Shi Zhengrong, "The Sun King". By World Economic Forum - Flickr: Shi Zhengrong - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2012, CC BY-SA 2.0, link

Australian “Local Manufacturing” Solar Subsidies to Go to China?

Essay by Eric Worrall

“I think you definitely need collaboration [with China]”.

The ‘Future Made in Australia’ plan for solar panels relies on a crucial ingredient: Help from China

By James Purtill May 6, 2024

Twenty-three years ago, a Chinese-Australian solar scientist moved from Sydney to Wuxi to build China’s solar panel manufacturing industry from scratch, using technology developed in Australian universities.

Shi Zhengrong became the world’s first clean energy billionaire, nicknamed “The Sun King”. China went on to dominate global solar panel manufacturing and, thanks to a mix of innovation and cut-throat competition, made solar the cheapest source of electricity in history.

Australian science graduates filled the top technology roles at the biggest Chinese solar companies. And a solar cell design developed in Australia became the global standard.

Meanwhile, Australia mostly stopped building its own solar panels.

Now, with the federal government preparing to ramp up Australia’s own tiny solar manufacturing industry, Dr Shi sees the story coming full circle.

“It’s an exciting opportunity for Australia,” he said, speaking to the ABC from China.

“I think you definitely need collaboration [with China], but I think Australia is in a better position compared to 20 years ago in China.”

The public reaction in the weeks since has been mixed. Many energy experts welcomed the plan as a way to ensure supply of a critical energy resource (solar will soon generate most of Australia’s electricity) and carve out a slice of a growing global industry.

But some economists and the federal government’s own Productivity Commission warned it could lead to the government wasting money by subsidising the production of panels that China can make more cheaply.

Read more: https://johnmenadue.com/the-future-made-in-australia-plan-for-solar-panels-relies-on-a-crucial-ingredient-help-from-china/

What did we do wrong, to be cursed with such a parade of economically incompetent politicians? The government’s own productivity commission is warning it’s a bad idea, but politicians would rather listen to an Australian trained Chinese scientist who has already made billions of dollars off Australia’s economic incompetence, and stands to make billions more if this plan goes ahead.

The following article is from 2006 – why Shi Zhengrong, the Sun King, chose China over Australia;

Arise the Sun King

September 12, 2006 — 10.00am

Many factors, including China’s determination to attract its brightest minds back from overseas to help create new high-tech businesses, have contributed to Shi’s good fortune. His company’s rapid expansion has also been fuelled by rising global demand for solar cells, as governments in countries such as Germany and Japan, unlike here, have embraced clean energy.

“He was the right person at the right spot at the right time to move in both Chinese and Western cultures,” says Professor Martin Green, of the University of NSW, about his former student. “He was successful because of his own personal skills as a technologist and his ability to handle the managerial and political aspects of setting up and manufacturing in China.”

Content with his comfortable life in Sydney, he took Australian citizenship, but his homeland kept a close eye on this rising solar expert. At Chinese New Year and other festive occasions Shi was invited to celebrations at the Chinese embassy. “It was the policy of the Government to attract people like me – overseas scholars – to come back,” he says. In 2000 representatives of the Wuxi region approached him with an offer of $US6 million to establish a conventional photovoltaic solar cell manufacturing plant. Shi was sceptical that he could turn a profit in China. “The system was corrupted. I didn’t have any confidence [in returning],” he says.

He was also reluctant to give up his work on thin films – the technology of the future. But a two-week visit to China changed his mind. The infrastructure had improved and he could see that the handful of solar cell manufacturers there were losing money because of a lack of good technology.

With his experience and plentiful ideas for how to set up a plant, he realised the business could be a winner. “There was already a great demand for solar panels.”

Read more: https://www.smh.com.au/national/arise-the-sun-king-20060912-gdoddr.html

I’m not criticising Shi Zhengrong’s choices or actions. In Shi’s place, if I had his skills and background, I might have made similar choices. He is undoubtably a brilliant scientist and a Chinese patriot who made a good decision for himself personally and for China, which made lots of Chinese people, including Shi, very rich – “the right person at the right spot at the right time”.

What I am criticising is the economic incompetence of Australia’s politicians. Shi had sound economic reasons, in addition to the subsidy cash, to relocate to China. But what is the competitive advantage which suddenly makes solar in Australia a good idea?

China dominates solar manufacturing because they have cheap coal energy. Low wages helped their competitive advantage, but the real key advantage is their low cost energy.

But Australia still has higher wages, higher energy costs, more environmental regulations and higher taxes than China. None of the economic advantages which convinced Shi to move to China have changed – China is still the more cost effective location to manufacture solar panels.

Even if you believe Australia is the better place to deploy solar panels, and there are arguments for and against this position, this doesn’t change whether China is the best place to manufacture solar panels.

If there was a real economic opportunity to manufacture solar panels in Australia, Australian businesses would be jumping all over it, leaping to fill the gap in the market. No government subsidy would be required to convince Aussie businesses to take advantage of a big profit opportunity.

The only competitive advantage Australia is publicly offering right now is lots of free money. But free government money is not enough to build a sustainable business, because solar manufacturing in Australia will dry up the moment the money stops. Giving away subsidy money with every sale of subsidised Australian manufactured goods would impoverish Australia, not give us a competitive advantage.

5 18 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

34 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
May 6, 2024 2:15 pm

Yet another subsidy mining operation?

Reply to  Tom Halla
May 6, 2024 2:30 pm

They are the least risky mines on the planet.

Who wouldn’t love a guaranteed profit BEFORE even breaking ground on the mine?

May 6, 2024 2:16 pm

Politicians are, by nature, economically enumerate. Otherwise net zero would be a dead issue.

leefor
Reply to  Nansar07
May 6, 2024 7:51 pm

I would have said innumerate.

Interested Observer
Reply to  Nansar07
May 7, 2024 1:35 am

How economically enumerate are politicians? Let me count the ways.

May 6, 2024 2:56 pm

Story tip :
Generally favourable and reasonable article about new nuclear power in UK:

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/why-britain-is-building-the-worlds-most-expensive-nuclear-plant/

May 6, 2024 3:07 pm

All of those in positions of power are … well… people.
Some are self-governed by honest personal ethics (hat do not include “The end justifies the means.)
Some are governed by getting their “10%”.

Mr.
May 6, 2024 3:09 pm

Poor fella my country.

Mac
May 6, 2024 3:10 pm

Off topic but Biden’s Climate Corps ready to go…
file:///C:/Users/bdmck/OneDrive/Documents/schiff%20soverign.htm

Curious George
Reply to  Mac
May 6, 2024 3:16 pm

A better link, please.

Reply to  Mac
May 6, 2024 3:53 pm

Can’t link into your hard drive!

Reply to  PCman999
May 6, 2024 5:10 pm

Well, he is on a Mac, and you are on a PC, so maybe it is a compatibility problem?

/dad joke tag off

ResourceGuy
May 6, 2024 3:29 pm

It’s an exciting time for govt. subsidies.

Bob
May 6, 2024 3:46 pm

This article is not helpful. China does not have a competative advantage. China is a powerful and ruthless country run by monsters. They will do anything, say anything and steal anything they want to get their way. You will do what they say or be executed or sent to their version of the gulag. They polute their air, water and land without a second thought. They have no concern for their people, their people are expendable and everyone knows it. Slavery is known to exist in China. I could go on and on but there is no need to. Anyone who speaks of China as equal to the west morally or otherwise is acting like a fool. We are not the same.

Reply to  Bob
May 6, 2024 3:56 pm

That’s all a competitive advantage – and the idiot and corrupt politicians that let China into the WTO and other low tax treaties were insane as well.

Reply to  PCman999
May 7, 2024 3:44 am

But if their students weren’t allowed into western universities- they’d have no modern technology today. The universities love them as they usually pay the full- rip off price.

Rud Istvan
Reply to  Bob
May 6, 2024 4:01 pm

Got news for you. As long as China remains in the WTO, everything bad that they do IS a competitive advantage against those that cannot play by the same ‘rules’ as China. And China know this.

Rich
Reply to  Bob
May 6, 2024 4:01 pm

I fully believe you to be correct!!! Survival of the fittest?? Critical race theory?? I believe we are quickly falling behind….

The WEST needs to wake-up. People who think there are fair rules to economic warfare are in for a stark awakining!

Bob
Reply to  Eric Worrall
May 6, 2024 6:11 pm

Eric my statement was not directed to you.

Alexy Scherbakoff
Reply to  Bob
May 6, 2024 5:19 pm

I don’t think your anger stops you from buying ‘Made in China’ stuff.

Bob
Reply to  Alexy Scherbakoff
May 7, 2024 2:53 pm

I do my best to not buy from China, anger has nothing to do with it.

Reply to  Bob
May 7, 2024 4:26 pm

First things first – find something that’s not “Made In China”.

Sweet Old Bob
May 6, 2024 5:01 pm
Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
May 6, 2024 5:15 pm

31 MPH winds?

We have gusts that high in my area during what the locals call a windless day.

If it was really windy, those solar panels would be stacking up in Nepal about now.

Alexy Scherbakoff
Reply to  pillageidiot
May 6, 2024 6:15 pm

Designed by:
(Insert name) -Structural Engineer, failed Calcutta University.

Reply to  Sweet Old Bob
May 7, 2024 2:37 am

100 sq Km of black solar panels would have the UHI effect of a fairly large city. And this is supposed to reduce AGW?

Mac
May 6, 2024 6:12 pm

Sorry about the link. Check out shiffsoverign.com. Article titled Even the Soviet Union Was Better Than This. Talks about Biden’s Climate Corps.

May 7, 2024 4:56 am

I have been reliably informed that the Australian Federal Minister for Energy Poverty and Climate Alarmism, is to have a meeting with executives from Rockwell International Incorporated.

It is thought the folks at Rockwell are seeking government funding to assist with the development and eventual deployment of the “Turbo Encapulator ™” transmission system to be used in wind turbines.

Though Rockwell have to date been heavily involved in the automotive industry, it sees an enormous opportunity in re-deploying the Encapulator into the renewables industry.

The following short film briefly describes this remarkable piece of engineering.

Chris Bowen it is thought is 100% behind this proposal and sees it as yet another fantastic opportunity for Australia as the country continues it relentless quest to become the world leader in green energy production.

The Turbo Encapulator is yet another example of the remarkable technologies and engineering that is emerging to support our transition to a de-carbonised world, and I’m thrilled and excited to get behind this project in any way I can, said Mr. Bowen,

The Turbo Encapulator –

Alexy Scherbakoff
Reply to  SteveG
May 8, 2024 12:43 am

Brilliant piece of technology. I am glad you brought it to my attention. I will be investing heavily in this.

Denis
May 7, 2024 5:42 am

“…solar the cheapest source of electricity in history.” Really? What is the cost of solar when integrated into an electric power distribution system which is supposed to provide power all the time? It is clearly not the cheapest source of electricity in a real power distribution system except for those who want power for 8 hours per day or less, some of the time.

May 7, 2024 10:16 am

At the time I am posting this, Australian power is relying on 77% coal and gas. Unless we can extract power from the moonshine or battery technology improves we will be near NetZero electricity.

Verified by MonsterInsights