![Posts by Hannah Hickey screenshot_wave_graph[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/screenshot_wave_graph1.jpg?w=640&resize=640%2C358)
Waves breaking over sandy beaches are captured in countless tourist photos. But enormous waves breaking deep in the ocean are seldom seen, although they play a crucial role in long-term climate cycles.
A University of Washington study for the first time recorded such a wave breaking in a key bottleneck for circulation in the world’s largest ocean. The study was published online this month in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.
The deep ocean is thought of as dark, cold and still. While this is mostly true, huge waves form between layers of water of different density. These skyscraper-tall waves transport heat, energy, carbon and nutrients around the globe. Where and how they break is important for the planet’s climate.
“Climate models are really sensitive not only to how much turbulence there is in the deep ocean, but to where it is,” said lead author Matthew Alford, an oceanographer in the UW Applied Physics Laboratory. He led the expedition to the Samoan Passage, a narrow channel in the South Pacific Ocean that funnels water flowing from Antarctica.
“The primary importance of understanding deep-ocean turbulence is to get the climate models right on long timescales,” Alford said.
Dense water in Antarctica sinks to the deep Pacific, where it eventually surges through a 25-mile gap in the submarine landscape northeast of Samoa.
“Basically the entire South Pacific flow is blocked by this huge submarine ridge,” Alford said. “The amount of water that’s trying to get northward through this gap is just tremendous – 6 million cubic meters of water per second, or about 35 Amazon Rivers.”
In the 1990s, a major expedition measured these currents through the Samoan Passage. The scientists inferred that a lot of mixing must also happen there, but couldn’t measure it.
In the summer of 2012 the UW team embarked on a seven-week cruise to track the 800-foot-high waves that form atop the flow, 3 miles below the ocean’s surface. Their measurements show these giant waves do break, producing mixing 1,000 to 10,000 times that of the surrounding slow-moving water.
“Oceanographers used to talk about the so-called ‘dark mixing’ problem, where they knew that there should be a certain amount of turbulence in the deep ocean, and yet every time they made a measurement they observed a tenth of that,” Alford said. “We found there’s loads and loads of turbulence in the Samoan Passage, and detailed measurements show it’s due to breaking waves.”
It turns out layers of water flowing over two consecutive ridges form a lee wave, like those in air that passes over mountains. These waves become unstable and turbulent, and break. Thus the deepest water, the densest in the world, mixes with upper layers and disappears.
This mixing helps explain why dense, cold water doesn’t permanently pool at the bottom of the ocean and instead rises as part of a global conveyor-belt circulation pattern.
The Samoan Passage is important because it mixes so much water, but similar processes happen in other places, Alford said. Better knowledge of deep-ocean mixing could help simulate global currents and place instruments to track any changes.
On a lighter note: Could an intrepid surfer ride these killer deep-sea waves?
“It would be really boring,” admitted Alford, who is a surfer. “The waves can take an hour to break, and I think most surfers are not going to wait that long for one wave.”
In fact, even making the measurements was painstaking work. Instruments took 1.5 hours to lower to the seafloor, and the ship traveled at only a half knot, slower than a person walking, during the 30-hour casts. New technology let the scientists measure turbulence directly and make measurements from instruments lowered more than 3 miles off the side of the ship.
The researchers left instruments recording long-term measurements. The team will do another 40-day cruise in January to collect those instruments and map currents flowing through various gaps in the intricate channel.
Co-authors of the paper are James Girton, Gunnar Voet and John Mickett at the UW Applied Physics Lab; Glenn Carter at the University of Hawaii; and Jody Klymak at the University of Victoria. The research was funded by the National Science Foundation.
###
- Visit the Wavechasers website
- Watch the authors conduct research in Samoa
- Read the new research paper
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I understand. Global warming happens nowhere in particular and to nobody specifically, via invisible waves and a mechanism mostly impossible to follow that acts in regions of the globe with minimal or zero link to anything else.
Just like the fairies.
Dang it! After all words telling us how well they understood all this, they come along and tell us about the previously unmentioned “so-called ‘dark mixing’ problem”, and then assure us they have now sorted it out.
Why don’t I feel re-assured?
This is so underwhelming its untrue. In one very small part of one very large ocean there’s measurable turbulence?
Stick to that theory and it’s science. Anything further is pure conjecture.
I did some back of envelop figures some time back on the time scale of deep ocean tides.
This seems to be a similar thing.
There is a density difference between the surface mixed layer and the deeper, cooler and more saline waters. That is subject to the same lunar / solar gravity differential that is the main cause for surface tidal patterns, except that the density difference is about 1000 less than the air/water interface. Thus major tides will 1000 times slower.
The puts variations of the order of years. Is this not a likely explanation for the origin of El Nino cycles?
To above objections, this paper just deals with one local site but it does establish that this deep interface has waves analogous to those of the ocean surface. If there are wave there will also be tides. If the waves are 300 ft now high are the tides.
Deep, slow basin wide tidal movements right across that Pacific (and other major basins) could easily explain El Nino events and seems more convincing that all the usual talk about “sloshing” back and forth due to winds.
There is a NOAA (or NASA) animation of the thermocline in the Pacific and it does just this.
The mention of 12h tides above is just to get the timescale of how such an interface would respond. It will be far too slow to be affected by the classic 24h variations in tidal forces. However, longer cycles like the 4.43y passage of the lunar perigree precession across the equator may be able to create tidal patterns in this slow moving interface.
El Nino is decribed as 3 to 5 year pseudo cycles. Modulate 4.43 years with something like 28 years and you get just that.
And you can find exactly that happening in trade wind and other climate data.
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=283
What are the chances that GRL doesn’t know how to define turbulent mixing from any other type of mixing? Why can’t it be stream instability?
In addition, for there to be an instability, there must be an energetic advantage to the unstable flow. What is it in this case? Also, if you run a large current through a small-ish channel, you are going to do mechanical work, at least on the boundaries. Is there any contribution from mechanical work here?
This is surface long period wave (simulated from 1988) in Pacific.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/joseph.barsugli/anim.html
“The relatively small motions in sea level shown here (10 – 20 centimeters) are indicative of much larger motions in the opposite direction in the depth of the thermocline below the surface.”
Thermocline tide.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/joseph.barsugli/enso_anim_jjb2.html
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/joseph.barsugli/mov_tao.gif
I’ve always wondered about the possibility of such deep-sea waves, for water seemingly would be injected into the thermohaline circulation in an irregular manner, almost like a heart-beat, and that might create waves.
During the summer phase, as ice melts, the melt-water is relatively fresh. It creates a “lens” of more brackish sea-water atop the Arctic Sea. (Some Alarmists speak of a “lens of fresh water,” but the water is still too salty to drink, and even at its least salty it still needs to get down to around -1.7 c to freeze.) This water seemingly does not go down deep and add to thermohaline circulation.
During the refreeze phase, as ice forms, salt is extracted. This process is interesting in and of itself, with little drops of brine melting their way down through the ice. Although “baby ice” retains a little more salt than “multi-year ice,” most salt is removed right at the start, and even “baby ice” is relatively fresh. The brine that is removed can be well below the freezing point of salt water, and is very dense. This water seemingly would sink down and add to the thermohaline circulation.
These injections ought occur in an alternating manner, matching the refreeze first in the Arctic, and then in the Antarctic. The question then becomes, would they create waves, or differences in pressure (even though water is non-compressible?) And, if such waves are created, what would happen when such a wave ran up against a continental shelf, such as the coast of Peru where we all watch for signs of cold up-welling that adds to a La Nina? (I’m not saying it would be a major effect, as great as trade winds, but….could it mess up delicate calculations, and trigger changes in the manner a pebble triggers an avalanche?)
I’m glad to see a little funding is doing some actual exploration of the mysterious deeps. Hansen wasted too much on mere models, and even more messing up past records with “adjustments.”
I ventured some thoughts about these ideas two Septembers ago, hoping to stimulate WUWT discussion. If you can overlook a dunderheaded mistake I made, (using the word “pneumatic” when I meant “hydraulic,”) it is a start to a discussion I think it would be interesting to continue.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/18/a-laymans-paper-pneumatic-effects-on-thermohaline-flow/
This raises the exciting prospect of submarine (adjective) submarine (noun) surfing.
If anybody knows anything about this it will be the world submarine (noun) operators, and they will tell you nothing.
“…. or about 35 Amazon Rivers.”
How much is that in SI Units i.e. Olympic swimming pools?
What percent of the world’s ocean mixing does this area represent? They have found one spot where there are actual measurements of the mixing (yay! Observations!). How many more places do they need to find to add up to a global effect on climate?
No, there is no “missing heat” hiding in the oceans, leaping out to cause “extreme weather” then running away and hiding again. Neither LWIR or heated air can significantly effect the cooling rate of liquid water let alone heat it. The gas/liquid interface at the ocean surface is a special condition. Calculating the effect of incident LWIR using the emissivity figures for liquid water is one of the critical mistakes in climate pseudo science. This can be demonstrated by the following simple experiment –
Experiment 1. Effect of incident LWIR on liquid water that is free to evaporatively cool.
Incident LWIR can slow the cooling rate of materials. Climate scientists claim that DWLWIR has the same effect over oceans as it does over land, and this is shown in many Trenberthian energy budget cartoons. Does the ocean respond to DWLWIR the same way as land?
– Build two water proof EPS foam cubes 150mm on a side and open at the top.
– Position a 100mm square aluminium water block as LWIR source 25mm above each cube.
– Position two small computer fans to blow a very light breeze between the foam cube and the water blocks.
– Insert a probe thermometer with 0.1C resolution through the side of each cube 25mm below the top.
– Continuously run 80C water through one water block and 1C water through the other.
– Fill both EPS foam cubes to the top with 40C water an allow to cool for 30 min while recording temperatures.
– Repeat the experiment with a thin LDPE film on the surface of the water in each cube to prevent evaporative cooling. Now incident LWIR can slow the cooling of the water sample under the 80C aluminium water block.
Here is an early variant of this experiment in which IR from cooling water samples was reflected back to the water surface – http://i47.tinypic.com/694203.jpg
This type of wave has been suggested as a plausible explanation for many of the Loch Ness monster sightings. Loch Ness is long, and very deep, and waves traveling along the thermocline can travel up and down it’s length for a long time after the initial event that triggered them.
RE: Greg Goodman says:
September 11, 2013 at 2:25 am
Wow! What a terrific animation! True, it is a “model,” but it shows some thinking is going on. Thanks for sharing it.
yeah, right so these waves mix the waters, including the missing heat and the ARGO buoys cannot detect it????
I do not doubt the undersea turbulence, but the rest?
The point about deep sea diving ‘missing heat’ is simple. What goes in must come out and has always been with us. Now let’s look back at the recent warming.
It must bumpy drive for submarine ,,,,
@- Konrad
No, there is no “missing heat” hiding in the oceans, leaping out to cause “extreme weather” then running away and hiding again.
If there is no additional heat in the oceans that could have caused thermal expansion then ALL the sea level rise over the last 15 years would have to be explained by the melting of land based ice and the extraction of water from deep aquifers being fed back to the oceans.
Direct observations do not support enough melting or ocean drainage of aquifers to explain the observed rise in sea level. Thermal expansion, indicating deep heating of the oceans is an unavoidable deduction.
Caleb would the linkage between AO index and tropical atm CO2 help your WHADUP plan;
http://climategrog.wordpress.com/?attachment_id=259
There is heat at the bottom of the ocean.From underwater volcanoes.
WJohn says:
September 11, 2013 at 2:29 am
This raises the exciting prospect of submarine (adjective) submarine (noun) surfing.
If anybody knows anything about this it will be the world submarine (noun) operators, and they will tell you nothing.
Been there, done that. This technique was used by german U-boats transiting Gibraltar Sound in WW 2.
tty “Been there, done that. This technique was used by german U-boats transiting Gibraltar Sound in WW 2.”
Wouldn’t that be gliding out on the tide rather than surfing the thermocline?
This is all very convenient, isn’t it?
izen:
In your post at September 11, 2013 at 3:19 am
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/09/11/breaking-deep-sea-waves-reveal-a-potential-mechanism-for-global-ocean-mixing/#comment-1414056
you say
NO! That is a falsehood.
The unavoidable reality is that there are no measurements with sufficient accuracy to support your assertion.
Richard
@Anthony
>The study was published online this month
>in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/grl.50684/abstract
Yes, “online” but seems to be blocked by a paywall. Am I missing a public, free access link?
My question is: Did the UW team actually observe (and record) these 800 foot waves, or did they merely infer their existence by sampling the turbulent mixing products?
Don’t recall ever seeing anything approaching ‘monster waves’ like this in NOAA’s Pacific wave and wind forecasts, which I assume are based partly on extrapolations of observations:
http://www.opc.ncep.noaa.gov/shtml/P_48hrwind_wave.gif
So color me slightly confused/skeptical on what this report is really telling us.
😐