From Penn State: Weather phenomenon that eluded scientists for decades captured in nature as corona discharges glow on tips of leaves
UNIVERSITY PARK — In a converted 2013 Toyota Sienna affixed with a hand-built telescopic weather device protruding from the roof, Penn State experts in meteorology and atmospheric science made their way down the nation’s eastern coast in June 2024 in search of Florida’s famed near-daily summer thunderstorms.
They were hoping to catch corona discharges, a long-hypothesized atmospheric weather phenomenon where miniscule pulses of electricity dance at the tips of tree leaves, causing the canopy to glow in the ultraviolet (UV). For more than 70 years, scientists have suspected treetops might emit these corona electrical discharges because of odd electric field activity in and over forests during storms, yet they have never been documented outside the lab.
The team, consisting of William Brune, distinguished professor of meteorology and atmospheric science; Patrick McFarland, a doctoral candidate in meteorology and atmospheric science; Jena Jenkins, assistant research professor; and David Miller, a former associate research professor who is now at the Penn State Applied Research Lab; worked to be the first to document this effect.
They chose the Sunshine State because of its propensity to produce frequent thunderstorms. However, as is often the case during research endeavors, the typical weather proved atypical.
For three weeks in Florida, McFarland and Brune chased pop-up storms that left as quickly as they formed.
The researchers had little to show for their efforts until, as they made their way back to Penn State, massive and sustained storms began cropping up just west of Interstate 95. The team caught an exit, nestled in a parking lot at the University of North Carolina at Pembroke, and trained their instruments to the top branches of a sweetgum tree that the rangefinder logged as 100 feet from their van.
The thunderstorm flashed lightning and poured rain for nearly two hours, giving them time to also observe corona on a nearby long needle loblolly pine tree as the storm waned. The results, which were the first directly-observed corona discharges occurring in nature, were recently published in Geophysical Research Letters.
“This just goes to show that there’s still discovery science being done,” said McFarland, lead author on the paper. “For more than half a century, scientists have theorized that corona exists, but this proves it.”
Corona discharges take shape during storms, the researchers said, because clouds build up strong negative charges that attract the opposite positive charge on the ground below. Opposites attract and this positive electrical ground charge rises up through the trees to the highest point, causing an electric field on the tiny, hair-like tips of leaves that is great enough to create the weak corona glow in both visible and UV form. This UV from the corona breaks apart water vapor, producing hydroxyl.
Hydroxyl is the atmosphere’s main oxidizer. Oxidizers clean the air by reacting with chemicals emitted into the air, making other chemicals that are easier to remove. These chemicals include volatile organic compounds emitted by trees or human activities and the greenhouse gas methane. The team’s prior research found corona discharges to be a substantial source of atmospheric cleansers in the forest canopy.
The chemical conversion is what researchers keyed in on. Several years ago, the team applied high-voltage, low-current electrical impulses to tree branches and found a strong correlation between the UV emissions from corona discharges and the creation of hydroxyl compounds. In that project and the more recent observations, researchers noted leaf damage at the point corona was emitted.
To capture the phenomena in nature and make use of this correlation, the team developed the Corona Observing Telescope System, a Newtonian telescope that feeds into a UV camera. It’s geolocated, equipped with a device for measuring atmospheric electricity and calibrated for UV emissions using a mercury lamp. The solar UV wavelength band is completely blocked, leaving corona, lightning and fire as the only sources of UV in the field.
In North Carolina, this system captured 859 coronae events on the sweetgum tree and 93 on the loblolly pine. Events ranged from a blink to several seconds, McFarland said. During the field campaign, researchers observed coronae in four additional thunderstorms and on four additional tree species.
“It’s nearly invisible to the naked eye but our instruments give rise to a vision of swaths of scintillating corona glowing as thunderstorms pass overhead,” McFarland said. “Such widespread coronae have implications for the removal of hydrocarbons emitted by trees, subtle tree leaf damage and could have broader implications for the health of trees, forests and the atmosphere.”
While the researchers have confirmed the phenomena, they said they still don’t know much about the potential impacts of these corona discharges and have more questions, such as: Are trees harmed during this process? Or do they benefit in some way? Have they evolved to withstand it? Does the atmospheric cleansing have a benefit to the forest? The researchers are beginning collaborations with interested tree ecologists and biologists to answer these questions, thus blazing new paths of discovery into the natural world around us.
This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation. Brune, Jenkins and Miller were co-authors on the research.
Journal
Geophysical Research Letters DOI 10.1029/2025GL119591
Very cool!
Electrifying.
Sparkling!
Well, at long last we have the answer as to why many plant leaves, especially those on tall trees*, have “pointy” end points: it’s nature’s means of minimizing the buildup of static charge on trees. By the process of gradual “corona” discharge, the probability of a cloud-to-tree-top lightning discharge is minimized, thus minimizing the direct tree damage and probability of igniting a tree fire as might result from a typical 300 million volt, 30,000 amp lightening strike.
*Just look at the leaves of giant redwoods, sequoia, tall eucalyptus, pine, spruce and maple trees.
Nature/evolution is so smart!
(Potentially) Shocking!
Strongly resembles St Elmo’s Fire. So I guess it could be called St Elmo’s Fir.
Or a “southern” St. Elmo’s Fire?
“yet there is too much visible light from the sun to see these coronae glows with our eyes”
Depends on what you’re high on. 🙂
Great photos. On the night of January 11-12, 1972 I was a college freshman in Laramie, Wyoming. We had stunning wind that night. It was bad on the front range in Colorado, too. Gusts to 81 MPH at the regional airport.
The wind put out the electric service in Laramie, after dark, and in the utter darkness everything that presented a sharp point was aglow with St. Elmo’s Fire — twigs on trees and the aluminum window frames in the dormitories especially. The city was bathed in indigo. I have been through hurricanes but have never seen such a display as in Laramie that night.
It is quite rare for the electric service to fail nowadays, but when wind gusts reach 60 MPH around here now during the day, a person can see a lot of airborne dust across the Laramie Valley — airborne dust or spray and high winds are perfect combination for generating charged surfaces.
Mark it well, OUTSIDE a lab.
Observing, detecting, recording.
Data!
Verifiable data
interesting article. a sailor and we call that St Elmo’s fire, and it is a well-known phenomenon at sea. It would make sense that it has a similar effect on land. i was fortunate enought to see it on several occasions. It was much more impressive, which also makes sense since there weren’t as many sharp points for it to discharge from. St. Elmo’s Fire is named after St. Erasmus of Formia (also known as St. Elmo), the patron saint of sailors. Sailors historically viewed the glowing blue or violet plasma discharge on ship masts during storms as a sign of his protection—a good omen that the saint was watching over them
It may be worth noting that these experts in meteorology were not able to predict thunderstorms in Florida with sufficient accuracy to have captured their sought-after phenomenon while on their trip there all the way from Pennsylvania.
Which is why they’re called ‘pop-up’ thunderstorms. 🙂
Applies x10 to “climate” predictions.
Kinda like Mad Magazine’s “The Lighter Side of Rip-offs.”
Waiter makes a mistake on the bill in frame one, tells the customer he’s “bad at math.”
Waiter points out that the tip is lower than normal in frame two.
Customer reminds the waiter in frame three about his supposed math difficulties.
In the fourth frame, the writer’s defense is “But I’m a WHIZ at PERCENTAGES.”
Discharges of lightning generates oxygen atoms which react with molecular oxygen to form ozone. The very reactive ozone would readily oxidizes methane. This is one reason the concentration of methane in air is a low 1.9 ppmv. We really don’t have to worry about emission of methane.
There are many natural sources of methane such as swamps, marshes, bogs, fens, wet lands, domestic and wild ruminate animals, decaying vegetation and termites, specially African termites. The big question is: How much of the methane in the air is from natural sources and how much is from activities of humans?
We really don’t have to worry about emission of methane.
You haven’t been paying attention. Methane is many times more powerful at trapping heat than CO2. All you need to do is a Google [news] Search on “Methane times” and that statistic will pop right up. All the climate crusaders are worried about methane and so should you.
Harold The Organic Chemist Says:
FYI: The concentration of methane in dry air is 1.9 ppmv. One cubic meter of this air has a mass of 1,290 g and contains a mere 0.0014 g of methane at STP. The global warming potential of methane is a computed number based on its IR spectrum and has never been measured. This trace amount of methane in air can not absorb enough out-going long wave length IR light emanating from the earth’s surface to heat up such a large mass of air.
Another reason for the low concentration of methane in air is that methane is slightly soluble in cold water. One liter of cold water can hold up to 35 ml of methane. The methane that dissolves in the cold polar water slowly diffuse down to the ocean floor where under high pressure it forms a solid clathrate known as methane ice. There are vast amounts of methane ice on the cold oceans floors.
All combustion processes at the earth’s surface consume large amounts of air and the methane therein is burned up. Jet planes with there large engines are flying incinerators for methane as well as gasoline and diesel vapors, propellants from cans, and VOC from plants.
The greenhouse effect is a minor process that warms the air. Over land conduction and convection of warm surface air into atmosphere is the main process for warming the air. Another process for warming the air is advection. Over the oceans evaporation of water carries enormous of heat into the air. The wind sweeps large amounts of warm surface air up into the atmosphere.
You forgot the sarc tag for the cheap backrow seats.
The key phrase “climate crusaders” was a dead giveaway.
I didn’t downvote, did get the sarcasm, but posted the reality anyway, for the lurkers that might not get it…
For you downvoters, Steve did not see the need to put the /sarc tag on this comment.
You forgot the /sarc off.
Methane doesn’t ‘trap heat.’ Neither does CO2.
I have always been amazed by how the climate crusaders hype the miniscule effects of CH4 and CO2 which have limited and narrow IR absorption bands, while totally ignoring H2O with its very broad IR absorption bands.
Both methane and CO2 (as do all other “greenhouse gases”, predominately water vapor) first intercept LWIR radiated off Earth’s surfaces and then, almost instantaneously, thermally equilibrate that received, excess energy with other non-LWIR active atmospheric gases—predominately N2 and O2—by means of rapid molecular collisions occurring in the 5 km altitude above Earth’s surface.
True, methane and CO2 don’t “trap heat”, but Earth’s overall atmosphere does “store” LWIR-radiated energy until such can be fully thermally-radiated away due to the average temperature of atmospheric gases being above absolute zero temperature.
Only the “dry atmosphere” used to calculate its “global warming potential” is IMAGINARY.
In reality, it has zero “global warming potential, ” because water vapor already absorbs whatever methane could possibly have absorbed.
The real question is why does anyone think it matters? Methane’s “absorption bands” are *completely* overlapped by WATER VAPOR, so methane is irrelevant even if its concentration grows.
And further irrelevant because “greenhouse gases” don’t “drive” the climate.
And further irrelevant since a WARMER climate IS BETTER.
So…irrelevant.
Thanks Anthony.
I’ve got several types of needle leaf trees within view of my house, Ponderosa Pine being the native and most common. What I don’t have are thunderstorms. Darn. T_T
Absolutely to be expected .
What is the common reaction forming the -OH radical ? Where does the lost H go ?
Is it associated in any way with the formation of O3 ?
It strikes me that the amount of the reactions over a forest under a storm is likely much greater than the direct effects surrounding actual lightening strikes .
I am curious as to the relationship between this phenomenon and the propensity for trees in the Great Smoky Mountains to give off VOCs which give them their name. Are the coronas more common in that area, which probably has its fair share of summer thunderstorms?
Ozone in the air reacts with the terpenes (turpentine) from the pine trees to from solid compounds called ozonides which scatter mostly blue light.
So if the VOCs become solid particles, presumably they don’t form these coronas, or at least not in abundance.
You are right, The ozonides are are very small particles, form aerosols and are not involved in the coronas.
Said to occur on cattle horns, too, though I have never seen it.
Kirlian photography!!!!!
I prefer Girlian photography, but hey, to each their own.
this phenomenon of electron discharge forms the design of modern lightning protection, i.e. beyond the old rod and porcelain ball on farm houses. Link the ground electrically to a ‘spikey’ array atop a building. That way you have continuous electrons emanating into the air, reducing the chance of a lightning strike substantially. Note most lightning is discharge from ground to air, not the other way around. Grass tips, trees help the same way.
Ah fieldwork. How REAL science is done.
The climate goose-steppers would just plug an assumption of the existence of something into a model and then pointed to the model output and said “See?”
Well, lightning occurs when charge builds up between objects on earth and clouds, until the air breaks down.
Tree tops are a frequent point of discharge.
Descending from the summit of Mt Kenya as the afternoon clouds were building up we could hear the rocks around us sizzling . If we pointed a finger at the sky , the tip of the finger crackled and a tingle could be felt . We were acting as discharge points for the static build up . Being broad daylight we did not see the glow . Needless to say . we speeded up our descent .
A forest smells absolutely beautiful after a thunderstorm & a good rain… I’m sure this helps to explain why!