The Brain Microplastics Claim and the Collapse of Scientific Restraint

…the episode will stand as another example of how easily scientific restraint is abandoned when a frightening story is available for the telling.

Mighty Mickey Has Struck Out-Again

And oh, the sound of gavel wood was sharp against the hall— They ruled the play was foul, not fair, bad faith and that was all.

Open Thread

A place for discussion.

Screw Your Comfort: How Nature Became a Nagging Preacher

The tragedy is not that Nature publishes climate papers. It is that it no longer seems capable of publishing skepticism — not denial, but skepticism in its proper sense: disciplined…

Open Thread

A place for discussion.

U.S. Withdraws from the IPCC—and Dismantles a Global Climate Bureaucracy

…the exit from IPCC-adjacent institutions is not an isolated gesture, but a blunt, in your face, message that the era of unquestioned deference to transnational climate bureaucracy is over.

Studying Skeptics Through a Keyhole: Why Climate Communication Research Can’t See What It Refuses to Understand

They may quote skeptics endlessly. They may code them meticulously. They may analyze their “affective economies” until the funding runs out. They will still have no idea why climate skepticism…

Science Without Skepticism Is Just Politics in a Lab Coat

A society that values both knowledge and liberty must resist this convergence of expertise and power. Scientists play a vital role in informing public debate. They do not acquire special…

Milloy talks energy with David Asman and Lydia Hu on FOX Business

From the December 22, 2025 edition of The Bottom Line.

Open Thread

A place for discussion.

When Everything Is a Heat Wave and Every Change Is Climate

In the end, the paper offers a compelling story, but not a disciplined causal argument. A loosely defined marine heat wave is paired with a loosely defined ecological baseline, and…

Hiding the Pea, Revisited: Remove the Scenario, Keep the Result

At this point, a reminder is useful: the issue is not what the authors claim, but what the results depend on.

Open Thread

A place for the discussion.

How a PNAS Study Confuses Institutional Authority with Truth

What the paper actually demonstrates—despite its intentions—is that institutional authority no longer guarantees attention. Users are selective. They are skeptical. They are increasingly uninterested in being told what is true…

How the Grinch Stole Greenie Christmas

Every Greenie down in Green-ville liked green funding a lot, But the Grinch, up in D.C., most certainly did not.

Measuring Climate Change Without a Ruler

From a strict epistemological standpoint, we do not know—at high confidence—whether the total energy of the Earth’s climate system is increasing, decreasing, or remaining approximately constant.

Open Thread

A place for discussion

Scientific Report or Legal Brief? The Hunga Tonga Assessment and the Anatomy of Narrative Closure

In that sense, the document reads less like an open scientific inquiry and more like a legal brief. Evidence is marshaled, counterarguments anticipated, uncertainties catalogued, and a verdict delivered early,…

Open Thread

A place for discussion.

Save Okefenokee Swamp from UNESCO Control

In Episode 21 of Conservation Country, host ‪@GabriellaHoffman‬ investigates a Biden-era policy to designate Okefenokee Swamp in Georgia as a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage…