The UN climate chief Simon Stiell was in fine hysterical form at the start of the COP30 conference in Belém, telling delegates that squabbling would not be forgiven while famines take hold, forcing millions to flee their homelands. “To falter whilst megadroughts wreck national harvests, sending food prices soaring, makes zero sense economically and politically,” he was reported to have said by the Guardian. Fine words, of course, maybe even worth cutting down 100,000 mature rainforest trees so that 50,000 other COP clowns can hear them. Almost a shame to note that over the last 30 years, higher crop yields, thanks to hydrocarbon-produced fertiliser and increases in global biomass caused by a little extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, have led to the almost complete elimination of natural famine. Nobody can adequately define a climate refugee but no doubt millions, nay billions, are already on the move in the fevered imaginations of COP attendees and Guardian readers.
Over the last 25 years, natural famine, those primarily caused by environmental factors such as droughts and heat, has become exceedingly rare. In fact, natural famine mortality has been falling dramatically over the last 100 years. Almost all famines are caused by local conflicts or senseless outbreaks of political ideology. Chairman Mao’s ‘Great Leap Forward’ in the late 1950s destroyed traditional farming in China and led to tens of millions of deaths through starvation. Ironically, if the hard-Left Net Zero numpties get their way and abolish hydrocarbon-produced fertiliser across the globe, even higher numbers of people, stretching into billions, will starve and likely die.
According to the latest WHO State of Food Security and Nutrition Report, hunger affected 8.2% of the global population. This was down from 8.5% in 2023 and the peak of 9.2% in 2022. One always needs to see the workings out whenever the United Nations is involved these days but famine classifications are said to be limited to warzones.
Simon Stiell is a major league climate hysteric with plenty of past form. Former Amnesty International Secretary General Kumi Naidoo was also on COP manoeuvres and offered the opinion that “we’ll warm up the planet to the point where we destroy our soil and water, and it becomes so hot we can’t plant food”. The picky might note that it is difficult to “destroy” H2O – just ask hydrogen fans who have the devil of an expensive job in separating its two constituent parts. Heat can work in separating the individual atoms – 10,000°C near the Sun is a good bet. Meanwhile, World Food Programme Executive Director Cindy McCain claimed that unchecked climate change was already driving millions towards hunger through extreme weather. Checking climate, stopping the temperature, getting rid of all hydrocarbons from a modern society to bring forth a bright new future – Chairman Mao must be quietly chuckling in his Tiananmen Square mausoleum.
Regular readers of the Daily Sceptic will, of course, be up to speed regarding all the twaddle spoken about extreme weather and natural events such as drought. But it seems that however many times it is pointed out that even the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) detects little, if any, change in most extreme weather trends, the scare – the number one scare – is too good to let go to promote the Net Zero fantasy.
Professor Gianluca Alimonti said that in 2022 and an unholy alliance of activists manged to get his widely-publicised paper retracted in Nature a year later. Now he is back with Alimonti 2 noting there have been no statistically worsening trends of climate impacts. On the other hand, there have been many improvements in humans adapting to whatever nature has thrown against them. Alimonti draws attention to IPCC findings that there is “low confidence” in the emergence of drought frequency, “for any type of drought, in all regions”. Similar lack of change is detected in cyclones, floods and wildfires.
Meanwhile, evidence continues to accumulate showing the Earth is increasing biomass at a considerable rate as higher levels of CO2, partly helped by humans using hydrocarbons, rescue the atmosphere from the near-denuded levels of the immediate paleo past. As the COP clowns travelled down their local ‘Highway of Shame’, built for their comfort by chopping down 100,000 rainforest trees, they would at least have been cheered by the recent news that the remaining mature Amazon trees are gorging on the gas of life. According to a recent paper published in Nature Plants, they are getting fatter by 6% on average every decade.
Hydrocarbon-based fertiliser has been an enormous help in feeding the world, but the role of higher levels of CO2 is also crucial. More CO2 in the atmosphere has boosted plant growth almost everywhere, leading to notable de-desertification in marginal living areas in places such as sub-Saharan Africa. Another advantage is that plants growing with more CO2 need less water and can survive in areas where local droughts occur. More biomass also leads to a healthier planet with massive benefits cascading through the ecosystem.
Promising famines while promoting the ‘Great Leap Forward’ of Net Zero is just one reason why this deluded elite COP30 gathering collapsed under the weight of its own sinister inconsistencies.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. Follow him on X.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
One minor niggle:
“… this deluded
eliteilliterati COP30 gathering collapsed under the weight of its own sinister inconsistencies.”Imagin if Kamala had won:
” This COP was the ultimate milestone to save the planet by making the entire west go net-zero by 2035. No more coal and nuclear power,no more fertilizers,
most nations won’t even be able to maintain their existing green power grids.
The resulting famines will help us replace the native populations faster than ever
and it’ll all be blamed on AGW.
All those nations and borders must vanish if they want to get relief supply
and the remaining population must move into megacities if they want to get aid.
There will be no culture,no paper money,no sovereignty,no private property – people will be completely unburdened by all that has been.And they will own love the nothing they own or they won’t get access to food.”
Not very good. You need a lot of self-referential statements. Something like: We must save the planet by working to work, to save the planet, with work, that comes with work, and saving the planet.
Good, that’s good. But don’t forget the head bob. Her head bob is fundamental.
I am reminded of a handwave and, “It’s got electrolytes.”
The Alberts correction sounds truer to me but Imagining the Kamala win distracted me.from seeing it. Her supporters can imagine whatever reaction they like because there is no reference to compare to. The guessable alternative, Joe, would have said/done… nothing? Some anonymous bureaucrat I don’t know the name of would have funneled a few $Billion loaned federal funds to an anonymous green businessman from elsewhere?
Safe and effective – Biden’s pronouncement.
Why not both?
Besides, doesn’t «elite» at least somewhat overlap with «inbred» (whether literally or figuratively) in every meaning except names proper?
Real famines will start when there is no fossil fuel to provide fertiliser, harvesting and transport.
Their manic mal-informed anti-CO2, anti-progress, anti-hydrocarbon agenda is what caused famine in Sri Lanka…
…and it is what will cause famine in many other parts of the world if it isn’t shut down soon.
THEY ARE THE CAUSE. !!!
Transport will be the first “tipping point” as food cannot be delivered and spoils while loaded on unmoving trucks.
“… if the hard-Left Net Zero numpties get their way and abolish hydrocarbon-produced fertiliser across the globe, even higher numbers of people, stretching into billions, will starve and likely die …”
And no diesel for tractors, nor trucks, nor ships, nor trains. Food production, processing, and distribution would all but stop. It’s not exaggeration to state that billions would starve if Nut Zero is implemented. The wackies blame agriculture for global boiling and wish to slaughter all cattle and leave the carcasses to bloat and rot in the pastures. It’s all famine all the time for these raving commie idiots.
And to think entire political parties and millions of adherents have bought into this madness hook, line, and sinker. Not to mention the Pope. Pan-genocidal insanity is epidemic, with no cure in sight.
Desperation at losing control of the people with lies is making them lose their minds.
You have a fundamental assumption: that they have minds to lose.
While Stiell was ranting the more advanced activists have found an effective way of combatting climate change. By colouring the waters green.
“When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”― Arthur Conan Doyle, The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes
‘Fine word legitimate’. King Lear
The cop-out should broaden their reading habit from Conan-Doyle and Franz Kafka. As may have been noticed with the BBC’s little local difficulty, whenever a clique are left to their own devices they can convince themselves of anything. I said that.
The straw-grasping and pearl-clutching at CRAP30 reached epic levels. Indeed, it may turn out to be the final nail in the coffin of climate ideology. Their climate caterwauling falls on deaf ears now.
Perhaps many deaf ears, but there are many still devoted to the choir.
With their fire situation, we can hope that it’s a cremation, as opposed to a traditional burial.
“According to a recent paper published in Nature Plants, they are getting fatter by 6% on average every decade.”
So we don’t have to worry about advancing glaciers (yet). But we have to worry about a Tree Age. Where morbidly obese trees crush cities and mountains alike, in their inexorable girth of destruction. Oh the botanity!
The abuse of the word “optics” makes no sense.
Creating mass famine is one of their primary goals. Reducing global population is their goal, starvation is one of their favored tools for achieving this end.
Are you sure it wasn’t Bedlém?
Proof that this issue will not be won by facts and truth pulling the other side over to our side. We have to reach the average guy with facts and truth. He is the one paying for this stinking mess. We don’t need a long technical argument to move him. Just show him that he is paying a whale of a lot of money and sacrificing for nothing. CO2 hasn’t gone down, it has gone up, average global temperatures haven’t gone down they have gone up, catastrophe is not approaching we are doing fine. The other side are liars and cheats and the average guy must be informed.
These mass starvation warnings typify the desperation of the climate alarmists whose earlier warnings have been proven consistency erroneous. So now their modus operandi is to blow the exaggerations really out of proportion since they believe that nothing success like excess.
Why ironically?
Many in the same crowd openly have said something or other along the line of «Too many hu-mons, let’s stop the growth / reduce by 10% / reduce by 99%» for a long while (take a look at “Egoscience” by Holdren, Ehrlich and Ehrlich, that was 1977).
As to those nice people selflessly running to extinguish fires by pouring more fuel on any hot coals they can find, it ’s always the same crowd. Consider a run-of-the-mill bank crisis “somehow despite all the efforts” turning into the Great Depression, or Prohibition and its re-runs (including Gorbachev’s imitation and War on Drugs), or the eternal Arab–Israeli “Peace Process”, etc etc. That’s a thing they do, all the time.