffered from uncharacteristic dry spells the past few springs. A series of unusually cold winters has gripped the American Far West, while New England and northern Europe have recently experienced the mildest winters within anyone’s recollection.
As they review the bizarre and unpredictable weather pattern of the past several years, a growing number of scientists are beginning to suspect that many seemingly contradictory meteorological fluctuations are actually part of a global climatic upheaval. However widely the weather varies from place to place and time to time, when meteorologists take an average of temperatures around the globe they find that the atmosphere has been growing gradually cooler for the past three decades. The trend shows no indication of reversing. Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age.
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it’s only a hundred billion. It’s less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.
UPDATE: In response to questions in comments, Steve Goddard located this graph from the Danish Meteorological Institute.

Calculation of the Arctic Mean TemperatureThe daily mean temperature of the Arctic area north of the 80th northern parallel is estimated from the average of the 00z and 12z analysis for all model grid points inside that area. The ERA40 reanalysis data set from ECMWF, has been applied to calculate daily mean temperatures for the period from 1958 to 2002, from 2002 to 2006 data from the global NWP model T511 is used and from 2006 to present the T799 model data are used.
The ERA40 reanalysis data, has been applied to calculation of daily climate values that are plotted along with the daily analysis values in all plots. The data used to determine climate values is the full ERA40 data set, from 1958 to 2002.
So it is a model, not an observation.
@ur momisugly Mike.
Yes. You know what Robert ‘Frost’ had to say about the end of the world:
that what he knows of ‘hate’ . . . Ice would suffice.
And yes. It’s ‘desire’ that he equates with heat/fire.
Cold bad. Warm good. Period 😉
(I don’t think the poet intended his words as counters to global warming hysteria, but hey! the gloves are off)
Jimb et al. perhaps you could start with a trend which is significant. 4 weeks or 4 years ending in a solar minimum and La Nina is a data troll. There is a reason why this stuff never appears in science journals – and only on blogs. It’s not science.
Christian Bultmann (20:17:30) :
“Having seen the BBC show Top Gear (Polar Special) where they drive with a truck to the north pole and following the Catlin Arctic Survey with there resupply flights and what have you.
I’m wondering who will have the smaller carbon footprint reaching the north pole.
One thing is for sure the Top Gear team was much better prepared for the trip.”
Top Gear drove to the 1996 magnetic pole, which is around a thousand miles short of the “north pole” Catlin is aiming for. A comparison of carbon footprints or anything else can’t be made of the Top Gear and Catlin trips.
But I estimate if all went according to plan with no additional trips to resupply, that just the fuel for the Twin Otter trips will be at minimum 5000 gallons. I’d call that about a size 15 footprint for a 1000 km jaunt.
In comparison though with a 2000km journey in a truck (1000 both ways and no air support) that got say 10 km per gallon using 200 gallons, Top Gear would win hands down.
http://www.catlinarcticsurvey.com/route_globe.aspx
http://www.catlinarcticsurvey.com/assets/downloads/RouteMap.pdf
http://polar.nrcan.gc.ca/about/manual/ch1/2_e.php
According to NSIDC the artic warmer this winter.
http://nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/20090406_Figure4.png
Steve G scaremongering again ! 😉
Did Mr George Wills ever get proven right about reaching the 1979- average as Steve claimed would soon happen?
Nope.
Regards
Andy
http://www.catlinarcticsurvey.com/route_globe.aspx
I wondered why this route was chosen… now I know…
http://nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/20090406_Figure5.png
I wonder if it’s working out like they expected… I don’t think so. Too bad they won’t man up and share the data…
ScienceDaily (Apr. 6, 2009) — The latest data from NASA and the University of Colorado at Boulder’s National Snow and Ice Data Center show the continuation of a decade-long trend of shrinking sea ice extent in the Arctic, including new evidence for thinning ice as well.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090406132602.htm
[snip, way off topic, way too political]