19% of Low Income Australians are Eating from Trash Cans – the True Cost of Net Zero

Essay by Eric Worrall

According to the Salvation Army, just under one in five Australians who sought emergency relief admitted to scavenging discarded food from trash cans.

Aussies forced to eat from bins as cost-of-living crisis worsens

A Salvation Army report reveals that Australia’s most marginalised people have had to revert to eating spoiled food from bins in order to survive.

Preston Potts, Reporter
Updated Wed 27 May 2026 at 5:15 pm AEST

The Salvation Army has warned the cost-of-living crisis is spiralling out of control for Australia’s most disadvantaged groups, as a new report reveals those relying on the charity’s support had turned to eating out of bins and surviving on spoiled food.

A survey of 4,400 Australians seeking emergency relief support from the Salvos found that nearly one in five (19 per cent) were eating from bins, and three in five (60 per cent) were eating expired or spoiled food over the past 12 months.

The Salvation Army’s Mayor, Bruce Harmer, told Yahoo News that it’s deeply confronting to see so many people across Australia feeling the levels of hardship.

No one in Australia should be forced to choose between heating their home, feeding their children or buying medication, yet this is the reality facing more and more people every single day,” he said.

Nationwide, the Salvos network spans 400 centres, providing assistance to one person every 17 seconds and delivering more than 1.74 million sessions of care to over 228,000 people in need.

Read more: https://au.news.yahoo.com/aussies-forced-to-eat-from-bins-as-cost-of-living-crisis-worsens-071438002.html

Let’s do some math – 228,000 people x 19% = 43,000 people helped by the Salvos who are eating out of trash cans.

Of course the true number is likely much higher – many people forced into such a horrible predicament might be too ashamed to admit what they are doing.

Even though the Salvation Army didn’t say “renewable energy is the problem”, there is no doubt Net Zero has driven up cost of living pressures on these poor people. Renewables always cost more than conventional energy, because renewables cannot provide reliable electricity. A renewable grid cannot survive without backup. No matter how cheap the renewable component of the system, and cheap likely isn’t an appropriate word for a form of energy which requires such high subsidies, the conventional energy system backup still has to be paid for, even if it is switched off for some of the time.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.8 10 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
74 Comments
Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 2:09 pm

Even though the Salvation Army didn’t say “renewable energy is the problem”,”

Of course they didn’t, because it isn’t. If people skimp on heating, it is because of the high cost of gas. And that is because gas producers will sell to China unless they pay a competitive price. The high price of fossil fuels is a big driver of inflation.

MarkW
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 2:44 pm

As usual, Nick completely ignores what the bans on fossil fuel production has done to fossil fuel prices. Right up there with him completely ignoring the role that renewable energy has had on electricity prices.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  MarkW
June 18, 2026 3:00 pm

There are no bans on fossil fuel productions here. Oz is one of the biggest exporters of coal and LNG. So we pay world prices.

MarkW
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 3:21 pm

I see that Nick is still trying to pretend that fossil fuel prices are not global.
PS: I see you have no comment regarding the fact that renewable energy has made electricity much more expensive.

michael fellion
Reply to  MarkW
June 18, 2026 8:09 pm

Fossil fuel prices are global when the government in charge allows them to be governed by OPEC monopoly prices. There is no reason to allow that internally for gas and oil used in country. As long as the prices allow a reasonable profit one can have two prices if internal consumption is lower than production.

JamesB_684
Reply to  michael fellion
June 19, 2026 9:15 am

OPEC is shrinking in relevance. The largest producer, the USA, is not a member of OPEC and the UAE just left OPEC.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 4:38 pm

Hazelwood was forced to close because of greed by the Victorian government, in the form of royalties.

Brown coal is not exported, so it is not governed by world prices

ozspeaksup
Reply to  bnice2000
June 19, 2026 5:41 am

and the greentards pushing its closure

Mike Borgelt
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 4:45 pm

Incorrect. See Victoria and gas exploration bans and fracking bans. Offshore exploration banned off Newcastle and new coal mines having lawfare waged against them, sometimes successfully.

tedbear
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 5:32 pm

Oh I thought the reason for building wind and solar farms to produce electricity in Oz is because there is a ban on using coal to produce electricity in Oz.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  tedbear
June 18, 2026 10:37 pm

There is no such ban. But coal costs – wind and sun are free.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 19, 2026 12:04 am

How can you possibly assert this nonsense?
The apparatus for the capture and storage and distribution and synchronisation of power collected by windmills and solar panels is very expensive.
Black coal and brown coal and crude oil and wood from old growth forest are all free too.
The cost of getting them for use is the devil in the detail.

Reply to  Phillip Chalmers
June 20, 2026 4:40 am

How can you possibly assert this nonsense?

That’s not the way the world works. Using that logic the steel in wind turbines is free too. And the making of them is the devil in the details.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 19, 2026 5:43 am

free ? come on even you have to admit theyre insanely costly to buy and maintain and do NOT produce enough to be viable even if they DID run 24/7

ozspeaksup
Reply to  tedbear
June 19, 2026 5:42 am

yeah theyre sure trying

michael fellion
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 8:05 pm

“The new laws seek to do two things: lift the ban on conventional onshore gas production, and to entrench a ban on fracking and coal seam gas exploration into the state constitution. The government has stated it wants to make it difficult for future governments to remove the fracking ban.” This would seem to make the claim of no bans false.

leefor
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 8:57 pm

So tell us why there is no new fossil fuel extraction/exploration. Some existing increasing. 😉

George Kaplan
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 19, 2026 1:21 am

It is basically impossible to build a fossil fuel power station in Australia due to the de facto ban on them. Not only are Green-Teal-Labor clear they don’t want gas, let alone coal, but the current gas and coal plants are aging out with many having decommissioning dates scheduled, though governments are pushing those back as they realise abolishing coal power means no power in most states, and a similar issue for gas in SA. Because of Green-Teal-Labor animus to coal and gas, and policies that pay renewables at gas prices, no private company will risk their money on a fossil fuel power station, instead they’re opting for government subsidies and guaranteed revenue – electricity supply optional.

Remember, renewables run off free energy when it works, but coal stations cost to run, and unlike renewables, they can’t be switched off without warning. Indeed the best that can be done is ramp them down and run at low output and minimise losses until coal power is needed again and losses can be recovered and profit made. Gas can be switched on and off faster, but they too need to recover their losses, and maximise profit during their uptime. Renewables don’t need to make money as their profit margins aren’t based on selling electricity, but rather selling carbon credits or whatever to Australian companies mandated by government to buy them.

The hidden cost for renewables is the massive infrastructure and backup required, like gas plants. Big Green uses sleight of hand to evade blame.

Yes Australia is a large exporter of coal and gas, but local prices are a result of government policy. It’s entirely possible to ensure that Australians pay less than overseas, rather than the reverse which is the current situation.

Reply to  George Kaplan
June 19, 2026 5:42 am

In practice Australia’s grid is stable in terms of coal use. Coal doesn’t need to inefficiently ramp up and down quickly because excess is used to charge batteries. In fact coal use in Australia is remarkably consistent. Here is today’s energy across Australia.

chrome_2026-06-19_22-36-39
Nick Stokes
Reply to  George Kaplan
June 19, 2026 12:53 pm

It is basically impossible to build a fossil fuel power station in Australia due to the de facto ban on them.”

Just not true.
Tallawarra B – 320 MW gas, commissioned 2024
Kurri Kurri gas, 660 MW started 2025
Barker Inlet 210 MW gas, 2019

But it is hard for fossil fuels, with fuel cost, to now compete with renewables.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 19, 2026 5:40 am

well we have banned frakking in vic n sa and I agree with that ..we have OFFshore but the greenies bitch when they try n access it . we COULD and did use our own oil and the sulphur content didnt matter a damn until..EU regs n greenies again had fits so now we flog our gas to canada..WTF? and our oil/gas to asia and buy back a “approved” more costly version or petrol . of course shutting the refineries that DID handle that grade oil ok , was a dirty and unmentioned reason they managed it on the sly too

Mr.
Reply to  MarkW
June 18, 2026 4:37 pm

Astoundingly, for such a brainy bloke, Nick’s thought processes in his assessment of wind & solar electricity pricing stops at –
“wind & sunshine are free”.

Ideology prevents him from thinking the whole costs issues through to the end outcomes, i.e. –
Aussie households and businesses suffer some of the highest electricity bills in the world, as detailed in Total Cost Of Energy analyses as distinct from Levelized Cost of Energy analyses.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 3:06 pm

I have produced off-grid electricity now for 14 years using solar and battery. If I get the target 20 year life, the average cost of electricity will be $600/MWh (without any subsidies but assuming the capital would earn 5% in TDs).

Before the “renewables” theft was introduced at scale back in 2003, the Latrobe Valley generators sold electricity for $23/MWh. That makes battery firmed solar 26 times more expensive as base load generation.

There is no way the grid can produce battery firmed solar electricity at lower cost than I can using rooftop solar. There are huge costs in land acquisition, First Nations approval, farmer appeasement and environmental impact studies for the solar farms and their transmission lines. None of these costs get counted in the whimsical analysis that liars at their CSIRO pluck out of the air. And battery firmed wind is even more expensive because wind takes annual leave in winter when the energy is most needed and the sun is not doing heaps for rooftops.

The test for any “renewables” advocate is to ask if they run their household off grid. If they do, then ask what is their average cost of electricity allowing for all the capital and lost opportunity of the capital.

When Nick Stokes can provide those numbers for his house, he will know what he is talking about. Till then he is promoting lies with no clue.

George Kaplan
Reply to  RickWill
June 19, 2026 1:33 am

I suspect farmer appeasement tends to be zero cost in Labor states, and lost opportunity of capital e.g. bank interest is always disregarded in calculations.

I’m honestly not sure it’s possible to get a RoI for a grid based solar system now with base FiTs for exports ranging from 3c to 0c. If you’re a heavy power consumer during daylight hours it might be viable via self consumption, but for low users, and those mostly away during daylight hours e.g. working couples, the maths simply doesn’t work. And on-grid batteries tend to make things worse.

Factor in reports that bills are set to soar due to fixed costs e.g. connection fees, rising as much as 40%, with a modest reduction on usage costs, and the situation is only getting worse. The maths for off-grid might work, especially if costs rise as much as some claim, and continue to rise in such fashion over the years, but if too many opt out of the grid then odds are Green-Teal-Labor types will demand off-gridders subsidise the grid.

Reply to  RickWill
June 19, 2026 6:44 am

If I get the target 20 year life, the average cost of electricity will be $600/MWh

Of course if you bought into it today, it would be much less expensive as the cost of both the panels and battery have significantly dropped.

The cost of batteries is set to massively drop too now that sodium batteries are entering production.

Reply to  RickWill
June 20, 2026 6:09 pm

I have produced off-grid electricity now for 14 years using solar and battery. If I get the target 20 year life, the average cost of electricity will be $600/MWh (without any subsidies but assuming the capital would earn 5% in TDs).

Minus tax of course.

And what if you assume you fully invested the savings you’re making at 5% instead of only looking at the outlay investment?

Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 3:09 pm

Nick, you are wrong. It is, but indirectly. Let me explain why in a way even you cannot refute.

Renewables have raised the cost of electricity in AUS very significantly. (Specifically, in 2000 it was 9-12 Aud cents per kWh. In 2025, it was 35-40 cents per kWh. So about 4x in 25 years.) As a result, over the past 20 years the AUS manufacturing sector has shrunk to just 5.1% of its economy—the lowest by far in all of OECD. I just checked.

As a result, the blue collar jobs just aren’t there. As a result, increased poverty and hunger.

As just one specific example of many, there are no longer ANY automobile assembly lines in AUS. So, no auto assembly line jobs are available. In 2000, there were 3 majors, directly and indirectly (tiers 1-2-3) employing over 50,000 blue collar workers. That number does NOT include all the additional ancillary jobs those workers incomes supported. Per Google AI, that is an additional on average 2.2x manufacturing job multiplier.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Rud Istvan
June 18, 2026 3:45 pm

What happened to electricity prices since 2000 was heavily influenced by privatisation. In 2000 is was mostly government (Vic had only just sold its generatio). Since, it was sold to private firms.

AUS manufacturing shrunk long before renewables became significant. The last auto assemly lines were well gone by 2017, when renewables were just beginning. The reason manufacturing shrunk is that mineral exports boomed. With such exports we have to import something (else what have we got?) and inevitably, that is manufactured goods. Familiar story? But nothing to do with renewables. And it happened much earlier.

MarkW
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 5:14 pm

How convenient that privatization started causing electricity prices to start rising at the same time that subsidies were cut and renewables were mandated.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 9:26 pm

With all Nicks free renewable energy Australia is clearly going to be manufacturing powerhouse 🙂

He would have to a Greens supporter because only those crazies believe that sort of rubbish and the public have long since given up even listening to them.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 19, 2026 12:07 am

Have you missed the verdict of Julia Gillard, raging at the cost of the distribution network calling them “gold plated poles and wires”?

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Phillip Chalmers
June 19, 2026 5:57 am

yeah the vic govt spent billions on what was called goldplated poles n wires would future proof the grid for decades to come ..they said… ( many are decades OLD pine poles still ) and then? within 3yrs max they said we needed more cos renewable sited where wires arent meant thousands of kms to ruin the countryside farm areas etc were needed along with birdshredders and PV eyesores all over

George Kaplan
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 19, 2026 1:34 am

Labor said privatisation would save everyone money – it hasn’t.

Labor said renewables would save everyone money – it hasn’t.

Notice a common theme?

Nick Stokes
Reply to  George Kaplan
June 19, 2026 11:56 pm

Privatisation was the policy of the conservatives.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 19, 2026 5:54 am

remember the greenies cleanup the planet from the 70s onwards so they cleaned up usa aus uk etc by??? OFFSHORING the nasty messy production of the goods we relied on to? China vietnam korea etc now we have no whitegoods or cars or much of anything and lost the skills n trades along with it

Reply to  Rud Istvan
June 19, 2026 6:06 pm

As just one specific example of many, there are no longer ANY automobile assembly lines in AUS.

Not a good example. We stopped building cars because they stopped being bought and consequently stopped being profitable. I’m old enough to remember when government car pools were primarily made up of locally built cars but once policy changed to allow choices from all manufacturers, fleets quickly became mainly non-Australian cars.

Global manufacturing was offshored to China. Australia isn’t the only country to have done so but it wasn’t because of energy costs, it was because of labour costs. Once we lost manufacturing, its incredibly hard to bring it back.


aussiecol
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 3:10 pm

Oh Nick… where’s my promised $275 power price reduction… spare me.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Eric Worrall
June 18, 2026 3:50 pm

Victoria still uses coal and little gas for generating. Yet Victoria produces plenty of gas, and exports to NSW and beyond. Coal is still shovelled into generators, but much more is shovelled into ships.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 4:33 pm

[you’ve harassed Nick enough today]

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Eric Worrall
June 18, 2026 5:29 pm

A great deal of black coal is shovelled into ships. It is Australia’s major export.

Reply to  Eric Worrall
June 18, 2026 7:03 pm

That is why the Latrobe Valley was able to produce electricity at $23/MWh before the “renewables: bullshit became vogue. Carbon and volatiles with thin overburden and deep seam costing peanuts to mine while using waste heat to dry.

It could still produce at $23/MWh if it was not dancing up and down on an hourly basis and burdened with artificial costs.

Reply to  Eric Worrall
June 18, 2026 7:05 pm

Precisely Eric..

A great deal of black coal goes towards electrictiy, it is a major electricity supply..

It is batteries and diesel and instantaneous gas (to covered for failed wind and solar) that give the highest prices.

If we had another big coal fired power station in each eastern state, these price peaks would not happen, the grid would be more dispatchable and stable, and electricity prices would be much lower…

… so long as they were allowed to operate to peak efficiency without having to waste energy throttling back to make way for erratic supply from wind and solar.

MarkW
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 7:42 pm

True, and completely irrelevant to the topic at hand.

Reply to  Eric Worrall
June 18, 2026 7:03 pm

You can make brown coal transportable, but you have to dry it out first, using heat.. which is somewhat counter-productive.

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 4:07 pm

Nicks right. this is the least convincing article I’ve read ever. this article tries to link low-income australians to renewable energy. heating their house was a metaphor. in fact, you pay 38-200 times more to pay rent. they aren’t poor and eating out of trash bins cuz of electricity prices. they are doing it because they cant afford anything, and electricity happens to be one of them, albeit 38-200 times less of a problem.

Reply to  Eric Worrall
June 20, 2026 5:57 pm

So the hardship Aussies are experiencing all feeds back to the cost of energy in Australia.

The article is about “homeless” and Australia’s homes have become unaffordable and rents have followed. You cant blame energy costs for housing prices. Once you’re homeless, you’re on a spiral descent.

Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
June 18, 2026 4:35 pm

WOW, so you are saying they should do the “homeless” thing like in LA, and not pay rent.

You truly are a rabid far-leftist . !

MarkW
Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
June 18, 2026 5:15 pm

It really is amazing how socialists actually believe that they have a right to a reality of their own making.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 4:32 pm

Why do you think we use gas, Nick?

Aren’t renewables cheap, efficient and dispatchable with adequate supplies at all times of the day?

Nick Stokes
Reply to  John in Oz
June 18, 2026 5:31 pm

Because we have piped gas, gas stoves, gas heaters. But people are changing as fast as they can.

MarkW
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 7:45 pm

Not voluntarily, but because the government is forcing them to.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 9:32 pm

Must be an Eastern states thing but Western Australia does have gas retention laws. I just built a house and Gas stove and gas instantaneous water heater was first choice because it’s so cheap to run. My gas bill is tiny compared to my electrical power bill.

If you want numbers about $200 every 6 months for gas about $400-600 every quarter for power.

Reply to  John in Oz
June 18, 2026 6:01 pm

 cheap, efficient and dispatchable”

That means Gas and Coal power electricity.

Prices in Australia were really cheap when coal powered electricity had a buffer on demand.

Problem is, they got rid of that buffer, and wasted funds on totally unreliable and erratic supplies instead.

michael fellion
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 18, 2026 8:00 pm

Why does anybody believe 19% of the tiny number helped by the Salvation army eats from trash cans? The official homeless rate is 280,000 people out of 27 million plus population. It is almost 100% sure that 19% is from the homeless population who for whatever reason refuse to work to earn enough to live in housing and have made a living from lifetime welfare. Their standard claim is no money, I am poor and need help. Standing there with a sign asking for money is their idea of work. If anybody asks how they are doing they give the same spiel of pain and suffering yet never actually change anything to make their lives different.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Nick Stokes
June 19, 2026 5:36 am

yeah our gas IS a ripoff when its taken to singapore and magically changes price tax ex dodges on the way and we sell it to them for a LOT for less ..but were charged OS prices when we buy here .

June 18, 2026 2:45 pm

I joined a Vinnies Webinar last week. This charitable organisation does great analysis of the cost of energy in Australia through a commissioned report that has been running for years now.
Energy prices | St Vincent de Paul Society | Vinnies

Gavin Dufty is the Vinnies director of energy policy and I know he is a great supporter of “renewables”. During the webinar he stated that the current high cost of electricity is due to running two systems. Once the buildout of the “renewable” system is completed. the prices will come down.

He openly admits that the solar panels and batteries he has installed on his home gets an annual cross subsidy from the poor of about $1,000 per year.

The only thing that is changing in Australia is that the poor can no longer afford the cross subsidy so it will come from general revenue in the future.

All remaining heavy industry in Australia is getting government support. Australia is now a kleptocracy. It is no longer a market economy. The government supports its winners and expects its chosen to support it. The CMFEU has bled billions from Victorian Government projects and then paid dues to keep Labor in government. The same thing is happening Federally with Snowy Hydro 2. It is now a union stronghold; bleeding taxpayer money for union dues that get back to Labor. Dim Jim will decide who pays the new capital gains tax and who doesn’t. All Labor members of parliament could have CGT exemption if Dim Jim decides they need it.

There is just enough makers left in the Australian economy to give One Nation a fighting chance of restoring a market economy.

Bob
June 18, 2026 3:57 pm

Of course renewables and Net Zero contribute to high costs and misery but it is crappy government and only crappy government that is responsible.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
June 18, 2026 4:57 pm

It’s more than renewables trashing Australia. It’s another country going down the Marxist rat hole.

June 18, 2026 5:01 pm

Harold The Organic Chemist Says:
ATTN: Aussies
RE: No Warming Of Air In Adelaide Since 1857!

Shown in the chart (See below) is a plot of the annual mean temperature in Adelaide from 1857 to 1999. In 1857 the concentration of CO2 in dry air was ca. 280 ppmv (0.55 g of CO2/cu. m.), and by 1999 it had increased to ca. 368 ppmv (0.72 g CO2/cu. m. of air), but there was corresponding increase in air temperature in this port city. Instead there was a slight cooling that begin in ca. 1940. In 1857 the annual mean temperature (Tav) was 17.2° C, and by 1999 it had declined to 16.7° C. Brisbane had a similar cooling.

To obtain recent Adelaide temperature data, I went to:
https://www.extremeweatherwatch.com/cities/adelaide/average-temperature-by-year. The Thi and Tlo temperature data from1887 to 2025 are displayed in a table. The computed Tav for 2025 was 17.4° C. At the Mauna Loa Obs. in Hawaii, the concentration of CO2 in dry air in 2025 was 429 ppmv (0.84 g CO2/cu. m. of air). Please note and never forget how little CO2 there is in the air.

Since temperature measurement error is+/-0.1° C. it is conclude that there has been no warming of air for 168 years in Adelaide and that the trace amount of CO2 in the air has had no effect on its air temperature. It further concluded there is no need to reduce the use of fossil fuels The draconian climate agenda of Premier Anthony A. and the Canberra Climate cartel and their goal of Net Zero by 2025 should be abandon.

The chart was taken from the late John L. Daly’s website:
“Still Waiting For Greenhouse” available at http://www.john-daly.com. From the home page go to end and click on “Station Temperature Data”. Ob the “World Map” click on “Australia”. There is displayed a list of stations. Click on “Adelaide”. To redisplay the list of stations click on the back arrow. Clicking on the back arrow again displays there “World Map”. Australian John L. Daly found over 200 weather stations that showed no warming up to 2002. He was the first citizen-scientist to show that CO2 did not cause warming of air.

NB: If you click on the chart it will expand and become clear. Click on the “X” in the circle to contact the chart and return to Comments.

adelaide
tedbear
June 18, 2026 5:22 pm

Will you please stop and refrain forever using the term “renewable power”.
Until some kind of power grabbing from thin air perpetual motion system has been invented, it is an impossibility to renew power that’s been used.
Thank you in anticipation.

sherro01
Reply to  tedbear
June 18, 2026 7:02 pm

Harold the Organic Chemist,
I write to you again as Geoffrey the Hard Chemist to ask you again to stop using the scientifically poor information in your article above. Hard Chemistry involves validation or ranking of your data sources, not simply taking them as correct.
You cannot validly use the temperature record that you do, because it has some rather large problems that you fail to mention.
I have summarised them in the following link that I have sent to you before. Please tell me if I have made any significant mistakes, or simply shut up and stop spreading nonsense repeatedly. Geoff S
https://www.geoffstuff.com/adelt.docx

Reply to  sherro01
June 18, 2026 9:02 pm

Australian John Daly obtained his temperature data from the GISS and CRU data bases. When I site CO2 concentration data, I use data from the NOAA’s Global Monitoring Laboratory. Extreme Weather Watch obtains temperature data from NOAA’s data base. What I really don’t know is the actual concentrations of CO2 in Adelaide for the dates cited.

I live in Burnaby, B.C. which was one of the first political jurisdiction to levy a carbon tax on fossil fuels. In 2009 the tax was $10 per tonne of CO2 equivalent. Then the government got greedy and by 2024 the tax was $80 per tonne of CO2 equivalent, and government was raking in several billion dollars per year. The consumer carbon tax was ended in 2026 and replaced with the industrial carbon tax.
Alberta and the federal government now discussing plans for carbon capture and storage for the oil companies processing tar sand bitumen. Federal government has goal of Net Zero by 2050.

Look what all this CO2 emission and greenhouse nonsense has done to the economies of Australia, the UK, Germany, New York and California, for example. Have read Roger Caiazza recent articles about the New Climate Act and the RGGI posted here.

I stand 100% by what I have posted and I will not shut up. I will now go check out your website site.

tedbear
Reply to  sherro01
June 18, 2026 10:10 pm

Who the hell is “Harold the Organic Chemist” and what does any of your temperature records have anything to do with renewable power?

Reply to  tedbear
June 18, 2026 11:29 pm

FYI, I am Harold D. Pierce, Jr. B.Sc.(Hon), Ph.D. Do a Google Scholar search on my name in quotation marks for a list of some of my research papers on insect pheromone chemistry and yeast sterol biosynthesis.

Temperatures from many locations around the world show warming of few degrees since 1900 which the corrupt IPCC claims that this is due to CO2 from the use of fossil fuels in electrical power plants. To avoid more global warming, it has been proposed that renewable will reduce the use of fossil fuels in power plants.

Reply to  sherro01
June 18, 2026 11:40 pm

I went to your website and found analytical overkill. I’m 82 come Aug 1 and found it difficult to read the tables and charts because the letters and numbers were too small.

BTW, you should have a plot annual rainfall in Adelaide. The availability of fresh is more important than temperature.

Phillip Chalmers
Reply to  tedbear
June 18, 2026 7:38 pm

I agree wholeheartedly.
Can we start a competition for a name which accurately describes the gathering and distribution of electrical energy by artificial means as it is ONLY electrical energy being described.

Phillip Chalmers
June 18, 2026 7:09 pm

20% of most populations anywhere are in some sort of deprivation or poverty.
They are not all eating out of bins, this is a survey of those who are already impoverished by gambling, drug addiction, alcoholism, mental illness or families deserted by the breadwinner.
They included the idiocy of suggesting that eating from packages after their used by date is shocking. I do that all the time, and am not at all short of money; I just hate waste.

another ian
June 19, 2026 12:53 am

Renewables must be good eh”

“Record levels of throwing renewable energy away in 2025”

https://joannenova.com.au/2026/06/record-levels-of-throwing-renewable-energy-away-in-2025/

ozspeaksup
June 19, 2026 5:33 am

ok its NOT just the insane power costs BUT the damn near 2.5 times or more ! RENT hike in large part demand from MILLIONS of immigrants forcing aussie out ie rent that was 160 max in my small town apre covid is now 400 or so same place! high demand low supply and then commercial like hospitals/council etc buying or getting first dibs on any rentals that are there . as for expired date past food FFS stupormarkets sell it ! I buy it . WW bins fine enough food cos of date NOT being “off” we used to be able to buy 2nd grade fruit n veg cheaper now ? one brand has made a big act of doing that but its still not that cheap . they wont SELL a bruised apple they bin it. its still fine and can be eaten or cooked for pie etc. Bakers delight will NOT sell day old cheaper priced as toast bread OR end of day half price cos people wouldnt pay 6 or more … yeah well they cant Pay that otherwise they would ( if theyre daft its crap anyway) so they dump it to petfood private people who go get it for chooks ducks etc people that cant cook from scratch seem to be all over . those that can? wont use a saggy carrot or a veg with a spot you simply cut off . oh its yukky . I can tell you I have had the odd food box from charities and got 2yr OOD gravy mix that was solid and mouldy cheese etc in it . merry xmas it wasnt .