Essay by Eric Worrall
… there are some laws which cannot be circumvented by powerful men, and the consequences of those laws are coming for us all.
Western liberalism and the harsh reality of climate change
By Yuki Lindley | 15 November 2025, 11:00am
Capitalism’s unrestrained access to political influence, land and labour is starting to cannibalise the very consumer market it requires to exist, writes Yuki Lindley.
WITH OUR SOCIAL MEDIA feeds flooded with images of death and destruction — whether from the live-streamed genocide in Gaza or the urgent warnings from scientists about ecological collapse and the crossing of planetary tipping points — it is becoming more apparent to those who have long been shielded from the true costs of Western “civilisation” that all is not well with Western liberalism.
This harsh reality has never been hidden from the global majority; those whose ancestors were colonised, enslaved and subjected to genocide by the brutal march of modernity, liberalism and global capitalism.
However, with a cult-like leader in the Oval Office who openly embraces fascism, the facade of Western exceptionalism is beginning to crumble. Now that the capitalist class has over-exploited the lands and people of countries in the periphery (poorer, often formerly colonised nations), the driving force of exploitation is coming from the core (those in wealthy, industrialised nations).
Capitalism has historically relied on the exploitation of formally colonised nations at the periphery – international laws and economic systems designed by powerful colonial states entrench poverty, in order to maintain a supply of cheap labour, and raw materials to sustain the prosperity of those in the core.
However, with ecological collapse unable to be contained within national borders, and the exhaustion of the natural resources in the periphery, those dynamics are starting to be felt in the core. With increasing austerity measures, labour precarity, the privatisation of public services and the destruction of our planetary home, the exploitation upon which capitalism was built, is boomeranging back upon ordinary people living in wealthy nations, no longer seeing an endless curve of prosperity for their futures.
Western liberalism emerged to provide political and philosophical justifications for the newly emerging social order that capitalism was creating. Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Hobbes, and Jeremy Bentham helped shape the ideological framework within which capitalism could expand, unrestrained to colonise new lands and people in its search for cheap labour, and endless expanses of lands from which to extract wealth.
Through a narrative of individual freedom, private ownership of property, reason and a drive for endless progress and economic productivity, enlightenment thinkers heralded in the age of Western liberalism, which was then spread throughout the world through a brutal regime of colonisation. When Spanish colonisers stole vast quantities of Andean and Mesoamerican gold and silver from the Americas, this enormous wealth circulated throughout European financial centres to fund banking and credit systems, which allowed for the rapid expansion of a global market system, giving rise to early financial capitalism.
Enlightenment thinkers seeking to escape the dark ages of religious dogmatism determined that rationality was the highest form of human evolution, and conveniently saw in themselves – the wealthy, educated Western European man – the pinnacle of this process, the modern man. This of course entailed that everyone else fell somewhere behind them in the scale of human evolution, not just women of course (who were too emotional to be rational), but all the other races, who were unfortunately falling behind in evolutionary terms, thus, the burden fell upon the white man to go forth and civilise them, such that they could be brought into the modern age of reason.
Known as the white man’s burden, this civilising mission spread white terror and genocide across the globe, with historians estimating that at its peak, Western European powers (and their settler colonies) dominated around 85 per cent of the world’s territory, representing the consolidation of the Western, global, capitalist order. The fact that large numbers of these evolutionarily backwards people would die out was seen as natural, and if they were helped along in their extinguishment by the well-oiled machinery of genocidal colonial practices, well, that was just helping nature along in a process of ensuring the survival of the fittest (which also meant the whitest).
Thus, Western colonisation spread liberalism throughout the globe, ushering in a new dawn of globalised capitalism, which developed along racialised lines. New global structures were developed by powerful, colonial states, to entrench their advantage through economic and international legal systems, often at the expense of formerly colonised nations, which were left reeling from the trauma, and destruction of their societies, peoples and lands. Of course, these legal frameworks were always applied unevenly, with powerful nations largely ignoring their own rules when it conflicted with their economic or political interests.
As Henry Reynolds points out, the British colonisation of Australia was illegal under international law as it existed in the late 18th century. It was clear that the lands were inhabited, thus, it could not lawfully be claimed as terra nullius (a land without people), and as such, sovereignty could only be acquired through treaty or a declaration of war, neither of which the British chose to do.
Paradoxically, during this time of colonial terrorism throughout the globe, there was a flourishing of a human rights-based discourse in Western Europe, which proudly proclaimed that all men were equal and born with inalienable rights. Of course, in reality, only a minority of the population (Western European men) could be recognised as being a man, and thus, with rights worthy of protection. This transparent hypocrisy within the Western cannon, was apparent to all those existing at the margins, unable to be recognised as part of mankind; however, the powerful and articulate critiques of the colonised, were rendered unintelligible to many in the West, because they could not see them as equally human, and thus these critiques were sidelined, allowing the hubris of Western liberalism to march on.
Now that actually-existing-capitalism (as opposed to the economic theory), with its unrestrained access to political influence, indigenous lands, and slave labour, has passed its zenith, it is starting to cannibalise the very things it requires to exist; a stable planetary system, the unpaid social labour of care giving, and a politically stable, market of consumers. A frightening new era of techo-facists is heralding in the dusk of a dying empire, long past its peak of economic prosperity and dominance, left clinging desperately to its military might as its last remaining source of power.
Corporate power, having long embedded itself into our public institutions, has discarded any facade of separation and is brazenly stepping forward to reveal itself as the true ruler of liberal democracies. The techno-facists in the White House have little regard for those they deem superfluous to capitalism; they believe that through digital mass-surveillance, their control over the flows of information (through platform monopolisation), and their control over state security apparatuses to suppress dissent, they will be able to usher in a new dawn of AI-powered efficiency and progress.
Of course, there is nothing new about these worldviews — they are the product of Western liberalism and its foundational disregard for certain lives, in the brutal quest for progress and profit.
Gaza is where the mask of Western liberalism has fallen to reveal its true face — one which has never been hidden to the global majority. Western liberalism was built upon the genocides of many of the world’s truly democratic, anti-authoritarian civilisations, showing one face to those it deems human, and another to those whose lives it deems ungrievable.
The true face of Western liberalism, if we’re forced to contend with its material history, is one of racialised and gendered domination, which saw the lands and bodies of Indigenous peoples as merely a resource from which to extract endless wealth, and rendered the unpaid labour of women invisible.
It believed in rational modern man’s ability to understand the natural world, in order to dominate it; a hubris the natural world is on track to deliver a crushing blow to. The West has long seen itself as above the laws it has helped create, but there are older laws, those of the land, well understood by Indigenous peoples, which care not for the demands of Western exceptionalism; for there are some laws which cannot be circumvented by powerful men, and the consequences of those laws are coming for us all.
Yuki Lindley is a student of philosophy of race, colonisation and Indigenous sovereignty.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License
Source: https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/western-liberalism-and-the-harsh-reality-of-climate-change,20380
Can’t you smell the hopelessness? Silicon Valley no longer answers their calls, COP30 is an unmitigated disaster, Bill Gates has abandoned the faith, and across the world, soaring energy prices have sparked populist movements which threaten to topple their few remaining friends from office.
So what do they do? Instead of having the guts to admit they got everything wrong, they try to keep hope alive by promoting fantasies of impending climate breakdown.
The only places where ecological breakdown is happening are the kind of vicious totalitarian tyrannies whose governmental systems these climate thinkers appear to prefer – but almost never want to experience first hand for themselves.
international law as it existed in the late 18th century.
Now, that was funny. Almost as funny as the Argentine claim on the Falklands. So, how does that fit in with Spanish colonisation of lands that were inhabited?
Colonisation / slavery only matters if it’s the English doing it
God forbid anyone finds out that black slavers sold their own people into slavery
They also enslaved people of other races. That’s happened all throughout human history. No race exists that wasn’t enslaved by other races.
Not just by other races, but in many cases by their own race as well.
I’ve been enjoying the decline and dismemberment of climate change “doctrine” and this is no exception. I will never forget what the greenies put us through in their quest for raw power, and still am amazed at their lack of ability to do real scientific inquiry or even use logical, rational reasoning. They are doomed.
Oh wow! I need a stiff drink after reading this…
Yeah, and here I thought that “A Theory Of Justice” by John Rawls was a slog.
I stopped reading after the second “genocide”.
The same thing happens to me whenever I see “systemic”.
An interpretation of real history that is immature, selective, dishonest, offensive and ready to forget. Grow up and learn, Yuki, before you start to preach.
Geoff S
Let’s see: Free market capitalism has brought the entire world out of universal abject poverty. This clown thinks aboriginal thinking is superior. That experiment has been run and the results are in.
[BTW: Democracy is mob rule.]
They frequently believe they do stand for democracy, but they appear to want a form of democracy where wrong think is censored. While Prime Minister Starmer has people arrested for hurty Facebook posts, he still vigorously defends Britain’s defence of free speech, he just wants to censor the wrong kind of free speech.
The socialists believe in free speech, it’s just that they don’t believe that “hate speech” should be protected.
And of course they define hate speech as being anything they hate hearing. IE, anything the party tells them to not believe.
The marriage of communism and Malthusian delusion expressed as grievance epitomizes woke ignorance about how things work in the real world. They blame capitalism being clueless that corruption is omnipresent in all human institutions. They then goose step to authoritarian tyranny as if that is a virtue..
Capitalism is about competition. A corrupt company will always be out completed by companies that aren’t corrupt.
The more concentrated power becomes, the less the consequences of corruption are to those who are corrupt.
Government is the ultimate monopoly. The genius of the US founding fathers is that they sought to break up political power into multiple power centers.
First there was the 3 branches, Executive, Legislative and Judicial Secondly there were the states and the federal government.
Progressives have succeeded in neutering the states by making senators directly elected instead of being appointed by the state governments. They have also tried to neuter the legislative branch by creating bureaucracies with the power to create new laws and put those bureaucracies under the executive branch.
“A corrupt company will always be out completed by companies that aren’t corrupt.”
Not if they have corrupted the government to assist in restraint of trade. Big Pharma is a textbook example of a market failure due to their iron fist monopoly on healthcare. Free market capitalism can only occur in the absence of corruption.
My point was Progressives think government is the answer being ignorant that they are captured contributors to the problem. Bribery is legal in America.
Reads like an upper division theme paper, gotta please the Prof!
ChatGPT: “Write a paper on capitalism, colonialism, and genocide using only Wikipedia, The Nation, “Das Kapital” and “The Communist Manifesto” as sources.”
Yuki’s prompt?
I see your point, but the conclusion is unhinged in a way only a real human can do.
That was sort of a Baltimore Catechism
of Marxist Greenness, hitting all the necessary points of his faith.
Who cares that the Arcadian precapitalist
society never existed, or could exist in the real world?
Yuki is trapped in the intellectual traffic jam of leftist intersectionality.
Leftism is a sort of pseudo-intellectualism.
It doesn’t actually contribute anything to society.
In fact , it seeks to destroy it.
See, if you let your emotions command your responses to situations, you really are acting irrationally.
Because ideology / emotions and rationality cannot occupy the same mind space at the same time.
Yuki didn’t read history closely enough.
Queen Isabella unified Spain, kicked out the Muslims from their last outposts in Spain, and financed the Columbus expedition, which paved the way for colonisation of the Americas. Even though she married, history remembers Isabella as the main power in Spain during this critical era.
Queen Victoria presided over the pinnacle of Britain’s industrial revolution might, and arguably over the height of the British Empire. While the empire stayed powerful for decades after she died, I think the Elizabethan era marks the end of the age when the empire seemed unshakeable.
There are plenty of strong women in history, and some of them presided over that age of imperialism Yuki seems to take such exception to.
“I may have the body of a frail and feeble woman; but I have the heart and the stomach of a King, and of a King of England too.”
-Elizabeth I
Yep.
And then there were Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir, Margaret Thatcher,
Julia Gillard,Helen Clark,Jacinda Ardern,Hilary Clinton,Kamala Harris.Oh dear, every time I see Julia Gillard’s name, I think of the advice Sacha Baron Cohen’s character “The Dictator” gave to Gillard on The Today Show.
Not to mention Hatshepsut, or Maria Theresa. I believe the Maria Theresa Thaler is still minted by the Austrian Mint, dated 1780 (when the Empress died), and are still used as currency today). Maria Theresa bore 16 children, of whom 10 survived into adulthood. How many men could do that?
And of course, Joan of Arc, Catherine the Great, Cleopatra, Boudicca . . .
Strangely, some people think that men and women are different in general, both mentally and physically! Pathologists even believe they can distinguish sex by looking at bones, muscle tissue and even brain tissue! Hard to believe – given that we are told men and women are “equal”.
Also Catherine the Great of Russia.
In the modern era, There’s Lady Thatcher of England and Golda Meir of Israel.
The techno-facists in the White House have little regard for those they deem superfluous to capitalism; they believe that through digital mass-surveillance, their control over the flows of information (through platform monopolisation), and their control over state security apparatuses to suppress dissent, they will be able to usher in a new dawn of AI-powered efficiency and progress.
Was this written when Biden was in office? Or Obama?
This is projection on steroids.
“the dusk of a dying empire, long past its peak of economic prosperity and dominance, left clinging desperately to its military might as its last remaining source of power.”.
Russia?
I agree w the quote. And no, it isn’t Russia which makes connections the more it is pushed. As does China and India. More than half of the population. BRICS+ is an undeniable fact. Deal with it, adjust or falter by playing a zero sum game.
The europeans will fall first as they support the faltering US hegemon( for now).
Unless the US goes back to the principles of its founding fathers it will accelerate its demise.
It looked promising w Trump. But now he is just a weak emperor without clothes. Stupid bully meets serious opposition: only one outcome..
The philosophy course I took in college long ago was taught by a mathematician. The course was about logic. Not some made up philosophy of race, oppression, gender etc.
The rot set in long ago in Australia. A friend took a philosophy course 50 years ago to make up a few points, to pass the course he had to write an essay on feminist philosophy. He said the lecturer knew he thought it was all nonsense, so the lecturer stood behind him through the entire exam, to make sure he didn’t veer off narrative.
50 years ago.
Stupid is as stupid does!
STORY TIP
350.ORG suspends US operations due to funding challenges.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/13/green-group-350-org-suspends-us-operations-00651124
They really ought to change their name to 450.org.
They have failed utterly with 350 ! 🙂
Great news. No one will miss it.
“a student of philosophy of race, colonisation and Indigenous sovereignty”
Why should ANYONE pay even the slightest attention to this wacko !!
I’ll bet she has no idea that “indigenous” peoples slaughtered, enslaved, and genocided each other constantly. I’d wager there are people we don’t know about who were wiped out by other people we don’t know about.
I’ve dealt with a number of leftists who were absolutely certain that the North American native Americans were 100% peaceful prior to the arrival of the white man.
He even declared that the tomahawk was merely an agricultural implement until the white man taught them how to use it to kill.
Jeepers, and I thought the guy they elected in NYC was bad.
Man am I glad this gal isn’t on our side. How would like to try to defend this kind of trash. Shows once again CAGW isn’t about climate and science rather it is pure power and control trash talk.
Sorry Yuki, a return to the pre-Enlightenment world is not going to catch on IMO.
Another professional victim with a “degree.” How pathetic.
Oh, the “indigenous people”, is it? Must be worshipped because they are “superior”, and a different species to common old Homo Sapiens, is that it?
I don’t believe it – this grovelling to people on the basis of inherited wealth, power, and position only seems to be “good” if the people in question are oppressed, trodden-down and persecuted – or claim to be so.
The reality is that every society of any note from the dawn of civilisation seems to be characterised by racialised and gendered domination.
Suck it up, princess.
I can’t think of a single culture that didn’t consider land as being something to be exploited, and they all fought with their neighbors in order to capture more land to exploit.
And unfortunately, it seems we failed. Not only that, but we have started to lose grip on reason ourselves, as evidenced by this “student of philosophy of race, colonisation and Indigenous sovereignty”.
He gets an A+. In quackademic bafflegab.
The bio for Yuki says, “Yuki Lindley is a student of philosophy of race, colonisation and Indigenous sovereignty.”
She looks young- probably has little contact with reality. She’s just regurgitating what her profs have told her with no original thinking of her own.
I actually have no objection to anyone who choses to live in pre industrial conditions. But then they cannot use any products produced by hydrocarbons ( like going online) or take part in modern healthcare or derive any income from it by working in any sector that has hydrocarbon elements in it.
Or being supported by the State that uses them.
Or go to a school built with them or take lessons from those who do.
Or play music through a modern device.
Or have a house built by a builder using modern equipment and materials or use (evil) combustion engines for transport.
Anyone here guessing the % of Greenies who might qualify?