Essay by Eric Worrall
“… In cases where an arrest resulted in a conviction, you may be permanently ineligible to receive a visa …” – US Visa Page (UK Embassy).
Swedish Court Convicts Greta Thunberg For Truck-Blocking Protest
OLIVER JJ LANE 24 Jul 2023
Greta Thunberg will have to pay a small fine after being convicted of disobeying a lawful order of the authorities to stop blocking a road earlier this year, an outcome she has decried as “absurd”.
Those who burn fossil fuels should be in court, not those who fight against them, climate celebrity Greta Thunberg said today as she was handed a criminal record in a Swedish court for a protest action earlier this year. Thunberg was ordered to pay 50 kronor, or £3.75/$4.80 a day every day for 30 days. In all, the fine will add up to just £112, or $144.
It was previously reported she could have faced months of prison time, underlining the leniency of the fine.
Read more: https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/07/24/swedish-court-convicts-greta-thunberg-for-truck-blocking-protest/
A criminal record can dramatically complicate visiting other countries.
Greta will likely still be able to visit COP28. The UAE is usually fairly lenient about visitors with criminal records, only requiring that the crime was not committed in the UAE, and that any term or sentence has been completed.
But for visiting countries with stricter rules like the USA, even a minor conviction likely means Greta will need to obtain special clearance to visit.
Criminals like Greta Thunberg need to accept their unlawful actions have consequences.
For more information about why Greta Thunberg is wrong about climate change, click here.
The various environmentalist groups who have funded her various trips and activities in the past will pay to bail her out here as well.
Does she even go to work or school or anything to advance her life? I’ve made the observation that people with no job, no hobbies, no purpose in their lives tend to be overly emotional and blame other people for their problems.
“No purpose in their lives … “
You may not agree with her, but it would be difficult to argue she has no purpose in her life given what she has achieved.
What has she achieved?
Well for a start every time she farts, Eric writes an article about it. But seriously, if you think she has achieved nothing then in my opinion you have taken your eye off the ball. Like I said, you don’t have to agree with her, but she has galvanised a big chunk of a generation of people behind her cause. I’d say that’s something.
A cause for a problem that doesn’t exist?
She is basically just like Simon
…mathematically and scientifically illiterate.
And has achieved absolutely NOTHING in her lifetime except to be a mindless puppet like shill for AGW, capable of regurgitating only mantra nonsense.
Only the most stupid and gullible of the uneducated would follow such a wastrel. eg… Simon .
“Only the most stupid and gullible of the uneducated would follow such a wastrel…..”
Well it seems Eric and you are….. so that must mean?
No simpleton… we are LAUGHING at her, because she is such ignorant clown.
Same reason we LAUGH at you. !
A phycologist would have fun trying to determine which of you is the least mentally developed.
“because she is such ignorant clown.”
Sorry I can’t let this one go… it’s because she is such “an” ignorant clown.
There’s that irony again.
“There’s that irony again.”
Your 10-year-old mentality is showing through, yet again.
No wonder you worship Greta. !
I would say the responses so far fall into the 6-9 year old Clever Dick category
Following her? By that standard you have spent most of the last couple of years following me.
But you are fun to follow, she’s not.
Do you understand the simple difference between “follow” and “report on”?
‘…but she has galvanised a big chunk of a generation of people behind her cause.’
I can think of many ‘leaders’ in the past who have checked that box. The resulting death tolls were enormous.
“I can think of many ‘leaders’ in the past who have checked that box. The resulting death tolls were enormous.”
Gotta agree with that, one just got voted out of the White House. How many covid deaths did the US needlessly suffer because of his actions (or lack of)?
Now Simon’s TDS surfaces. ! Hilarious.
Yep, he should never have listened to the Fauci stooge.
I’m sure you worshiped Mao, though. !
A) Your depiction is bizarrely wrong.
B) Nowhere near as many as Fauci and Birx killed globally.
The other suppliers of alleged vaccines have similar records of causing far more health damage than even the most optimistic COVID-19 vaccine promoter believes they saved.
I’m sure you can manage to find research.
Lack of action? When did President Trump fail to act?
Or do you mean he failed to fire Fauci?
Or failed to dissolve the CDC and most other agencies?
Is there any agency that can be defended?
Can anyone find any evidence that Greta has “galvanized” anyone?
Galvanised Eric and this website.
“and this website.”
Yep, like laughing at the 3 Stooges. !
You really don’t realise the utter idiocy of your comments, do you !
🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂
🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡
Not even close! Astounding typical galactic level of clueless!
That would be my question, too.
“I can think of many ‘leaders’ in the past who have checked that box”
Hitler, Mao.. etc
All leftist totalitarians, of course. !
Hitler was not left. If you knew anything you would know he executed the left.
You mean the Hitler who was the head of the National Socialist German Workers Party, otherwise known as the NAZIS.
Yep he executed people on the left. He is considered a far right fascist…… Look it up.
“He is considered a far right fascist……”
Only by the left and the ignorant. (oops, same thing.)
They know he was a socialist, but make pitiful attempts to disassociate from him.
Socialists aren’t leftists .. Ok
NAZI = National Socialist German Workers’ Party
Is there anything you aren’t totally ignorant about ???
the extreme left and extreme right are the same thing
Yes, both the left, and the extreme right, are divorced from reality.
The difference is there are few people on the far right, whereas there are millions of people on the far left.
“Yes, both the left, and the extreme right, are divorced from reality.”
I’d agree with that.
Yep, basically anyone with leftist ideology… is divorced from reality.
That would be you, Simon. !
Nope!
An impossible oxymoron claim.
National Socialist Party wasn’t socialist?
Hitlers sole aim was his racist objectives against jews, slavs, gypsy and other races. The communist party being allied to slavic Russia was therefore an enemy.
Many other policies were socialist derived, state run holiday villages, cruise ships and the People’s Car being examples
Hitler was a Nationalist Socialist.
The only ones more left than National Socialists are communists.
The whole Hitler movement was for all people to serve the state, again a very leftist desire.
Hitler executed communists, scientists, nonwhite races, authors, free thinkers, activists that made Hitler’s rise to power possible, etc. etc.
Repeatedly, you display your ignorance and false beliefs.
Then Lenin is not left nor Stalin.
Nobody who had power is left by definition.
lol
Well for a start every time she farts, Eric writes an article about it…
Only for the entertainment value Simon
“Only for the entertainment value Simon”
If you say so Eric, but is does seem a bit… well… incessant. I mean if you really think she is just a silly young girl, why do you keep highlighting what she does? Isn’t that what she wants? Just ignore her is my advice.
That’s because they keep trotting out her brain-washed ignorance for all to see.
Just like you do with your brain-washed ignorance.
Have you sent her your marriage proposal yet..
Bird-brains of a feather.. !
Everybody likes to watch a comedic tragedy somethings.
Or is it low-IQ slap-stick comedy. (like you provide)
Hard to tell with the climate zealots…
The problem is that all the naive folks out there obey her and cause massive problems with our energy systems and economies. So we could ignore her only if we want to ignore the influence she has.
“So we could ignore her only if we want to ignore the influence she has.”
So you agree with my original point and that was….. she does have a purpose in her life and she has made a difference.
What!?
Ride multimillion dollar yachts that are mostly made of carbon and use fossil fuels for their generator and windless travel!?
No difference except to give motives to clueless fossil fuel product wearing and using fools.
That includes Greta who is usually fully garbed in fossil fuel derived clothing, shoes and rides vehicles everywhere.
Because she is a very silly young girl
Hmmmm… I’d add….A very silly popular galvanising young girl who is a threat to this community. If you genuinely all thought she was a nobody, you would simply ignore her, but you don’t and can’t. Now why is that?
A nobody is somebody that nobody knows about. She’s been on the cover of Time Magazine- all over TV and the internet- recognized by major politicians and media stars. So it’s not that we think she’s a nobody- but that her influence is very negative. She even went to see the Dali Lama- along with a forestry hater, named Bill Moomaw who has fantasized a policy to lock up all forests for the purpose of sequstering carbon to “save the Earth”. Their meeting with DL is on YouTube. DL didn’t say much- mostly smiled at them. 🙂
😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂
What a 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡!
She has influence among the mentally deficient so it’s important to point out how ridiculous she truly is even though you’ll never get the joke.
She was an abused child who is now a mentally impaired adult due to all the abuse.
Your people
Well done.
“She was an abused child who is now a mentally impaired adult due to all the abuse.”
OK that’s serious. I didn’t know that. Do you have a reference?
You really are totally clueless about basically everything, aren’t you, Simon. !
Even those you worship, you have no clue about.
FYI
Greta has Autism, Asperger’s and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
He parents and the climate scum preyed on those traits.
It has been essentially child abuse… from the very start.
Mind you, you also have some obvious deep-seated mental issues…
… that lead you to be totally gullible and incapable of learning or thinking for yourself.
“Greta has Autism, Asperger’s and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder”
Yep knew that. I’m gonna take a stab here and say her parents are proud of what she has achieved. Maybe we could celebrate/list your achievements given you think she is a nothing. Here’s your chance…..
Oh dear, you are now worshiping predatory parent that used their child’s mental disabilities for political purposes.
WOW… You really are mentally SICK and morally DEPRAVED, aren’t you. !.
Her achievement? Basically, crying “fire” in a theater.
When there is no fire.
That is a claim you have to prove.
Greta’s parents have been using Greta for their own purposes and fund raising.
Greta’s parents are the ones who taught Greta every wrong thing she believes.
She was terrified into believing that the world was coming to an end.
Hmmm….
Yes, that’s child abuse. But Greta isn’t the only one suffering because of the climate liars, she has plenty of company in the Western world, including, unfortunately, most of the politicians of the Western world. They are all mesmerized by misinformation about CO2 and have lost touch with reality.
Regardless of that claim- I have some doubts about it- but, I say again, much of what she says is absurd- yet people follow her as if she’s the Joan of Arc, saving the Earth. Unfortunately we know what happened to Joan.
Looks like Simon is getting jealous.
No she hasn’t – she’s got a small vocal minority that listen to her but you are overstating her influence quite considerably.
“the has
galvanisedpoisoned a big chunk of a generation of people behind her cause”fixed it for you!
So you agree she has had an influence? So does google.
Having an influence is not necessarily a good thing.
You want to be seen to be a clot head?
People of influence also killed “salem witches”.
Mao inspired millions of kids to go send their parents and teachers to be re-educated or plain executed during the “cultural revolution”.
I don’t see much better from this dumb Greta kid.
She shows all the same signs of brainwashing inspired by her even dumber arty-farty wanna be opera singer mum.
She has NOT galvanized a big chunk of people to stop using FF but rather to preach to others not to use them, and that is hypocrisy.
So a negative becomes a positive? Must be the new math.
A lot of them are brainwashed into believing the planet is endangered and we are going to melt from extreme heat. They acting out of naivety, irrationality, and likely fear thanks to people like you.
The purpose was of her handlers.
A puppet cannot “achieve” anything.
You should know that from your own personal experience.
“A puppet cannot “achieve” anything.”
Oh the irony of this…. Coming from a sad old man who sits round yelling at his computer that “the data is corrupt… the data is corrupt. I tell you, the data is corrupt!!!!!”
DENIAL of how bad the data is, is the mainstay of the AGW scam.
Even a clueless puppet like you must have realise that by now.
Or are you actually DENYING that measuring temperatures on top of a concrete roof or next to air-conditioner outlets or behind a jet aircraft as it takes off or lands, will cause spurious warming.
Does your little mind really have that little grasp on reality ???
Denial of the fact the data is good and where it’s not sound, it is accounted for, is pretty much the mainstay of the garden variety climate science denier, of which, if you don’t mind me saying so, you seem to be a pristine example.
We don’t know which data is bad, we don’t know how the data is bad, we don’t know how much of the data is bad.
But rest assured we have fixed all the problems with the data.
But we do know the main data sets across the planet pretty much agree… We are warming.
You do know what collusion is, don’t you.
You do know they all use the same corrupted surface data..
… and same corrupted method of fabrication, don’t you. !
Why are you so Gullible and NAIVE?
Must be something to do with your totally lack of mental awareness and thinking capacity.
“You do know what collusion is, don’t you.”
Yep it’s been a popular word lately.
You have to give the devil his due. Even our friends at UAH (University of Alabama Huntsville) show warming in the satellite era. (If memory serves me correctly, they say the trend is around 1.4C per century.)
The question isn’t whether it’s warming. The planet has been warming ever since we left the Little Ice Age.
The question is how much warming we can expect and how much, if any, is due to human CO2 emissions.
The question is also whether the increased temperature would be catastrophic or beneficial. Svante Arrhenius, who first calculated climate sensitivity to CO2, said the warming would be beneficial.
Greta is too young, stupid, and uneducated, to know better. On the other hand, we have Dr. Mann who is a scofflaw and a self admitted fraud.
The fact that the catastrophists rely on fraud is the only evidence I need. The warming probably is largely natural and largely beneficial.
“The question is how much warming we can expect and how much, if any, is due to human CO2 emissions.”
totally agree …. And I’ll add “how much disruption will any warming bring to humanity and life in general on the planet?”
““The question is how much warming we can expect and how much, if any, is due to human CO2 emissions.””
You know that the answer is VERY LITTLE IF ANY.
You know there is no evidence at all that enhanced atmospheric CO2 causes warming.
Similar questions might be..
“Was chicken-little correct”?
“Was the Big Bad Wolf really that dangerous?”
“Did Hansel and Gretel really kill the witch?”
“Did Mummy bear really like her porridge tepid?”
What a prat! SIMON – Griff reincarnated?
I would be really worried if the world hadn’t warmed since 1800.
It’s called COMING OUT OF THE LIA…
yer know the same Little ice age that brought famine all over Europe – probably started the French Revolution, and had frost fairs on the Thames + the Irish potato famine.
Heard of Dickens?
He wrote about the kind of winter I would not like too much nowadays – the conditions where the Catholic nutters were praying in Chamonix for the glaciers pls pls pls go back up the valley, as by then it was sitting in the middle of the bl…dy town blocking the valley!
So you really do think concrete roof, air-con outlets, and jet engines are THE PLACE to measure temperatures..
… and that you can properly “correct” the massive warming introduced.
Now that is BIZARRE to say the least !
You really are showing your true ignorance today. !!
”Denial of the fact the data is good ”
The data (you are talking about) is not good. It shows 1958 and 2001 0.5 degrees apart when they were actually basically the same as evidenced by uncorrupted balloon data. They are measuring UHI and calling it climate change.
In all sciences- there are differences of opinion. In astronomy there has been a long running debate about the “big bang”. Some astronomers don’t agree with that theory- but they aren’t called “big bang deniers” from those who do believe that theory. Same with all sciencies. Look at the social sciences- not much proven there- but the different schools of thought don’t call the other side deniers. Nobody is a climate science denier- they just have different opinons on data, models and conclusions. That is, as Steven Koonin so well entitled his book, “Unsettled”. For one side of the real debate to call the other side “denier” is indicative of lack of confidence by the “believers”. I don’t think Einstein ever called anyone who didn’t believe in relativity a “relativity denier”. The denier term is obviously meant to compare those who don’t agree with the climate emergency agenda with those handful of people who think there was no holocaust.
Using the “Denier” label for climate skeptics is just a tactical device to demean and delegitimize those who do not go along with the official human-caused climate change dogma.
Calling people dergatory names doesn’t change the fact that climate alamrists cannot prove what they claim about CO2 and its interactions with the Earth’s climate. They cannot show that CO2 is doing anything to change the Earth’s weather or climate. That is the state of the science today, and it is climate alarmists who deny this. So who is the real denier?
“Using the “Denier” label for climate skeptics is just a tactical device to demean and delegitimize those who do not go along with the official human-caused climate change dogma.”
Tom this is just too weird. You regularly call people by names that are considered demeaning. You use the term Chicom. Google it. Here I have done it for you “Disparaging. a contemptuous term used to refer to a Chinese Communist.”
You call me an alarmist. I consider that offensive, but you don’t hear me bleating about it. Seriously, if you want to play by a set of rules you can’t complain when the other team does the same.
I use the term “Chicom” to distinguish the criminal leadership of China from the innocent people of China.
As far as describing you as an alarmist, I’m just calling them like I see them. Your unsubstantiated assumptions and assertions about CO2 and the Earth’s climate are alarming, but without merit. So a person who spreads alarm is an alarmist in my book. It is derogatory, but it is also true. I’m sticking with speaking the truth as I see it. I doubt I’ve hurt your feelings much, but I could be wrong. it’s not meant to be offensive, it is meant to be descriptive.
“As far as describing you as an alarmist, I’m just calling them like I see them.”
So you will then be fine with me calling “climate science deniers” as I see them. Glad that’s settled.
Yet YOU are the one in total DENIAL of your LACK OF SCIENCE.
Name one thing we “deny” that you can provide solid scientific proof for….
Really, being called a “denier” by a scientific retard is not going to worry any of us.
“ The denier term is obviously meant to compare those who don’t agree with the climate emergency agenda with those handful of people who think there was no holocaust.”
No, the term denier is used to describe a group that despite all the evidence still clings to denial to to justify their stance. It is really the only word that describes people on the fringe who fight their cause despite the evidence.
No, that’s YOUR opinion. I suggest you attempt to read “Unsettled” by Koonin. He doesn’t say there is no climate change. He just explains how it’s not proven to be all or mostly due to carbon emissions and he says it’s nothing to panic over. You think such people are fringe types- ignoring all their valid points about the true problems of “renewable” energy, the immense cost, the wasting of landscapes, the decline of our economies while China and India proceed to build more coal plants faster than we can take ours down. If you want to be taken seriously- I suggest you get on a plane and fly to China, talk with Xi and tell him to give up using fossil fuels. If you manage to survive that conversation and return home, let us know how it went. 🙂
By the way, Koonin knows a million times more about this issue than you’ll ever know so you could learn a good deal. If you aren’t willing, then I’d say you are a reality denier. I think I’ll give up on responding to you unless you begin to show you can break free from the prison of climate panic.
“No, the term denier is used to describe a group that despite all the evidence still clings to denial to to justify their stance.”
So that makes YOU the denier,
OK !
You KNOW you have no scientific evidence to support your stance.
You KNOW all the scientific evidence is contrary to your stance.
You DENY that concrete roofs, jet engines, air-con outputs etc add spurious warming.
You are in TOTAL DENIAL of reality !
“despite the evidence.”
There is no evidence for what you claim.
Saying it is so, doesn’t make it so.
A technical quibble.
‘DENIAL of how bad the data is, how badly they mishandle and misuse data are the mainstay of the AGW scam’
The data is corrupt, your categorization of others being a sad little man yelling at their screens sounds a lot more like you.
Simon seems to be one of those rather unfortunate people that brains and education basically skipped. !
Yep.. that sort of ignorance, truly is SAD !
It’s the models that are worthless, not the data- but it’s fair to say that some data is corrupt and it takes good science to determine how good it is- or bad, like temperature data taken a airports or any hot urban area and pretending it represents that region.
It’s all about feelings with you people isn’t it.
for a simple comparison, overlay the global temperature anomaly. I’m not a scientist and don’t pretend to have the knowledge and skills that many on this site have, but I see no correlation between CO2 concentrations and temperature (even though we know the data is poor). I admit I am a simple man. And, as such, simple messages are needed in the fight against the lunacy.
Here you go Bill. This could not be easier to understand….
chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://static.berkeleyearth.org/pdf/annual-with-forcing.pdf
Berkeley is a rabid AGW zealot fabrication.
It bears absolutely zero resemblance to anything real.
Can you reference where I said feelings are top of my list? I don’t recall doing that.
You have been pouring out your “feelings” since your first post in this thread.
“You have been pouring out your “feelings” since your first post in this thread.”
That’s intriguing? Do you have an example of where I have “poured out my feelings?”
”Do you have an example of where I have “poured out my feelings?””
Yep, you replied to Walter. Then it all went down hill from there.
So that’s a no then?
You are a far-leftist patsy.
Of course the only thing you have to work with is “feelings”
You certainly show no signs of any rational thought ability..
Well I guess at least you didn’t say “the data was corrupt” in that last comment.
““the data was corrupt””
Poor little Simon, DENYING what is provable correct, just to support his stance.
By your definition, that makes you a DENIER.
Don’t worry Greta, I’m sure our Woke State Departments will give you a waiver to travel anywhere in the western world you want.
Disobeying a lawful order is no big deal. On the other hand, if she’d have been convicted of DUI her role as an international Cassandra would be over, even in Sweden.
I don’t think it’s that major an issue – for their fellow leftists there is always a way around the regulations – think of a certain duke of Montecito that has had his extensive and self-proclaimed drug use completely ignored by the Biden regime.
You have heard of a “jump the shark” moment? If not search it up.
Greta, other activists, and ClimateCult™ groups are always looking for a bigger shark.
In this sense, we have experienced “Peak Greta.”
Does she lose her eco-zealot canonisation for her crime? Or is she seen again as a role model, taking a metaphorical bullet for “ the cause”.
I agree with Simon, she has achieved a lot, if you consider being recruited, manipulated and paraded around the world as a confected child prophet eco- warrior.
She was /is the child climate messiah that was sculpted and scripted to convert the very young.
A false prophet indeed..
“A false prophet indeed..”
So it is only natural for people like Simon to worship her.
Their whole AGW worship is built on fakery…. from the quicksand up. !
She’ll (is that appropriate? :-)) wear it like a badge of honor.
At least Greta has moved up the rung of the activist scale:
1. Con artist of the ‘climate change, we are all going to burn’.
2. Phony honours degree, theological honorary doctorate, after not having been to school at all
3. Now has a criminal conviction.
Where’s the mass extinction? We are all still here and still powering the world with fossil fuels and will continue to do so for many decades to come.
These are all “great achievements” in the eyes of climate zealots and stooges.
4 Burned at the stake.
5 Beatified and venerated for generations as a saint.
That appears to be the plan.
Cults do love their martyr’s.
My message is that as a convict, we’ll be watching her.
This is all wrong. She should be in school on the other side of the sea. Yet she comes to us adults with lectures. How dare she!
We have padded her childhood with luxuries beyond the imagination of a child of only a couple hundred years ago and she comes to us with empty words.
She is one of the lucky ones; to be alive at this time of prosperity and health for billions. People were suffering. People were dying. Entire tribes fell victim to disasters or disease. Our population had barely grown in hundreds of years until we found the energy sources to fuel limitless economic growth. And all she can do is parrot extremist fearmongering about the source of life for all plant life – CO2. How dare she!
For more than 30 years, since well before she was born, her predecessors have warned us with predictions of catastrophe, deadlines and tipping points that never materialized. Yet the politics and solutions to this nonsense are nowhere in sight.
She says she understands the science, but no matter how annoyed and angry I am, I do not want to believe that. Because if she really understood the situation and kept on spouting the alarmist drivel, then she would be an utter moron. And that I refuse to believe.
The popular idea of cutting our emissions in half in 10 years only gives us a tiny chance of securing the health and prosperity of humanity, and risks of setting off irreversible economic chain reactions beyond human control.
This may be acceptable to her. But those numbers do not include economic tipping points, most feedback loops, additional costs hidden by green grifters, or the aspects of equity and economic justice. They also rely on exhausting the capital and resources my generation and those before me have built through painstaking labor and scientific advancement.
So this risk is not acceptable to us and our forebearers, who have built this vast and beautiful planet-wide civilization.
How dare she pretend that this can be solved with her stupid greenwashing and illegal protests? With even today’s green subsidies, the remaining government budgets and debt-issuing capacity will be entirely gone within less than 8 1/2 years.
There will not be any reasonable solutions to her imaginary crisis, or even plans presented by her, because these numbers are too uncomfortable. And she is still not mature or educated enough to obey the rule of law.
If she represents the next generation, they are failing us. But we, her elders, understand well her betrayal. The eyes of all past generations are upon her and her ilk. And if they choose to fail us, I say: We will NEVER forgive her.
We will not let her get away with this. Right here, right now is where we draw the line. The world is waking up. And jail is coming, whether she likes it or not.
Thank you.
Poor Greta is the poster child for the arrogance of leftists. Their cause is so righteous that they are above laws and the little people. Let them eat cake.
“Thunberg was ordered to pay 50 kronor,”
Oh dear, do you think Soros et al will be able to afford that?
The official criminal record is far more damaging, it will give a future Republican administration a legal basis to keep her out of the USA.
As long as there is a Democrat in the White House, there will be no problem getting that special clearance.
She’s the Sinead O’Connor of enviro mentalism. Without the looks.
Or Shuhada’ Sadaqat as she became known after converting to Islam. I wonder if Greta will do the same.
Look on the bright side. If the Climate Alarmists had any leaders that were in the least bit capable of leading, the world would be in a dangerous place.
We should be grateful, the Alarmists choose lame brains like Kerry, Gore, Mann, Turdeau…. as there go to champions. The younger generation are forced to adopt an uneducated unscientific incapable child, as their mascot leader. The only question for Greta is, have you seen any CO2 lately?
From the article: “But for visiting countries with stricter rules like the USA, even a minor conviction likely means Greta will need to obtain special clearance to visit.”
No, Greta can just travel to Mexico and then walk across the U.S. southern border. No visa required.
Biden will have a bus or airplane waiting to move her into the country where she can get free room and board and medical, courtesy of the American taxpayers.
. . . free cell phone, free lawyer service, free education too.
Good ol’ Uncle Sam.
Uncle Sucker, when Democrats are in charge.
Greta does not burn FF? What a HYPOCRITE! She uses FF every day!
Greta Thunberg, the magazine Time Person-of-the-Year awardee in 2019.
Sic transit gloria, for both Greta and Time.
Greta can simply go to Mexico and walk across the U.S. border. She’ll need to pay the cartels off, but she’s got plenty of sponsors.
She’s is a public danger, but hardly a violent criminal.
I have long been a proponent of arresting Just Stop Oil, XR Thinsulate Britain and the rest of the astroturf “activists” for crimes like trespass, creating a public nuisance, vandalism, destruction of private property etc etc. As many charges as can be laid against the. If the police were doing their job they would actually be arresting most of them each time. Yes, they will get a small fine but, more importantly they will acquire a criminal record. Arrest them each time they appear on these stupid jaunts and rinse and repeat. They will build up a list of priors that will flag them every time they start to interact with police, border patrol and others. As the same charges are repeated, in some cases, the penalty also goes up. This is the smartest way to handle these people. And they NEED to be handled