Essay by Eric Worrall
But eco-communism can save us, according to “The 2023 state of the climate report“.
Earth’s vital signs have never been worse, as climate scientists warn of ‘unbearable heat and shortages of food and freshwater’
By Mark Saunokonoko • Senior Journalist
“Unfortunately, time is up.”
That’s the bleak warning headlining a concerning new report where climate scientists conclude Earth’s vital signs are now worse than anything humans have seen.
The climate situation is now so bad that life on Earth is imperilled, the scientists said, pointing to 20 of 35 identified planetary vital signs that are teetering at record extremes.
Those red-lining vital signs meant “profoundly distressing scenes of suffering” will unfold on the planet’s population, the report published today in Bioscience declared.
…
Read more: https://www.9news.com.au/national/earth-vital-signs-now-worse-than-ever-been-before-climate-scientists-warn/fb978b1c-7b97-45ae-a1f9-6321a8ee3ef7
The report referenced by the press story above;
The 2023 state of the climate report: Entering uncharted territory
William J Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Jillian W Gregg, Johan Rockström, Thomas M Newsome, Beverly E Law, Luiz Marques, Timothy M Lenton, Chi Xu, Saleemul Huq, Leon Simons, Sir David Anthony King
BioScience, biad080, https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biad080
Published: 24 October 2023
Life on planet Earth is under siege. We are now in an uncharted territory. For several decades, scientists have consistently warned of a future marked by extreme climatic conditions because of escalating global temperatures caused by ongoing human activities that release harmful greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. Unfortunately, time is up. We are seeing the manifestation of those predictions as an alarming and unprecedented succession of climate records are broken, causing profoundly distressing scenes of suffering to unfold. We are entering an unfamiliar domain regarding our climate crisis, a situation no one has ever witnessed firsthand in the history of humanity.
…
Climate-related all-time records
In 2023, we witnessed an extraordinary series of climate-related records being broken around the world. The rapid pace of change has surprised scientists and caused concern about the dangers of extreme weather, risky climate feedback loops, and the approach of damaging tipping points sooner than expected (Armstrong McKay et al. 2022, Ripple et al. 2023). … possibly the warmest temperature on Earth over the past 100,000 years (figure 1e). It is a sign that we are pushing our planetary systems into dangerous instability.
…
Energy
It appears the green recovery following COVID-19 that many had hoped for has largely failed to materialize (Zhang et al. 2023). Instead, carbon emissions have continued soaring, and fossil fuels remain dominant, with annual coal consumption reaching a near all-time high of 161.5 exajoules in 2022 (figure 2h).
…
Economics
Economic growth, as it is conventionally pursued, is unlikely to allow us to achieve our social, climate, and biodiversity goals. … We therefore need to change our economy to a system that supports meeting basic needs for all people instead of excessive consumption by the wealthy (O’Neill et al. 2018).
…
Food security and undernourishment
After declining for many years, the prevalence of undernourishment is now on the rise (figure 5e). In 2022, an estimated 735 million people faced chronic hunger—an increase of roughly 122 million since 2019 (FAO et al. 2023).
…
Read more: https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/biad080/7319571?login=false
The report claims extreme weather is worse, but we’ve all heard this nonsense before.
The only significant bad identified, food security and undernourishment, is more likely the consequences of the Ukraine war, and high energy prices driving up the cost of fertiliser. The ongoing high level political attacks on the use of fertiliser and agricultural chemicals, and insane agriculture policies such as buying out farmers and requiring they never farm again, as part of the settlement, are probably contributing to disruption in the agricultural sector. The push for “rewilding“, destroying farmland and giving it over to the weeds, is probably also contributing. Greens are responsible for creating a food crisis we don’t have to have.
As for the claims of climate instability, there is no paleo climate evidence that a warmer climate is less productive. Quite the opposite.
How could our monkey ancestors have colonised much of the world during the hothouse world of the PETM, if all that global warming damaged their food supply?
Last time the world was really hot, The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, 5-8C hotter than today, the species which did really well was monkeys. Our monkey ancestors colonised much of Eurasia and North America, feasting on the abundance which the PETM warmth delivered. The monkeys passed through the warm temperate forests of Greenland on their journey. Our monkey ancestors only retreated when the warm age ended, because they were driven out of their new homes by the encroaching cold.
The biggest problem with the report though, is they simply ignored some options for addressing what they claim is a crisis.
Why do we “need to change our economy to a system that supports meeting basic needs for all people instead of excessive consumption”? Why can’t we just build a bunch of nuclear reactors, like France did in the 70s?
The report only contains one mention of nuclear energy that I could find, and that mention was not in the context of a potential climate solution – even though the French experience proves that nuclear power is a scalable and affordable path to reducing CO2 emissions.
The failure to even mention the nuclear solution to the alleged climate crisis in the context of a possible solution, let alone discuss the pros and cons of nuclear energy, along with the report’s emphasis on renewable energy and economic transformation, in my opinion betrays the true nature of this document – transparently politicised academic communist propaganda, masquerading as a climate warning.
Bloomberg’s green energy research team estimates $200 trillion to stop warming.
For $1 trillion we could surely develop air-conditioned clothing using solar cells and thermoelectric cooling materials. We don’t try to warm up the winters, we wear clothes to keep us at the temperature we like.
Don’t allow Siberia and Canada to become habitable! That would be the end of settled science!
What unadulterated garbage!
In about 4 months their warning of “unbearable heat” will change to “unbearable cold.”
Seasons are obviously proof of the climate crisis…
The communists have been building many more coal-fired power plants. They say growth is their main objective.
When communists build coal plants they burn good coal. And since they are not motivated by profit, communist coal plants are part of their orderly social transition to Net Zero.
This is the real climate science. Forget all the dots, graphs, plots, and models. This has been the agenda for many years.
“possibly the warmest temperature on Earth over the past 100,000 years”
Out of all the falsehoods they are spouting that is the most outrageous. Hard to not conclude they are intentionally lying because nobody with any understanding of the geologic record could make such a statement.
If I remember correctly that was a model that referring to. A MODEL to tell us what the temperature was on July 15, BC 180.
That wasn’t the day Julius Caesar got stabbed, was it?
Time is up for what? Are you going to stop browbeating us about our CO2 sins now that we’ve passed a “tipping point”? Excellent! Shut up and leave us alone.
We noticed that CO2 was ten times higher, global temperatures several degrees higher, and oceans several meters higher in the past and life managed to thrive; there was no death spiral into an inhospitable, hothouse planet. So what exactly are these “tipping points” of which you screech?
They get all the cushy flyover jobs and you do the tipping with your taxes deplorable.
NOTED..
Not one of the usual AGW trollettes has the courage to come out in defence of this anti-scientific gibberish.
Or to come out to say it is just moronic balderdash.
“affiliated with” ???
And is Bangladesh really in India?
Yawn.
If CO2 is of such an exteme global threat as to risk, well, something between the “ending of life as we know it,” to “global extinction”, then activists would be rushing to build as many nuclear plants as possible. It is the only proven carbon free power supply.
The fact that scientist and activitst don’t demand replacing fossil fuels with nuclear power proves global warming is about creating green energy novo-robber barrons, not saving the planet. If CO2 is a global threat capable of destroying life as we know it within decades than in comparison any risk from modern nuclear energy is minor and localized. Small price to pay for efficient, reliable, CO2 free energy.
It’s been said for years by many realists.
There is no way that anyone should believe in global warming, when none of the people pushing it, act as if they believe in it.
We therefore need to change our economy to a system that supports meeting basic needs for all people instead of excessive consumption by the wealthy
Are you listening Leonardo Dicaprio, Bill Gates, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Joe Biden, Klaus Schwab and all the other very wealthy people who tell us there is a climate emergency?
Such an economic system would have to be government controlled with the government telling enterprises what to produce and how much to produce and rationing output so that nobody gets more than what the government has decided meets their ‘basic needs’. I can just see Leonardo and Co singing the praises of that suggestion.
If you read the article half the “vital signs” listed have nothing to do with the health of the planet nor its temperature. It lists a comical set of “vital signs” including: lower number of births per woman (so heat makes women have fewer kids?), higher amount of eating meat (so fighting malnutrition is bad?), increased air travel, lack of diversified investments (because the amount of money in fossil fuels investments directly damages the planet..?), increased energy use, carbon credits…. yeah, all environmental vital signs indicating earths health…
Of the vital signs that it does list about the planet, most are improving not getting worse. Artic ice loss is stable. Deforestation has decreased, billon dollar floods have decreased, US Area burnt has decreased (even ignoring that 95% is arsen), brazilian rainforest deforestation decreased, number of hottest days decreased,…
So at beast this is a report that uses bad alalysis in order to reach unsupported conclusions in to produce a dramtic headline. …
“We therefore need to change our economy to a system that supports meeting basic needs for all people instead of excessive consumption by the wealthy (O’Neill et al. 2018).”
When a person comes into the family owned appliance store where I work, and they buy a $20,000 package of appliances to upgrade their $1 million plus condo, the gross profit from that sale to the store is around $7,000 (including installs and delivery). That $7,000 helps pay the bills that keep the store open so I can work there, and it pays my wages. So thank you wealthy people for spending your money on more than basic needs.
Oddly enough, the basic needs (and more) for all people are met in almost all First World countries.
Perhaps they have their own definition of “basic needs”.