“Lack of Commitment” Threatens Europe’s Net Zero Progress

Essay by Eric Worrall

What a surprise – European climate zealot politicians are not practicing what they are preaching.

EU Policy. Lack of commitment threatens bloc’s climate-neutrality target

By Marta Pacheco & Robert Hodgson
Published on 03/01/2024 – 13:26•Updated 13:51

With the European Commission expected to announce next month a radical new 2040 target for greenhouse gas emissions reduction, there are worrying signs that governments are struggling to meet existing commitments.

Member states are already struggling to meet the 2030 targets for energy savings, renewable energy use, and overall emissions reduction at the core of the EU’s contribution to the global effort. During the same environment ministers’ gathering in December, the Commission published a damning assessment of national climate and energy plans (NECPs) submitted to date.

With all the planned measures combined, the bloc looked set to fall short of all three targets for the end of this decade, which require roughly doubling the share of renewables such as wind and solar in the EU’s energy mix to 42.5% while cutting overall energy use by 11.7% on the way to slashing net emissions by 55% compared to 1990.

Moreover, despite an end-of-June deadline, only 21 member states had submitted draft plans by mid-November, a scenario that has significantly compromised the process of assessing their combined impact, according to the Commission. The executive’s appraisal points to shortcomings on several fronts, including EU countries’ performance on reducing national annual emissions.

Current measures would lead to a reduction of 51%, four points short of the 2030 target, the Commission found. As for renewable energy in the mix, current drafts show that EU countries are on track to reach a share of around 39% by 2030. For energy efficiency the picture is much worse: the plans submitted by mid-November imply a 5.8% reduction in energy demand, just half of the EU target.

Read more: https://www.euronews.com/green/2024/01/03/eu-policy-weak-performance-threatens-blocs-climate-neutrality-target

As WUWT reported recently, it could be a lot worse than Euronews is letting on. The German Renewable Energy sector is on the brink of collapse.

As far as I can tell, the core problem is too much economic activity has been outsourced to low cost centres like China, including the manufacture of renewable energy components. Chinese manufacturing costs are lower than Europe, because China uses cheap coal power and possibly also uses slave labor to manufacture energy intensive solar panels and wind turbine components. But the European economy is doing so badly that Chinese prices have risen relative to the European economy, to the extent that European companies are struggling to afford Chinese imports. This in turn is triggering job losses and severe slowdowns in Europe’s green energy sector.

What about manufacturing green energy components in Europe instead of importing from China? Europe has so far failed to replace Chinese imports with their own manufactured products, because manufacturing solar panels and wind turbine components is energy intensive. European energy is too expensive to competitively manufacture green energy components, even in the context of rising import prices. Arguably German green energy is too expensive for any kind of manufacturing, German industrial production is currently suffering a severe contraction, likely caused by disruption of Russian gas supplies, and the complete failure of renewable energy to fill the hole left by the withdrawal of Russian energy.

Germany may receive some energy price relief in 2024, though not from renewables. Norway has agreed to supply enough gas to replace what Germany used to import from Russia. But Norway has other customers like Britain who are also desperate for Norwegian gas, so it’s likely the price Germany pays for Norwegian gas will likely be higher than what Russia used to charge.

The Chinese economy is also unravelling, but for a different reason. The Chinese housing sector is collapsing, and that collapse is threatening to drag down the entire Chinese economy. Structural problems such as a local government debt crisis, from excessive debts incurred by ambitious local politicians desperate to meet communist central government growth targets, and the close tie between local government finances and income from housing development land sales, are also weighing on the Chinese economy.

There may be a sliver of opportunity for Germany in 2024, Norwegian gas may revive hopes of local manufacture of energy intensive renewable components. But China’s economic woes won’t last forever. Whatever happens to German manufacturing, the continued European dependence on fossil fuel, and the complete failure of renewables to deliver a viable end to end renewable based economy, which includes extraction, manufacture and replacement of renewable components all powered by an entirely renewable energy based supply chain, speaks volumes about Europe’s structural failure to hit its climate targets.

4.9 23 votes
Article Rating
72 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Philip Mulholland
January 4, 2024 2:04 am

Do as you would be done by.
Be done by as you did.
The Water-Babies, A Fairy Tale for a Land Baby

Ron Long
January 4, 2024 2:16 am

I bet most of or parents, teaching us to drive, told us not to speed up when encountering a sign that states “dead end”, but instead to slow down and think of a Plan B. These corrupt/woke/privileged virtue-signaling politicians chasing after Net Zero apparently can adapt, like buying Norwegian gas, wait for it.

Reply to  Ron Long
January 4, 2024 3:25 am

Nice one…
It was because, seemingly, the German car making industry is having some sort of Boom Time.

I came upon the story a few weeks ago from a brief article asserting that the CEOs of the big 5 carmakers had cheerfully doubled their annual salaries in the last year alone.

Having endured, during this last year, a minor fail in the AdBlue system on a VW diesel and discovered the truly insane costs of parts & labour, I can understand why.
And it took 4 months to fix!!!
(A heating element in the AdBlue tank had failed but it cost 2 new Lambda sensors and all those diagnostics/test drives to work it out – each of those parts = £500 to £600 +20% tax)

Also how an identical vehicle to mine when I bought it 6 years ago (2nd hand and one year old) is now 250% more expensive. IF you got there fast enough, there was only one available in all of South Yorkshire compared dozens and dozens when I got mine.

I didn’t take the opportunity back then for further research and make Bookmarks so….. over to you

Reply to  Ron Long
January 4, 2024 3:28 am

“Danger – Bridge Out Ahead” And still the accelerator is pressed to the floor.

Reply to  David Dibbell
January 4, 2024 5:25 am

Thelma & Louise

William Howard
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 4, 2024 7:14 am

Hernan Cortez

MyUsername
January 4, 2024 2:26 am

2030 is still a few years away, and with the accelerating pace in the last three years…we’ll see.

Bill Toland
Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 3:20 am

You’ve misspelled decelerating.

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 3:23 am

Do you see progress as the collapse of the German economy. It really is on its knees. Of course, like any EU member state, the Germans will blame it on the Eurozone etc – ie not their fault.

It is a truly wonderful thing that the UK never joined the Euro. And our politicians can no longer blame somebody else.

Reply to  strativarius
January 4, 2024 6:13 am

You are kidding, right? Our politicians are still blaming everyone else but themselves and will continue using Brexit as an excuse for their blunders for quite some time.

Reply to  strativarius
January 4, 2024 6:21 am

You really think so? I can remember pre-EU/EEC membership, even voted in an election. They blamed any problem on someone else, including 13 years of Tory misrule.

Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 7:26 am

We’ll see as much “carbon pollution” as now and probably more- and the world will be just fine- no boiling oceans, no sunk islands, polar bears will be thriving, coral reefs will be awesome- and the climate nut jobs will still be crying. Same in 2050 and 2100.

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 5, 2024 8:16 pm

The Grand Solar Minimum has just started.

Even NOAA is forecasting the Sunspot Number to drop from around 110 today to zero in 2040 when their forecast ends.

The Sunspot Number reflects the output of the Sun. The last time the Sun had one was in the Little Ice Age.

Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 10:48 am

We’ll look forward to you telling us “I told you so” /sarc

Ian_e
Reply to  MyUsername
January 5, 2024 1:38 am

Could I recommend for you a trip to SpecSavers?

January 4, 2024 2:32 am

“Member states are already struggling to meet the 2030 targets ….. ”

Of course they are, the targets are impossible to meet and the Bandar-log know it, they just won’t say it ‘cos they are afraid that saying it will make them look stupid.

Reply to  Oldseadog
January 4, 2024 5:28 am

I had to google Bandar-log!

Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 4, 2024 9:41 am

Tsk, tsk, Joseph, you need to read both Jungle Books now, and then follow up with the Just So Stories.

Reply to  Oldseadog
January 4, 2024 11:57 am

I think I started to read one- about 60 years ago- didn’t get far with it- either I was too young or something- can’t recall.

January 4, 2024 2:35 am

“Lack of Commitment” Threatens Europe’s Net Zero Progress
“Lack of a Climate Crisis” Threatens Europe’s Net Zero Progress.

There. Fixed it for you.

MyUsername
Reply to  David Kamakaris
January 4, 2024 2:38 am

Even without, renewables are still beneficial for europe.

Like more public transport.

Or public transport running on renewables.

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 3:26 am

public transport running on renewables”

Can you point to one example of this? There’s a lot of pseudo guidance on this idea out there, but no actual examples.

Reply to  strativarius
January 4, 2024 4:37 am

The poor muppet is truly in la-la-land.

Already countries that have tried so-called “renewables” for buses, have found them totally useless.

old cocky
Reply to  strativarius
January 4, 2024 12:21 pm

Swiss trains are electric, and just over half the electricity generation is hydroelectric.
Of course, a bit over a third is nuclear.

Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 4:35 am

renewables are still beneficial for europe.”

Utter RUBBISH

Runiables would not exist if not for the huge subsidies.

They are a parasite on any electrical grid system.

They serve absolutely NO PURPOSE except pointless virtue-seeking

They cannot and do not provide reliable electricity that a modern country absolutely needs if it wants to continue to exist

ZERO BENEFIT to anyone but the scammers-in-chief.

Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 5:22 am

I love the religious faith displayed by the Marxist Greens…

…Why did I spend three years getting a degree in Engineering when all I had to do was ‘believe’ that my fantasies would work instead of calculating why they would not?
.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Leo Smith
January 4, 2024 9:52 am

All those engineering equations are racist.
Just believe the bridge will stay up, and it will. 🙂

Reply to  John Hultquist
January 4, 2024 10:07 am

Just believe the bridge will stay up

Modern engineering:

brij
Jim Masterson
Reply to  Tony_G
January 4, 2024 4:31 pm

I enjoyed statics class and computing the forces on truss members.

Reply to  Jim Masterson
January 4, 2024 5:52 pm

Not half as much fun as trying to teach it to Uni Engineering students that only did mid or low level maths at high school. 😉

Blank glazed eyes when you mention words like integration and differentiation !

Jim Masterson
Reply to  bnice2000
January 5, 2024 11:26 am

Centroids were easy. I had trouble with the second moment of inertia. I rarely got the answer in the back of the book.

Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 6:17 am

No. It might be if the temperature continues to warm but if it cools then a dependancy on unreliable, intermittent energy sources will lead to increased deaths among the most vulnerable.
You seem happy to promote something that drives people into poverty then may cause their death.

Reply to  Richard Page
January 4, 2024 8:10 am

If the temperature world-wide drops 2C, or even rises 2C, on some sort of average, no normal living person will know. If the annual minimum low in Alphaville is -8C and it becomes, over an extended period -10C no one but climate scientists will be aware of it. If the annual maximum high is 37C and it rises to 39C no one will take note of that either.
Art history is real history. A current resident of Amsterdam isn’t impressed or depressed by the ice-fee canals in the city unless he looks at 17th century Dutch paintings of the folk skating and playing hockey on those same canals.

NetherlandsTheHagueMauritshuisMuseumHendrickAvercampIJsvermaakSkatersWinterSceneWikimedia-2410711145
Reply to  general custer
January 4, 2024 8:11 am

This evening.

Amsterdam-canal
Reply to  general custer
January 5, 2024 11:26 am

Breughel?

Reply to  Richard Page
January 5, 2024 8:19 pm

The Grand Soarl Minimum has just started. It may get much cooler in the coming years.

Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 6:29 am

Do you mean public transport running on electricity generated only by wind and sun, (in the UK hydro is marginal)?

If so can I challenge you to only using public transport to get anywhere, matching travel to percentage of demand met by renewables.

https://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/
Today you’d get 10% of the way there.

Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 7:28 am

Even without, renewables are still beneficial for europe.”

Check out the plight of those mining cobalt and other essential metals for your vaunted renewables. How beneficial is it for them? And all to solve a crisis that does not exist.

John Hultquist
Reply to  MyUsername
January 4, 2024 9:50 am

Cold weather has shut down electric buses in major cities.
Millions spent for EVs — now back to diesels.
Next brilliant idea please.

Reply to  David Kamakaris
January 4, 2024 5:29 am

Right, everyone sees that the oceans aren’t boiling and the islands aren’t sinking and we’re all still afraid of the polar bears.

strativarius
January 4, 2024 2:40 am

The EU as is will be changed as more populist governments are elected. In Germany AfD is surging in the polls…

“Should Germany ban AfD? “
https://www.euronews.com/2023/06/14/should-germany-ban-afd-what-impact-could-this-have

Desperate times in Brussels – even Flanders has had enough

strativarius
Reply to  strativarius
January 4, 2024 3:13 am

Elections are due to be held in June 2024. According to POLITICO’s Poll of Polls, the far-right Vlaams Belang party — which wants to turn Flanders into a fully independent, breakaway state — is now the biggest political force in the country. “
https://www.politico.eu/article/belgium-break-up-flanders-wallonia-tom-van-grieken-vlaams-belang-far-right/

Belgium was always a ticking time bomb.

Reply to  strativarius
January 4, 2024 6:32 am

You support breakaway nationalist aspirations?

Gary from Belgium
Reply to  Ben Vorlich
January 4, 2024 10:03 am

The issue is more complex that that simple contradiction. There a two flemish parties that support a split with the Walloon part and the metropolis of Brussels. They have close to 50% of the flemish vote… Both these parties wild be described als conservative leaning, Vlaams Belang more so then the NVA. Our next election will be very intresting.

Reply to  Ben Vorlich
January 5, 2024 11:29 am

I don’t think it’s a case of supporting or condemning. Stating the bleedin’ obvious just is – facts are facts. If it happens then there’s not a whole lot we can do either way.

observa
January 4, 2024 2:47 am

It’s works like this with dependable concentrated energy numpties-
Olkiluoto Nuclear Plant Powers a Third of Finland: Record Electricity Production Achieved (msn.com)
rather than covering the planet with dilute fickle junk.

Reply to  observa
January 4, 2024 3:38 am

That’s very lovely but they really have put a lot of eggs in one basket.

Did all that juice actually ‘power Finland’ or did they export to Germany and it went on to places further afield via interconnectors?
e.g. The UK………….

Also, does Finland still have a natural gas connection to ‘you know where’ or were they getting (electric making) gas from even just boring old Norway, now feverishly exporting gas, esp to the UK

The Love Of Money knows no boundaries………… and occasions immense mendacity.

observa
Reply to  Peta of Newark
January 4, 2024 4:52 am

It was costly due to nuclear expertise having been lost but now they have it and a proven model it can be replicated.

Reply to  observa
January 4, 2024 5:33 am

Finland, great country, other than that university that gave Greta an honorary doctorate in theology!

Bill Toland
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
January 4, 2024 7:22 am

I think that was a practical joke on Greta. Think about it. One of the coldest countries in the world gives a theology doctorate to a climate alarmist.

Reply to  Bill Toland
January 5, 2024 11:32 am

Maybe. The Finns may be quietly laughing behind their hands at her while she doesn’t get it at all.

January 4, 2024 3:48 am

Maybe not ‘commitment‘ that’s lacking – we may be witnessing the age-old problem that all socialists have eventually to face: Other People’s Money

headline:EU heads tell Brussels to find ‘more cash’ as bloc’s finances bleed
Daily Express UK

Sean2828
January 4, 2024 3:59 am

UK’s manufacturing sector is in exactly the same boat as Germany.
https://oilprice.com/Finance/the-Economy/UK-Manufacturing-Sector-Plunges-Deeper-Into-Crisis.html

Dave Andrews
Reply to  Sean2828
January 4, 2024 8:35 am

UK’s manufacturing sector is only about 20% of the economy these days – we’re 80% services.

Reply to  Dave Andrews
January 5, 2024 11:38 am

Yeah but not much of that money stays in the country. The financial sector has a huge amount of money coming in which inflates the revenue figures but it all goes straight back out. Ideally we need revenue which feeds back into the country and generates growth, the financial services will be unable to do that.

UK-Weather Lass
January 4, 2024 4:10 am

Wind and solar should never have been approved from the beginning. They are neither an efficient use of raw materials at the beginning, nor a provider of reliable and efficient energy generation at the end. They represent the very worse examples of human folly and will blemish our environments for a long time after they have ceased working. They are an example of what happens when you give the wrong people lots of money to indulge in their fantasies.

Start suitably punishing decision makers for their mistakes and we may see care return to decision making. In the meantime we are supposed to tolerate the fools in charge – that is how bad the problem really is. Now if the climate change worriers got behind nuclear and made one big shove …

John Hultquist
Reply to  UK-Weather Lass
January 4, 2024 10:13 am

” and will blemish our environments for a long time after they have ceased working

13 miles west of me is an abandoned Darrieus Wind Machine. Built in the mid-1980s, it was a failure from the beginning. There was no money or effort to take it down. Found at the following location: 47.101065, -120.750094
See using Google Earth Street View from the county road.

Richard Greene
January 4, 2024 4:31 am

German leaders should be committed
to a lunatic asylum for damaging their own nation while about 180 of 195 nations could not care less about Nut Zero and CO2. Including China, Russia and India.

Nut Zero seems like an energy policy designed by China and sold to other nations to spur Chinese sales of solar panels, wind turbines and EVs.

German utilities wanted to buy Russian pipeline gas and Gazprom certainly wanted to sell as much pipeline gas as possible. But politicians of both nations decided to have a trade war. Buying expensive LNG does not make Germany the winner.

Reply to  Richard Greene
January 4, 2024 5:36 am

trade war?

Reply to  Richard Greene
January 5, 2024 8:49 pm

The UN’s IPCC, with the loudest voice on the planet, comes out with dire “climate change” predictions about every other week.

Gerald
January 4, 2024 4:37 am

The crazier, the better. In June 24 there will be elections for the European Parliament and I hope for lots of people in the EU member states realizing the craziness of this eco-totalitarism. Current polls are already predicting a landslide loss for the eco-zealots. The current EU-commission and president of the Comission von der Leyen went completely nuts considering her statement from the COP28

“In climate finance, we have to move from billions to trillions.

To get there, we need new sources of revenues.

New levies, green bonds and of course – carbon pricing.”

https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1730850092565901713

January 4, 2024 5:41 am

With a flip of the switch, offshore wind energy enters New England’s grid
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/01/03/science/vineyard-wind-up-online/

The usual BS from the Bah-stin Globe including the following: “59 percent of Massachusetts electricity is carbon free, according to state figures”

John Hultquist
January 4, 2024 9:06 am

” But China’s economic woes won’t last forever. “

I must have dosed off during the Econ 101 lecture when
“forever” was defined.
There appears to be much interest in the year 2030 regarding
western nations being saved from climate catastrophe.
I don’t expect China or the nations of Europe to get
their woes in order in the next couple of years,
nor by 2030.
[Forever, like infinity, is a concept, not a number.]

Reply to  John Hultquist
January 5, 2024 8:53 pm

The definition of “Climate” changed from thousands to millions of years, to just 30 years now.

I guess that’s all the models could hope to handle.

January 4, 2024 10:45 am

Please stop referring to wind turbines and solar as “green energy”, they’re neither green nor energy (when needed most)

Reply to  Redge
January 4, 2024 11:53 am

Absolutely, Redge.
And they are only “renewables” because they don’t last long so you have to keep renewing them frequently

Bob
January 4, 2024 2:24 pm

More good news.

I don’t understand Europeans.

Number one there is no reason to use less fossil fuel.

Number two burning fossil fuel from a different country does not make you better.

Number three no part of the globe has done more to uphold their commitments to the meaningless CAGW cause than Europe. Yet CO2 emissions have continued to rise. They are castrating themselves for no good reason.

Number four they need to score their efforts differently. Since they have done more than everyone else they need to tell the world we are putting future efforts on hold till the rest of the world catches up to us, then we will begin again. No one is going to be foolish enough to do what they have already done so they can get on with drilling and burning their own fuel and get back in the nuclear business.

Reply to  Bob
January 4, 2024 5:54 pm

Like your comments, Bob 🙂

Neo
January 4, 2024 11:05 pm

Extreme cold grips the Nordics, breaking record in Sweden for coldest January night
Temperatures have fallen below minus 40 degrees Celsius in the Nordic region for a second day in a row, with the coldest January temperature recorded in Swedish Lapland in 25 years
ByJAN M. OLSEN Associated Press
January 3, 2024, 5:09 AM

Coeur de Lion
January 5, 2024 2:27 am

What’s this ‘global effort’ ? China’s 104 gigawatts of new coal? Are the EU bureaucrats stupid or liars?

January 5, 2024 9:04 pm

When the world cut CO2 emissions by 6 percent in 2020 because of lockdowns and people staying away from crowded places, because of COVID-19, the increases in CO2 didn’t change at all.
https://www.co2.earth/monthly-co2