Eye Roller Study: Burned forest areas have faster snowmelt

From the “No tree canopy means more sunlight reaches the ground…. Well….DUH!” department comes this bit of obvious science. Of course, never mind the albedo change…because…CLIMATE CHANGE! SMDH.

The Pacific Northwest has seen below-normal snow this season — and new research from Portland State University suggests that the region’s snowmelt-dependent water resources could face growing challenges in the years ahead as forest fires and winter rainstorms become more frequent.

Researchers in PSU’s Snow Hydrology Lab, led by Kelly Gleason, an associate professor of eco-hydro-climatology in the School of Earth, Environment & Society, found that snow in burned areas of Oregon’s western Cascades melted much faster during midwinter rain-on-snow events than snow in nearby unburned areas. 

Rain-on-snow events — when warm rain falls on an existing snowpack — can trigger rapid melting and increase flood risk downstream in just a matter of days. In the Pacific Northwest, that matters because mountain snow acts as critical seasonal water storage, refilling reservoirs, refreshing municipal and irrigation water supplies, producing hydroelectric power and providing habitat during the drier summer months. The new study shows that wildfire damage can intensify those impacts, reducing how long snow can hold onto water.

Wildfires open forest canopies, allowing more sunlight to reach the snow, while burned debris on the snow surface makes the snow absorb more and reflect less of that light. Together, those changes reduce the snowpack’s “cold content” — the built-in buffer that allows snow to warm up without immediately melting.

Sage Ebel, the study’s lead author and a doctoral student in PSU’s Earth, Environment & Society program, compares that cold content to a sponge.

“If a sponge has a lot of space, it can absorb water before anything drains out,” Ebel said. “But if it’s already saturated, water runs out right away. A snowpack with a lot of cold content can absorb heat before it starts melting. What we’re finding is that small changes in short- and long-wave radiation in the burned sites are keeping that cold content lower than in unburned areas, making them vulnerable to snowmelt during rain-on-snow events.”

Ebel and Gleason installed snow monitoring stations across high, mid and low elevations in the Breitenbush River watershed, 80% of which burned during the 2020 Lionshead fire. In 2023 and 2024, burned sites lost roughly twice as much snow during these rain-on-snow events as nearby unburned areas. Snowpacks at mid-elevations were most vulnerable, with rain-on-snow-driven melt accounting for 26% more of the total annual melt in burned forests.

“The impacts of climate change are exacerbated in the burned forest,” Ebel said. “There’s less capacity to absorb small changes in warming or inputs from rain than in unburned areas. As the area of burned forests increases with climate change, those effects could have widespread consequences for the water reserves we rely on across the West.”

Faster winter melt from burned areas adds new stress to those systems, forcing water managers to balance flood preparedness with long-term water storage in a warming climate.

The researchers say understanding how wildfires and rain-on-snow events interact is essential for refining snowmelt models, improving flood forecasting and planning for more reliable water supplies in the future.

The study was published in the journal Environmental Research Communications. The findings are one example of the kind of applied, place-based research underway in PSU’s School of Earth, Environment & Society, which launched this fall uniting multiple departments to encourage collaboration on complex, interconnected issues such as climate change.


Journal

Environmental Research Communications DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ae550d 

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 27, 2026 6:16 pm

From the first paragraph in the above article:

“From the ‘No tree canopy means more sunlight reaches the ground…. Well….DUH!’ department comes this bit of obvious science. Of course, never mind the albedo change…because…CLIMATE CHANGE!”

Kudos, Anthony! Right on.

Also this “DUH”, somewhat related to albedo change:

Those tree trunks and branches (both standing and fallen) that have been darkened nearly black by fire and smoke have much higher solar absorptivity and surface emissivity than do naturally growing trees. Hence, they will get hotter under sunlight and re-radiate more energy to the (snow covered) earth surface than would exist in unburned forests of the same areal tree coverage fraction. The extra energy impinging on the snow would, of course, make it melt faster than normal, all other facts being comparable. Physics 101.

BTW, referring to Mr. Sage Ebel’s comment about the “cold content” of snow (a completely unscientific term), he apparently fails to recognize that all snow has the latent “heat of fusion” associated with its transition from water ice to liquid water (about 334 joules/gm) which can be compared to the specific heat of snow (about 2.1 joules/gm/deg-C). So snow at, say 10 deg-C colder than melting (i.e., at about -10 deg-C) would only have about 6% more “cold content”.

Mr.
April 27, 2026 6:40 pm

A peer reviewer responded to the study with a one-liner –
“no sh1t Sherlock”

April 27, 2026 7:20 pm

Six million acres of PNW forests have burned since Bill “Epstein” Clinton and Algore shut down all management of Federal forests in 1994. The spotted owl population has plummeted from 22,000 to less than 2,000, in part because they are not made of asbestos.

Maybe, just maybe, the School of Earth, Environment & Society at Portland State University might want to study the effect of political tyranny married to scientism quackery. Perhaps the “College of Antifa” could do some real work in ending the 30+ year catastrophic failure that has hammered our priceless heritage forests as well as our shattered economy.

leefor
April 27, 2026 8:12 pm

So Ebel isn’t sage at all. 😉

John Hultquist
April 27, 2026 8:14 pm

 The subject is more complex. Fires produce soot. These particles do end up downwind in the forest canopy that did not burn. When the soot falls out onto snow the result is more or faster melting. After a large fire, it takes about three years for this process to cease.

kwinterkorn
April 27, 2026 8:30 pm

So, based on the beliefs and findings of these “scientists”, they would support more active forest management to prevent fires, right?

But I guess that would be contrary to their religion….

April 27, 2026 8:56 pm

I wanna be a climate researcher when I grow up.
That ain’t workin. That’s the way you do it. Money for nothing and your chicks for free.

Mr.
Reply to  Mike
April 27, 2026 9:14 pm

Banging on the bongos keyboard like a chimpanzee
Oh, that ain’t workin’, that’s the way you do it
Money for nothing, and your chicks for free

Lemme tell ya, them guys ain’t dumb
Maybe get a blister on your little finger
Maybe get a blister on your thumb