Watch the Ongoing Mann-Steyn Trial Live

I especially like the very last part of Mark’s opening where he uses Mann’s books to show how indebted Mann is to the Penn State president who was CONVICTED for covering up for the child m@lester. He thanks him in his books even after he was convicted and imprisoned. He is thanking him for creating the panel who covered up Mann’s fakery on producing the hookey schtick through the rigged ‘investigation” of his “science”.

Of course THAT was the point of Mark’s article, that the corrupt Penn State @ssH@ts that covered up for a serial h@mosexual ped@phile also covered up for serial data manipulator.

Amazing Mann drug this case out for 12 years while he continued to add to Steyn’s defense by calling deniers every name in the leftist book. Of course ped@phile was not included in Mann’s attacks, since leftists would NEVER attack ped@philes unless they were associated to religion.

Every man has the right to an opinion but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts. Nor, above all, to persist in errors as to facts.

Bernard Baruch, 1948.

He said that Mann earned the title because he molested numbers like Sandusky molested children. Which doesn’t make sense, but whatever.

Nick,

You know that Mann used ex post fact elimination of every dendrochronology series that didn’t fit his desired results. You have been to Climate Audit and KNOW this to be true.

Elimination of the “numbers” that didn’t fit his desired outcome, using a series in the inverse of what the original scientists concluded was correct (and after modern agricultural runoff contaminated that record, thus creating a hookey schtick), and relying on a few other individual trees was the Mannipulation that created the schtick.

You know these things Nick, but instead of admitting the truth, you, like all liberals, are trying to attack the man, Mark Steyn.

And BTW Nick, why do you h@te the poor so much??

Nick knows this, that even though others claimed to have used “different” data, while not posting the data, including pseudoscientists that received money from the US government which requires the data to be included. Steve M showed that the few data sets that formed the blade were the same as used by Mann, even though a few other inconsequential series were different.

Nick Knows, he has spent a lot of time at Climate Audit, yet he continues to claim the false narrative of other’s replicated Mann’s crap with DIFFERENT data, a bald faced l!e

And he still H@TES poor people soo much that he continues to support the unsupportable fr@ud of Mann and cronies, one of whom is Nick himself.