URI bubble physicist counts bubbles in the ocean to answer questions about climate, sound, light

From a University of Rhode Island press release
NARRAGANSETT, R.I. – January 21, 2010 – The bubbles in your champagne that appear to jump out of your glass and tickle your nose are exhibiting a behavior quite similar to the tiny bubbles found throughout the world’s oceans, according to bubble physicist Helen Czerski.
But while the champagne bubbles are likely to raise your spirits, those in the ocean can cause clouds to form and affect the climate.
“Bubbles are little packets of gases that rise or fall and can be carried around as if they’re on little conveyor belts,” said Czerski, a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Rhode Island Graduate School of Oceanography. “They carry carbon dioxide and oxygen from the atmosphere down into the ocean, and then when they go back up again they pop and sulfur compounds from marine plants are sent upward, forming particles in the air that lead to the formation of clouds.”
Czerski is studying how to detect and count ocean bubbles of different sizes to help scientists in other disciplines create more accurate models. She said that scientists have found it difficult to judge the effect of bubbles on their data for years and usually have had to add a “fudge factor” to account for them.
“For instance, bubbles ring like bells when they are formed or when sound waves go past them, and if you’re studying sounds traveling through the ocean – like sounds from whales or sonar – bubbles can get in the way of what you’re trying to listen for,” said Czerski, who earned a Ph.D. from Cambridge University before spending a year studying bubbles at Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego and then moving to URI.
“Bubbles also scatter light strongly in the oceans and make things cloudy, so if you’re studying light in the ocean you need to understand bubbles,” she added.
The URI scientist uses an acoustical resonator to detect and count bubbles of different sizes in the water column. The device can detect bubbles from 3 to 170 microns in size, and she is assessing the accuracy and uncertainty in the measurements.
She recently used the resonator to collect bubble data near the Hawaiian Islands and in the Santa Barbara Channel off Southern California. She counts bubbles down to 10 meters deep – most bubbles don’t go down much further than that, she said. The big ones float back to the surface while the smallest ones gets squeezed out by the pressure as they sink.
“Just after a wave breaks, there are loads of bubbles and they’re changing really, really quickly,” Czerski explained. “They’re stretching and squishing and bumping into each other and breaking into smaller bubbles and they’re doing it all too fast for us to see directly. Whenever they break up, each new bubble makes a ‘ping’ sound, and if you hear it you can say something about those new bubbles.”
Czerski said that understanding the physics of bubbles is increasingly important as climate models become more and more refined.
“We need to study bubble distribution and where they go in the water column to understand the exchange of gases that they carry,” she said.
According to Czerski, while carbon dioxide and oxygen get carried into the ocean via bubbles, a chemical compound produced by phytoplankton gets carried out of the ocean via bubbles.
“No one really knows why phytoplankton create dimethyl sulfide, but they do, and it passes into bubbles and is carried up and out,” she said. “These bubbles supply sulfur to the atmosphere, which acts as a seed for cloud droplets to form.
“Climate is made up of a whole bunch of little things, including bubbles, and these little things matter because there are lots of them,” Czerski said.
Czerski began studying bubbles after earning a Ph.D. in a field she described as “blowing things up,” which included becoming expert at high-speed photography. She then looked for disciplines in which she could apply this knowledge.
“I’ve always been fascinated by small things that do stuff that’s too fast for us to see,” she said. “And I like building experiments that help us see those things.”
She learned to scuba dive in order to deploy instruments for measuring bubbles, and she now believes that getting in the water is a vital step for any aspiring bubble scientist.
“You can’t really understand what’s going on under the sea unless you go there yourself,” Czerski concluded. “There is a huge benefit to directly experiencing the world you’re studying. The rules are different down there.”
The ability of DMSO to cause cloud formation would be ‘interesting’ to model.
It sounds like she’s postulating that these bubbles act like hemoglobin in the blood; taking the good stuff (CO2 and O2) down and bringing dimethyl sulfide up.
Interesting.
But I do wonder why this kind of research always gets done “near the Hawaiian Islands and in the Santa Barbara Channel off Southern California” rather than (say) in the North Sea off Scarborough. Don’t we get bubbles in the UK?
Can’t say I really blame her, mind…..
“She said that scientists have found it difficult to judge the effect of bubbles on their data for years and usually have had to add a “fudge factor” to account for them.”
A recurring theme in climate ‘science’…
Anyway, Billie Holiday knew all about those ‘…bubbles in a glass of champagne…’
I wanted to come out and admit my guilt… for the last 15 years I’ve been causing global warming in a very selfish way. It started innocently… with just a small 1 gallon jug of grapes and water. Within 5 years I built an impressive collection of forty 6 gallon carboys… each producing weird and wonderful sorts of wine and beer. The yeast have no concern about the climate… they do what they do, like a heartbeat, constantly spitting out carbon dioxide for weeks and weeks. Just so I can indulge…. yet I destroy the planet every single day.
Sitting here, I can hear the airlocks blubbing away…. each one a small pocket of carbon dioxide… climate killers in my home.
I make wine and beer and I am guilty as charged 🙁 May god have mercy on my soul for willfully contributing to the destruction of the planet :((
Moon affects tides
Tides affect waves
Waves affect bubbles
Bubbles transport dimethyl sulfide into atmosphere
Sulfur acts to seed clouds
Clouds heat the atmosphere
So its the moon that is causing global warming.
What a great job! Hang out by the beach and count the bubbles in the waves.
I clearly went into the wrong field.
Czerski said that understanding the physics of bubbles is increasingly important as climate models become more and more refined.
Is this related to:
…said Czerski, who earned a Ph.D. from Cambridge University before spending a year studying bubbles at Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego and then moving to URI. ?
Did she find the “science” too settled at Scripps to validate the need for more refined climate models? By the current dogma at Scripps things seem fine, the predictions are coming true, so why tweak what works so well?
Jennifer Jambo (11:47:11) :
(…)
I make wine and beer and I am guilty as charged 🙁 May god have mercy on my soul for willfully contributing to the destruction of the planet :((
Dear Lord, I’ve made homemade bread, with yeast!
I’m guilty as well!
DocMartyn (11:22:36) :
“The ability of DMSO to cause cloud formation would be ‘interesting’ to model.”
DocMartyn – a quick FYI: DMSO is dimethylsulfoxide, a polar solvent. DMS is dimethyl sulfide, which appears to be metabolized by microorganims in the marine environment into DMSO. Good discussion in (can you believe it?) Wikipedia.
Helen Czerski.
She’s smart… and she’s hot!
I appreciated this comment: “You can’t really understand what’s going on under the sea unless you go there yourself,” Czerski concluded. “There is a huge benefit to directly experiencing the world you’re studying. The rules are different down there.”
When I was doing condensed matter physics, I “owned” my apparatus in the sense that all the measurements were taken by me, it was repaired by me, and if needed, modified by me. I did not have to assume anything about how it was used by anyone else, nor did I have any questions about the enviroment in which it made it’s measurments. Obviously, climate scientists cannot build and man every temperature sensor worldwide, but if any of the “honest” AGW scientists had possessed Czerski’s attitude, they would have visited the places where their data actually came from, and seen that “the rules are different out there” from what they’d been assuming.
Horatio:
O day and night, but this is wondrous strange!
Hamlet:
And therefore as a stranger give it welcome.
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
This is important research.
Ant you are getting silly now. Not as silly as Gavin and co but stilll silly.
Gee I would love to get a job counting… bubbles?
I agree with Bret.. I clearly went into the wron field. I work in IT in a real job.. not a job where can scuba dive and count bubbles. How do I get a grant for that… gee “öcean bubbles and their affect on climate change” 4million grant money… or get a gig here in Australia doing a review of tax laws ( Ken Henry) and decide we want more!!! grrrhhh socialist governments
Don’t look for monsters under the bed. URI has a highly-regarded oceanographic research program and scientists frequently move between institutions.
I can see how bubbles can increase the rate of transfer of gases and volatile compounds from atmosphere to ocean and vice versa by increasing surface area but not how they would change the partition coefficient between water and air. Bubbles would seem to be only in the top few metres of the ocean. Their relevance to transfer of substances from the deep ocean to the atmosphere must be minimal.
The relevance to sound and light transmission is obvious, the relevance to climate and atmospheric physics escapes me, except as a means of attracting funding.
I’d have to look at it further, but my first reaction is this is someone doing research on ocean bubbles (why not?) and working in a global warming angle.
She’s right… the bubbles coming up in my bathtub stick!!!
@KeithGuy Clouds increase the albedo of the earth and result in a net cooling, as well as causing the water vapor to give up its latent heat of evaporation that is then radiated into space. (Downwards also, but long term the trend is toward a negative energy balance.)
Why worship the earth and feel bad (especially over bad science)? See:
What is a degree or two (if that) compared to summer and winter?
Enjoy in moderation!
[snip – sorry, no religious discussions here]
Counting bubbles, I hope they are at least robust.
I wish these people would stop and get a real job.
No one would know what to do with that information anyway.