BREAKING: An IPCC backchannel ‘cloud’ was apparently established to hide IPCC deliberations from FOIA.

UPDATE: (9:20 PST 10-17) the FOI request has been released, a copy of which is now linked below. This story will remain at the top of WUWT for a day or two. New stories will appear below this one.

CEI has learned of a UN plan recently put in place to hide official  correspondence on non-governmental accounts, which correspondence a federal inspector general has already confirmed are subject to FOIA. This ‘cloud’ serves as a dead-drop of sorts for discussions by U.S. government employees over the next report being produced by the scandal-plagued IPCC, which is funded with millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars.

By Christopher Horner, CEI.org for WUWT

Although this is seedy and unlawful at any time, it also goes in the ‘bad timing’ file. Or it’s good timing, depending on one’s perspective.

Just as a brand new book further exposes the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)(which scam I dissected here, and in more disturbing detail here), and on the heels of the weekend surprise of a 2005 memo showing President Obama’s cooling/warming/population zealot of a ‘science czar’ John Holdren is the kind of guy Mitt Romney turns to to develop his ‘environmental’ policies, we’ve exposed the Obama administration and IPCC have cooperated to subvert U.S. transparency laws, run domestically out of Holdren’s White House office.

With this morning’s Freedom of Information Act request, the explaining they have to do must begin by providing the taxpayer certain records regarding — including but not limited to user name and password — for a backchannel ‘cloud’ established to hide IPCC deliberations from FOIA.

The IPCC, you will recall, is Al Gore’s co-recipient of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. And the host over the years of numerous scandals involving fudged and twisted data, cut-and-pastes from student theses, popular magazine articles and green-group press releases and of course the infamous “hide the decline” in temperatures. This is not just one more scandal, however.

Until the FOI request is posted at CEI.org (later today), here is a snapshot:

CEI has learned of a UN plan recently put in place to hide official  correspondence on non-governmental accounts, which correspondence a federal inspector general has already confirmed are subject to FOIA. This ‘cloud’ serves as a dead-drop of sorts for discussions by U.S. government employees over the next report being produced by the scandal-plagued IPCC, which is funded with millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars.

As our FOIA request details, the UN informed participants that it was motivated by embarrassing releases of earlier discussions (“ClimateGate” key among them), and to circumvent the problem that national government transparency laws were posing the group.

CEI reminds OSTP that this practice was described as “creat[ing] non-governmental accounts for official business”, “using the nongovernmental accounts specifically to avoid creating a record of the communications”, in a recent analogous situation involving lobbyist Jack Abramoff. CEI expects similar congressional and media outrage at this similar practice to evade the applicable record-keeping laws.

This effort has apparently been conducted with participation — thereby direct assistance and enabling — by the Obama White House which, shortly after taking office, seized for Holdren’s office the lead role on IPCC work from the Department of Commerce. The plan to secretly create a FOIA-free zone was then implemented.

This represents politically assisting the IPCC to enable UN, EU and U.S. bureaucrats and political appointees avoid official email channels for specific official work of high public interest, performed on official time and using government computers, away from the prying eyes of increasingly skeptical taxpayers.

CEI also reminds OSTP of a similar, ongoing effort by the administration to claim that records on U.S. government computers belong to the UN IPCC, refusing to produce them under FOIA. This practice was affirmed in a report by the Department of Commerce’s Office of Inspector General earlier this year.

As talks resume next month to forge a successor to the failed Kyoto Protocol, CEI looks forward to OSTP ceasing this unlawful activity, and providing prompt access to the requested records so the taxpayer can know what they, and the IPCC, are up to.

So this morning we requested all relevant records under FOIA, including all records sitting on that server, as they all were provided to U.S. government employees for official purposes. This was filed with OSTP run by controversial ‘science czar” and, we now know, former Mitt Romney ‘climate’ advisor John Holdren. The taxpayer deserves to know about this coordinated effort between OSTP and the IPCC to subvert U.S. law.

Possibly one Republican candidate will call in the next debate for ending US funding of the IPCC, now shown to be actively working (with the Obama White House) to subvert US law. Enough is enough is enough. Possibly Gov. Romney could defend Holdren and the IPCC.

In the meantime, we look for Rep. Henry Waxman’s outrage over Abramoff to prove it was also not political, and come down hard on the practice he so aggressively condemned and pursued, demanding preservation of records, threatening subpoenas, the whole works. With our request, that’s essentially what we’ve done, and we’d appreciate the company. You too, NPR.

Of course, it may not be of interest to the media because it only uncovers unlawful dealings to hide an effort impacting our entire economy, the premise for that “fundamental transformation” of America, with the sleazy lobbying operation being the UN. We’ll wait on OSTP’s response and hope for the best from the Hill and Republican candidates.

===============================================================

UPDATE: The FOI request document:  OSTP_IPCC_Elec_Comm_FOIA1 (PDF 112k)

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

185 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 17, 2011 12:12 am

Chris,
If you look in the climategate mails you will find that Jones planned a meeting with patchy and Tom Stocker to discuss strategies for “handling” FOIA and the IPCC.
like I said back on nov 19, 2009. Follow the FOIA.
Nice work.

October 17, 2011 12:18 am

Remember children, the IPCC has always been very proud to tell people it itself employs very few people, and its work is mostly done by scientists in their own (the taxpayer-funded’s that is) time.

tokyoboy
October 17, 2011 12:32 am

I hope The End is nigh.

October 17, 2011 12:52 am

I get the gist but you need to seriously substantively edit this post. “Get me Rewrite”. Here’s your lede.
“CEI has learned of a UN plan recently put in place to hide official correspondence on non-governmental accounts, which correspondence a federal inspector general has already confirmed are subject to FOIA. This ‘cloud’ serves as a dead-drop of sorts for discussions by U.S. government employees over the next report being produced by the scandal-plagued IPCC, which is funded with millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars.”
Start there.
Slagging assorted Administration figures can wait for several grafs. Your real story is the idea that the IPCC is encouraging the creation of a backchannel in the Cloud. Hit it and hit it again.
REPLY: I’ll add that as a short intro read, thanks, Chris is offline for a few hours – Anthony

UK Sceptic
October 17, 2011 1:06 am

The kind of nefarious, White House dirty deeds that impeachment was designed for…

October 17, 2011 1:20 am

Ever since reading Red Hot Lies, I’ve been an avid followed of Chris Horner and in turn Watts and others. If only other people would actually educate themselves and listen to all this. How can they call skeptics “deniers” when the IPCC hides everything possible and lies at every turn (yet sill never fails to screw up)?

Greg Holmes
October 17, 2011 1:27 am

“Mafia” by another name, but the rewards are bigger.

Steve C
October 17, 2011 1:30 am

The longer we leave this IPCC thing lying around, the worse it stinks – even worse than its unelected, unrepresentative parent the UN. For decency’s sake, it’s way past time that we bury the body and disinfect public life.
Excellent work, Chris, and thanks.

October 17, 2011 1:31 am

On behalf of all us anagram-challenged foreigners outside of the alphabet soup addicted U.S., may I ask please who or what is/are the OSTP?

John DeFayette
October 17, 2011 1:47 am

This is absurd…CEI and its cohorts are invading the privacy of the IPCC knights, inhibiting the salvation of our world. We need to get those IPCC boys and girls some encrypted satellite telephones and fax machines, fast. Better yet, anybody involved in the IPCC should start using little slips of paper delivered by children for all future communications. The mafia uses this last method since it has the distinct advantage of working even while the participants are in prison (hint, hint).

Paul Westhaver
October 17, 2011 2:07 am

Chris,
Are you trying to get yourself shot? Your run the risk of seriously exposing yourself to a pretty unsavory leftist mob with all this fact finding. If I were you I’d hire a food taster and stop appearing in public. Maybe buy some Kevlar long-johns, but by all means do not stop tearing into the IPCC and their nine circles of fraud.
Fabulous work!

Richard Abbott
October 17, 2011 2:23 am

Two questions….
Do Nobel Laurette gongs come with an embossed return address?
Will the largest toll ring out from ObamaGate or ClimateGate?

October 17, 2011 2:31 am

Actually the latest list is 129 scandals long, last updated about 10 months ago. That was my last list.
The scandals are so numerous that I have given up trying to keep track of them all.

Kohl
October 17, 2011 2:32 am

This breathless screaming tabloid approach is not my cup of tea.
I’m with Jay Currie – this just clouds the message.
Nevertheless, the deliberate subversion of national laws by or on behalf of a body which is under the auspices of the UN is just insupportable.
There is no way that the UN can support such a actions, and there is no way that the dollars of taxpayers should go to pay the UN for such actions.
I would also be surprised if such actions were not formally in breach of the UN Charter.

October 17, 2011 2:33 am
FergalR
October 17, 2011 2:57 am

OSTP = White House Office of Science and Technology Policy – John Holdren is director (science czar).

Nick Stokes
October 17, 2011 3:00 am

UK Sceptic says: October 17, 2011 at 1:06 am
“The kind of nefarious, White House dirty deeds that impeachment was designed for…”

Well, in fact the Bush Admin did exactly that – used RNC accounts for Government business on a massive scale. I don’t recall any talk of impeachment over that. And it didn’t seem to violate FOIA,
REPLY: Ah geez Nick, pull your head out of your ass for once. – Anthony

Leon Brozyna
October 17, 2011 3:33 am

memoryvault says:
October 17, 2011 at 1:31 am

On behalf of all us anagram-challenged foreigners outside of the alphabet soup addicted U.S., may I ask please who or what is/are the OSTP?

Office of Science and Technology Policy is part of the White House staff

Baa Humbug
October 17, 2011 3:34 am

So CloudGate I suppose

Kohl
October 17, 2011 3:39 am

UK Sceptic said –
“The kind of nefarious, White House dirty deeds that impeachment was designed for…”
to which Nick Stokes replied –
“Well, in fact the Bush Admin did exactly that – used RNC accounts for Government business on a massive scale. I don’t recall any talk of impeachment over that. And it didn’t seem to violate FOIA”,
Whatever the merits of this debate, it is really entirely peripheral to the central central message.
I take it that the central message concerns the deliberate subversion of the national law of a constituent state by a UN body. I imagine, perhaps somewhat naively, that this would be of great concern to every citizen of the planet.
Officials working for the UN do not hold office by way of any election; they are not in any sense representative of the interests of a constituency; they subsist on tax dollars provided by citizens of the member nations.
Then they had better abide by the Charter to which they owe their position and power! To repeat, the subversion of the laws of a member state by UN officials is insupportable.

Steeptown
October 17, 2011 3:53 am

You can always rely on Nick Stokes to defend the indefensible. Has he not heard that two wrongs don’t make a right?

Ken Harvey
October 17, 2011 4:18 am

I sense that there is a real story here, but it is a pity that it is written in a way that is largely unintelligible to me, and, I suspect, most of my age group. .

Speed
October 17, 2011 4:28 am

<bMemorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies
SUBJECT: Transparency and Open Government
My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.

BARACK OBAMA
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/

Nick Stokes
October 17, 2011 4:28 am

Steeptown says: October 17, 2011 at 3:53 am
“You can always rely on Nick Stokes to defend the indefensible. Has he not heard that two wrongs don’t make a right?”

I don’t think they were equivalent. One was the WH using external accounts for WH business. The other is the IPCC using IPCC accounts for IPCC business.

johnmcguire
October 17, 2011 4:30 am

The real problem in the US is that we have many millions of stupid , greedy people sucking a living off of the rest of the people. By that statement I am not referring to welfare as much as I am to the corporate thieves that infest the body politic. They have sucked fortunes from the tortured taxpayers and are never satisfied. There is only one canidate for election to the office of president of the US that has a record of taking them on and that is Texas representative to congress Ron Paul.

1 2 3 8
Verified by MonsterInsights