Germany Begins Felling 120,000 Trees From ‘Fairy Tale’ Forest to Make Way for Wind Turbines

From the DAILY SCEPTIC

BY CHRIS MORRISON

The windmills are spinning golden subsidies in the central German ‘fairy tale’ forest of Reinhardswald, but the payment is the partial destruction of the 1,000 year-old ancient wood itself. Work has started on the clearing of up to 120,000 trees in the forest, the setting for many of the Brothers Grimm mythical stories, to provide access for an initial 18 giant wind turbines around the Sababurg ‘Sleeping Beauty’ castle. Who is opposing this massive destruction of the ancient forest teeming with wildlife with trees over 200 years old? Certainly not the Green party, now in power at national and local level. In fact the project is being led by local Hesse Green Minister Priska Hinz who is reported to have said: “Wind energy makes a decisive contribution to the energy transition and the preservation of nature. It is the only way to preserve forests and important ecosystems.”

There is some local press interest in Germany about the destruction of part of the forest that covers a 200 square kilometre area. Nevertheless, the mainstream media generally keep well away from covering environmental destruction when the Greens are doing it in the claimed cause of saving the planet. The BBC did cover the story under the headline ‘Battle over wind turbines in the land of Sleeping Beauty‘, but that was in 2013 when plans for the industrial development were first announced. It seems that the state-reliant broadcaster is less interested now that the Big Bad Wolf has finally made a meal of Little Red Riding Hood.

Pierre Gosselin, who runs the German-based science site No Tricks Zone, has been covering the outrage felt in a number of German quarters at the plans to destroy some of the Reinhardswald forest in the interest of inferior green technology. He feels the affair shows what an inefficient and costly scam green energy is. “It’s not cost-free, it’s full of corrupt and unresponsive politicians who no longer care about democracy, and it certainly doesn’t make the environment better. It’s a nasty juggernaut of waste, fraud, corruption and ecological degradation – with dead birds, turbine vibration sickness, strobe dizziness and landscape pollution,” he adds.

The Guardian has been curiously silent over the clearing of woodland to build wind turbines in Hesse. In 2020 it was less reticent about reporting on the construction of a 3 km highway in another Hessian forest at Dannenroder. Thousands of climate activists gathered on the site north of Frankfurt, it reported. Dannenroder tree-felling would be a catastrophe, environmental campaigners are reported to have said. “Some parts of this forest are 250 years old,” noted Nicola Uhde of the German Federation for the Environment and Nature Conservation (Bund), “and there is simply not much of this kind of woodland around anymore.” At the time, the Guardian noted the fate of Dannenroder was a “litmus test for the Green party” which governed the state as part of a coalition. It seems to have been remiss in not suggesting such a test with the Reinhardswald deforestation. But then it seems none of the usual climate activists have been protesting about the loss of trees and wildlife habitat on this occasion.

The Daily Sceptic has reported on numerous recent examples where the lack of interest in ecological damage is a feature of green industrial development. Last month, we noted that one of India’s iconic large birds, the great Indian bustard, was on the verge of extinction due to the growth of electric power lines in its home area of the Thar desert. To reach global Net Zero, it has been estimated that new power lines equivalent to circling the globe 2,000 times will need to be built in the next few years.

Last October, we reported that wind farms in Tasmania had reduced the population of the endangered local wedge-tailed eagle to around 1,000 individuals. Across the world, millions of bats are being chewed by giant wind blades. Any animal that relies on wind currents for flight such as a large raptor is at risk of being sucked into the whirling machines. In California, the Democrat-controlled state Government recently relaxed controls on wildlife protections to allow permits to kill previously fully protected species for renewable infrastructure projects. Despite an increased risk to America’s national bird, the bald eagle, barely a peep of protest was recorded. Off America’s eastern coast, massive industrial parks are being constructed for wind turbines. It might be a coincidence that hundreds of whales have beached along the shore in recent years, but a more likely explanation is the deafening sonar noise, constant pile driving, extensive ocean building works and heavy shipping movements.

None of the above are likely to feature when the magic mirror is asked: “Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the greenest one of all?”

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

4.8 26 votes
Article Rating
58 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scissor
March 9, 2024 2:07 pm

Ecoterrorists go mainstream.

Rud Istvan
March 9, 2024 2:10 pm

Great Josh cartoon. Says it all.

Jim Masterson
Reply to  Rud Istvan
March 9, 2024 2:17 pm

Hansel and Gretel only had to worry about one wicked witch. We have to deal with and entire movement composed of many wicked witches and warlocks.

Rud Istvan
Reply to  Jim Masterson
March 9, 2024 2:53 pm

Oreskes looks the part of a wicked witch. Mann is too pudgy to be a warlock. Ditto Dessler. Ditto Gore.

Scissor
Reply to  Rud Istvan
March 9, 2024 3:14 pm

I think you just insulted witches, but a combination of the others proves MannBearPig is real.

Bryan A
Reply to  Scissor
March 9, 2024 7:45 pm

I was thinking more WhoreLock

Reply to  Rud Istvan
March 9, 2024 3:58 pm

Now, Rud.
Oreskes can’t help that she looks like Margaret Hamilton, who played “The Wicked Witch of the West”.
As far as I know Margaret Hamilton was a fine person who played a wicked role that she’s remembered for. (She also did commercials for a coffee brand.)
BUT, it would be nice if she tried to emulate Margaret Hamilton rather the that role she played. 😎
Many of those other names could be Dwindle Dee and Dwindle Dumb?
Or just Humpty Dumpty?
(https://wattsupwiththat.com/failed-prediction-timeline/)

Bryan A
Reply to  Gunga Din
March 9, 2024 7:48 pm

While AlGore certainly is the ButtHead he’s made out to be, Humpty Dumpty wasn’t all he was cracked up to be

atticman
Reply to  Gunga Din
March 10, 2024 5:26 am

I assume you meant “Dumbty”, Gunga Din…

Reply to  atticman
March 10, 2024 3:44 pm

I stand corrected. 😎

Rich Davis
Reply to  Gunga Din
March 10, 2024 8:16 am

If you don’t like turning to stone, just don’t look.

Jim Masterson
Reply to  Gunga Din
March 11, 2024 2:20 am

That’s a great link. I missed it originally, but it’s now captured in perpetuity.

atticman
Reply to  Rud Istvan
March 10, 2024 5:25 am

Is there a girth limit on warlocks, then? That’s a new one on me!

Reply to  Jim Masterson
March 10, 2024 4:58 am

It’s now Hanson and Greta.

March 9, 2024 2:27 pm

I’ve been told many times right here that this doesn’t happen – solar and wind installations are put on unusable land, nobody cuts down trees to make room for them.

I wonder if those same people will repeat that now?

Andrew
Reply to  Tony_G
March 9, 2024 10:05 pm

This is Germany that was Texas.

Reply to  Andrew
March 10, 2024 6:09 am

It looks like to me that the German politicians are the most stupid when it comes to Human-caused climate change.

German politicians are completely sold on eliminating CO2 and they are not going to let anything get in their way, including this ancient forest. They will go on this way until the whole thing (the German economy) comes crashing down around their ears.

The only good that will come out of this is it will show the rest of the Western world what a bad idea it is to try to power the world with windmills. it’s a failed idea. It is already obvious it is a failed idea, and yet the stupid German politicians continue down this path.

D Sandberg
Reply to  Tom Abbott
March 13, 2024 3:24 am

Tom. Germany realized by 2019 that wind wasn’t working. They built as much wind in 2018 as they in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 combined. Last year they got back into it hot and heavy. Their 3-party coalition government does some crazy things to hold the coalition together. Germany’s wind fetish has driven them into a recession and deindustrialization. I see no evidence of any Country in the West taking note. Wind and solar are booming!

March 9, 2024 2:34 pm

Google search Rheinhardswald – pictures

just to have an idea, what these Greens believe to be good…

Rud Istvan
Reply to  Krishna Gans
March 9, 2024 2:40 pm

Danke Schoen. Unglaublich!

Reply to  Krishna Gans
March 9, 2024 2:54 pm

They are socialists. This is one of their principles:

  • Rooted in collectivism – no individual is of material importance, only society as a whole. Any number of individual needs, preferences, and lives can and should be sacrificed for the good of the collective.

The other main principles are here:

https://mises.org/mises-wire/socialists-it-doesnt-matter-if-socialism-works-what-matters-power

Reply to  Frank from NoVA
March 10, 2024 8:59 am

Socialists is too long a word. Let’s just call them Borg.

dk_
March 9, 2024 2:51 pm

From Hansel and Gretal to Hansen and Greta! Where are the Euro Ecofreaks, and why aren’t they building tree houses, or taking advice from BLM secretary Stone-Manning and vandalizing them with forester-killing spikes? Where are Germany’s traditional forest-meisters – have they all been replaced by EU sycophants?

Don’t think it can’t happen here. They’ll be after the forests Adirondaks and Catskills quite soon now, and they’ll be looking to omit the sylvania suffix from Penn.

Rud Istvan
Reply to  dk_
March 9, 2024 3:09 pm

Between my Wisconsin Uplands dairy farm and the Iowa county seat at Dodgeville (to the farm’s SW— hey, grocery store and Walmart and tractor dealer) there is along my County C south to Hwy 12 west route a massive wind farm visible along the next ridge line to the immediate west, (so NW of Dodgeville). That ridge line used to be all forest because too steep to farm (even as pasture). No longer. Clearcut for maybe 20 big turbines plus access road. Visible from many miles away. And from Google Earth using the above rough coordinates. Grim.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Rud Istvan
March 10, 2024 4:22 am

so when you get some very wet yrs..wonder how the land slippage will go.

atticman
Reply to  Rud Istvan
March 10, 2024 5:32 am

Just imagine, Rud, what it’s like with the numbers we now have in the UK packed on to our tiny island. It’s getting very hard now to find a view – inland or coastal – in which they don’t intrude somewhere and ruin the panorama.

Ironic, isn’t it, that the people who clamour for these things consider themselves to be environmentally aware?

Reply to  dk_
March 9, 2024 4:01 pm

From Hansel and Gretal to Hansen and Greta!”

Love it!
“Follow the bread!”
(“Bread” as in $Green$.)

Reply to  dk_
March 9, 2024 8:23 pm

“From Hansel and Gretal to Hansen and Greta!” 

Nice.

March 9, 2024 2:54 pm

Are they shipping the forest to Drax for burning ??

March 9, 2024 2:55 pm

How many acres is 120,000 trees, a thousand?
Horrifying

Rud Istvan
Reply to  Thomas Finegan
March 9, 2024 3:43 pm

Was curious so looked it up. On an old hardwood forest, the maximum trees is 150 per hectare. Can be as low as 15 in a really old forest. So a minimum 800 hectares. Probably much more. Tragic loss.

Bob
March 9, 2024 3:00 pm

Very nice Chris.

Yet another example of CAGW monsters controlling the language in their pursuit of power. Green doesn’t mean anything therefore it can mean anything. You know, what ever these monsters want.

Most of us think green means environmentally friendly. You know to protect plants and animals, the oceans, lakes and streams, the air and yes even people. That is what most of us think but not the CAGW mob.

They use the word green as a vehicle to gain power and control over the rest of us saps. They are not out to protect anyone or anything except their power and control.

The greens can go to hell.

March 9, 2024 3:11 pm

Where are the usual AGW-cultist trolls to defend this environmentally destructive lunacy. !!

The fact they don’t speak out LOUDLY against it, means they must condone it.

Reply to  bnice2000
March 9, 2024 5:30 pm

Not too many years ago there were some articles on the clear cutting of 4500 acres of “protected green belt” in Virginia or West Virginia. 3000 or 3500 acres were to be covered by solar panels, the remaining acreage was for building “administrative” infrastructure.

The stories were mainly about a number of people who had small plots with a cabin, some who had lived in the forest essentially their entire life. I don’t know just how that works but apparently these people had some kinds of property right before the “green belt” was established. Photos showed some forlorn people and cabins in the midst of total destruction. Apparently bull dozing was to follow as there were a great many tree stumps in evidence. Anyway, the stories were not about any activists protesting the clear cutting.

March 9, 2024 3:28 pm

They paved paradise and put up a (windmill) parking lot.

http://youtu.be/2595abcvh2M

Reply to  Paul Hurley
March 10, 2024 2:18 pm

You don’t know what you’ve got til it’s gone…

March 9, 2024 3:30 pm

That makes sense.
Destroy some of natures ability to extract CO2 from the air in order to (hypothetically) prevent more CO2 from going into the air?
How much CO2 is released to produce just one windmill? Would one tree remove more CO2 over it’s lifetime than the lifetime of the windmill (or all the windmills needed to replace it as it wore out)?

OT I hate “Daylight Savings Time”.
Twice a year they screw up things and to gain what? Nothing.
(I do wonder if the accident rates increase for those who have to drive at a certain time east or west into a sunrise or sunset when they have to it twice a year instead of just once?)
Just pick one “Time” and stick with it.

Scissor
Reply to  Gunga Din
March 9, 2024 3:37 pm

I’m with you. One might conclude that the “time change” is a psychological operation,

Rud Istvan
Reply to  Gunga Din
March 9, 2024 3:49 pm

Preach it.The idea was originally to save power during wartime. But it never did. Sort of like renewables.

Reply to  Rud Istvan
March 9, 2024 4:43 pm

As I recall, Benjamin Franklin first proposed it to save candles. Back then, towns kept their own time “standards”.
Later it was the railroads that proposed, and it was adopted, to have “time zones” we now have. (So the trains “ran on time”.)
I’m not sure about your “wartime time” thing but Carter (The guy who didn’t have Christmas Lights at the White House.) during the “Energy Crisis” pushed it to go nationwide.
What’s interesting is that some of the eastern counties didn’t do it. Later when they were forced to it, a study of energy consumption in those counties over the period actually increases.
It was lower at the start and the end of Daylight Savings Tine but in the middle it increased to point where, overall, DST caused more energy to be used. Their guess was that whatever numbers they had for both areas was before AC was common.
When people got home from work, which after DST, was the heat of the day, they’d crank up their AC.
Changing our clocks twice a year has ZERO benefit.

Reply to  Gunga Din
March 12, 2024 1:54 pm

I went back and looked at this again and realized I didn’t clarify “What’s interesting is that some of the eastern counties didn’t do it. Later when they were forced to it, a study of energy consumption in those counties over the period actually increases.”

I referring the eastern counties in Indiana. After they adopted DST like the rest of state had for years, there was data to compare before and after energy consumption.
(Occasionally, I think faster than I can type. 😎

0perator
March 9, 2024 4:43 pm

I thought deforestation was killing the planet.
Im beginning to think something else is going on contrary to their stated agenda.

Reply to  0perator
March 9, 2024 5:07 pm

There are some who will promote anything is “destroying the planet” as long as they are left controlling the planet. (They’ve already been shifting to the “evil” of disinformation.)
Hard to imagine. But we see everyday that some are capable of and actually do, in real life, depravities we’d rather just see in a movie or a movie plot.
PS Hard to imagine that someone would kill their own child. But some do. We are facing those who would commit such atrocities but on a much greater scale.

Reply to  0perator
March 9, 2024 5:13 pm

There are the loons who think ALL tree cutting should be stopped. They apparently believe that since forest fires are ‘natural’ the big fires resulting from un-managed forests are not only good (quite aside from their CAGW propaganda value) but that the large resulting CO2 release doesn’t count.

Decaf
March 9, 2024 5:07 pm

They’re destroying Germany a third time.

ResourceGuy
March 9, 2024 5:19 pm

Don’t forget to feed Drax and maybe get double or triple credit for it.

March 9, 2024 5:22 pm

The Daily Sceptic has reported on numerous recent examples where the lack of interest in ecological damage is a feature of green industrial development.”

I won’t list all of the collateral eco-damage here, but none of this should surprise you. For the Left, the outcome and furthering of their destructive agenda is all that matters. Do you think they care about whales or bald eagles? Look at how they treat their own people. If you’re a leftist female, you have to understand that you are expected to take one for the team. If that means suffering at the hands of cartels and Coyotes who are engaged in human trafficking and the sex trade, too bad. Are radical Islamists having their way with you, and treating you like a second-class citizen? Take one for the team! They sure aren’t going to help bats being grinded by a windmill, now will they?

March 9, 2024 5:39 pm

it has been estimated that new power lines equivalent to circling the globe 2,000 times will need to be built in the next few years.

7900 miles seems like a decent approximation for the average diameter of the planet. Using 3.14 for Pi I get 24,806 as the average circumference. 2,000 times that is 49,610,000 miles. Are there really estimates of a need for more than 49 million more miles of new power lines? By whom?

Dave Andrews
Reply to  AndyHce
March 10, 2024 10:16 am

IEA ‘Electricity Grids and Secure Energy Transitions’ October 2023

“Adding and refurbishing a total of 80m kilometres of grids by 2040”

“the equivalent of the entire existing global grid”

Reply to  Dave Andrews
March 10, 2024 4:12 pm

Some recent article about actual long distance transmission lines, and the very slow pace they were being constructed, claimed a per mile cost of almost $4 million. That is certain to go up over time with any large project, most especially if government is involved in any way. In round numbers, about $199 trillion minimum for the above claimed need.

Nick Frencken
March 9, 2024 6:40 pm

Disgusting hypocrites.

March 10, 2024 4:57 am

Where are the environmental protesters now? Why aren’t they gluing themselves to the tree cutting equipment as they would do if this was a road or an airport? Where are the environmentalists objecting about the loss of habitat for a particular animal, or plant?
I can only conclude that environmentalism is not actually about the environment at all?

atticman
Reply to  sskinner
March 10, 2024 6:53 am

Indeed, if it were a new road that the trees were being felled for, even one which would reduce traffic snarl-ups and thus carbon dioxide emissions, they’d be out protesting in their hundreds; when it’s happening to build a wind farm, nary a peep out of them! The level of cognitive dissonance that this requires is probably what’s causing the outbreak of mental illness associated with net zero…

March 10, 2024 7:11 am

somewhat untrue. the area of forest in question has been largely denuded of viable trees by drought, wind and bark beetle attack. I.e. the area is not pristine forest as suggested.

Reply to  ghalfrunt
March 10, 2024 2:20 pm

That justifies its destruction, according to Half Runt?

March 10, 2024 9:10 am

Radical environmentalists are the environment’s greatest threat.

SteveZ56
March 11, 2024 3:21 pm

Carbon footprint for Reinhardswald wind project = tons CO2 consumed per year by photosynthesis per tree * 120,000 trees. Divide that by the actual power output (not the nameplate capacity) of the wind turbines in MWh per year.

If somebody can get a good estimate of the CO2 consumption per tree per year, it would be interesting to compare the ratio above to the CO2 emission per MWh for a gas-fired power plant.

What would the green geniuses think if a gas-fired power plant with the same power output produced less CO2 than the trees consumed until they were cut down?

Green activists used to bemoan the deforestation of the Amazon valley in Brazil, but now they applaud deforestation in Germany. Tree huggers cutting down trees. Sleeping Beauty wakes up to a chainsaw massacre.

Corrigenda
March 12, 2024 8:41 am

And all this only a few weeks after the EU, the UK and several other countries have finally grasped that Net Zero is scientifically faulted. Then, worse, that the whole world is still subsidising India and China to help them thrive whilst the rest of the world economy is being blighted by Paris agreement subsidies. Faulted science has a lot to answer for.
https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2023-02-23-Challenging-Net-Zero-with-Science.pdf