Essay by Eric Worrall
President Biden doing his best to burn down an industry filled with well paid unionised jobs.
JANUARY 26, 2024
FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces Temporary Pause on Pending Approvals of Liquefied Natural Gas Exports
President Biden has been clear that climate change is the existential threat of our time – and we must act with the urgency it demands to protect the future for generations to come. That’s why, since Day One, President Biden has led and delivered on the most ambitious climate agenda in history, which is lowering energy costs for hardworking Americans, creating millions of good-paying jobs, safeguarding the health of our communities, and ensuring America leads the clean energy future.
Today, the Biden-Harris Administration is announcing a temporary pause on pending decisions on exports of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) to non-FTA countries until the Department of Energy can update the underlying analyses for authorizations. The current economic and environmental analyses DOE uses to underpin its LNG export authorizations are roughly five years old and no longer adequately account for considerations like potential energy cost increases for American consumers and manufacturers beyond current authorizations or the latest assessment of the impact of greenhouse gas emissions. Today, we have an evolving understanding of the market need for LNG, the long-term supply of LNG, and the perilous impacts of methane on our planet. We also must adequately guard against risks to the health of our communities, especially frontline communities in the United States who disproportionately shoulder the burden of pollution from new export facilities. The pause, which is subject to exception for unanticipated and immediate national security emergencies, will provide the time to integrate these critical considerations.
The U.S. is already the number one exporter of LNG worldwide – with U.S. LNG exports expected to double by the end of this decade. At the same time, the U.S. remains unwavering in our commitment to supporting our allies around the world. Today’s announcement will not impact our ability to continue supplying LNG to our allies in the near-term. Last year, roughly half of U.S. LNG exports went to Europe, and the U.S. has worked with the E.U. to successfully economize consumption and manage its storage to ensure that unprovoked acts of aggression cannot threaten its supply. Furthermore, in 2022, the E.U and U.S. pledged to work toward the goal of ensuring additional LNG volumes for the E.U. market – with the U.S. exceeding our annual delivery targets to the E.U. in each of the past two years. Through existing LNG production and export infrastructure, the U.S. has – and will continue – to deliver for our allies.
As Republicans in Congress continue to deny the very existence of climate change while attempting to strip their constituents of the economic, environmental and health benefits of the President’s historic climate investments, the Biden-Harris Administration will continue to lead the way in ambitious climate action while ensuring the American economy remains the envy of the world.
Biden-Harris Administration’s Top Climate Accomplishments:Source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/01/26/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-temporary-pause-on-pending-approvals-of-liquefied-natural-gas-exports/
- Signed into law the largest climate investment in history, the Inflation Reduction Act, which has already created 210,000 new jobs across nearly every state and attracted more than $200 billion in private clean energy investments ($365 billion since President Biden took office), while putting the U.S. on a path to meet our climate goals and reach 80% clean energy by 2030 – in addition to securing the American Rescue Plan, Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and CHIPS and Science Act
- Established a whole-of-government strategy to tackle methane emissions – from plugging wells and leaks in the oil and gas sector, to reclaiming abandoned coal mines, to reducing food waste and agricultural emissions, and finalized a historic rule to reduce methane emissionsfrom oil and gas operations by nearly 80%, delivering billions of dollars in health and economic benefits
- Launched the American Climate Corps to mobilize a new, diverse generation of Americans – putting them to work conserving and restoring our lands and waters, bolstering community resilience, deploying clean energy, implementing energy efficient technologies, and advancing environmental justice, all while creating pathways to high-quality, good-paying jobs
- Advancing the most ambitious environmental justice agenda in history, including by signing a historic Executive Order that calls on the federal government to bring clean energy and healthy environments to all and mitigate harm to those who have suffered from toxic pollution and other environmental burdens like climate change; delivering on the Justice40 initiative, which is ensuring that the benefits of President Biden’s historic investments in America – from clean energy projects to floodwater protections – reach communities that need them most; replacing lead pipes and taking action to protect communities from PFAS pollution; accelerating Superfund cleanups; tightening air quality enforcement near pollution facilities; and more
- Protected 26 million acres of lands and waters – on track to conserve more lands and waters than any President in history – including five new national monuments that include protections for lands in Colorado, Nevada, Texas, and most recently, the Baaj Nwaavjo I’tah Kukveni – Ancestral Footprints of the Grand Canyon National Monument in Arizona; initiating new national marine sanctuaries as part of the President’s goal of conserving 30% of lands and waters by 2030, delivering billions of dollars to accelerate land, water, and wildlife conservation efforts in all 50 states, territories, the District of Columbia, and Tribal nations; and more
- Canceled remaining oil and gas leases issued by the previous administration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, proposed protections for more than 13 million acres in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, and withdrew approximately 2.8 million acres of the Beaufort Sea, ensuring the entire United States Arctic Ocean is off limits to new oil and gas leasing
- Signed an Executive Order that sets an ambitious target to make half of all new vehicles sold in 2030 zero-emissions, while proposing strongest-ever limits on tail pipe emissions and issuing fuel economy standards, giving Americans more choices about the cars they drive, and saving Americans hundreds of dollars at the pump
- Proposed carbon pollution standards for coal and gas-fired power plant emissions that would avoid hundreds of millions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions and protect people’s health
- Accelerated permitting of clean energy projects, including 47 projects on public lands that total 11.2 megawatts of wind, solar and geothermal energy on public lands – enough to power more than 3.5 million homes, and broke ground on 10 major transmission projects, which are slated to connect 19.5 gigawatts of new generation to the grid
- Rallied world leaders to raise global climate ambition, including by securing commitments from more than 155 countries to reduce methane emissions by at least 30 percent by 2030, joining leaders at COP28 to commit, for the first time, to transition away from fossil fuels, end new unabated coal capacity globally, and agree to triple renewable energy globally by 2030
- Invoked the Defense Production Act using emergency authority on the basis of climate change to increase domestic production of key clean energy technologies, such as solar, transformers and electric grid components, and heat pumps
This isn’t the first time Biden has attacked natural gas. Who can forget one of his first acts as President, cancelling Keystone. How much hardship did that decision cause, both union workers who lost their jobs, and more US energy insecurity, driving up pump prices?
None of Biden’s climate acts have made a single bit of difference, other than driving up the national debt, and increasing costs for ordinary Americans. They’ll all be repealed by the next administration.
“Rallying world leaders?” Since Biden became president, with the exception of Glasgow, COP Climate conferences have been held in petro-state dictatorships. A federal Aussie senator told me to my face, that Australia’s vocal commitment to climate action will ease up, as soon as the USA has a change of administration.
All Biden’s arbitrary pandering to his few remaining supporters will achieve is to reinforce the impression of the USA as an unreliable trading partner, and tax revenue generating trade is something an administration which blew up the national debt to $34 trillion should really be encouraging.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I read (a long time ago) that “refinery worker” was the highest paying blue collar job in the U.S.
I would assume LNG export terminal worker would fall into the same class.
Why does the “party of the working class” continually harm the fortunes of the working class? Do they even know any working class people? (Their gardener, nanny, maid, cook, and chauffeur excluded.)
For the same reason that socialists and communists perpetually harm the working class. They are merely the sheep to be shorn for the communists’ road to power. Under socialism, everything including life, family, personal possessions is to be sacrificed for the empowering of the state. Because they are contrary to the interests of the state and its power, family and church are always the first things attacked and dismantled by socialism.
Might ask the guys who were working on the Keystone pipeline
President Biden has been clear that climate change is the existential threat of our time – and we must act with the urgency it demands to protect the future for generations to come.
That’s why, since Day One, President Biden has led and delivered on the most ambitious climate agenda in history, which is lowering energy costs for hardworking Americans, creating millions of good-paying jobs, safeguarding the health of our communities, and ensuring America leads the clean energy future.
I have split into two paras for clarity. Suppose there is an existential threat. Then you would expect the actions undertaken as a result to be described as having some effect on it. And you’d expect to be told how much effect.
Instead, in the usual quick change of subject what we find is how the program is lowering energy costs…etc.
There is nothing, zero, about how it is affecting the ‘existential threat of our time’ which was cited as the prime motivation of the program.
This is because it has no effect whatever on global emissions, global temperatures or global climate. We are acting with ‘the urgency it demands’ to do something that will have no more effect on climate than standing on our heads every morning for a few minutes.
Its not just the US. Its Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK and to a lesser extent Germany. A sort of wave of popular delusion and crowd madness on the part of the political classes.
When human CO2 emissions dropped 6% in 2020 because of COVID-19, according to the IEA, the rate of increase in atmospheric CO2 didn’t change one bit.
https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2020/global-energy-and-co2-emissions-in-2020
https://www.co2.earth/monthly-co2
Actually, the effect of this LNG garbage decision will be to INCREASE CO2 emissions, since what will be used in its place will emit more CO2 than LNG would have. If you think they really care about emissions, wake up now – this is about power and money, not about emissions.
Joe is cognitively impaired. Else he would heed the Army’s first rule of holes:
when in one wanting out, first stop digging.
I think he only has in mind to stop digging. Or drilling, at least.
America please get this corrupt and deluded man out of office before he brings the whole world to it’s knees.
Worse than that, he’s shipping nukes to Mildenhall, Fairford and Lakenheath
So Buyden wants the world to use more coal than natural gas – who knew he was such a friend of the coal industry
Dr Mercola has a great summary today – go to his web site
The aim is
1) cause US gas production to be shut in and not developed
2) the lack of an arbitrage with export netback value can then allow domestic prices to soar
and if
3) further development is banned – Americans will pay a lot for energy (at least those who can afford it), while those who can’t afford it will end up cold, and at risk of illness and death.
meanwhile
4) the rest of the world learns to live without the US, probably at pain to itself, with lack of competition in supply leading to higher prices and uncomfortable dependencies on unpleasant regimes.
Biden is going where the climate votes overwhelming are.
In the latest Pew Research poll on the subject, 61% percent of adult Americans support the so-called “Climate Change” agenda of net zero by 2050 compared to 28% against. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/09/what-the-data-says-about-americans-views-of-climate-change/
In the latest Gallup poll, 59% to 35%, of the public believes the nation should emphasize the development of alternative energy sources such as wind and solar power over producing energy from oil, gas, and coal.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/473810/sharply-fewer-energy-situation-serious.aspx#:~:text=By%20an%20even%20larger%20margin,from%20oil%2C%20gas%20and%20coal.
Republican states lead the US in electricity generated by wind power, with Texas being number one and other Republican states right behind Texas. The Democratic states have emphasized solar energy for generating electricity.
https://www.sustainabilitybynumbers.com/p/red-states-renewables
The polls were designed to elicit specific responses.
You know this.
What is your goal in spreading, what is essentially, lies? What are you trying to accomplish?
The polls were also designed to measure the effectiveness of the climate propaganda through the media.
“In the latest Pew Research poll on the subject”
This Pew Research poll was taken in August of 2023. That’s the latest one?
What if they asked the question in a realistic manner, which includes the actual tradeoffs? We’ll put aside for now that “net zero” is a fantasy that will never happen in the foreseeable future, and the fact that the climate models are wrong and the actual effect will be close to zero no matter what humans do.
What do you think the answer would be to this question: Would you support policies that increased your energy bills by 500-1000% in order to lower global temperatures by 0.1-0.2 degrees by 2100?
Remember, Independent, we are fighting the existential threat to humanity. Every million tons we reduce evil fossil fuel emissions will lower global temperature by a thousandth of a degree and we will have fewer tornadoes, floods and hurricanes. At least, that’s what the models say! Yikes.
gums sends…
Keep believing that based on that poll people will vote for Biden because of his climate change agenda. Please. Ignore the polls that show climate change is not even on the list of voter concerns. Let the Republicans waste their time and money seeking votes based on economic and illegal immigration concerns. I beg you.
Spend millions on TV ads touting Biden’s push to have us buy EVs. Spend thousands on bumper stickers saying something like, “Biden Gives Us Cool Solutions to Global Warming.” Clearly a winning strategy, right? If you love your country you would help make these things happen.
Go for it!
Look at poll question that asks how much people are willing to spend to STOP the weather from getting warmer and more comfy.
Now my déjà vu is having déjà vu …
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/01/10/biden-make-china-great-again/#comment-3845945
A copy of the original comment that the above link links to follows for those pressed for time.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
I posted under one of your many previous copies of this assertion that poll results depend on the questions asked.
Looking more closely at your link to the Pew poll (in your reply to “Joseph Zorzin”), I eventually noticed the “How we did this” bar had a “plus sign inside a circle” icon next to it.
Clicking on this opened a box ending with :
“Here are the questions used for this analysis, along with responses, and its methodology.”
On the Pew webpage, the underlined text is a link to a PDF file with the questions asked (!), along with the results.
You appear to have only looked at the response to question “EN1” of that poll.
You appear to have stopped there.
I don’t need to look for any “others”.
Some other questions, with their responses … from one of your chosen polls … lightly reformatted, with highlighting added by me.
– – – – – – – – – –
Question EN2
Thinking about the country’s energy supply, do you think the U.S. should…
Phase out the use of oil, coal and natural gas completely, relying instead on renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power only : 31%
Use a mix of energy sources including oil, coal and natural gas along with renewable energy sources : 68%
No answer : 1%
– – – – – – – – – –
Question EN3
[ Note in Pew PDF file : “ASK IF “USE A MIX” (EN2=2) [N=7,151]” ]
And do you think that …
The country should never stop using oil, coal and natural gas : 52%
The country should eventually stop using oil, coal and natural gas, but we aren’t ready yet : 47%
No answer : 1%
NB : 52% of 68% is just over 35% of “Americans” …
– – – – – – – – – –
Question NRGPROB
If the U.S. greatly reduces energy production from fossil fuel sources such as oil, coal and natural gas, and increases energy production from renewable sources such as wind and solar… [h]ow likely do you think it is that this transition would lead to unexpected problems for the country?
Very likely : 34%
Somewhat likely : 38%
Not too likely : 23%
Not at all likely : 3%
No answer : 1%
NB (for the mathematically challenged) : 34% + 38% = 72%, or almost three-quarters of “Americans”, think it is “likely or very likely” that trying to rush a transition to renewables “would” (definitely) lead to “problems”.
– – – – – – – – – –
“Americans’ views of climate change” are slightly more nuanced than the “narrative” of enthusiastic support for “slashing climate pollution / more action on climate change” that you seem to want people to infer from your posts.
For a while, early in the Brandon Administration, I struggled to figure out whether he was stupid or bad. Now I think the people behind him are all in for chaos. Now I´m struggling to figure out how this works for any one, other than the BRICS types, Iran, North Korea, wait a minute, the old GW Bush Axis Of Evil redo. I need a drink.
Realize that the Democrat Party wants to destroy the United States. They are often stupid, but definitely evil.
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. – Hanlon’s Razor
OK we have to assume an awful lot of stupidity….
Or in this case, at least moderate cognitive impairment combined with a long history of being wrong on almost everything.
If US Domestic production is shuttered, if there is still be demand, companies like Ukraine’s Burisma will have to expand production to fulfil that demand.
Though I’m sure Biden is doing this for moral reasons, not because Hunter has directorships on the boards of companies which would benefit financially from a drop in US domestic energy production.
“I think he has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.”
— Robert Gates (on Joe Biden)
Obama: “Never underestimate Joe’s ability to eff things up.”
Clowns—the “existential threat of our time” is Crime Boss & Resident Biden, the one with the mushrooms for brains.
Marc Morano discussed this on Fox News a few hours ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3OhKAH7e_k
Regards,
Bob
That list is invaluable as ‘to undo’ list for President Trump.
That’s what I was thinking, too.
A good list of things for Trump to cancel.
Eleven months and a few days.
Where are the Republicans in the so-called “climate change” debate? Hiding it looks like.
They should be calling the so-called “climate change experts” to testify under oath in House hearings to debunk the “climate change” myth.
People are concerned over the economy and illegal immigration. Virtually no one cares about cc unless it affects their bank accounts.
Meet John Kerry’s replacement as the new “Climate Czar.”…he has already accomplished more that Kerry did in his entire three year stint.
Biden Team Reportedly Took Step Toward Killing Natural Gas Project After Meeting With 25-Year-Old TikTok Influencer Alex Haraus, from Colorado, who has organized an online campaign demanding that the administration kill the LNG project.https://dailycaller.com/2024/01/25/biden-team-reportedly-met-25-year-old-tiktok-influencer-cp2/
Okay you’ve listed all the bad stuff he has done. Has done any good stuff?
He has spent roughly 50- of the days of his presidency on vacation. Else it would be worse.
I’ve been following the LNG export development on the Delaware River
for a few years and from what I have seen it’s being stopped by actions
by the Sierra Club and it’s offshoots, radical enviros.
Joe Biden and his family are text book examples of a pathological liar,
he would rather lie then tell the truth.
The media and government cover for him. VP Harris was being interviewed
yesterday and her body language was obvious. Note the way she furrows her
forehead when responding to the media questions. It’s the same body language
that B Clinton had when asked about Monica Lewinsky, they just can’t
help it.
“I’ve been following the LNG export development on the Delaware River
for a few years and from what I have seen it’s being stopped by actions
by the Sierra Club and it’s offshoots, radical enviros.”
You can bet a leftwing billionaire or two are involved.
Leftwing billionaires seem to be the driving force in everything that harms the United States.
Money will only take someone so far, then it becomes power that
is the driving force. There is a branch of my family tree from the mid west
that had to deal with the Teamster’s Union and Jimmy Hoffa and the mob in the ’70’s.
I’ve heard stories about flying in non-union drivers during a strike in Chicago
and having off duty police officers follow those trucks on delivery..and Hoffa &
the Teamsters mob settling..
The leftist enviro radicals have taken over to what
the union mobsters were back in those days as far as power and control goes.
The public sector unions have replaced union job leftist after the production was shipped off shore.
Now we have a generation or two that have been indoctrinated to the CO2 climate change
by the public school system. The more things change the more they stay the same.
Biden probably doesn’t know what day of the week it is. The administration’s policies are designed by the CIA and the Pentagon whose goal is the control of all hydrocarbon energy on the planet. It matters not who wins any important election, those beneath the curtain manipulate the puppets above. They’ll be happy if their plan works out and the rest of the planet tries to operate on wind turbines, solar panels, and hydrogen fuel as long as they end up with the oil and natural gas. In order to do this they need to demonstrate how important “renewable” energy is and get everyone else on board by putting some of it together themselves. They’re not spending their own personal funds on offshore turbines, all of the money comes from the population.
When this ultimate fraud finally blows up they’ll be the ones in complete control. Everyone else will be an impoverished sucker.
I’m waiting for the Babylon Bee headline: “Biden Administration Bans Water Vapor”. Or maybe it would be Gavin Newsom…
An old definition of an “honest” politian: One who, when he has been ‘bought’, stays ‘bought’.
That would apply to Biden. He has “stayed bought” in regard to the Chicoms. Everything he does helps the Chicoms.
In the immortal words/comedy of Ron White, “You can’t fix stupid.”
Biden Pauses Natural Gas Export Approvals … because … Biden is Putin’s puppet.
Projection is NOT just a river in Egypt.
Hmmmm… There is no US/EU FTA.
Negotiations for a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) were underway, but were abandoned.
I wonder how literal can Mr Biden be.
There does seem to be quite a few links to Chinese payments/influence to Democratic party members/workers etc.
Perhaps working from the inside is a more effective way of taking over a country than all out war?
Story tip: Greenies are now touting many analyses that purport to show that operating an LNG plant causes more methane & CO2 emissions than burning the equivalent amount of coal in Europe. See https://www.research.howarthlab.org/publications/Howarth_LNG_assessment_preprint_archived_2023-1103.pdf. In response, I have written the following to Dr. Howarth:
Dr. Howarth,
I am a retired chemical engineer, and I read with interest your paper regarding the greenhouse gas footprint of an LNG plant. As an academic analysis, it is thorough, although I might have an issue with some of the percentages of methane emissions estimated in the life cycle. Those would be nits.
My primary disagreement would be that it is a static assessment that ignores market forces and does not consider the production realities of natural gas production in the US nor does it address foreign market responses to less US LNG.
Let’s look at the CP2 LNG project. At full capacity, CP2 would export about 20MM tonnes per year of LNG (liquefied methane). That’s equivalent to about 2.8 billion cubic feet per year (BCFY) of methane. Haynesville gas is about 94% methane on average, per the Louisiana DNR. According to the EIA, the US produced about 120 BCF of natural gas in 2022. For the sake of my discussion, I will assume all the CP2 natural gas comes from Haynesville or similar plays. So, the CP2 LNG plant equates to about 2.5 percent of total US methane gas production [2.8/ (120 x .94)]. Therefore, pausing of one LNG plant is not enough to noticeably affect drilling activity. All the CP2 gas would still be drilled/produced.
The worldwide utility rate for LNG tankers is about 80%, so the tankers assigned to CP2 would just go somewhere else, and not be mothballed. In the very unlikely event all future US LNG plants were permanently cancelled, Mexico can take up the slack – they already have 3 plants under construction and some Permian gas is expected to be part of the mix.. Many plants are planned for the Middle East and Asia – much of this because Europe finally realizes that having all their energy eggs in the Russian basket is a bad idea. (As an aside, foreign operators do not operate under the same environmental constraints that we do in the US, so the world likely would get more emissions from them than from a US plant. The same goes for gas production.) Any reduction in US exports would be filled by foreign actors. The bottom line is that I believe the only inputs that should be considered when measuring CH4 emissions are those methane emissions directly attributable to the operation of the CP2 plant. (And not even those, if foreign actors increase their exports to account for US export reductions.) All the other emissions will still occur, especially the increased European coal emissions, unless they get LNG elsewhere, which is a real possibility. (20MM tonnes of CH4 = ~1,000 trillion BTU = ~36,000 tonnes of coal) And because the pause is being done by presidential fiat and not by Congressional action, a different administration could overturn the pause on day one. In short, pausing or cancelling US increased exports will almost certainly have little to no effect on global methane emissions, especially in the long term.
Job losses, some high paying, would also occur – many temporary (construction), and many permanent. (Plant jobs + nearby services such as restaurants, hotels, etc.)
Thanks for your time.
Cordially,
Gregory K. Staff
Just the next stage of the attack, demonized coal with gas being the better replacement so now need to get rid of gas