Aussie Emissions Drop. Source ABC, Fair Use, Low Resolution Image to Identify the Subject.

Aussie Renewable Turning Point or Imminent Economic Contraction?

Essay by Eric Worrall

Aussie greens are celebrating a reduction in Aussie emissions as a green energy turning point. But other numbers tell a different story.

Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions drop as renewable energy, batteries surge

By climate reporter Nathan Morris
Friday 5 June

Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions have dropped, showing signs of a turning point in the country’s most polluting sectors.

Emissions are at their lowest point since the COVID pandemic shut down the economy, dropping 2.1 per cent over the year to December 2025, according to the latest national greenhouse gas inventory update.

The significant drop is largely driven by clean energy replacing fossil fuels in electricity generation, but transport emissions also continued to fall, year-on-year, for the second quarter in a row since the pandemic.

Electricity on downward trend

Electricity remains the largest source of emissions, accounting for 31.8 per cent. But emissions from the sector peaked in 2009 and have continued to fall since, down 3.8 per cent to December 2025 and 25.8 per cent since 2005.

Despite the Clean Energy Council reporting that investment in large-scale renewable projects had fallen 46 per cent, the sector continues to displace coal and gas.

“The largest increase was in wind generation, which increased by a record 22.6 per cent over the year to December,” the report said,

Read more: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-05/australias-emissions-drop-as-renewable-energy-batteries-surge/106751294

So what are those “other numbers” telling us?

For starters, agriculture is on track for a significant contraction this year, thanks to skyrocketing fossil fuel prices and fertiliser prices. A problem exacerbated by political hostility towards Australian domestic energy production, forcing all but a handful of refineries to close.

Productivity is collapsing, leading to a silent contraction in living standards.

Australia is showing how a rich country gets poorer

Idling productivity over the past decade is estimated to have cost each Australian about $11,000 per year in lost income.

Attila Brungs UNSW vice chancellor
May 7, 2026 – 5.00am

For the first time in Australian history, younger generations are forecast to have a lower standard of living than their parents. People across the country know about the cost-of-living crisis and the housing affordability crisis.

Less appreciated is that both are rooted in Australia’s stagnating productivity. But a sense of déjà vu pervades discussions about Australia’s productivity crisis. Paralysed by relentless polling cycles, political leaders have been unable to undertake serious productivity reform for more than two decades.

Read more: https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/australia-is-showing-how-a-rich-country-gets-poorer-20260506-p5zua1

Economic growth is plunging.

Australia’s economic growth slowed sharply in the March quarter, ABS figures reveal

4 June 2026 | By Chris Johnson

The Federal Government is defending national accounts figures showing a decline in gross domestic product growth in the quarter to March, with productivity having its sharpest fall in two years.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics released the latest figures on Wednesday (3 June), showing that GDP rose 0.3 per cent in the March quarter this year, and 2.5 per cent compared to a year ago.

The 0.3 per cent growth in the March quarter is the weakest growth in the past year and below market expectations, and productivity is down 0.6 per cent over the quarter. GDP per capita declined 0.1 per cent over the quarter.

Rising interest rates and significantly higher fuel costs in March likely created an environment for more cautious consumer behaviour,” she said.

“This resulted in reduced spending across a range of household expenditure categories.

Read more: https://region.com.au/australias-economic-growth-slowed-sharply-in-the-march-quarter-abs-figures-reveal/971526/

My point is, emissions are not falling because green energy is a success. Emissions are falling because the Australian economy is slowly grinding to a halt, with millions of Australians tightening their belts, reducing vehicle use, rationing heating, skipping meals, not purchasing medicine, and doing all the other things people do when they are worried about money. Even investment in renewables is falling sharply.

Since renewables in Australia have first call on grid capacity, any reduction in demand, such as happened in 2024-2025, forces other energy suppliers to cut back, causing a rise in renewable energy mix – except when the renewables are not working, of course.

The following was published late November last year by the Australian Government.

Decrease in domestic energy use driven by households

Media Release
Released 20/11/2025

Source
Energy Account, Australia, 2023-24 financial year

Domestic energy use

Domestic energy use fell by 0.7 per cent to 5,691 petajoules (PJ) in the 2023-24 financial year, according to data released today by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. 

Luisa Ryan, ABS head of environment statistics, said, ‘Household use of energy fell by 3.4 per cent to 980 PJ in the 2023-24 financial year, driven by a 15.1 per cent fall in natural gas usage. Electricity usage remained flat, with most other energy products recording small decreases.’ 

Energy net use by industry fell by 0.1 per cent to 4,711 PJ. This reflected lower energy use in the manufacturing industry, which fell 6.1 per cent. This fall was offset by rises in the transport industry (up 10.6 per cent) and the commercial and services sector (up 3.2 per cent). 

‘Renewable energy production in Australia continued to grow in the 2023-24 financial year, with solar energy production rising by 15.9 per cent and now accounting for 51 per cent of renewable energy,’ Ms Ryan said.

There were small falls in the production of other renewables, including wind energy (down 1.8 per cent) and hydro energy (down 10 per cent).

Energy exports

Energy exports rose by 3.1 per cent to 17,927 PJ in 2023-24, driven by black coal exports.

Black coal remained Australia’s largest energy export, growing by 4.8 per cent to 9,906 PJ. 

Liquefied natural gas (LNG) remained our second biggest energy export despite falling for the second year after a decade of strong growth, down 0.8 per cent to 4,481 PJ.

Further information on national estimates of energy assets, physical supply and use of energy products, and the monetary use of energy products by industry can be found in Energy Account, Australia 2023-24. 

Media notes

  • PJ = One petajoule is 10¹⁵ joules, or 278 gigawatt hours. A glossary is available for key terms within this release.
  • When reporting ABS data you must attribute the Australian Bureau of Statistics (or the ABS) as the source.
  • For media requests and interviews, contact the ABS Media Team via media@abs.gov.au (9am-5pm Mon-Fri).
  • Subscribe to our media release notification service to get notified of ABS media releases or publications upon their release.
  • Watch our data crash course, designed especially for journalists, to learn how to find, download and interpret our data.
Source: https://www.abs.gov.au/media-centre/media-releases/decrease-domestic-energy-use-driven-households

Putting a face to this energy poverty hardship;

Australians are skipping meals and medication to afford rising energy bills, research finds

April Glover
March 13, 2025 – 2.13pm

Everyday Australians are being forced to choose between putting food on the table and paying their power bills, new research has found.

Half of the 1011 people surveyed by the Australian Council of Social Service said they were skipping meals and going without medication to keep the air conditioning or heating on.

Some said they were selling their belongings or using buy now, pay later (BNPL) products to afford their skyrocketing energy bills.

Others said they were simply avoiding cooling or heating their home altogether to limit energy use.

Read more: https://www.nine.com.au/australia-news/energy-bill-prices-australians-skipping-meals-to-afford-power-bills-research-finds-20250313-p5zbz0.html

Despite establishment attempts to project general tone of green optimism, the Australian government is at least a little worried about the economy – they recently commissioned a carbon leakage report, an attempt to identify which industries Australia was losing and would lose if the government tightens the screws on carbon taxes.

Final report from the Australian Carbon Leakage Review 

  • 12 minute read
  • 19 Feb 2026

The final report published by the Carbon Leakage Review offers an important insight into whether Australia may adopt an import-based border carbon tax. 

In brief 

The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) has completed its review into whether additional policies are needed to address carbon leakage in Australia. The review concludes that while current Safeguard Mechanism settings are effective in the short to medium term, additional targeted measures are likely to be required for specific commodities as leakage risks from imports evolve. In particular, the report identifies a border carbon adjustment (BCA) as the preferred instrument for a select set of high‑risk commodities to ensure a level playing field for Australian producers subject to domestic carbon constraints.  

The report concludes that any proposed BCA mechanism should mirror the Safeguard Mechanism’s scope (i.e. scope 1 emissions), avoid export rebates, remove Trade Exposed Baseline Adjustment (TEBA) provisions for covered commodities, and be staged, starting with cement and clinker, and later expanding to cover lime, steel, glass, and ammonia and derivatives.  

Read more: https://www.pwc.com.au/tax/tax-alerts/final-report-from-the-australian-carbon-leakage-review.html

But I can understand why greens think inflicting hardship on ordinary people is a success story. They don’t seem to care about hardship for other people. The green ideal of a sustainable economy is Cuba – at least it was, until the problems became impossible to hide.

Can We Learn From Cuba’s Sustainable Revolution?

ByElias Ferrer,

Former Contributor. I write on the key issues for global energy, with a focus on LATAM.Aug 24, 2023, 11:37am EDTAug 30, 2023, 11:58am EDT

In the last two decades, Cuba has made important achievements in building a more sustainable society, in part because, and in spite of, the many hurdles it faces. Such feats have been the result of efforts, innovation and entrepreneurship from all levels of Cuban society; from state-led campaigns to cooperatives, businesses, organised communities and individuals.

Cuba’s form of government is not the subject of this article, while it may be for many others who wish to discuss it. Instead, the point is to foster debate on the attainments, regarding sustainable development, in a poor country which has also been under heavy sanctions for more than 60 years.

Read more: https://www.forbes.com/sites/eliasferrerbreda/2023/08/24/can-we-learn-from-cubas-sustainable-revolution/

Cuba Sets Solar Power Record, Surpassing 900 MW of Photovoltaic Generation

La revolucion energetica: Cuba’s energy revolution

Cuba: The Renewable Revolution Shaping the Caribbean

etc,

Now greens have started celebrating Australia in the same way they used to celebrate Cuba, lets just say this doesn’t fill me with confidence about the economic future of my country.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 14 votes
Article Rating
69 Comments
June 6, 2026 10:05 am

Fugitives?

Reply to  Steve Case
June 6, 2026 10:27 am

I wondered about that, too.

Scissor
Reply to  Steve Case
June 6, 2026 10:56 am

Leaks and unintended industrial emissions.

June 6, 2026 10:31 am

Sanctions by the United States are not holding Cuba back.

The U.S. does restrict U.S. trade with Cuba, but Cuba is free to trade with any other nation on Earth.

It’s not sanctions that hold Cuba back, it is a communist government that has devastated the Cuban economy. Cuba doesn’t have any money. That’s their problem.

Victor
Reply to  Tom Abbott
June 6, 2026 10:37 am

Only a small oil blockade.

Reply to  Victor
June 6, 2026 10:42 am

Cuba now has to purchase its oil on the international market rather than getting it free from Venezuela. Cuba is broke.

George Thompson
Reply to  Victor
June 6, 2026 11:18 am

Call it a small educational slap on the back of Cuba’s head. The so-called oil blockade is the least of Cuba’s worries.

Victor
Reply to  George Thompson
June 6, 2026 1:39 pm

If Cuba’s communist regime falls and the country becomes a democracy, will the Cubans who have been forced to flee to the United States return to their homeland of Cuba?

The Trump administration on Thursday imposed sanctions on Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel, his wife and three others, marking the latest effort to increase pressure on the island’s communist leadership.

According to a White House fact sheet, the sanctions are “part of the Trump Administration’s comprehensive push to end the Cuban regime’s decades-long campaign of political, ideological, and institutional warfare against the United States and to hold accountable those who sustain its operations and profit from the Cuban people’s oppression.”

https://news4sanantonio.com/news/nation-world/us-sanctions-cuban-president-miguel-diaz-canel-as-pressure-campaign-against-havana-intensifies-island-leadership-former-president-raul-castro-president-donald-trump-venezula-nicolas-maduro-energy-fuel-blockade

George Kaplan
Reply to  Victor
June 6, 2026 8:50 pm

Oil is bad so the Green and climate change types should be celebrating America’s efforts to ‘help’ Cuba avoid succumbing to it.

Reply to  Tom Abbott
June 6, 2026 11:26 am

You forgot to mention that smaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaall detail that nations and companies trading with cuba face penalties and trade restrictions with the US.

But yeah, must be the “communism” and not their imperialist neighbour.

Mr.
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 6, 2026 11:47 am

So they rely on the capitalist USA to keep them afloat?

Makes sense – socialism / communism has never, will never work anywhere it’s ever been tried.

Slow learners those misanthropists.

Reply to  Mr.
June 6, 2026 11:53 am

WUWTs relationship with reality, 2026, colorized.

img
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 6, 2026 1:59 pm

Reality is something you have never had the ability to grasp.

Simon
Reply to  bnice2000
June 6, 2026 3:42 pm

Reality is something you have never had the ability to grasp.”
Says the man who thinks El Nino is causing the warming. Too funny….

Reply to  Simon
June 6, 2026 4:29 pm

Denial of the warming by El Nino events, when the evidence is right there in the data, and climate activist absolutely RELY on them.

Warming by El Nino events IS REALITY.. something you apparently can’t seem to grasp. !

aussiecol
Reply to  Simon
June 6, 2026 4:58 pm

So Simon, why is it, the only time we get a jump in global temperatures is when an El Nino event occurs… waiting with bated breath…

Simon
Reply to  aussiecol
June 6, 2026 9:27 pm

El Nino and La Nina are neutral events. As in they cancel each other out. If there was no warming there would be no difference between the height of the peaks.They have been around for ???? a long time. If they were the cause then we would be continually warming.No sane person who knows anything about the topic thinks ENSO is the cause of the warming.It is true the peaks of El Nino are also the peaks of the warming…. till the next El Nino, but in a warming world that is what you would expect. In a cooling world the troughs would be the La Ninas. It’s like high tide is the peak during a period of sea level rise, but the high tide is not causing the rise.Not rocket science.

Your turn Aussiecol. Why do you think Enso is causing the recent increase in global temperatures? I’ll wait with bated breath.

Reply to  Simon
June 6, 2026 9:59 pm

It seems that you have near zero comprehension of what La Nina and El Nino are and do… No point in anyone trying to explain to you.

Each of the most recent El Ninos has also provided a step up, clearly seem in the UAH atmospheric data.

Between those El Nino events , there is no warming.., in fact it cooled between the 2016 El Nino and the 2023/4/5 event

No sane person would think that human released CO2 could be the cause of this spike + step warming.

Yes, wait for the next El Nino.. for another WARMING spike. !

leefor
Reply to  Simon
June 6, 2026 10:03 pm

Please supply data showing they are neutral events. 😉

Simon
Reply to  leefor
June 6, 2026 11:08 pm

There is an enormous amount of information about what ENSO is and isn’t on the internet. You will be able to find all you need to know there. What you wont find is any credible reference that states ENSO is the cause of the increased global temperatures over the last 100 years. I wonder if you can prove me wrong?

Reply to  Simon
June 7, 2026 1:30 am

ENSO is a cycle, but La Nina and El Nino are NOT opposite events..

That is what you seem incapable of understanding !!

Reply to  Simon
June 7, 2026 6:55 am

A shock in a time series can be a unexpected change in the underlying process that affects the series at a specific point in time. These breaks can cause persistent changes in the series and require intervention fo insure they do not become persistent. This is most noticeable when a level shift occurs and is not damped. This can occur especially when multi-time intervals are averaged.

Do you have any evidence that UAH insures that shocks are properly damped? If not, then it remains a viable question about a problem in the series.

Simon
Reply to  Jim Gorman
June 7, 2026 2:12 pm

Good on ya Jim. Now got any references/evidence for this…. this….. theory of yours?

Reply to  Simon
June 8, 2026 5:31 am

Good on ya Jim. Now got any references/evidence for this…. this….. theory of yours?

Why yes I do. Look at the graph.

Why don’t you give us a reference that explains a physical connection for step increases in global temperature that just happen to occur simultaneously with El Nino’s.

I’ve given you a statistical reason. Perhaps you can refute it using statistics. If not, then you have refuted nothing.

aussiecol
Reply to  Simon
June 7, 2026 4:32 pm

Actually, evidence shows the ENSO cycle is a result of warming from exiting the last ice age. Even the IPCC say that. It has nothing to do with the mythical effects of the mystical CO2 molecule… there is plenty of evidence out there that shows that. I’ll wait with bated breath for you to refute that…

Simon
Reply to  aussiecol
June 8, 2026 1:07 am

I don’t think anyone is saying ENSO is caused by CO2. Not sure where you got that from?
As for your theory… I have no need to refute something that no sane person is stating. Sorry.

Reply to  Simon
June 8, 2026 5:33 am

As for your theory… I have no need to refute something that no sane person is stating. Sorry.

In other words, you can’t refute it. So, the theory stands until an experiment proves it false, right?

Simon
Reply to  Jim Gorman
June 8, 2026 2:18 pm

In other words, you can’t refute it. So, the theory stands until an experiment proves it false, right?”
Brilliant….. but no. I suspect it is just another crack pot theory not worth wasting time on. I did a short google search and nothing. That’s enough.

Mr.
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 6, 2026 2:45 pm

I see you’re trying to graduate from crayons to screenshots, MUR.

Keep trying, young fella – if you don’t succeed, there’s always finger-painting.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 6, 2026 6:31 pm

If you click on the black image it will expand and become clear. Use escape key to contract the image.

Scissor
Reply to  Mr.
June 6, 2026 12:18 pm

Yeah. Castro and his thugs killed, pillaged and stole just about the entire island. For 60 odd years escapees have supported those that remain imprisoned by sending them food, clothing and money.

The same destruction occurred in Venezuela.

We should listen to those who know what they are talking about.

Reply to  Mr.
June 6, 2026 1:58 pm

A completely correct statement.. Well said.

Victor
June 6, 2026 10:34 am

Green energy economy is the same as peak oil.
What year will peak oil occur?

Reply to  Victor
June 6, 2026 11:28 am

Peak demand? Before 2030. Thanks dozy-no-more-oil donny.

Reply to  bnice2000
June 7, 2026 12:36 am

We still burn most of our oil for road transport. The growth in other sectors will not be enough to mask this decline:

Two countries have banned the import of ICE cars, and more will follow.
China is the biggest car market and their EVs alread replace 1 mb/d. Climbing. Recent numbers showed a drop in oil consumption last year and a massive one because of Hormuz (Thanks dozy donny!)
India is also electrifying their road transport.
Sales of EVs in Europe soar. 2035 ban of ICE cars.
Sales of EVs also increase in african and south american countries.
The US is the only one trying to swim against the current (more or less succesfull)
40% of shipping is transporting fossil fuels. What do you think are they going to transport?

Where do you see oil demand growth coming from?

9e83821d912cdbe937562771942a1efd
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 7, 2026 1:13 am

“Two countries have banned the import of ICE cars”

There is absolutely zero accounting for Government STUPIDITY !!

But, then, that’s the only way they can force people to buy short-lived throw-away EVs.

And China has a lottery for ICE vehicles that only the very rich can play in.

Other people have a lottery for EV number plates.. even if they can’t afford a car, the car is still counted as registered..

Typical communism.

MarkW
Reply to  bnice2000
June 7, 2026 7:26 am

In LooserNames mind, government action is part of the market economy. To him, government outlawing something is no different than the market rejecting it.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 7, 2026 1:24 am

What do you think are they going to transport?”

They will end up be the only country that CAN transport stuff. !

And they will transport EVERYTHING they want.. because they CAN

US economy is surging..

Dow Jones went over 51500 then dropped back a bit , but still at 50800.

If people didn’t want oil.. there wouldn’t be a price surge and SO many countries increasing their local production.

The world runs on OIL, COAL and GAS, any will continue to do so many decades to come

Yes… YOU are totally reliant on those three products for your very existence.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 7, 2026 6:09 am

Two countries have banned the import of ICE cars” Nope, just one — Ethiopia. And that ban had little or nothing to do with emissions or climate change.

Main Reasons (Economic Survival Strategy)

  • Foreign currency (forex) shortages and massive fuel import costs: Ethiopia, a landlocked nation, spent ~$4–6 billion annually on fuel imports and subsidies (a huge drain on reserves for one of Africa’s poorest countries). Fuel prices tripled in recent years, exacerbating shortages and long queues. The ban aimed to reduce oil dependency, conserve scarce forex, and stabilize the economy after a 2023 sovereign default and IMF bailout.
  • Cheap local electricity: ~96% of Ethiopia’s power comes from renewable hydropower (with more capacity coming online via projects like the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam). Shifting to EVs leverages abundant, low-cost domestic energy instead of imported fuel.

If ideologues such as yourself would spend just five minutes doing a little AI-assisted research, you would find that answers are much more complicated than Climate sloganism, and generally far more pragmatic.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 7, 2026 6:29 am

China is the biggest car market and their EVs alread replace 1 mb/d. 

Every time you bring out this disinformation, I’m going to repeat my real life experience in China, previously posted here on 17th May 2026 and still unanswered:

BTW, you often bang on about how China has had huge growth in EV sales.
Recently I was in China for about a month and had many conversations with Chinese people.

Chinese people can’t just walk into a dealership and buy whatever car they want. New license plates are strictly limited:

  • For ICE cars: You enter a lottery with terrible odds (often less than 1% chance). Many people wait years, many never win the lottery.
  • For EVs: Much easier – you often get a plate immediately, or through a far less competitive process, sometimes for free. People take this route even though they can’t afford a new car and buy the license plate for when/if they can afford a new car.

How it distorts things:

  • It artificially boosts EV sales by making them the only practical option for many buyers and potential buyers who want a car now.
  • People who would naturally prefer a petrol car (for range, refuelling speed, or lower upfront cost in some cases) are forced into EVs instead.
  • This creates inflated demand for EVs that isn’t purely based on consumer preference, price, or performance.

It’s a very effective government tool for hitting EV targets and reducing local emissions, but it’s classic central planning distortion – not a free market outcome. Many “EV adopters” in these cities are simply lottery refugees.

So the next time you bank on about how great China’s EV sales are, bear this in mind, because frankly it’s clear you know nothing about EV sales in China.

And I’ll bet you ignore it again because the truth hurts

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 7, 2026 6:33 am

Two countries have banned the import of ICE cars

Ethiopia and Laos.

Both very small markets:

  • Ethiopia: Around 3,000–5,000 new vehicles per year registered in recent pre-ban years (e.g., ~2,800 in one recent year). Even with the EV shift, the overall new car market remains tiny for a country of 120+ million people.
  • Laos: Roughly 20,000–21,000 new vehicles per year (e.g., 20,908 in 2023). Slightly larger than Ethiopia but still modest.

That’s going to cure global warming!

MarkW
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 6, 2026 6:05 pm

Peak oil and peak demand are entirely different things.
Given the fact that oil usage continues to increase at the same rate it’s done for decades and there is no potential replacement for oil in the wings, your fantasies have no chance of coming true.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
June 6, 2026 10:37 pm

I love how lefties like reloaded want to dream of peak oil by 2030 and then really expect net-zero by 2050.

In Western Australia nobody remotely believes it even Woodside the largest gas producer openly admits we can’t do it and it’s openly reported in even lefty press.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-11/wa-will-fail-to-achieve-net-zero-by-2050-woodside-report-warns/106665142

If the feds won’t net-zero in Western Australia they are going to have to stump up a lot of cash because we aren’t spending our money.

MarkW
Reply to  Leon de Boer
June 7, 2026 7:29 am

In their minds, the only standing between us and a perfect world, is a lack of sufficient government power.

Mr.
Reply to  Victor
June 6, 2026 11:49 am

probably when the rush away from ‘renewables’ back to reliable energy sources occurs?

Victor
Reply to  Mr.
June 6, 2026 1:44 pm

As oil shortages increase, demand for coal will increase.

MarkW
Reply to  Victor
June 6, 2026 6:05 pm

That won’t happen for hundreds of years.

Victor
Reply to  MarkW
June 7, 2026 12:02 am

Higher oil prices make more difficult to recover oil fields profitable.
Higher oil prices make other energy sources attractive.

Peak US oil production occurred in October 2025 at 13,864 kb/d but may be exceeded in early 2027, according to the STEO forecast.

“For years now, we have outlined with what we hoped was clarity, and what we now submit was prescience, the view that U.S. shale oil, that great source of modern supply, could not grow forever. It would mature, crest, and begin its long descent. That moment, by our models and measures, has arrived: shale has plateaued, and 2024 appears to be its high-water mark. And yet, investor sentiment has scarcely been more downbeat.”

https://peakoilbarrel.com/us-march-oil-production-flat/

MarkW
Reply to  Victor
June 7, 2026 7:30 am

I see that the fools still believe that government action to restrict oil/gas development is proof that we are running out of both.

Victor
Reply to  MarkW
June 8, 2026 9:38 am

The cost of oil extraction varies between different oil fields.
If the oil price falls below the cost of extracting the oil from an oil field, the oil production company will suffer a financial loss.

American shale oil costs production stands at a critical juncture as breakeven prices prepare to climb to $95 per barrel by 2035, invest in oil and gas with Domestic Drilling and Operating. This forecast represents a fundamental shift for domestic producers accustomed to relatively stable production economics over recent years. The average breakeven price for new shale wells currently sits at $70 per barrel, yet industry experts project substantial cost increases throughout the coming decade.

https://www.domesticoperating.com/blog/2025/09/28/u-s-shale-oil-costs-set-to-hit-95-breakeven-point-invest-now-with-domestic/

Tony Tea
Reply to  Victor
June 6, 2026 4:39 pm

Peak oil will occur in 2010…

mleskovarsocalrrcom
June 6, 2026 10:41 am

NetZero = burn down the village to save it.

June 6, 2026 10:41 am

Australia’s efforts to reduce CO2 is a sad commentary on brainwashing.

The Alarmists actually think these efforts make a positive difference.

Australia’s efforts are inconsequential to the Earth’s weather and climate but are devastating to the economy and national security of Australia.

Does Mad Ed have a Hotline to the Australian government? They seem to be heading down the same Road to Ruin with their Net Zero delusions.

Victor
Reply to  Tom Abbott
June 6, 2026 1:52 pm

When citizens get worse financially, the support for the government will decrease.

Reply to  Victor
June 6, 2026 2:02 pm

One Nation, who are “realists”, are surging massively in the polls, now ahead of every other party.

Bodes well for a possible recover after the next election as the Australian public gradually wakes up to the devastating effects of the anti-CO2 scam.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Victor
June 6, 2026 10:28 pm

Already happened if you held an election today the government would fall and they are in full panic mode.

Curious George
June 6, 2026 10:53 am

Please Learn From Sri Lanka’s Sustainable Revolution.

George Thompson
Reply to  Curious George
June 6, 2026 11:22 am

Never happen-greeniewhacks will find some other excuse for the unfortunate event in Sri Lanka; after all, the greenie attempts were simply done wrong…it’ll be better next time, doncha know?

MarkW
Reply to  George Thompson
June 7, 2026 7:31 am

The socialist mantra:

This time it’s going to work.

Jeff Alberts
June 6, 2026 1:17 pm

Crisis crisis crisis. When everything is a crisis, nothing is a crisis.

Bob
June 6, 2026 3:41 pm

You just can’t get dumber than government.

MarkW
Reply to  Bob
June 7, 2026 7:32 am

There are those who ignore history and believe that more government is the solution to every problem.

observa
June 6, 2026 7:47 pm

Not to worry younguns your Gummint is investing in your future for generational equity-
‘The hits just keep coming’: Labor backs clean energy solar expansion deal in India
Well they need more money for your expensive housing and keeping the lefty unis in biz and on message-
India becomes Australia’s largest foreign-born group, overtakes England | World News – The Indian Express
Patronage where patronage is due.

observa
Reply to  observa
June 6, 2026 8:02 pm

PS: Meanwhile in another galaxy far far away the Celestial generation continues the epic struggle for equity against the outside forces of darkness with lack of pronouns or something or other-
Why Celeste turned to Google for dating: ‘I’m not leaving my house for just anyone’

June 6, 2026 7:54 pm

For a Australia temperature check, i went to:
https://www.extremeweatherwatch.com/countries/australia/average-temperature-by-year. The Thi and Tlo data from 1901 to 2024 are displayed in a table. Here is the data for those to dates:

Year———Thi——–Tlo——–Tav Temperatures are ° C
2024——-29.7——-15.9——-22.8
1901——–28.6——-14.5——-21.6
Change—+1.1——-+1.4——-+1.2
Range Thi: 27.5—30.1
Range Tlo: 13.8—15.9

CO2 Concentration Data
2024: 425 ppmv (0.84 g CO2/cu. m. of air)
1901: 297 ppmv (0.58 g CO2/cu. m. of air)

After 123 years the temperatures have increased by only a small amount and are within the range of natural variation.

At the MLO in Hawaii, the concentration of CO2 in dry air is currently 431 ppmv. One cubic meter of this air has mass of 1,290 g and contains a mere 0.85 g of CO2. This small amount of CO2 can not absorb enough out-going long wavelength IR light to warm up such a large mass of air. Please note and never forget how little CO2 there is in the air. This means the so-called greenhouse effect has no role in warming the air.

The main process for warming of the air is quite simple: sunlight warms the earth’s surface. Air contacts the warm surface and the warm air then rises up. The process is absorption, conduction and convection. However, in some areas of the earth’s surface such deserts advection, a horizontal wind, carries away the warm air to nearby areas. Siroccos are the hot winds blowing out of deserts

The challenge is: How do we explain the above to Premier Anthony A. and the Canberra Climate Cartel and convince them to abandon their draconian climate agenda and the goal of Net Zero by 2050?

rovingbroker
June 7, 2026 2:57 am

Mrs. Jones — we’re happy to tell you that rather than repair your son’s broken femur using a stainless-steel Femoral Head, we’ve removed his entire leg and replaced it with a wood crutch. We’re starting physical therapy tomorrow to teach him how to walk again. We are also planting a tree in what used to be the hospital’s parking lot. We look forward to the day when we can cut that tree down and use the wood to make more crutches and canes.

Have a good day.

Ddwieland
June 7, 2026 7:15 am

Canada is disturbingly similar to Australia in the level of climate brainwashing we’ve endured. Australia should be a cautionary tale, but I doubt that our intellectual idiot of a prime minister who has been a staunch supporter of the net zero madness sees that. So Canada, too, is in decline, obsessed more with Trump than our self-inflicted economic shrinkage and inflation.