What about Earth’s Threatened and Endangered PEOPLE?

We just had our 57th Earth Day, and our planet’s poorest people were ignored yet again  

Paul Driessen

Another Earth Day has come and gone – number 57, like Heinz steak sauce. Once again, the media, activists and international agencies fed us pablum, exaggeration and alarmism.

Our public lands, the Endangered Species Act, biodiversity and environmental justice are under threat, they raged. Oceans are filling with plastic waste. Big polluting corporations are getting away with “climate homicide” and “planetary ecocide.” The Arctic is melting, and polar bear cubs are drowning.

The United Nations took a short break from bashing Israel over “Palestinian genocide” and western nations for the “gravest crime” ever committed against humanity (trans-Atlantic slavery), to proclaim April 22 “International Mother Earth Day” and call for an end to “crimes” that “disrupt biodiversity.” 

Activists held the “first multilateral conference” on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels. Their “Our Power, Our Planet” theme says further progress will require that communities and individuals pressure governments to accelerate the “clean” energy transition from “dirty” fossil fuels.

Forgive my skepticism. But I was a college organizer for very first Earth Day (1970), back when we had real, highly visible environmental problems: air pollution and toxic smog over cities, industrial water pollution that made it unsafe to swim, leaded gasoline, and more. We largely solved those problems.

Since then, greens have grown in domestic and foreign financing, power and influence, and the ability to conduct ideological campaigns and lawfare on issues of irrelevance to the vast majority of Americans, let alone families in the most energy-deprived, destitute, diseased and malnourished nations on our planet.

Any yet, for days leading up to Earth Day and afterward, virtually nothing was said by the UN, WHO, eco-activists, media screed-meisters or I-care-deeply politicians about these people … or even about people in their own developed countries who bear the brunt of climate-centric, anti-growth, net-zero, de-industrialization, lower-living-standards policies.

It’s as if people don’t exist, and don’t belong, on our planet. The human herd must be culled.

In the developed world, most climate-focused countries and states have the most pseudo-clean energy mandates and subsidies … the highest electricity prices … the highest prices for goods and services. They’re destroying entire industries, leaving thousands unemployed. They have the technologies to utilize their abundant carbon and nuclear energy, but ruling elites don’t want citizens to enjoy jobs and living standards based on that energy. Each year thousands die needlessly during frigid winters and summer heatwaves because families cannot afford or obtain proper heating and air conditioning.

The “climate crisis” is s Hollywood special effects disaster movie. The foundation for any “clean” energy transition is imaginary. Utopian energy is simply not clean, green, renewable or sustainable.

When wind turbines, solar panels, transformers, transmission lines and backup batteries or power plants are included, wind and solar energy require dozens of times more raw materials (and thus mining and pollution) and hundreds of times more land than just building a few nuclear or combined-cycle gas plants close to where electricity is needed – and forgetting about any pseudo-renewable systems.

For families in poor nations, the price tag is infinitely higher.

Worldwide, 730 million people still have no access to electricity. Billions more have minimal, sporadic access. In Sub-Saharan Africa, 600 million have no electricity; hundreds of millions more have minimal, unpredictable electricity from small wind turbines and solar panels here and there. The situation in much of rural Asia and Latin America is little better. Ditto for vehicles and gasoline.

The result is entirely predictable. Almost no wage-earning jobs or mechanized farming, but abundant backbreaking work for parents and children in fields – and plenty of malnutrition, disease and death.

Over half the world’s people (more than four billion) still subsist on $10 a day.

More than 260 million suffer from critical food insecurity and malnutrition, and 35 million children are acutely malnourished, including 10 million with childhood wasting disease – leaving them with weak immune systems and vulnerable to developmental delays, disease and death

Malaria still infects 280,000,000 people annually and kills 610,000. Indoor air pollution from wood, dung, coal and kerosene cooking and heating fires kills nearly 3,000,000 people globally every year. Up to 3.5 million – mostly children – die annually due to inadequate safe water, sanitation and hygiene. Diseases modern western societies never even hear about sicken, disable or kill still more millions.

Do you think any of their grieving families gives a spotted owl hoot that your local temperature climbed a degree since the Little Ice Age ended, or a polar bear cub drowned halfway around the world?

A major reason is rampant corruption. The World Bank found that at least 7.5% (and as much as 15% or more) of total assistance to the most aid-dependent nations ends up in ruling elites’ foreign bank accounts. And yet the WB’s International Development Association received $94 billion for the 2022-2025 period. Multilateral development bank financing to top humanitarian recipients was $12 billion in 2020. Total worldwide Official Development Assistance reached a record $161.2 billion in 2020. Do the math.

Far worse, these banks, US and European foundations, and climate, agricultural and other activist groups work tirelessly to prevent these countries from acquiring or developing the electricity and other energy they need to emerge from squalor, starvation and disease. For decades these virtue-signaling banks have provided loans only for wind and solar projects – almost never for coal or gas power plants.

The result? Expensive, limited, unreliable electricity. No modern hospitals, schools, water purification, factories or shops. Continued pollution from wood and dung fuels. No jobs, improved living standards or reductions in killer diseases.

The same institutions – along with UN and other government agencies – oppose pesticides for eradicating locusts and malarial mosquitoes. They wage campaigns against biotech corn, soybeans, canola, and even hybrid seeds and life-saving Golden Rice. They pressure African governments to ban non-organic fertilizers and crop-saving pesticides that have been approved as safe in wealthy countries. Many even oppose tractors and other mechanized equipment.

To them, the only acceptable farming method is “agro-ecology” – la Via Campesina: the Peasant Way – aka, “traditional,” “organic,” backbreaking subsistence farming.

This, corruption, wars and food-deprivation as a weapon of war is why we still have malnutrition, starvation, disease and astronomical death tolls in African and other impoverished countries.

These global zealots want power over poor countries – not power for the countries’ destitute and desperate people. Their morally depraved policies and practices bring death to millions every year.  

Developing countries should avoid doing what rich nations are doing now that they are rich. Instead, they should do what rich nations did to become rich. They should remember that wealthy industrialized countries did not have MDBs to help them; they created institutions to finance the power generation and factories that created jobs, middle classes, health, prosperity, new industries … and taxes to pay for more.

They must chart their own destiny – and take their rightful places among Earth’s healthy and prosperous people. Decent, moral Westerners must help them end the corruption and make this happen.

Paul Driessen is senior policy advisor for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and author of books, reports and articles on energy, environmental, climate and human rights issues.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 13 votes
Article Rating
22 Comments
Edward Katz
May 4, 2026 6:27 pm

It’s been a safe bet that for years now foreign aid money designed to alleviate 3rd World poverty has been siphoned off into government leaders’ private accounts. So why would anyone expect the amounts designed to fight a non-existent climate threat end up anywhere else? So just as the vast majority of people in the Developed World don’t see climate change as any particular threat, those in the poorer countries don’t see or even expect their governments to take any positive action against higher levels of poverty, hunger, disease or most internal or external threats except at the bare minimum level.

ResourceGuy
Reply to  Edward Katz
May 4, 2026 7:37 pm

Don’t forget the other double jeopardy of Chinese firms causing major environmental damage to these countries while holding multi billions in government debt in the same (see Zambia).

Gregg Eshelman
May 4, 2026 7:36 pm

Story Tip: The Guardian’s BSometer is off the end of the scale with this article, claiming New Orleans is facing 3 to 7 meters of sea level rise. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/04/new-orleans-sea-levels-relocation-climate-crisis

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Gregg Eshelman
May 5, 2026 8:47 am

The Guardian. bwahahaha….

Funny how it does not look at all of the Florida coastal cities.

7 meters is 23 feet. Not going to happen.

observa
May 4, 2026 7:44 pm
Leon de Boer
Reply to  observa
May 4, 2026 10:22 pm

How many meat of fossil fuels ads were on billboards etc around the city of Amsterdam my guess is ZERO. So lets call it what it is a PR stunt to get some media coverage.

Reply to  Leon de Boer
May 5, 2026 3:59 am

Now that I’m an AI addict, I’m imagining one of those billboards and the prompt that I’ll need to get AI to create the image. Maybe later after I wake up. 🙂

May 4, 2026 9:52 pm

It’s as if people don’t exist, and don’t belong, on our planet. The human herd must be culled.

Spreadsheet from The Optimum Trust AKA Population Matters, Patron Saint Attenborough, showing where the cull needs to be.

Direct link to the spreadsheet.

Spoiler alert: Any country where non-whites live.

Keitho
Editor
Reply to  Redge
May 5, 2026 2:01 am

Ah but he’s a National Treasure . . . blurgh!

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Redge
May 5, 2026 8:38 am

The Population Bomb.

May 4, 2026 10:01 pm

Up to 3.5 million – mostly children – die annually due to inadequate safe water, sanitation and hygiene.

So clean water is a bit of a hobby horse for me and I’ve rabbited on about this for many, many years.

According to the World Health Organisation:

In 2017 29% of the global population lack easy access to safe, uncontaminated drinking water. Of these 2.2 billion people, 829,000, including 297,000 children under 5, died from diarrhoea alone.

  • 785 million people lack even a basic drinking-water service, including 144 million people who are dependent on surface water.
  • Globally, at least 2 billion people use a drinking water source contaminated with faeces.
  • In the least developed countries, 22% of health care facilities have no water service, 21% no sanitation service, and 22% no waste management service.
  • Contaminated water and poor sanitation are linked to the transmission of diseases such as cholera, diarrhoea, dysentery, hepatitis A, typhoid, and polio. Absent, inadequate, or inappropriately managed water and sanitation services expose individuals to preventable health risks. 

Diarrhoea is mostly preventable and yet we waste billions of dollars every year “fighting” climate change, arguably a fight that has only claimed energy-poor victims. Not a single person has on their death certificate “Cause of Death: Climate Change”.

The demand for more money to fight climate change has risen inexorably to the extent we are projected to spend trillions of dollars on a non-issue, whilst the annual cost of a genuine, fixable issue providing clean, safe water is estimated at $22.6 billion.

A global average temperature is a complete red-herring.

Helping the clean water impoverished millions is a relatively cheap and easy task compared with “fighting” climate change, a fight only nature will win.

So why aren’t we doing it?

I think I know the answer.

Leon de Boer
Reply to  Redge
May 4, 2026 10:29 pm

The UK warm home plan could have paid for that and had change. They have also said

The UK plans to spend “around £6bn” ($8bn) of its overseas development aid (ODA) budget as international climate finance over the next three years, the government said today.

So it should be a none issue send the bill to the UK and they could look like real climate champions rather than the fools they currently are.

Reply to  Redge
May 5, 2026 7:22 am

Many of the climate zealots are neo-Malthusians. They actually want a large slice of the population to die. It is therefore not surprising that these people craft their climate change plans to hinder development in the countries which need cheap energy the most.

Phillip Chalmers
May 5, 2026 1:27 am

Now that there is a WWW, the following is possible.
Start yet another movement, choose an appropriate name and specify what problems are motivating the concern of the members and followers.
Now, green cannot be used in the name as it has been hijacked. Universality should not and must not be used, because the world where living in unsatisfactory is like an archipelago which has islands with very different problems. Locality is vital.
Uniformity must not be idealised, different problems need different solutions and all change needs to be tolerated as a slow, step-by-step process and no blame be put on others who are ahead, better off and achieving goals before others.
A view of leadership which truly is and acts as if it is working for the common good needs to be examined and how such leaders are chosen and how they are kept in power or replaced by others be pre-planned and agreed.
Forget John Lennon Imagine, such self-righteous fantasies without practical suggestions for solutions are counter-productive – dreaming is for people who are asleep.

I would like to rewind and re-start with someone who was alive and awake –  “Small is Beautiful” a collection of essays published in 1973 by German-born British economist E. F. Schumacher. 

Reply to  Phillip Chalmers
May 5, 2026 4:14 am

Google AI says about that book:

Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered is a classic 1973 book by E.F. Schumacher that critiques modern, large-scale economics, arguing for a human-centered, decentralized approach that prioritizes human needs, local communities, and sustainability over endless growth and materialism. It advocates for “intermediate technology” and “production by the masses” instead of mass production, and champions values like self-respect, freedom, and community well-being over purely economic metrics like GDP. 

Sounds nice in theory- but just another impractical fantasy that would necessarily lead to totalitarianism.

“A view of leadership which truly is and acts as if it is working for the common good needs to be examined and how such leaders are chosen…”

Democracy can be messy and often doesn’t lead to the person with the highest IQ or most sophisticated vision of a utopia getting elected. But dismissing it also dismisses the concept that every person’s judgement is as good as everyone else’s and that the majority should pick the leader. The alternative view is that a select few are more enlightened and that they should lead or pick the leader. Trusting in the view that the judgement of the majority is better in the long run has yielded better results than elitism or just rule by the mighty.

Keitho
Editor
May 5, 2026 1:59 am

Eradicate the UN and all its departments for a start. Next get the markets working and democratic institutions will follow as people become richer and have more leisure time. Fossil fuels have a major role to play in this uplifting of poor people but first get rid of the rotten, destructive, corrupt and useless UN.

Reply to  Keitho
May 5, 2026 4:16 am

Getting rid of it won’t be easy but just reducing or ending support of it will be a good start. I think that’s Trump’s plan. Same for NATO.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Keitho
May 5, 2026 1:42 pm

NYC could then repurpose the UN complex as housing for illegal aliens.

Adrian Clarkson
May 5, 2026 2:43 am

UK Government predicts Energy Constraint Costs to rise from £1.3bn to over £7bn by 2030!They will use excuses like the Iran war to inflate energy costs so they can hide the true costs of
Net Zero from the public. Plus 2030 is the date they are wanting to introduce as many Net Zero polices/restrictions as the can because they know that 2030 is the end of the current Grand solar maximum and the begging of the next grand solar minimum. it is predicted by 2035 the UK will be having winters as we did in the 1960’s/1970’s. Our government know after 2030 it is going to get more and more difficult to hoodwink people into believing in the climate crisis con.

hiskorr
Reply to  Adrian Clarkson
May 5, 2026 6:15 am

Naah! After 2030, the UK will double down on Net Zero restrictions because “It’s working!!”

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  hiskorr
May 5, 2026 8:44 am

That is my prediction, world wide.
Except, CO2 emissions are not in remission.

Sparta Nova 4
May 5, 2026 8:37 am

Amen.