'What global warming really looks like' – Michael Oppenheimer FAIL

Well, I warned everybody yesterday. That briefing was put together by Climate Nexus, an advocacy and communications group. An accompanying report on heat waves and climate change was released simultaneously at climatecommunication.org

The usual suspects put that document together. See below.

Expert Reviewers:

Now with a telephone press conference, Climate Nexus seer Michael Oppenheimer says he knows “what global warming looks like”, and it apparently is a hazy yellow-orange.

“It looks like heat, it looks like fires, it looks like this kind of environmental disaster… this provides vivid images of what we can expect to see more of in the future.”

In Colorado, wildfires that have raged for weeks have killed four people, displaced thousands and destroyed hundreds of homes.

Because winter snowpack was lighter than usual and melted sooner, fire season started earlier in the US, with wildfires out of control in Colorado, Montana and Utah.

The high temperatures that are helping drive these fires are consistent with projections by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which said this kind of extreme heat, with little cooling overnight, is one kind of damaging impact of global warming.

Others include more severe storms, floods and droughts, Oppenheimer said.

The stage was set for these fires when winter snowpack was lighter than usual, said Steven Running, a forest ecologist at the University of Montana.

Full article here h/t to reader Alwyn Poole.

=============================================================

I wonder, did global warming look like this same yellow-orange hazy hellfire back in 1988 before Jim Hansen turned it into a cause?

Above – The Fires at Yellowstone National Park, 1988 when CO2 was at the “safe level” of approximately 350 parts per million according to Dr. James Hansen in this non peer reviewed declaration.  Image from yellowstonecountry.org

The NPS talks about fire history of the region in the context on 1988:

Such wildfires occurred across much of the ecosystem in the 1700s. But that, of course, was prior to the arrival of European explorers, to the designation of the park, and the pattern established by its early caretakers to battle all blazes in the belief that fire suppression was good stewardship. Throughout much of the 20th century, park managers and visitors alike have continued to view fire as a destructive force, one to be mastered, or at least tempered to a tamer, more controlled entity. By the 1940s, ecologists recognized that fire was a primary agent of change in many ecosystems, including the arid mountainous western United States. In the 1950s and 1960s, national parks and forests began to experiment with controlled burns, and by the 1970s Yellowstone and other parks had instituted a natural fire management plan to allow the process of lightning-caused fire to continue influencing wildland succession.

We are living in the age of crazy.

UPDATE: Here is some important data to counter these crazy claims. From SOS Forests who writes:

The founder and purveyor of Watts Up With That, the premier climate realist website and blog (twice the winner of the Best Science Blog), the estimable Anthony Watts, has posted some of our fire graphs [here].

But they are outdated (my fault). Here are the latest:

Data are from the National Interagency Fire Center.

There are some evident trends.

1. Total acres burned has increased from the 1960’s to this Century, from an average of 4.6 million acres per year to 6.8 million acres per year.

2. Average acres per fire has also increased, from a low in the 1970’s of 21 acres per fire to 83 acres per fire in this Century.

3. Number of fires per year has decreased from a high (1975-1984) of nearly 190,000 fires per year to 83,000 fires per year this Century.

Fewer but larger fires this Century, and more acres burned in total.

To me this suggests a legacy of poor fuel management rather than “global warming”.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

130 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 28, 2012 5:23 pm

The EPA is doing in putting its support behind global warming alarmism–empowering overreaching Leftists to take full advantage of credulous and thoughtless dimwits. The EPA is hiding the truth, hiding the decline, hiding the immorality and the harm to the public and to the culture and to all the kids in the dropout factories whose futures are being wiped out.
http://evilincandescentbulb.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/lies-damn-lies-and-the-epa/

A. Scott
June 28, 2012 5:29 pm

We passed simply the “age of crazy” a long time ago.
We now live in full on “batshit crazy” times …

LearDog
June 28, 2012 5:31 pm

And they wonder why they’re losing credibility with the public…. These people are (at best) delusional. Useful idiots..?

Occam's Blunt Razor
June 28, 2012 5:34 pm

Mate, that looks like summer in Australia – and we normally have these massive Sikorski Sky Crane Helitankers flying around that we lease from somewhere – the US of A I think.

Editor
June 28, 2012 5:36 pm

Oh good. fire fighters refer to New England as the “Asbestos Forest” because we usually don’t get dry enough for serious fires. It looks like we won’t be seeing global warming here. 🙂

Philip Bradley
June 28, 2012 5:36 pm

The most destructive forest fire ever recorded (in the world) was in 1871 in Wisconsin. 1200 people died.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peshtigo_Fire
In fact, the top 5 worst forest fires in terms of loss of life are all pre-1920 and all in N America.

SteveSadlov
June 28, 2012 5:40 pm

Broad brush … droughtyness in the Western US always looks like Global Cooling to me.
La Nina (at least up until recently) – check.
Negative PDO – check.
Weak solar cycle – check.
Any questions?

Interstellar Bill
June 28, 2012 5:40 pm

If the Colorado fires are because of global warming, which Obama says he wants to fight, then why did he cut back the tanker-plane fleet? Answer: isn’t Colorado leaning Republican?

R. Shearer
June 28, 2012 5:52 pm

Are people any more crazy today, than say a couple of hundred years ago when the most commonly used medical treatment was blood-letting?
By the way, there has been at least a brief respite in the Colorado heat. It’s currently 83F with scattered showers.

Pamela Gray
June 28, 2012 5:53 pm

Oregon was ablaze at the turn of the 20th century. We don’t come close to what it used to be. This “We are all going to burn!” is a prime example of drumming up scary stories to convince weak minded folks to let their pockets be picked on a global scale.
Given the recent Supreme Court decisions in the US, if we the people don’t take back control over our own destiny, we are in for worse than the scary story this post highlights.

Bob in Castlemaine
June 28, 2012 5:57 pm

“In Melbourne the day opened with a scorching north wind and an unclouded sky. Under the influence of the fierce sirocco the city was soon enveloped in blinding dust, and by 11 o’clock the thermometer marked 117 degrees ( 47.2 Celsius ) in the shade.
By midday, rolling volumes of smoke began to converge on the city, and outdoor life became intolerable. The streets were almost deserted, a dull sense of suffocation oppressed even those who cowered in the coolest recesses of their homes, and anxiously asked what it meant. Fortunately no fires broke out near the city, for had it once done so, in all probability the whole place would have fallen.
With sunset came a change of wind to the south, and anxious crowds gathered towards nightfall on the summits of Batman’s Hill and the Flagstaff Reserve to note with awe and wonder the red glare that marked the Dandenong Ranges and illuminated the whole of the northern horizon.
The change of wind relieved them from all fear for the city, but it was not until two or three days later that the extent of the devastation became even approximately known.“

This is a passage from H. G. Turner’s “History of the Colony of Victoria “.
The devastating fires Turner refers to are the Black Thursday fires which took place in 1851, on 6 February and subsequent days. The extent of land burned, 5 million hectares, has not come anywhere near being equaled by any other Victorian bushfire event since European settlement. Victoria also suffered significant flooding events during that same year.

David McKeever
June 28, 2012 6:01 pm

Mr. Watts, it is reaching the point where more people are reading the cagw point of view on here than through their press releases. You are (unintentionally) propagandizing the alarmist position, and you have been doing this since the Heartland forgery incident. I liked it better when the website was more purely focused on the science.

Bob in Castlemaine
June 28, 2012 6:03 pm

Link in my above post corrected:
http://home.iprimus.com.au/foo7/fire1851.html

Johnny Terawatt
June 28, 2012 6:09 pm

Never let a good crisis go to waste.

Gerry Parker
June 28, 2012 6:13 pm

Regular controlled burns would make a big difference too (under proper moist conditions), but the smokey bear mentality that all fires are bad would have to be overcome. Alas, I regret this requires a higher thought process than the masses have been able to achieve.
Gerry

Lady Life Grows
June 28, 2012 6:27 pm

Oh come on, Anthony. The fires are disasters, aren’t they? Of COURSE they are caused by Global Warming–just like droughts, floods, sea level rises, hurricanes, earthquakes, record heat, record cold, warm winters, cold winters and about 200 other items on that list you are keeping.

Goldie
June 28, 2012 6:51 pm

Couldn’t agree more Anthony – there are just too many confounding factors to link this simply to climate. The Western Australian experience is that 1) there are more fires during school holidays 2) Wildfires are commonly due to changes in fuel control – though the last major one was caused by a fuel control burn that got out of hand and 3) People’s memories are short so after a while without a wildfire, fuel control becomes less important to people.
However, in 1978 there appears to have been a step change in global rainfall, which inevitably will have led to a steady drying out of the environment over time. Some of the rise in acreage could be caused by that. One would still need to make several links to see this as a product of AGW though.

June 28, 2012 6:53 pm

People who have never fought a forest fire should be prohibited from commenting on their cause. We have only spent 100 years fighting and trying to prevent all wildfires. Mom Nature is striking back for our hubris. Does anyone remember Yellowstone 1988?

pat
June 28, 2012 7:01 pm

Rather it is a window into the minds of charlatans.
Colorado has been cooling for decades.
These forests thrived because of increased cooling and rainfall. Like the artificially managed forests in California, often Eucalyptus and non native pines rather than the indigenous oak, these forests are dangerous in summer.

Amino Acids in Meteorites
June 28, 2012 7:05 pm

We can expect to see more forest fires in the future? Wow, no kidding? Thanks Einstein.

Keith Pearson, formerly bikermailman, Anonymous no longer
June 28, 2012 7:07 pm

I was in Jellystone last fall, and signs of the ’88 fires are all over. But there’s tons of new growth in those same areas, as is the design for forested areas. As for the above mentioned controlled burns, they’re doing them from Alaska to New Mexico, but they’re far behind the curve. Good on em for getting started on it though.

Marian
June 28, 2012 7:10 pm

Don’t you just get sick of these Alarmist Opportunists. Turning any event into a GW PR Propaganda Spin.
Had that down here in NZ/OZ during those large bushfires in VIC a few years back.
Bushfires to be more extreme because of GW.
Of course those bushfires were mainly a result of Arson, carelessness and stupid ECO-green laws making it worse. Due to not allowing proper fire breaks around properties, etc. SO GW wasn’t the real cause.

Manfred
June 28, 2012 7:21 pm

ALL scientific evidence supports the opposite, warmer times were greener and wetter.

timc
June 28, 2012 7:28 pm

Alert, be wary of those photographs.
Reuters. Using handouts and what do we see…
http://s1.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/?m=02&d=20120627&t=2&i=623835964&w=&fh=&fw=&ll=700&pl=390&r=CBRE85Q1H4Z00
“A Modular Airborne Firefighting System-equipped C-130 drops fire retardant on a section of the Waldo Canyon fire near Colorado Springs, Colorado on June 26, 2012.”
US Air Force handout mentioning fire retardant, orange water?
If the link works this is the reuters slideshow containing the above and the headline photo at WUWT.
http://www.reuters.com/article/slideshow/idUSBRE85L1DD20120627#a=8
On technical examination that photo looks dodgy. Can’t see a competent camera doing that
with the channels. Compare with the other photos. (look at the RGB values)
Can any of you confirm?

1 2 3 6
Verified by MonsterInsights