Global Warming = more hurricanes | Still not happening

So far the hurricane season for the Atlantic has been pretty quiet for 2009. Ryan Maue from Florida State University explains why. In related news, Al Gore has dropped the [hurricane frequency] related slide in his traveling PowerPoint show. – Anthony

Great Depression! Tropical Cyclone Energy at 30-year lows

FSU-ACE_vs_GISS-oceantemp4
Global hurricane frequency versus global ocean temperatures - Top image from FSU ACE, bottom image from GISS ocean data plotted by WUWT - click for larger image

Both Northern Hemisphere and South Hemisphere AND therefore overall Global hurricane activity has continued to sink to levels not seen since the 1970s. Even more astounding, when the Southern Hemisphere hurricane data is analyzed to create a global value, we see that Global Hurricane Energy has sunk to 30-year lows, at the least. Since hurricane intensity and detection data is problematic as one goes back in time, when reporting and observing practices were different than today, it is possible that we underestimated global hurricane energy during the 1970s.

Using a well-accepted metric called the Accumulated Cyclone Energy index or ACE for short (Bell and Chelliah 2006), which has been used by Klotzbach (2006) and Emanuel (2005) (PDI is analogous to ACE), and most recently by myself in Maue (2009) , simple analysis shows that 24-month running sums of global ACE or hurricane energy have plummeted to levels not seen in 30 years.

Figure: 24-month running sums of Accumulated Cyclone Energy.

Why use 24-month running sums instead of simply yearly values? Since a primary driver of the Earth’s climate from year to year is the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) acts on time scales on the order of 2-7 years, and the fact that the bulk of the Southern Hemisphere hurricane season occurs from October – March, a reasonable interpretation of global hurricane activity requires a better metric than simply calendar year totals. The 24-month running sums is analogous to the idea of “what have you done for me lately”. During the past 6 months, extending back to October of 2008 when the Southern Hemisphere tropical season was gearing up, global ACE had crashed due to two consecutive years of well-below average Northern Hemisphere hurricane activity. To avoid confusion, I am not specifically addressing the North Atlantic, which was above normal in 2008 (in terms of ACE), but the hemisphere (and or globe) as a whole. The North Atlantic only represents a 1/10 to 1/8 of global hurricane energy output on average but deservedly so demands disproportionate media attention due to the devastating societal impacts of recent major hurricane landfalls.

Why the record low ACE?

During the past 2 years +, the Earth’s climate has cooled under the effects of a dramatic La Nina episode. The Pacific Ocean basin typically sees much weaker hurricanes that indeed have shorter lifecycles and therefore — less ACE . Conversely, due to well-researched upper-atmospheric flow (e.g. vertical shear) configurations favorable to Atlantic hurricane development and intensification, La Nina falls tend to favor very active seasons in the Atlantic (El Nino years are the converse, with must less activity, as forecast by Gray and NOAA for 2009). Thus, the Western North Pacific (typhoons) tropical activity was well below normal in 2007 and 2008 (see table). Same for the Eastern North Pacific. The Southern Hemisphere, which includes the southern Indian Ocean from the coast of Mozambique across Madagascar to the coast of Australia, into the South Pacific and Coral Sea, saw below normal activity as well in 2008. During the 2008-2009 TC season, the Southern Hemisphere ACE was about half of what’s expected in a normal year, with a multitude of very weak, short-lived hurricanes. All of these numbers tell a very simple story: just as there are active periods of hurricane activity around the globe, there are inactive periods, and we are currently experiencing one of the most impressive inactive periods, now for almost 3 years.

Bottom Line

Under global warming scenarios, hurricane intensity is expected to increase (on the order of a few percent), but MANY questions remain as to how much, where, and when. This science is very far from settled. Indeed, Al Gore has dropped the related slide in his PowerPoint. Many papers have suggested that these changes are already occurring especially in the strongest of hurricanes due to warming sea-surface temperatures, but the methodology and data issues with each of these papers perhaps overshadows the conclusions. The notion that the overall global hurricane energy or ACE has collapsed does not contradict the recent climate change / TC linkage literature but provides an additional, perhaps less publicized piece of the puzzle. Indeed, the very strong interannual variability of global hurricane ACE (energy) highly correlated to ENSO, suggests that the role of tropical cyclones in climate is modulated very strongly by the big movers and shakers in large-scale, global climate. The perceptible (and perhaps measurable) impact of global warming on hurricanes in today’s climate is arguably a pittance (or noise) compared to the reorganization and modulation of hurricane formation locations and preferred tracks/intensification corridors dominated by ENSO (and other natural climate factors). Moreover, our understanding of the complicated role of hurricanes with and role in climate is nebulous to be charitable. We must increase our understanding of the current climate’s hurricane activity.

Ryan Maue’s Seasonal Tropical Cyclone Activity Update

Current Tropical Cyclones = 0

September 21: As far as I can tell using the best-tracks, the last day in September without Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE, Bell et al. 2000) being registered was September 24, 2003. During the past 20-years, *15* September days have not had an active tropical cyclone with *5* of those days occurring at the end of September 1999.

Through September 21, comparing 2009 to the previous 20 Septembers for NH ACE, the current total from the operational advisories of about 71 is one standard deviation below the 20-year mean (mean=117,sigma=36). These links are for two plots that show the yearly Northern Hemisphere ACE for September and the average ACE per day during the month.

Since daily ACE represents a 4-times daily sum of wind speed squared, an “average” September 21st could see one of the following (among other combos):

One TC at 125 knots

Two TCs at 90 knots

Three TCs at 70 knots or

Six TCs at 50 knots

Current TCs = 0

September 15: Global Hurricane Frequency [storms with maximum intensity greater than 64 knots] has dramatically collapsed during the past 2-3 years. When measured using 12 or 24 month running sums, the number of tropical cyclones at hurricane intensity is clearly at a 30-year low. HOWEVER, the number of tropical cyclones with intensity greater than 34-knots has remained at the 30-year average (83 storms per year). More on the distinction in an upcoming paper currently submitted for publication.

Global Tropical Cyclone ACE valid September 22, 2009 00Z

BASIN 2009 Current YEARLY CLIMO

Thru Oct 31

CLIMO

Thru Sep 30

CLIMO

Avg Sep

N Hemisphere 244.8 563 493.2 402.8 154
N Atlantic 41.6375 106 99.2 85.0 51.6
W Pacific 109.5 309 254.5 197.9 65.2
E Pacific 89.0625 132 130.1 112.6 36.8
N Indian 4.6 17 9.3 7.3 0.3
S Hemisphere 107 229 Out of Season
  • Northern Hemisphere ACE for the month of July struggled across the finish line, with the lowest recorded value since at least 1970. The monthly ACE value of 15.6 is truly remarkable in its ineptitude considering the average of the previous 40 years is 73! See text file for the previous 40-years ranked according to July ACE activity.
  • May – June – July Northern Hemisphere Tropical Cyclone Activity: the three month ACE sum for 2009 just missed being the lowest since at least 1970, by less than one ACE point behind the truly anomalous year of 1977.

    Sorted monthly data: Text File


  • Sponsored IT training links:

    Save best on your 1z0-048 exam with testking and get latest 000-153 questions and 70-448 practice test for fail safe exam preparation.


    0 0 votes
    Article Rating

    Discover more from Watts Up With That?

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    96 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Phillip Bratby
    September 22, 2009 5:47 am

    Anthony:
    I think the first sentence should read “quiet”, not “quite”.
    Phil
    REPLY: Fixed that as soon as I posted, but thanks. A little early for me here in CA. Server failure alarm got me up in the middle of the night. – A

    anopheles
    September 22, 2009 5:49 am

    I think if you put that top graph alongside a temperature anomaly for the same time period, you’d see a reduction in both over the last twelve years. Which may not prove the headline point.
    No, I don’t think the correlation is significant, they are probably both responding to something else, or random. My point is that this could be ammo for the other side.
    REPLY: Actually I’m working on an update graph doing just that. UPDATE: posted now. – Anthony

    TERRY46
    September 22, 2009 5:55 am

    Last night I was watching the weather channel and Jim Cantori was in Georgia. He was talking about all the rain they have had recently. He said and I repeat if this isn’t CLIMATE CHANGE I don’t know what is. I thought weather wasn’t climate change? That’s what we all been told from all the global warming crowd for years. I guess if this winter we see feet of snow then what will they say then? I know natural variences.

    rbateman
    September 22, 2009 5:55 am

    All of these numbers tell a very simple story: just as there are active periods of hurricane activity around the globe, there are inactive periods, and we are currently experiencing one of the most impressive inactive periods, now for almost 3 years.
    Same for Solar Activity. Hurricanes would then be a domino in the heirarchy.

    rbateman
    September 22, 2009 5:58 am

    Gore may have removed his hurricane jones, but he’s got a new thing in river deltas.

    h.oldeboom
    September 22, 2009 6:00 am

    Less (trapped) atmospheric heat = less motion.(hurricanes)

    Patrick Davis
    September 22, 2009 6:14 am

    I recall discussing hurricanes (Before and) after Katrina with someone who was a serious AGW = worsening weather advocate (The same person who suggested that an earthquake storm, Mag. 3+, in Wellington, NZ, was unusual LMAO, in a quake prone zone after all), and in 2006, there was no increase. In 2007, there was no increase. In 2008, there was no increase, and now in 2009, appears to be no increase. OK, 4 years does not make a trend.

    Ron de Haan
    September 22, 2009 6:23 am

    Ban Ki-Moon in his opening speech at the UN Climate Week stated that he visited the North Pole an saw the melting glaciers with his own eyes!
    Blatant lies compete with sound science and clear facts.
    Climate Change must be stopped to safe the rain forests.
    We all know it is not climate change that threatens the rain forests but the uncontrolled use of the chain saw and the quest for bio fuels.
    Our politicians and the Green Movement have created their own cocoon, excluding sound scientific evidence from cherry picked semi scientific reports, preventing any open debate by spending over 79 billion dollar to corrupt our scientific institutions, and our press in order to screw our populations.
    Facts don’t matter anymore.
    The same goes for this excellent publication.
    As long as the world accepts the fact that they are ruled by a bunch of frauds and opportunists collaborating with the most dangerous extreme ideology ever to roam the earth, worse than the murderous regimes from Mao, Stalin and Hitler put together, we can publish what we want without any serious effect.
    The architects of the Green Doctrine are set to kill billions of people without risking a Nuremberg Trial.
    The AGW/Climate Change doctrine is aimed to destroy our energy infra structure and create economic and social chaos.
    The sooner we stop them the less blood will be shed.
    Otherwise it won’t take very long before we find ourselves fighting for our survival.
    Energy will be rationed and we will stand in long lines for food and water.
    The developing world already feels the fallout of the devastating policies of the Greens and mass starvation is just around the corner.
    Our political establishment can’t be trusted anymore and they have to go.

    Burch Seymour
    September 22, 2009 6:28 am

    “Last night I was watching the weather channel and Jim Cantori was in Georgia. He was talking about all the rain they have had recently. He said and I repeat if this isn’t CLIMATE CHANGE I don’t know what is.”
    Et tu Jim??? Correct me if I’m mis-remembering, but hasn’t Georgia had severe drought recently? Isn’t rain a good thing there?

    September 22, 2009 6:34 am

    Speaking of temperature cycles, what is going on with the Arctic temperature….that’s a pretty big spike…certainly not unheard of, but really weird looking.
    http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n.uk.php
    REPLY: And there is one just like it on the left side of the bell curve. Not to worry. -A

    Richard Heg
    September 22, 2009 6:37 am

    Al Gore has dropped the [hurricane frequency] related slide in his traveling PowerPoint show. – Anthony
    But i bet it has not been edited from the movie.
    “rbateman (05:58:53) :
    Gore may have removed his hurricane jones, but he’s got a new thing in river deltas.”
    seems river deltas have more to worry about from “green” hydro power than coal or oil.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8266500.stm
    Damming and diverting rivers means that much less sediment now reaches many delta areas, while extraction of gas and groundwater also lowers the land.

    wws
    September 22, 2009 6:45 am

    “Damming and diverting rivers means that much less sediment now reaches many delta areas, while extraction of gas and groundwater also lowers the land.”
    Not to mention that most river deltas are in naturally subsiding basins, such as the Mississippi delta. Not really a surprise – that’s the only reason the river was flowing to that point in the first place!

    Henry chance
    September 22, 2009 7:00 am

    Where do we find the models that predicted the lower accumulated cyclone energy? If the models are on track, a retrospective would be soo handy about now.

    Alan the Brit
    September 22, 2009 7:08 am

    Q: Why does the ocean temp graph stop at 2008, is this because the data would be incomplete?
    AtB
    REPLY: Yes, GISS only updates this particular dataset on annual boundaries. The data is as complete as GISS offers for this particular data set. I suppose I could run the monthly GISS Ocean data set and come up with a 2 year or 5 year curve, but I’m off to appointments this AM. If any of our WUWT regulars/contributors wishes to do such an exercise, I’ll be happy to post it later today. – Anthony

    MartinGAtkins
    September 22, 2009 7:09 am

    Nice one Anthony.
    I’ve been looking for this sort of stuff to match up with the various climate plots I do.
    One thing I’ve learned over the years with regard to the climate is, what you think should happen seldom ever does.

    Curiousgeorge
    September 22, 2009 7:17 am

    Obama at the UN predicting “Irreversible Catastrophe”. This guy needs to switch to decaf.

    M White
    September 22, 2009 7:24 am

    I believe this may be the price to pay for a reduction in tropical cyclone activity
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/8267165.stm
    “KENYA HIT BY KILLER DROUGHT”
    The next rains are due in October/November, if they fail the people there will be in deep trouble. In Britain I would expect to see wide spread coverage on the MSM and an urgent call for emergency aid.
    All this just before Copenhagen.

    September 22, 2009 7:25 am

    The DMI Arctic temperature spike could be the release of latent heat during a “burst” of freezing. Clicking through the years, they appear often during the fall freeze-up.
    As Anthony indicates by mentioning the spike earlier this year (due, according to some, to the record sudden stratospheric warming in that case), the entire record is littered with such brief and sometimes dramatic rises.

    September 22, 2009 7:25 am

    If you look closely you might notice that the variation of ocean temps and TC’s is similar, although the trend isn’t. Why? Ryan has a different graphic which answers that question: ENSO. See page twenty two here:
    http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/~maue/tropical/maue_2009_grl.pdf
    This is likely because of ENSO’s effects in the Pacific Ocean, not the Atlantic (the sign is wrong for that).

    September 22, 2009 7:27 am

    M White (07:24:13) : The thing about weather is that there may be nothing new under the sun, but something is always happening somewhere. Hence, any and all days will have a disaster to be blamed on AGW. Find me one that doesn’t!

    Ron de Haan
    September 22, 2009 7:28 am

    Just watched a speech by Hu Jintao on Climate Change issues.
    The Chinese acknowledge the World Wide consensus on climate change to be the biggest challenge to be faced by humanity and they are prepared to cap CO2 emissions 15% by 2020.

    J.K.
    September 22, 2009 7:32 am

    Anthony
    Thought you’d find this article of interest. I don’t understand most of it, but you probably will. Keep up the good work.
    http://www.clemson.edu/media-relations/article.php?article_id=2262

    SteveSadlov
    September 22, 2009 7:35 am

    I just figured it out. Hurricane frequency is a leading economic indicator! You may now call me at my new Wall Street office – LOL!

    September 22, 2009 7:36 am

    Ron de Haan (07:28:25) : 😆

    1 2 3 4
    Verified by MonsterInsights