Introducing the WUWT Great Lakes Ice Reference Page

NOAA Great Lakes Surface Environment Analysis (GLSEA) – Click the pic to view full size image

Image Credit: NOAA Great Lakes Surface Environment Analysis (GLSEA)

Great Lakes Ice Cover reached 91.8% yesterday, after Wednesday’s coverage of 91% made 2014 the second highest maximum on record. Great Lakes Ice Cover is well within striking distance of the highest maximum on record of 94.7% set in 1979. Coming on the heels of last week’s second highest Southern Sea Ice Area minimum on record, and The Pause in Earth’s temperature reaching 17 years last year, the signs of Earth’s “Rapidly Accelerating” Global Warming abound…

For those of you who like to watch Global Warming not happening, in real time, we are pleased to introduce WUWT’s newest addition, the WUWT Great Lakes Ice Reference Page. The Great Lakes Ice Page offers real-time graphs and graphics on Great Lakes Ice Cover, Air Temperature, Sea Temperature, Cloud Cover, Wind and Waves, as well as a section of more focused graphs and graphics for each of the individual Great Lakes.

In addition to the WUWT Great Lakes Ice Reference Page. if you have not had the opportunity to review some our other WUWT Reference Pages, they are highly recommended:

Please note that WUWT cannot vouch for the accuracy of the data within the Reference Pages, as WUWT is simply an aggregator. All of the data is linked from third party sources. If you have doubts about the accuracy of any of the graphs on the WUWT Reference Pages, or have any suggested additions or improvements to any of the pages, please let us know in comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

91 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Westhaver
March 6, 2014 12:10 pm

Very smart. I was using the few links provided prior this reference page to fiddle with the Great Lakes Ice Products…. Now shazzam… all here!.
Very clever of you and timely. Now I know what you’ve been up to.
One thing. An ice cover total calculator is absent and each of the lake’s discrete plots don’t report an hourly value so I can’t do the sums myself… hourly. Sounds like job for Willis. ie image processing, pixel counting. Don’t get me wrong. Great page. More of a complaint about the source data.

Paul Westhaver
March 6, 2014 12:12 pm

A second additional thought is this would be a good place for media to get a good summary all in one place.

Janice Moore
March 6, 2014 12:19 pm

Thank you, so much, Just the Facts, for your mighty efforts to get the truth out there! You are a one-man or one-woman climate truth army. YOU ROCK!
Gratefully,
Janice

Gail Combs
March 6, 2014 12:29 pm

Thank, Just the Facts,
You satisfied the curiosity bone. {:>)

Liz
March 6, 2014 12:47 pm

Thanks for the page – it’s nice to scroll down vs clicking on multiple pages to get the info.
Paul – in looking at the source data, it seems that the lake pages are updated at 0, 6, 12, 18 hours (GMT). The gray-scale summary page seems to be produced once a day. For example, the 3/5 summary showing all of the lakes is noted as being as of 3/5 at 18:00 GMT. But, the fine print states that it was updated on 3/6 at 00:33:17GMT.
I haven’t been able to find anything that we can use to estimate the interim numbers. But, the new number for ice coverage should be larger, since the Ontario coverage has increased from 39.5% on 3/5 18:00GMT to 49.9% coverage as of 3/6 18:00 GMT. All of the other lakes had minor increases of .1 – .7%.
I’m a Michigander by birth but living in the warmer south. Just have to worry about twisters and earthquakes!

spdrdr
March 6, 2014 12:51 pm

Why is the water temperature 28 degrees Celsius in the open areas?

Pete
March 6, 2014 1:00 pm

As a matter of interest, does anyone know why Lake Ontario isn’t iced over like the other Great Lakes?
Thanks,
Pete

Alan Robertson
March 6, 2014 1:04 pm

Paul Westhaver says:
March 6, 2014 at 12:12 pm
A second additional thought is this would be a good place for media to get a good summary all in one place.
_____________________
Have you noticed any indication that “the media” would be the least bit interested?

Alan Robertson
March 6, 2014 1:06 pm

Liz says:
March 6, 2014 at 12:47 pm
I’m a Michigander by birth but living in the warmer south. Just have to worry about twisters and earthquakes!
______________________
Sounds like you might be a resident of the great state of Oklahoma.

Ed
March 6, 2014 1:17 pm

The Canadians have a great data set also in Environmental Canada even tracks ice thickness

Jim Bo
March 6, 2014 1:24 pm

You can always rely upon AP to make a warm silk purse from a frigid sow’s ear. If the subject of possible record ice cover is (cough) “inconvenient”, change it to a discussion of “water levels”…

Snow, ice cover will boost Great Lakes levels
By JOHN FLESHER
AP Environmental Writer
Mar 5, 11:07 PM EST
[snip]
Great Lakes levels dropped sharply in the late 1990s and have remained mostly below normal since. Scientists blame a warming climate, which promotes evaporation and limits ice cover, and occasional dry spells.

CRS, DrPH
March 6, 2014 1:25 pm

Thanks, Anthony! As a resident of the Chicago area (and avid ice-fisherman), I’ve long held an interest in how our lakes behave. This winter has been a doozy….Coast Guard ice-breakers have been extremely busy, breaking ice for commercial shipping vessels.
http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/watch-coast-guard-ice-breakers-work-to-keep-great-lakes-shipping-channels-open/
The ice cover is good news for these aquatic systems, as it is preventing evaporation and allowing the lakes to build up some liquid capacity. The heavy snow cover we share in this area will be a blessing to regional farmers, who have dealt with a rather crushing drought for a season or so.

u.k.(us)
March 6, 2014 1:29 pm

There is a fun website that I’ve been following for years, here:
http://duluthshippingnews.com/
They are very proud of their port (as they should be).
I check it every day.
It’s at the west end of Lake Superior.

Steve from Rockwood
March 6, 2014 1:29 pm

Awesome!

Steve from Rockwood
March 6, 2014 1:35 pm

@Pete.
The reasons why Lake Ontario doesn’t freeze over are varied and speculative.
1. It is the last Great Lake in the chain;
2. It has a lower elevation compared to the other lakes;
3. Niagara Falls empties into it (the largest volume falls in the world);
4. Lots of cities on the lake (Hamilton, Toronto, Buffalo) so perhaps some human footprint;
5. It’s a deep lake with a low surface area to volume ratio – so harder to cool / warm.

James the Elder
March 6, 2014 1:52 pm

spdrdr says:
March 6, 2014 at 12:51 pm
Why is the water temperature 28 degrees Celsius in the open areas?
Well, since we know it’s not, it must be +1-2C

Steve C
March 6, 2014 1:58 pm

Thank you, JTF, for “yet another” piece of good work, and to Our Host for providing the page to put it on. This site is probably the best aggregator of hard climate info there is as a result, and very much appreciated. Kudos to you both.

Doug Huffman
March 6, 2014 2:05 pm

I’ve followed lysimeter/pan evaporator issues for some time. It is conventional wisdom that ~30% of loss from Lake Michigan is due to evaporation. I find that number amazing.
Here are the web cams nearest my home –
http://www.wisferry.com/web-cam/#camera1
http://www.wisferry.com/web-cam/#camera2
http://www.wisferry.com/web-cam/#camera3

March 6, 2014 2:06 pm

I am sure this is all of great interest to North American readers, but be wary of accusations of cherry-picking which events you cover. What would you write if SkS started regular updates on a particular heatwave somewhere in the world?

Mohatdebos
March 6, 2014 2:12 pm

A good article in the Detroit News http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140305/METRO06/303050105/0/METRO06/Lake-Superior-within-reach-historic-average-water-levels-Corps-projects
on how Lake Superior is within reach of its historical water levels, but no mention of the fact that alarmists had been prophesying the death of the Great Lakes because of global warming.

Alan Robertson
March 6, 2014 2:14 pm

Thanks for this great addition to WUWT’s handy reference pages.

Doug Huffman
March 6, 2014 2:15 pm

Other data shows Lake Michigan surface water temperatures ~32°F Image date 2/22/2014
http://www.coastwatch.msu.edu/michigan/m1.html

Gail Combs
March 6, 2014 2:15 pm

Jonathan Abbott says:
March 6, 2014 at 2:06 pm
I am sure this is all of great interest to North American readers, but be wary of accusations of cherry-picking which events you cover….
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Don’t worry, the Propaganda outlets News media and others cover all the hyperventilating over any warm event or any drought or flooding or storminess that can possibly be connected to GoreBull Warming. Therefore it is not necessary for A.W. to cover those events although he often does.
What A.W. is doing is covering the stuff that is NOT readily available.

RACookPE1978
Editor
March 6, 2014 2:20 pm

Doug Huffman says:
March 6, 2014 at 2:05 pm
I’ve followed lysimeter/pan evaporator issues for some time. It is conventional wisdom that ~30% of loss from Lake Michigan is due to evaporation. I find that number amazing.

Good!
If you do follow those pans, what is your best estimate of the “h” factor for the heat flow equivalent resistance from a surface (both water and ice!) at a near-zero temperature surface to a arctic-like air mass flowing over that surface?
I have pressure, air temperature, and air dew temperature (wet bulb) data available, but would prefer you verify the (often-conflicting) equations I find in the literature.

1 2 3 4