Ukraine attacks Russia’s oil sector, Canada attacks Canada’s… you sure you want us in NATO?

From the BOE REPORT

Terry Etam

Ukraine adapts against a vastly bigger opponent and illuminates the trap western governments have created for themselves

Recently, Ukraine has been launching massive drone attacks against Russian oil refineries/infrastructure. Seems reasonable, what with the invasion and all. 

Actually, it is more than reasonable, and about as logical as it gets. The Russians know this also; when they really want to rattle chains they go after western Ukraine’s energy infrastructure.

Energy is the lifeblood of everything and at this point in history, hydrocarbons are the blood in the system. Be under no illusions there. No one anywhere is looking to gain strategic military advantage by blowing up a wind turbine or covering a solar field with a tarp.

It’s interesting also how the West is flummoxed by the issue. Western governments are rightfully and fully supportive of Ukraine, and thus should in theory be highly in favour of such Ukrainian bombardments of Russian refineries. But it’s not that simple.

Russia is not the isolated pariah the west hopes for. Wave after wave of sanctions on the country have not achieved what was hoped, because Russia is adapting just as Ukraine is, and Russian oil is finding its way onto the market.

The West is caught in its weird dance whereby it implements policy after policy against hydrocarbons, attacking their own native supplies, while at the same time consuming the same amount as they always have, more or less. The west wants to cancel its own production, or strangle it, and at the same time wants to keep Russian oil off the market, and yet ironically, above all, wants low oil prices, because consumers freak out when they aren’t low.

An alien would look down at the situation and have nothing to say but the intergalactic equivalent of “WTF”.

Russia can cut off strategic oil supplies in a heartbeat, with little consequences to their own production. For example, Kazakhstan produces 1.5 million bbl/d of oil and ships most of it to Europe via a pipeline that crosses Russia. Imagine the impact on global oil prices if that cross-Russia pipeline was to “fall out of a window”, so to speak, as happens to so many Russian irritants. Even if Russian production was harmed to some extent by some policy, as long as that oil is removed from global markets, the Russians can do math as well as anyone: Yes Russia definitely does need the revenue! But 6 mmbbl/d at $80/bbl is the same revenue as 4 million b/d at $120/bbl. 

So the west, particularly in a US election year, is trapped. Anything that hikes oil prices materially will hit the pocketbooks of every consumer on earth, and fuel inflation, and every politician knows that inflation fuels rage. And governments can’t afford a prolonged fight against inflation anyway – imagine having to raise interest rates again in this fragile economic environment. Driving the point home starkly is the fact that the US government now spends more on interest payments than on defense. 

Behind closed doors at the highest levels of power, the tensions must be incredible. Particularly in the West, with the following must-win/highly contradictory ambitions: crush Russia, contain China, win the war against the climate or whatever it’s called these days, keep energy prices low to prevent outraged citizens and, following from the latter, do whatever it takes to keep their pudgy hands firmly on the controls. We can definitely see the bizarre output: attacks on our fuel system with no suitable replacement; attacks on average citizens for holding what are derisively now called ‘populist’ beliefs (even though the history of ‘populist’ beliefs crosses the entire political spectrum), and western foreign policy that seems paralyzed because it is ill-equipped to deal with, for example, the rise of BRICS.

And then, as a final but impressive gasp of inept state control, witness Canada’s frantic flailing to control the situation by…

Send in the goons: Canada cracks down on any speech it doesn’t like, with sweeping rules measured against undefined regulations, and enters the historical pantheon of legendarily badly run states

We’ve all heard about bill C-59 by now, the government of Canada’s crackdown on any comments related to emissions reduction mitigation efforts that do not adhere to “internationally recognized methodology”. It’s a Soviet-style attempt to crack down on any talk about what companies are doing to reduce emissions, or anything they do that is an attempt to reduce “the environmental, social and ecological causes or effects of climate change”.

The apes in charge, and their sycophants, say hey, it’s not censorship at all, you can talk about emissions reduction all day long, so long as it meets some undefined international standard, and the onus of proof is on anyone making the statement to show that they are not violating some “internationally recognized methodology” that does not exist. 

This whole fiasco is of course a one way street; the freedom to say anything that cements the climate emergency narrative remains gloriously unchecked. For example, energy commentator David Blackmon recently catalogued on LinkedIn the number of countries/regions that claim to be warming faster than the global average: Canada, Mexico, Latin America and Caribbean, Arctic, Asia, Africa, the US, Europe, Russia, Australia, China, and Finland all claim to be warming faster than the global average. The high priest of modern politicized science, Scientific American, says that oceans are also warming 40 percent faster than expected, and that oceans absorb up to 90 percent of the warming caused by human carbon emissions, and SA also notes that the South Pole is warming “three times faster than the global average.” So, as the pundits say, everywhere is warming faster than everywhere else.

Extrapolating from this, in keeping with necessary mathematical precedents such as how averages work, then the few remaining regions not mentioned must be plummeting in temperature, because that’s how averages work. And I mean plummeting, if it alone is offsetting the above-average gains in the rest of the world. Strange indeed how not a single headline can be found to that effect.

The speech police have no problem with such math crimes, because the asinine claims are put forth under the banner of ‘science’. It must be concluded then that math is not one of the “internationally recognized methodologies”.

No matter. The point is, as always, to silence discussions and ram through whatever ideological junk they can while still clinging to power like a bee holding onto an accelerating windshield.

Welcome to Canada, where if global embarrassment were an Olympic sport we’d be wearing perma-gold. Joke’s on us though; we elected these people. We should now clearly understand why Canada’s status as an investment haven is plummeting like a shot duck. (Do not point me towards legendary genius Warren Buffett who says he is comfortable investing in Canada; Buffett buys existing businesses, with moats, and the government of Canada is working to build those moats as fast as it can. Remember this investing rule for the foreseeable future: existing infrastructure is getting more valuable, because building anything gets harder by the day.)

It is probably unfair to single out Canada for such withering criticism when other western countries are on similar energy suicide missions. Australia, England, Germany… all under the spell of radicals that will accept nothing other than total nihilistic energy “victory”, a crown that seems to mean de-industrialization and subjugation of citizens in autos they don’t want, doing things they don’t want to, and not being permitted to say what they want to. (New Zealand was in that club as well, but has recently repealed a ban on oil & gas exploration when it dawned on them that fields decline, and do not produce at flat levels in perpetuity without investment. Yes, western governments really have enacted such legislation while simultaneously holding an astonishing ignorance about how energy really works.)

As far as Canada’s hydrocarbon sector goes, the most important thing to do at this stage is to keep our heads [down] and carry on providing the energy the world desperately needs. And that means every single person, right down to Guilbeault’s Greenpeace and the soup throwing fools of Just Stop Oil. If the feds are going to outlaw emissions talk, let them… the rotten foundations of their world can’t stand for much longer.

No one should stand taller than one that provides reliable and affordable energy for the globe’s citizens. Go back to work, and patiently wait until the inevitable happens, the day when governments are no longer able to pretend they can’t see reality. It’s going to be epic.

What the world desperately needs – energy clarity. And a few laughs. Pick up The End of Fossil Fuel Insanity,  available at Amazon.caIndigo.ca, or Amazon.com.

5 24 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

55 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scissor
June 26, 2024 6:06 pm

Half of our leaders are crooks, half are idiots, and some are both.

Reply to  Scissor
June 26, 2024 8:11 pm

A greatly overlapping Venn diagram.

Paul S
Reply to  bnice2000
June 26, 2024 8:40 pm

No wonder Kamala loves Venn diagrams so much.

Reply to  Paul S
June 26, 2024 8:46 pm

Just pretty circles to her !! Put some glitter, she would be giggling hysterically.

JamesD
Reply to  bnice2000
June 27, 2024 2:27 pm

Please don’t. That laugh makes puppies howl and children cry.

Reply to  Paul S
June 27, 2024 12:04 pm

Crooks; Idiots; Whores; Confused (drug/addled); Liars; Political image manipulators; Incompetent image manipulators; etc.

Kamala, the tiny circle right there in the center of all the overlaps.

Honest, smart, sincere, sensitive to others, not a whore … five circles not touching any part of the Kamala circle.

Coach Springer
Reply to  Scissor
June 27, 2024 5:51 am

Speaking of Venn diagrams, …

June 26, 2024 6:48 pm

Allowing ‘reasonable’ free speech is just an admittance of systemic censorship. The reasoning behind the speech will be ignored and pretended away while it is being silenced.

Tom Halla
Reply to  No one
June 26, 2024 8:30 pm

The US Supreme Court just punted with Murthy v Missouri, and denied standing to sue the Feds for coercing social media to block stories. The Ministry of Truth, next?

John Hultquist
Reply to  Tom Halla
June 26, 2024 8:44 pm

I think the Court punted. The issue remains open to be decided later.

Reply to  Tom Halla
June 27, 2024 11:07 am

for coercing social media to block stories

Several of the accounts my wife follows have suddenly been suspended in the last day.
Related? Or just coincidence?

Reply to  Tom Halla
June 27, 2024 11:48 am

They denied standing because the plaintiffs brought a suit about a hypothetical set of circumstances that they hadn’t personally experienced. They should have included people who had actually suffered because of these policies, instead of talking about potential future outcomes.

Tom Halla
Reply to  Archer
June 27, 2024 12:05 pm

Some of the plaintiffs had been injured, and were seeking an injunction against the Feds doing so again. The decision stank of the old “political question doctrine”.

Reply to  Archer
June 29, 2024 7:05 am

You are wrong

J Boles
June 26, 2024 6:48 pm

Excellent article! Good points! Unfortunately deeply worrying too.

June 26, 2024 7:15 pm

‘Particularly in the West, with the following must-win/highly contradictory ambitions: crush Russia, contain China, win the war against the climate or whatever it’s called these days, keep energy prices low to prevent outraged citizens and, following from the latter, do whatever it takes to keep their pudgy hands firmly on the controls.’

Terry, there’s nothing ‘contradictory’ about any of this once one realizes that the same governments that impose harmful domestic policies also follow harmful foreign policies.

cgh
June 26, 2024 7:23 pm

Climate policy in Canada is idiocy? That’s nothing. Try this. Meet Canada’s dimwitted Prime Minister.
Justin Trudeau Bhangra Dance in India | Full Video (youtube.com)

Yes he’s as stupid as he looks. Just this week his government got kicked in the ‘nads by losing a by-election in a riding full of rich socialists which has been Liberal for more than three decades.

Then there’s the Deputy Prime Minster and Minister of Finance having her Hillary Clinton moment.
WATCH: Chrystia Freeland Calls Canadians “COLD, CRUEL, AND SMALL” (youtube.com)
Go to 9:20 on the clip. You have to be a low-grade moron to insult the voters who determine your fate.Freeland’s riding of Toronto Center is right beside Toronto St. Paul’s.

I could go on. There was a fascinating clip of Canada’s Health Miinister delivering deranged remarks on climate change in the House. The common factor among all of this is that Canada’s ruling Liberal Party knows that it is now lower than raw sewage in the eyes of most voters.

Mr.
Reply to  cgh
June 26, 2024 8:04 pm

PM Justin Castreau lost the plebs when he said the millions of supporters of the truckers convoy had “unacceptable views”.

I mean, how much more up yourself could this guy get?

leefor
Reply to  cgh
June 26, 2024 8:09 pm

Unfortunately it leaves them in it up to their noses.

cgh
Reply to  leefor
June 27, 2024 5:44 am

Both of you are correct. The problem is that Justatwit is such a narcissist that he’s got rid of any members of Cabinet who might have been of some use or ability. We had a talented Minister of Defense in Anita Anand. As soon as she showed signs of getting to grips with the severe problems in Canada’s military and some leadership ambitions, she was dumped off to Treasury Board. She was replaced by the stupidest Minister of Defense Canada has ever had in the form of Bill Blair. In a history of Ministers of Defense that includes Col Sam Huges in 1916 and the truly stupid Paul Hellyer in 1963, that’s a seemingly impossible achievement.

What we have here is a government melting down under its own out-of-touch incompetence. The next election in 2025 is likely to see a decimation of both the Liberals and the NDP of epic proportions.

Rick Wedel
Reply to  cgh
June 27, 2024 7:19 am

Don’t pump Anita’s tires too hard. Her husband is a director in a company that has received many millions of federal covid dollars since she became a cabinet minister.

cgh
Reply to  Rick Wedel
June 27, 2024 8:27 am

That may be true, but that has nothing to do with Anita getting dumped out of Defense. Surely the pattern has been observed by now. Any time a cabinet minister looks like a leadership threat to Justatwit, or defies him in exercising her or his responsibilities in the portfolio, they are dumped over the side.

Reply to  cgh
June 27, 2024 7:15 am

Chrystia Freeland was Canada’s “negotiator” in the last US-Can-Mex trade agreement. She’s a media journalist. Lighthizer, Trumps’s rep, was an experienced trade dispute lawyer who had his boss put 30% duties on whole industries a couple of weeks before they were on the “negotiating” agenda. When the gunsmoke cleared, Canada’s unemployment level doubled that of the US, Canada fell 6 places lower in world per capita income, Canadian aircraft, auto, dairy, steel, aluminum, timber industries shrank. Canada’s dollar shrank in value from 90 cents to 73 cents US. Canada doesn’t need Freeland’s help with anything going forward.

cgh
Reply to  DMacKenzie
June 27, 2024 8:28 am

Which supports my contention that Freebase IS a low-grade moron.

Tom Halla
June 26, 2024 8:25 pm

Joe Biden, you can blame dementia. Justin Trudeau?

John Hultquist
Reply to  Tom Halla
June 26, 2024 8:47 pm

Emotional growth stalled at 13.

Old Mike
Reply to  Tom Halla
June 26, 2024 9:11 pm

His screw anything in trousers pot addicted mother

Tom Halla
Reply to  Old Mike
June 26, 2024 9:16 pm

She was probably bipolar, which is associated with substance abuse.

Reply to  Tom Halla
June 27, 2024 1:37 pm

When the medications don’t work people try something else.

John Hultquist
June 26, 2024 8:42 pm

An alien would look down at the situation and have nothing to say but the intergalactic equivalent of “WTF”.”

I have found this alien point of view to be very helpful in relieving stress.

Thanks for the review of the craziness.

Editor
June 26, 2024 9:02 pm

It seems there is a way for Canadians to get round the speech restrictions: Support the climate narrative. Go for it in spades! The world is heating so fast that every country is now warming faster than the average. Every crop in Canada will fail – no, has failed already – because of the extreme heat, so there will be no food on the supermarket shelves from tomorrow. The government has worked out how to make wind and solar work 24/7, so electricity will be free from next week onwards and the weather in every season from now on will be exactly average. ….. In other words, say what the law requires, but go over the top so that it is obviously false.

Of course, you have to hope that Canadians can still work it out, or have they now been completely brainwashed.

Bob Hunter
Reply to  Mike Jonas
June 27, 2024 9:14 am

This Albertan will never forget Biden cancelling XL pipeline on day 1 of his presidency, and later Biden begging Russia, Saudi Arabia & Iran to produce more oil to help reduce US inflation He later asked Venezuela. Canada was not asked.
Or, PM Trudeau not approving any new oil sands projects (source of vast majority of CDN oil production) even though Stats Canada data indicates, Alberta has subsidized CDN health/social programs across the country for decades. As well, federal govt grants for capital projects.

Chris Hanley
June 26, 2024 9:12 pm

Mineral fuels oils and distillation products are by far the largest single category of Canadian exports at 25% with motor vehicles next at 11% and the US is overwhelmingly the largest single market for Canadian exports overall at 78%.

The average annual temperature over Canada around 1920 was around -5C and now around -4C, why anyone in Canada would be concerned about a tiny bit of imperceptible warming over a century is a mystery 🤫.

Bob Hunter
Reply to  Chris Hanley
June 27, 2024 9:16 am

Canada actually imports more Autos & parts than it exports. Approx a $15 billion deficit each year.

Reply to  Chris Hanley
June 27, 2024 9:17 am

Chris, not a “mystery”. Canadian politics has always been in the control of the Laurentian “elites”. Including hydro and nuclear energy developed at taxpayer expense. The economic power of the “hillbillies” in the Western provinces petroleum is something they want and covet badly for their own enrichment purposes, and the faux emissions control agenda is how they decided to do it.

In reality Canada’s 300 billion trees only need to grow by a kilogram of cellulose/lignin per year to offset Canada’s total anthropogenic CO2 emissions, and Canada’s electric system is already 70% hydro and nuclear so one of the least CO2 emitting on the planet.

Here’s a good link about Guilbeault’s (minister of environment) latest discovered self enrichment shenanigans. Skip to about 5:20 for the main gist.

https://youtu.be/q-4ZvOD4_Hg?si=HTuoRShB0vf-cRdc

June 26, 2024 10:03 pm

No one anywhere is looking to gain strategic military advantage by blowing up a wind turbine or covering a solar field with a tarp.

Now that is really funny.

In a way, it highlights that they are so useless that they would not be worth targeting. On second thoughts, that could be a feature for pessimists. The problem is that China will eventually want everybody’s coal.

Reply to  RickWill
June 26, 2024 11:33 pm

“Eventually” is probably right now. Means just hasn’t quite caught up with desires yet.

Gregory Woods
June 27, 2024 4:08 am

‘Western governments are rightfully and fully supportive of Ukraine’ – nothing could be more wrong than that statement. Russia was and is merely protecting itself and the Russian speaking citizens of Ukraine. Read some history.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Gregory Woods
June 27, 2024 9:32 am

You are absolutely wrong on all points unless you get your history from Putin.
My wife’s parents survived the Holodomor. I am quite familiar with the history going back to the Kievan Rus. And I have done extensive reading of history in that part of the world.

Side note: the Dutchy of Muscovy was founded by an exiled Ukrainian prince.

Putin wants to reconstruct the Russian Empire to the extent gained by the Soviet Union post WWII. He wants to be compared to Peter the Great as an empire builder although some suggest he wants to be favorably compared to Ivan I.

The current war is simply an extension of the conflict started by Russia in 2014 in violation of treaties established in 1991 (Minsk Treaty) in which Russian signed on to guarantee Ukrainian security and internationally recognized borders in exchange for nuclear missiles transferred to Russia. Yes, that is a simplification of the treaty, but it highlights the salient points..

Gregory Woods
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
June 27, 2024 9:54 am

Wrong! It is Ukraine that violated the Minsk treaties. As previously advised: Read some history.

Reply to  Gregory Woods
June 27, 2024 11:48 am

and how did Ukraine do that, pray tell

Gregory Woods
Reply to  Nansar07
June 27, 2024 12:17 pm

Read….

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
June 27, 2024 12:03 pm

I believe you mean the Budapest agreement, Minsk was, I believe, 2004 and concerned the cease fire in the Donbas. The 2014 invasion of Crimea violated the Budapest agreement and should have been condemned by the UN. Russia then violated the agreement again 2022. Ukraine upheld its part of the bargain, Russia reneged.

Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
June 27, 2024 12:31 pm

I would like to learn (from both of you).

How did Russia violate the treaty?
How did Ukraine violate the treaty?

Someone
Reply to  Sparta Nova 4
June 28, 2024 9:02 am

The Dutchy of Moscow was founded by a Russian prince. There were no Ukrainians at the time.

Someone
Reply to  Gregory Woods
June 27, 2024 9:56 am

The powers in Kremlin do not care much, if at all, about Russian speaking citizens of Ukraine. This is just a pretext. Kremlin never bothered to protect them in post-Soviet times, in fact suppressing nationalistic domestic opposition that urged Kremlin to do so.

But Kremlin does care about Ukraine becoming NATO member, or, even if Ukraine is not NATO member, about its cooperation with USA against Russia. In the minds of Kremlin, no military threat to Russia is allowed to develop from the territories of Ukraine and Belarus. They allow for two scenarios

  • quasi-independent states fully aligned with Russia on military issues
  • complete incorporation into the Russian state, wholesale or by parts

The first scenario has been realized for Belorussia. The second is under way in Ukraine. The fate of what will be left of Ukraine after the war is still open. Kremlin does not seem to have enough strength to make remains of Ukraine another Belorussia.

If any military threat were to develop to USA from territories of Canada, Mexico, or Cuba, the USA would behave just the same. We have seen this in the Caribbean crisis of 1962.

Sparta Nova 4
June 27, 2024 8:49 am

Be under no illusions there. No one anywhere is looking to gain strategic military advantage by blowing up a wind turbine or covering a solar field with a tarp.

Excellent thought!

June 27, 2024 9:21 am

“Russia is not the isolated pariah the west hopes for. Wave after wave of sanctions on the country have not achieved what was hoped…”

Not so. Without those sanctions, the Russian economy would be much stronger. I doubt any serious military thinker expected Russia to collapse. It’s just one more tool.

June 27, 2024 9:23 am

“For example, Kazakhstan produces 1.5 million bbl/d of oil and ships most of it to Europe via a pipeline that crosses Russia. Imagine the impact on global oil prices if that cross-Russia pipeline was to “fall out of a window”

Kazakhstan wouldn’t be too happy with Russia, would it. Russia is terrified of alienating it’s former Central Asian colonies- mostly Moslem. It’s not going to do anything against those former colonies that Putler would love to get back into his New Russian Empire.

June 27, 2024 9:27 am

“all under the spell of radicals that will accept nothing other than total nihilistic energy “victory””

net zero nirvana

June 27, 2024 9:28 am

We’ve all heard about bill C-59 by now, the government of Canada’s crackdown on any comments related to emissions reduction mitigation efforts that do not adhere to “internationally recognized methodology”.

That can’t possibly hold up in the courts, can it?

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
June 27, 2024 11:35 am

Hey, we found a dead mouse in our beer, eh? That means you owe us a free case.

JamesD
June 27, 2024 2:26 pm

I get flash backs to Atlas Shrugged, with Rearden saying “We just need to work a little harder.”.

On a brighter note, the new pipeline is flowing so Canada is producing a lot more beautiful, clean, tar sands oil.

Edward Katz
June 27, 2024 2:26 pm

The irony here is that even though Canada talks a good game against reducing emissions and its fossil fuel use, survey after survey show that its citizens feel it’s up to the government itself to tackle whatever climate problems that exist because consumers have few intentions of changing their lifestyles or accepting new taxation to combat a problem that they don’t consider particularly serious in the first place. . In addition, if the government were really so concerned about rising emissions as a global issue, why does it continue to export fossil fuels to other countries? Could it be that the need for new and continuing revenue sources trumps environmental well-being every time?

Bob
June 27, 2024 5:16 pm

Nice Terry. It goes without saying that we have a government problem not a climate problem. We need to get in the governments face and stay there. They lie and cheat every day, we need to let the country and the world know they are liars and cheats. Thinking you are going to fix this at the ballot box is wishful thinking. It is the unelected bureaucrats, administrators and all the minions working for them that are the problem. We need to go after them.

Verified by MonsterInsights