People send me stuff. I often get hate mail, but this one was so irrational and feckless, I decided that I’d have to respond. Usually I ignore these, but this one offered an opportunity for a teachable moment.
First, I don’t work for the “fossil fuel industry” – I never have. I have not taken a single penny. It’s a common misconception (driven by people that publish outright fabrications with no evidence) out there that anyone who questions the “science is settled” aspect of climate change is automatically employed by “big oil.” It’s as if people like myself aren’t capable of having their own opinions rooted in their own research.
You’re wrong Susan, flat wrong. My opinions are my own, not bought, and unlike your tired and fact-free rhetoric, I have evidence to back up each and every one of them.
The other common misconception is that because I’m associated with The Heartland Institute, and they supposedly are getting funded by “big oil,” that also makes me a shill by association.
You’re wrong there too, Susan. The Heartland Institute does not receive any funding from any oil, coal, or natural gas companies whatsoever. Then there’s the other claim that “Heartland is funded by the Koch brothers to publish climate disinformation.”
Low-information people keep repeating these lies because it is far easier to spew hateful commentary than to spend time looking it up for themselves. Some facts from the Heartland web page Reply to Critics:
Is The Heartland Institute funded by the Koch Brothers?
No. Neither Charles Koch nor David Koch – nor any Koch family charitable foundation – is a current or regular contributor to The Heartland Institute. Koch Industries has never funded The Heartland Institute.
The Charles G. Koch Foundation in 2012 donated $25,000 to Heartland to support our work promoting free-market health care solutions, not climate issues. That is a paltry sum (0.36 percent) in our organization’s $7 million budget. That single donation – to support our work on health care issues – was the only Koch-connected contribution to Heartland in nearly two decades. [Important note: Heartland didn’t begin to support and promote scientists who are skeptical of human-caused climate catastrophe until 2008.]
The “Koch Brothers” generously support many nonprofit organizations that promote free markets and individual liberty. The Heartland Institute is not among them. Our policy positions, at any rate, are based on principle. We are not a “pay to play” organization.
Can you reply to specific accusations made by ExxonSecrets?
The site presents a list of gifts from ExxonMobil to Heartland from 1998 to 2006, based on annual reports from ExxonMobil, but fails to mention that the gifts never exceeded 5 percent of Heartland’s annual budgets, makes no mention of Heartland’s policies that separate donors from our researchers and writers, and presents no evidence at all of an improper relationship. It should matter that Heartland gets 95 percent of its income from energy consumers and only 5 percent from energy producers, but this fact doesn’t appear on ExxonSecrets.
While the first gift to Heartland reported on the ExxonSecrets site appears to have been made in 1998, the site fails to report that Heartland was questioning the science behind the global warming scare since 1994. And although ExxonMobil hasn’t contributed to Heartland since 2006, Heartland greatly increased its concentration and publication output on global warming since then.
So there you have it. I never have taken funding from “big oil” and Heartland hasn’t had any since 2006. But that doesn’t stop people like Susan from repeating a lie they use to justify their hate mails.
The most ridiculous statement from Susan was this:
“…people are suffering and dying.”
Apparently Susan thinks this is all due to me having and publishing an opinion she doesn’t like.
Well, once again its easier to repeat a lie to justify your hatred than it is to actually look up the data on that. For example, Susan did you know that “climate related deaths” are actually approaching ZERO?

Now before you say this is a oil-driven lie too, I’ll point out that the data comes from the International Disaster Database at https://public.emdat.be/ – you can register, login, grab the data, and plot it yourself, though I doubt you will, because science is hard. But, here’s something easier for you to wrap your head around. I’m assuming that your letter was driven by the recent media hype over heat waves. Here’s an immutable fact from NOAA, bold mine:
July 1936, part of the “Dust Bowl”, produced one of the hottest summers on record across the country, especially across the Plains, Upper Midwest, and Great Lakes regions. Nationally, about 5,000 people died from the heat. The heat was accentuated due to a prolonged drought that was affecting the region, and poor farming methods which left little vegetation to help mitigate the hot temperatures. In Illinois, many locations saw peak temperatures in excess of 110 degrees at the height of the heat wave, with all-time high temperature records established during this period.
https://www.weather.gov/ilx/july1936heat
Now if people were suffering and dying from heat waves today, especially in numbers like that, you’d surely hear about it in the media. But, you aren’t. Bottom line – we have learned how to adapt to heatwaves today, and yes while some people that don’t have the capability to adapt or make bad life choices are suffering and dying today, the two facts I presented above show that in the present-day, humans are doing far better than they did in the past at dealing with weather events like heat waves.
Based on my decades-long experience with haters, I don’t expect Susan will embrace this information, much less send an apology. Instead, she’ll likely find ways to work around it to maintain her erroneous belief system. Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain) said it best:
“It’s Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” – Mark Twain
For those of you like Susan who feel the way she does and want to send hate mail, you can use the contact form in the menu above under About>Contact. Go ahead, make my day.
Anthony,
You are wasting your precious time responding to these new religion cultists
They are not interested in facts, sensible debate or an opportunity to be rationally challenged
The ad hominem attack mode clearly shows they have no other purpose than to try to cause you some form of grief, censure or cancellation, better to not engage, unless they show some sign they are willing to debate sensibly
(driven by people that publish outright fabrications with no evidence)
You mean like “hottest July EVAR!” Stories, and just general Global Climate Warming Change articles, as well?
Well said!
I surmise that “Susan Wheadon” (so-called, maybe Susan Pankhurst) is the following person:
“Susan Wheadon
First and foremost Susan Wheadon sees herself as a grandmother who is very concerned about how the continuous damage done to the environment will harm her grandchildren and generations to come. She would like them to have clean air and water and access to all that is beautiful about the planet. Susan feels a personal responsibility to do what she can to make a difference. Growing up near the Love Canal and in an area where nuclear waste has impacted her hometown has made her more aware of this responsibility.”
Source: https://www.nmeac.org/our_board
She is a new member of the Michigan Climate Action Network: https://www.miclimateaction.org/susanpankhurst
Her Facebook page has a fasc(ist)inating collection of lunatic left photos: climate action, shut down pipelines, get your COVID booster, pro-masking, pro-Biden/Harris, anti-Trump, support Planned Parenthood, anti-guns, pro-Black Lives Matter, White-guilt, supports open borders and illegal immigration. She seems to fit the typical profile of a leftist, low-information voter. She might be a smiling grandma, but she is probably intolerable at the Thanksgiving family table.
So Anthony, she is unreachably entrenched in radical leftist ideology, a straight-ticket Democrat. She won’t let facts get in the way.
Does she know the real story behind Love Canal? I’ll bet not. That affair was papered-over for misdeeds committed by a greedy city and involved developers eventually too.
Susan Wheadon is going to lose her mind, when she reads The Guardian.
Antonio Guterres say we have “global boiling”. Think of the children!
– – – – – – – – –
‘Era of global boiling has arrived,’ says UN chief as July set to be hottest month on record
Head of World Meteorological Organization also warns ‘climate action is not a luxury but a must’ as temperatures soar
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/jul/27/scientists-july-world-hottest-month-record-climate-temperatures
“global boiling”…. hope it is very gradual, so that I don’t notice it until it is too late.
Admission: I am directly linked to the fossil fuel industry.
I have never worked or received money from them… but…
… just like everyone else in modern society, I am highly dependent on the products and services they offer.
I would find it extremely difficult to exist without the things that fossil fuels offer to society.
And to Susan. since you undoubtedly have a car, use electricity, buy products from the shops, live in a house etc etc…
… the fossil fuel industry would like to thank you for your continued and unwavering support.
I now identify as a fossil fuel user …..
I’m hooked on buying bicycle tires and tubes each year – am I tied to the fossil fuel industry too? I can’t seem to avoid attracting road debris that forces air to leave my inner tubes.
Yes you rubber abuser, you are tied to the fossil fuel industry. You need to start a sustainably sourced natural latex inner tube industry shipping product only on sailing vessels (naturally built using time honored native techniques utilizing natural tree falls, wood and natural fiber, no petroleum derived sealants). By paying more than the market rates for labor and material you can easily sell them to the woke marketplace for almost a tenth of what they will cost.
These climate loonies, I would love to know how many of them have kids!? Likely MOST of them. Hypocrites!
The Left has decided that death is the result of the failure to act. If one person dies of heat or lack there of, it is a climate death and so, a failure to act collectively to prevent it.
Anthony:
I am sure I speak for thousands when I say that we will never forget the years of talent and effort you have put into the climate thing.
Thank you sir. You are one of the best.
Very nice reply, I have no respect for Susan.
Your husband has been interstate for two days now. You must be getting lonely. Would you feel better if I visited you after midnight when your two little boys are asleep? We could talk about dirty nuclear energy or dirty sex. … ”
Phone calls like that went straight to local police, who were most cooperative with increased patrols etc. It can be a nasty business, this hate. Geoff S
This might be the same Susan Wheadon, I do not know.
Susan Wheadon
First and foremost Susan Wheadon sees herself as a grandmother who is very concerned about how the continuous damage done to the environment will harm her grandchildren and generations to come. She would like them to have clean air and water and access to all that is beautiful about the planet. Susan feels a personal responsibility to do what she can to make a difference. Growing up near the Love Canal and in an area where nuclear waste has impacted her hometown has made her more aware of this responsibility.
https://www.nmeac.org/our_board
Northern michigan Environmental Action Council.
Geoff S
One thing that almost never gets mentioned is that Exxon gave $10 million to Stanford University for climate research.
This did come up in a funny way. Back before my climate or other views got me banned from Twitter, I noted that Mark Jacobson, climate “scientist” and fabulist extraordinaire, claimed that anyone funded by “Big Oil” couldn’t be trusted.
I pointed out to him (and the Twitterverse) that he, Mark Jacobson, was and is employed by Stanford University in the very part of the school that got the ten megabucks of free money from Exxon.
Logically, I asked him if that meant that he himself couldn’t be trusted.
His response?
He blocked me. Typical for that kind of poseur, he couldn’t reply with facts so he replied with cowardly force.
Pathetic, but sadly, those are the folks in the seats of power.
Keep fighting the good fight, and Anthony?
Thanks for everything you do.
w.
Now that you’ve gone to the trouble to compose your response, you can just save it. Odds are that you’ll have reason to use it again.
Susan dear, knowing the “Imagine” lyrics is not considered as science.