By Vijay Jayaraj
Europe’s picturesque landscapes, adorned with sprawling croplands and pastures, have long been part of the continent’s agrarian identity. However, a wave of farmer protests have intruded on this peaceful scene and extended into cities.
From the rolling hills of France to the windswept plains of Poland, farmers have driven their tractors onto the streets, united in a fight against a threat to their livelihoods. As I write this, thousands of French farmers are on the outskirts of Paris, blocking roads in an act that has been dubbed the “siege of Paris.” The city of Toulouse, home to 800,000 people, was cut off from the rest of France due to protests.
Likewise, in cities across Belgium, Poland, Romania, Lithuania, the Netherlands, and Germany, farmers have blocked roads and conducted targeted protests at public buildings. Tractor convoys, road blockades, and impassioned speeches reflect the agricultural community’s deep frustration with attempts to reduce farmlands and ban fertilizer use.
The primary policy target of farmers is a so-called Farm to Fork program that seeks to halve pesticide use, reduce fertilizer use, cut by at least 10% agricultural areas and mandate a conversion of 25% of the European Union’s agricultural land to “organic-only” farming. The initiative also includes removal of subsidies for agricultural diesel used in tractors and machinery.
Farmers argue that all these policies jeopardize food security and undermine the rich agricultural heritage that has defined European societies for centuries.
Behind all this is the EU’s climate change agenda’s obsession with reducing harmless industrial and agricultural emissions of greenhouse gases, which include carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane. Farm to Fork is a subset of the bigger Green Deal and Net Zero programs.
France’s largest farm union, FNSEA, says it wants a change in the “very philosophy of the Green Deal which assumes degrowth.”
“French farmers are united in their opposition to absurd, extreme and unworkable environmental policies,” said the president of Coordination Rurale, a French farming group. “Those in power do not spare a thought for the impact of these policies on the livelihoods of farmers, the food security of the nation and the cost-of-living crisis facing ordinary people.”
The farmer unions have a point, and a serious one. Reducing the use of fertilizers would require employing more land for agriculture, but the EU’s green policies intend to decrease the amount of farmland. This amounts to forced agricultural suicide that threatens hunger, death and societal collapse.
In other words, the fight goes beyond the immediate use of land and fertilizers and to the well-being of generations to come. Farm to Fork won’t be resolved until there is an end to the Green Deal and Net Zero programs.
The European agricultural crisis is a warning to citizens of other governments planning to adopt similar policies for agricultural production to avert a nonexistent climate crisis.
So called green policies would kill the greenest parts of our world as they destroy ordinary people’s dream of a decent life with access to basic necessities for living.
This commentary was first published at Townhall February 9, 2024, and can be accessed here.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia. He holds a master’s degree in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia, U.K.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Apparently they want to change the name of Europe to “Sri Lanka”.
Every time politicians reach new depths of unawareness, I think they can’t get worse. And then I’m astonished when they do.
You would know.
What an incredibly meaningless comment !
He’s probably unaware of Sri Lanka’s organic farming fiasco.
You would know.
And once again, ghastly demonstrates that he simply is incapable of engaging in intelligent conversation.
Once more, the troll exhibits a remarkable incapacity to scroll down to my post. Is it arthritis hindering their movements, or an unrelenting desperation to disparage everything I write? LOL
Yawn.. pathetic. !
How can one “disparage” no content?
At one stage I taught class full of low-IQ 15 years old.
They were significantly brighter than you appear to be.
The troll masters are really reached the bottom of the barrel.
How difficult is it to change your name here?
Are gh()stly & gh(0stly two different people, acting obnoxious, in concert?
Maybe you should watch this video before revealing your ignorance again:
Makes you take more seriously that “The Great Culling” may be a real thing and not just a wild conspiracy theory. Something to think about while you observe what the ruing elites are forcing on us. Connect the dots to form a clearer picture of what’s in store for us. Decreased food supply + unstable/unreliable energy sources + censorship + inability to protect oneself (or be protected by an effective police force) + cold weather = anarchy and mass deaths….and all caused by the evil molecule, CO2 (sarc).
Your article lacks any semblance of balance as it blatantly ignores the EU’s rationale behind these policies. Your failure to incorporate concrete examples or data to support your claims or consider the perspective of so-called farmers makes it dubious at best. It wouldn’t be shocking if the entire narrative is merely fabricated.
Reinterpret John Kerry and Co for us-
🔴 FARMER PROTESTS SPREAD: Desperate Farmers Protest Against New Laws That Will Bankrupt Them (youtube.com)
The farmers aren’t stupid and know what’s going down-
MEP: People are realising climate change is a MASSIVE LIE | EU scared of voters after farmers revolt – YouTube
My take is there’s a short fuse out there now for anything that stinks of net-zero and the vision splendid-
Crowd sets Waymo self-driving vehicle ablaze in San Francisco (msn.com)
The EUSSR has a rationale? If you say so
ghastly, of course has nothing but yapping. Anyone see anything else from it ?
Yep, it is shocking that the whole anti-CO2 / net zero nonsense narrative is based TOTALLY on fabrication.
Noted.. its complete failure to explain EUs idiotic “rationale”
WUWT’s baboon,
Are you even capable of engaging in a civil discussion without resorting to hurling verbal excrement? Your remarks only serve to validate my assertion. This platform evidently harbors a right-wing, fascist agenda, and you, my friend, seem to revel in being their compliant baboon.
Self-awareness, thy name is “gh(0stly”.
Funny, opposing government control of farming is a fascist agenda.
Once again you demonstrate that you have absolutely no idea what the words you use mean.
Funny how you’re shackled by your narrow ideology, blindly adhering to assumptions that you believe represent the true situation.
ghastly with yet another incredibly meaningless an empty comment !
Obviously dredged up from the sewer of its own mind.
Noted.. Its complete failure to explain EUs idiotic “rationale”
Just more mindless yapping.
Please ignore this ‘gh(a)stly” dink. You gain nothing.
You might not realize it gh(0stly, but to EU’s elite, you’re part of the problem that they want to eliminate, along with many of the rest.
The very definition of a “useless eater.”
Why would the EU have any motive to eliminate me, Scissor? The idea of a large government actively pursuing the elimination of its citizens is counterproductive from a corrupt governance perspective and undermines the power base that sustains political authority. Such drastic actions would lead to anarchy and chaos, counterproductive to the goals of a corrupt politician seeking long-term power retention. The very stability they rely upon for control would crumble with the elimination of the population.
If such a sinister plan were in motion, those orchestrating it would take extreme measures to conceal their actions. You wouldn’t know about it, or even suspect it. A corrupt government would be cognizant of potential suspicions and would go to very extreme lengths to cover their tracks, understanding that any indication of their intentions will spark public scrutiny and international condemnation.
Tell that to Hitler/Stalin/Mao/Pol Pot.
So, the brilliant idea here is that, while calling for heightened vigilance, governments should take a page from the playbook of brutal dictators known for committing unspeakable atrocities. Because apparently, any diabolical plan worth its salt must completely ignore the lessons of history; after all, education is a concept that seems utterly lost on those lacking even a modicum of it.
“education is a concept”
Not even a concept to you, apparently !
Certainly not something you have ever experienced.
Looking at the choice of words used and how they are assembled, you just have to be “Artificial Ignorance.”
“The idea of a large government actively pursuing the elimination of its citizens is counterproductive from a corrupt governance perspective and undermines the power base that sustains political authority.”
Perhaps, but it’s a hallmark of totalitarian regimes, especially those that are communist.
“The Red Terror became official state policy on September 5, 1918.“We are not waging war against individual persons,” said Cheka leader Martyn Latsis. “We are exterminating the bourgeoisie as a class.” https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/history-and-civilisation/2020/09/how-the-red-terror-set-a-macabre-course-for-the-soviet-union
“Such drastic actions would lead to anarchy and chaos, counterproductive to the goals of a corrupt politician seeking long-term power retention. The very stability they rely upon for control would crumble with the elimination of the population.”
Perhaps, in some cases. Certainly not with the Red Guard, to cite one example. The Guard gave Mao exactly what he wanted: suppression of opposition.
“If such a sinister plan were in motion, those orchestrating it would take extreme measures to conceal their actions.”
Like this?
You mean that they’re doing all this by sheer random incompetence? I have lost all faith in the intelligence of the political elite if they can’t even come up with a half decent sinister plan.
Do you have secure supply lines for your food into the future? If not, Gpovernment anti-farmimg policies threaten your existence.
Heinrich Himmler was also a great fan of biodynamic (organic) agriculture.
Give me more downvotes! I’m aiming for the record or something, LOL!
ghastly takes great pride in being both offensive and ignorant.
The only thing he is capable of achieving…
The product of too many “participation” stars during kindy !
Oh dear
Cost cuts loom at The Guardian amid widening losses Newspaper forecasts a £39m loss amid a drop in demand from digital advertisers
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/02/11/cost-cuts-loom-at-the-guardian-amid-widening-losses/
Maybe they have pulled their ears out of their bum bags sufficient to here the Trumpet!
b
Something In The Air (youtube.com)
Billionaire Harvard donor Ken Griffin says elite colleges produce ‘whiny snowflakes,’ stops donations (yahoo.com)
and one for the Metoo Feminutzis-
Men Use AI To Put Clothes Back On Women! And Women ARE MAD AF (youtube.com)
And I think to myself….
What an Orwellian world.
That was interesting.
I must say I’m shocked at the way some females dress in public nowadays.
I guess I’m not the only one, as some guys are trying to put the clothes back on them!
It’s a very different generation as a result of the Pill long term and then the Feminist impact on young women coupled with social media that’s extremely toxic for them. Here’s a couple of psychs discussing it-
Are Women Actually Happy With Modern Dating? – Louise Perry (4K) (youtube.com)
Bearing in mind women dominate psych nowadays and Louise would be somewhat of a heretic amongst the usual suspects.
“It’s a very different generation as a result of the Pill long term and then the Feminist impact on young women coupled with social media that’s extremely toxic for them.”
I hope they all find what they are searching for.
It’s got to be hard on them with the extra pressures they feel today.
Given the proclivity for the acceptance of fat and flabby as being normal or even healthy, I totally agree with more clothes on females. Men too.
The Guardian should try organic farming, as it has access to plenty of bullshit.
They’ll just request that the BBC buy more copies.
So Fork the Farms seeks to reduce:
pesticides
fertilizer
agricultural land
agricultural diesel subsidies
carbon dioxide
nitrous oxide
methane
And mandate “organic-only” farming.
Did I miss anything?
Oh, I see Fork is a misspelling.
There are no agricultural diesel subsidies. Not having to pay road taxes for the roads that tractors don’t use, is not a subsidy.
Here’s what Vijay Jayaraj wrote above:
The initiative also includes removal of subsidies for
agricultural diesel used in tractors and machinery.
You made an error as it does not mandate organic-only farming. 25% of land should be farmed organically which leaves 75% – or it would if a further 10% was not to be left unfarmed as well.
Mandating organic farming on 25% of the land is mandating organic farming. Which farms are going to be told they’re in the 25 percent? Is the government going to create a bureaucracy to inspect farms to make sure 25% of their land is following the mandate?
Here’s what Vijay Jayaraj said above:
The primary policy target of farmers is a so-called Farm to Fork
program that seeks to … mandate a conversion of 25% of the
European Union’s agricultural land to “organic-only” farming.
FNSEA was following not leading.
There are considered weak and are accused of going along with the taxating objectives of the Macron government.
Politicians in the EU and UK were hoping to do with farming what they’ve done with heavy industries and export deadly CO2 emissions.
Fortunately unlike miners, steelworkers, shipbuilders and the rest farmers have the publics support. The public know biting the hand that feeds them is not a good plan
It’s amazing how short the publics collective memory is. I have memories of one
of my grandparents farms in the mid-west before the use of granular fertilizer, modern machinery
and other such items that are taken for granted these days. To go back to food production
of that era would be devastating. Life was brutally hard on a farm back even in the ’40’s and
and 50’s. Stories from my other grandads homestead days during the dust bowl are
very grim. These climate nutjobs wouldn’t last under those conditions for a day let alone a week. We’re very blessed to have the food production system knowledge and infrastructure in use today.
There wouldn’t be all the fat obese overweight people we have around around for long.
But there is no such collective memory. The folks coming up with these ideas have probably never been on a farm, let alone done any farmwork. They live in cities and know that their food comes, shrink-wrapped, from the grocery store. No idea whatsoever of what is involved in food production and distribution.
Farmers are not the only group waking up to Green Tyranny.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyB8XfBtix8
I genuinely believe that we are finally (finally!) witnessing the end of the entire Global Warming Scam.
Go farmers go. Same for any other primary producer who adds value to all our lives. The idiots who don’t know a pitchfork from a cow pie need to be put out to pasture and people with a clue need to make the decisions that will affect us all. Euro bureaucrats are an elite cadre of blood suckers trying to tell others how to live but with no concept of how our lives are supported by agriculture and industry. They would have us all starve to death in the dark and cold if not stopped.
“If you’re not using all that, we’ll take it!” – Rest of the World
Farmers are some of the sanest but most vulnerable people in the world. Power/market grabbers leverage politicians and regulation to get what they want. If they want your land they know how to take it. The trend of moving farmers off land they own has accelerated in the past 30 years. Europe protects their farmers and highly value it’s unique agriculture. It doesn’t see it as a totally mechanized globalized biomass fractionalized food science industry but as a brand rooted in the legacy of it’s human culture. The demand and value of European ag products has exploded since 2000 with the global economic expansion.
This is the reason why EU farmers can say no to insanity and people listen.
In the US, we need provide regulation sanctuaries to give families the opportunity own land and farm at scales from Nano on up…. one small puzzle piece in restoring sanity to America.
What would a re-wilded elite utopia be without the European culinary tradition and ag products. Obviously , it is too soon to dismantle the European Ag culture and it’s farmers….. not until depopulation takes hold when it will be incrementally shifted to a non-human high biotech endeavor.
Bourgogne Chardonnay grown by the finest Robots in the world, Locatelli Romano from the finest genetically engineered android sheep machines LOL
Mister Sneaky and Co react to Reckless Renewables protest or an eye on Europe’s farmers-
Government ‘quietly removed’ the proposed tax on farmers (msn.com)