Guardian: Climate Action is a Priority for Trump Supporters

Essay by Eric Worrall

“… The 2024 election was not a referendum on climate change – Americans believe in climate change, worry about climate change and support action on climate change …”

US public still favours action on climate change despite Trump’s fossil fuel drive

Two-thirds of Americans say they are worried about climate but level of media coverage does not reflect this

Oliver Milman
Wed 17 Jun 2026 22.00 AEST

US political and media discourse has drifted away from the climate crisis amid a frontal assault by Donald Trump upon policies to limit global heating and the president’s pugnacious demands to “drill, baby, drill” for more oil and gas.

Yet while elite attention on climate has waned, even among some previously vocal Democrats who have wound back on criticism of the fossil fuels that are overheating our planet, the American public remains concerned about the climate crisis and continues to favour action to deal with it, according to experts and polling.

“The 2024 election was not a referendum on climate change – Americans believe in climate change, worry about climate change and support action on climate change,” said Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the climate communication program at Yale University. “That didn’t change before, during or after the election.”

“Voting priorities haven’t changed much in terms of climate but other issues have leapfrogged over it, such as the Iran war, and the lack of coverage in the media means that people aren’t hearing or talking about it as much,” said Leiserowitz.

“There is this spiral of climate silence. I’ve even heard some leaders of climate groups say, ‘Don’t mention climate change.’ I don’t know why they’d make that decision, there’s absolutely no evidence that people care about this less than they did.”

“This war on renewables isn’t even shared by his own base. Climate is still very polarized in the US. But, on the whole, Americans have positive views of clean energy and pretty negative views of fossil fuel energy, which they think is dirty and polluting.”

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jun/17/climate-change-public-opinion-trump-fossil-fuel

I think get it – believers in the “everyone wants climate action” theory think the reason voters elected President Trump in 2024 is they hate his climate policies.

But you would expect an active imagination from people who think we’re in the midst of a climate crisis.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
21 Comments
Bryan A
June 18, 2026 10:10 am

“The 2024 election was not a referendum on climate change – Americans believe in climate change, worry about climate change and support action on climate change,” said Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the climate communication program at Yale University. “That didn’t change before, during or after the election.”

Exactly what one would expect a Liberal Socialist Yaley Professor to say. Must maintain the false message at all costs.

Russell Cook
Reply to  Bryan A
June 18, 2026 10:41 am

There’s more: the UK Grauniad would have their reading audiences believe this Anthony Leiserowitz guy was some kind of nice, benign, unbiased Yale University authority. At my April 2021 blog post, “Yale Program on Climate Change (YPCCC) Helps Facebook Debunk Climate Change Myths,” Anthony Leiserowitz was one the main characters I detailed on how YPCCC was not helping anybody debunk climate miyths, their clear goal was to reinforce unsupportable talking points about ‘settled science’ and ‘industry-corrupted skeptic climate scientists.’ YPCCC is little more than a propaganda effort to keep CAGW alive by any means possible. And here we are today, with the above days-old disinformation / gaslighting quote from Leiserowitz,

2hotel9
June 18, 2026 10:18 am

The only change in climate we want is all the climatards driven out of our government and academia at every level.

NotChickenLittle
June 18, 2026 10:27 am

As a conservative I believe I should endeavor to be a good steward of the land, air, and water. But the government’s involvement should be quite limited, not picking winners and losers and not using my tax money for the questionable scams and schemes as it now does to supposedly mitigate “damage” caused by “carbon”.
I’d think very few conservatives would agree that The Grauniad speaks for them, and certainly not some lefty from Yale who directs their climate propaganda program.

Junkgirl
Reply to  NotChickenLittle
June 18, 2026 11:59 am

As a conservative Trump supporter I’m LMAO. What is that loony bin media smoking?. I smell desperation. Getting rid of our invaders and fraudsters was a huge reason the left was squashed. Dumping climax hoax another one.

Reply to  Junkgirl
June 18, 2026 12:11 pm

As a conservative Trump supporter

Still?

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 18, 2026 12:42 pm

You just got burnt by MyUsernameReloaded. U gonna take that Junkgirl???

Must suck when trump promised you cheaper gas prices and then got into the Iran War. almost like he didn’t keep his promise!!

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 18, 2026 12:48 pm

tuffest comment ever

Dave O.
June 18, 2026 10:29 am

Just because people are brainwashed into thinking there’s a climate change problem, doesn’t mean that there’s a problem.

June 18, 2026 10:38 am

Of course Leiserowitz, director of the climate communications program at Yale, would assert such an obvious falsehood. Else he would be out of a job. Apparently at Yale, communications equals prevarication.

His problem remains indelible reality.
47 ran on ‘drill, baby drill’ and won in a landslide. The US is now the world’s largest producer of oil and gas.
47 promised to get rid of the climate nonsense. Obama’s endangerment finding is now repealed. Offshore wind leases have been terminated. US EV subsidies have ended, as a result of which auto manufacturers have written off $87 billion of EV investment.

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  Rud Istvan
June 18, 2026 12:45 pm

47 also started the Iran war. 47 is also a racist. 47 is also using the office for his personal purposes. 47 is also putting up his cronies in public office. youre happy about 87 billion dollars gone in ev investment? that’s 87 billion dollars gone from the economy, regardless of whether or not you support climate action! Let me remind you that 47 also promised cheaper prices for Americans. Gas especially.

Reply to  Ruhaan Pilani
June 18, 2026 12:57 pm

Smart people know when to stop digging, Stupid people say “hand me the shovel.”

Mr.
June 18, 2026 10:45 am

Look, when ideology smothers rationality in a person’s mind, they will continue with the etched-in dogma that has captured them, regardless of the observational realities that confront them.

On our human species’ evolutionary journey to (supposedly) develop reason and logic, we also picked up a capacity for irrationality.

Proving once again that nature is constantly out to get us and all living things on this earth in one way or another.

mleskovarsocalrrcom
June 18, 2026 10:54 am

Gaining control of the MSM is instrumental in the Marxist plan and AGW is a HUGE part of it. It’s the best way to spread propaganda. If Americans don’t wake up we’ll be in the same boat as the UK.

June 18, 2026 11:00 am

“There is this spiral of climate silence.”

They don’t get it yet. “Climate” is spiraling as an issue because it has has been Flushed. Swirlied. Down the Tubes, as they say.

That is all for now.

June 18, 2026 11:01 am

Story tip!
Another study about consumption and inequality. The ‘Rich’ have should pay more carbon taxes.
– – – – – – – – –

‘Mega-consumers’ of food and energy cost environment $5.7tn a year, study finds
Top 10% generate climate and biodiversity damage bill that exceeds economies of most countries, say researchers
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jun/18/mega-consumers-food-energy-damage-cost-environment

More CO2 emissions and models.

Environmental damages of the top ten percent consumers exceed global climate and biodiversity funding gaps
The top 10% of global consumers is disproportionately responsible for transgressing planetary boundaries, causing damages for which broader society bears the costs.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s44458-026-00079-x

Ed Zuiderwijk
June 18, 2026 11:33 am

Mr Leiserowitz lives in his own little world.

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
June 18, 2026 12:46 pm

and apparently, so do you.

Tom Halla
June 18, 2026 11:49 am

I can’t think of any Trump supporters who have drunk the climate KoolAid.

Junkgirl
Reply to  Tom Halla
June 18, 2026 12:02 pm

None I know either.

Ruhaan Pilani
Reply to  Junkgirl
June 18, 2026 12:47 pm

im sorry, is it a good thing? are trump supporters like the epitome of the average citizen?