Jirrbal woman Georgina Wieden. Source ADH TV, fair use, low resolution image to identify the subject.

Claim: Windfarms will Destroy the Australian First Nations Connection to Country

Essay by Eric Worrall

“…so many of our people are lost because they don’t have that connection to country…they don’t have a sense of belonging” – Jirrbal woman Georgina Wieden slamming the Chalumbin Wind Farm project.

A 57s clip of the video:

Watch the full ADH TV video here.

I visited Ravenshoe a year ago. Ravenshoe sits on top of a tropical highland plateau in Australia’s far North. It is a place of breathtaking beauty, full of unique species and natural wonders.

The thought of ruining such a place with mechanical monstrosities to satisfy the green energy fantasies of distant city based politicians is unthinkable.

Georgina has been fighting the green monstrosities for a while.

Proposed wind farm on Jirrbal Country a concern for some

Aleisha Orr – January 7, 2022

A proposal for a wind farm in North Queensland has raised concerns for some Jirrbal people who say the project does not respect the land and threatens native species.

The Chalumbin Wind Farm project would see wind farm developer Epuron construct 94 wind turbines and clear 1,132 ha of land near the town of Ravenshoe.

A number of online petitions to the project have been created which list concerns about the impact of a wind farm on vulnerable and endangered species including the northern greater glider, red goshawk and the magnificent brood frog.

Jirrbal woman Georgina Wieden told a community meeting in December the Country needs to be protected.

“My daughter she is a sugar glider, that is her totem, my son is a goanna, how do I explain that their animals don’t have homes anymore because we needed electricity.”

Read more: https://nit.com.au/07-01-2022/2656/proposed-wind-farm-on-jirrbal-country-a-concern-for-some

My heart goes out to you Georgina. I hope you win your battle against those who would trample your people’s ancient traditions, I hope you defeat the green energy despoilers of nature.


Update (EW): There is growing awareness of the devastation wind turbine projects inflict on nature.

Environmentalists on the Atherton Tableland (including Ravenshoe) in Queensland’s far North are waking up to the devastation :- https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/12/11/aussie-eco-warrior-fury-over-wind-farm-wilderness-devastation/

Queensland farmers objecting to power lines :- https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/03/19/widgee-say-no-to-the-lines-rally-meet-the-aussie-battlers-standing-up-to-big-green/

5 18 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

74 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ronald Stein
July 21, 2023 2:06 pm

Who will be responsible for decommissioning, waste, and recycling for wind and solar?An educational and entertaining 30-minute Podcast Event by Armando Cavanha in Brazil. 

https://www.linkedin.com/events/decommissioning-waste-andrecycl7087184044043452416/theater/

Disputin
Reply to  Ronald Stein
July 22, 2023 2:24 am

Responsible? Don’t be silly. We’re doing it to Save the Planet.

Bryan A
July 21, 2023 2:12 pm

Soooo much land for such LITTLE ENERGY.
A complete waste of space for a subsidy mine

July 21, 2023 2:52 pm

There may be a good reason to use the forest that would be a genuine benefit.
A bunch of pinwheels is not it.

Mr.
July 21, 2023 2:59 pm

Thanks Eric.

I couldn’t see in the links any info about where the necessary transmission lines to a grid connection were planned for, and how much land clearing and disruption (+ cost?) these activities would inflict.

?

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Mr.
July 21, 2023 5:07 pm

necessary transmission lines “
There are some hefty powerlines already running through Ravenshoe through to the mine at Mt Garnet

comment image

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Eric Worrall
July 21, 2023 5:36 pm

Coal mining (with trains etc) has been far more disruptive than wind towers will ever be.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 21, 2023 5:58 pm

Go to Google Street View and have a look at the area surrounding Palm Springs, CA. Disruptive?

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Tombstone Gabby
July 21, 2023 6:16 pm

Can’t find that. But here is the Mount Emerald wind farm that Eric linked to complaints about

comment image

You can see the sparsely distributed towers. And here, on a smaller scale, is the Collinsville coal mine, also in N Qld in similar country

comment image

Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 21, 2023 8:10 pm

From the interstate:

Wind mills from I-10.jpg
Reply to  Tombstone Gabby
July 22, 2023 5:07 am

Wow! must’ve used a very fast shutter speed to get no blurring on the windmill blades.

Reply to  Right-Handed Shark
July 22, 2023 10:02 am

G’Day Shark,

“..a very fast shutter speed…”

Well said. Scouted around for a more representative photo this morning. In the 1970’s this was all ‘pure’ desert, except for I-10 and the railroad.

Reply to  Tombstone Gabby
July 22, 2023 10:05 am

Darn, the photo didn’t ‘take’. Try again:

Wind mills Palm Springs area 20230722.jpg
Chris Hanley
Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 21, 2023 10:49 pm

According to the ABC the Collinsville mine and power plant have closed and plans are to replace it with a ‘multi-billion-dollar’ renewable energy project that will cover 190,000 hectares (734 sq. miles).

sherro01
Reply to  Chris Hanley
July 22, 2023 12:28 am

And the Collinsville old mine site will be rehabilitated. To be available for normal, further use. Geoff S

Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 21, 2023 7:30 pm

Utter BS from Nick , as usual..

Coal mines are tiny in area compared to w the area used by wind turbines.. especially when you consider the vast amounts more electricity/area produced by coal fired power stations.

Coal actually PROVIDES something for society.

Wind turbines TAKE…

They provide nothing to society

They destroy grid supply systems.

They also cause massive environmental damage where-ever they are installed.

Austrian Biochemical Engineer: “No Energy Production Method Is More Damaging Than Wind Turbines” (notrickszone.com)

Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 21, 2023 7:32 pm

16 MILLION trees removed for wind industrial estate in Scotland

Disgusting, wouldn’t you agree, Nick !!

Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 21, 2023 7:38 pm

Waiting for Nick to beg/pled/lobby for them to install a big wind turbine industrial estate in his area close to his house or property…

And of course he desperately wants those big electricity towers running next to his house.

You can BET he would do a Bob Brown and fight the installation.

Hypocritical NIMBY !

Mr.
Reply to  bnice2000
July 21, 2023 10:53 pm

I’m tempted to say that that would improve the views around Moyhu where Nick lives, but I’d be bullshitting.

Moyhu is a wonderfully scenic part of the world, and I’m sure Nick appreciates his sacramental natural views to not want to despoil them with (mostly-stationary) windmills atop all the numerous surrounding hilltops.

Reply to  Mr.
July 22, 2023 12:36 am

But Nick LOVES wind turbines.

Shirley he wants them on his local hills !

Right Nick ?

Reply to  bnice2000
July 24, 2023 7:45 pm

Nah – Old mate does not want to look at indescribably idiotic & ugly windmills, whilst sipping King Valley prosecco and nibbling his Milawa cheeses….

ozspeaksup
Reply to  bnice2000
July 22, 2023 3:17 am

wow gross on a massive scale

Reply to  bnice2000
July 22, 2023 5:12 am

Again, so many people must have high speed cameras these days. Not 1 pixel of blurring.

observa
Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 21, 2023 11:09 pm

Yes Nick but the climate changers are scrapping the large hub and spoke electricity grid for spaghetti and meatballs everywhere and on top of that needing to do all that Mark Mills digging everywhere to replace the ICE. Problem is you’ve groomed a generation on ‘Just stop everything’ and now you want to replace everything. How dumb is that?

sherro01
Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 22, 2023 12:47 am

Nick,
Source needed on respective areas affected by mines versus electricity supply.
Here are 7 reasonably big mines that our Company found on green fields. The 4 images can each be depicted as within an area of 30 square kilometres. Some images show more than one mine.
Each one will be returned, after mining, to a state quite close to that before mining. Once was wheat paddock, will return to wheat paddock after being borrowed for 30 years or so. Geoff S
https://www.geoffstuff.com/fourmines.com

sherro01
Reply to  sherro01
July 22, 2023 12:49 am

Sorry, typo.
comment image

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 22, 2023 3:15 am

while being created sure then the land settles and they are forced to repair n repat the lot, dont see that happening with birdshredder sites do we?

Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 22, 2023 12:46 pm

Coal mining (with trains etc) has been far more disruptive than wind towers will ever be.

So … your argument is that since some areas have have been disrupted we should disrupt the rest?

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Eric Worrall
July 22, 2023 3:12 am

give it a rest Eric very few of them live on or ever did on lands they claim as special. my descendant line is scot/ irish/ poms , do I have any right to claim jackschitt of what they lived on or owned as “special”? nope, either in aus or in the uk.
claims of longest evah culture are made but just cos one spot over in WA was dated to 60k yrs that sure doesnt mean the entire lot were around then, or all over Aus. personally I am well n truly OVER all the aknowledgement to first nation(hello USA imported terms) on local council and all other govvy paperwork, signs stating XYZ welcome to whoevers land , NO its NOT it WAS maybe but it sure is NOT NOW. buy it paytaxes and you can call it yours others wise stfu.
my great granny had a nice pet rock…so bloody what!

Mr.
Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 21, 2023 5:20 pm

So is the plan to run no new connection lines from the wind turbines pads to connect to the existing HT lines?

Or maybe send the generated wind power to the HT lines by Bluetooth?

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Mr.
July 21, 2023 5:58 pm

It’s actually 4 km from the pre-existing Chalumbin sub-station

comment image

Mr.
Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 21, 2023 9:43 pm

So a further 4km X [numerous windmill pads] of pristine bushland clearance to connect the (intermittent / unreliable) wind electricity?

What a great deal for the Last Generation activists!

(they’ll no doubt adopt you as one of their heroes, Nick)

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Mr.
July 22, 2023 3:19 am

be interesting if one of them catches fire in that area

sherro01
Reply to  Nick Stokes
July 22, 2023 12:36 am

The mine at Mt Garnet was there, operating, decades before those electric line towers were constructed. Geoff S

July 21, 2023 3:49 pm

The virtue signalers do not care about anyone but themselves and the false images they wish to project.

Sommer
Reply to  Shoki
July 21, 2023 5:50 pm

The same thing has been and is still happening in Canada. Has the financial offer been enough of an incentive to over ride their connection to the land and their protection of habitat? Were they desperate for money like the leaseholder farmers?

https://www.fnlngalliance.com/2023/02/08/blog-first-nations-behind-wind-power/

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Sommer
July 22, 2023 3:21 am

they get mega millions in compensation for areas where the mines are, maybe theyve not been offered enough?

billbates
July 21, 2023 3:55 pm

The Far North Queensland ‘GREENS’ and conservationist actions closed down the local sustainable timber industry destroying business and livelihoods. Now only a handful of locals are fighting too stop the Wind Farm and its bull dozing of the forest. Seems to be karma for those who were determined to remove industrious humans from the forest.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Eric Worrall
July 22, 2023 3:22 am

yeah for the wealthy greentards like atlassian

John Hultquist
July 21, 2023 4:23 pm

This brings up a cultural divide of two parts.
First, some of us have no serious attachment to “place” as she expresses it. Sure, I have fond feelings about where I grew up, and then left at age 21. Why 21? I went to college locally. Many others left at 17 or 18. However, there are no origin stories attached to the land. The stories are about how the family came to be in that place. Where I lived that meant ancestors coming, mostly, from northern European countries, Germany, Sweden, Ireland. I think there is a “forest” to “forest” migration stream involved.
Second, if I have to name an origin story, it would be Adam and Eve in the garden – Gan Eden – as much a concept as a location. Where that location is/was remains debatable. Family has had no connection to that place since initial migrations into Europe.
Georgina Wieden’s history is distinctly different. (As are origin stories of the early Americans – where I now live.)
Here is a link to some of the Aboriginal creation story.
https://www.worldfootprints.com/singing-the-country-understanding-the-aboriginal-creation-story/

May she and her people prevail.

old cocky
Reply to  John Hultquist
July 21, 2023 5:35 pm

Most (not all, but most) farm families have a similar connection to place, and desire for stewardship of the land.

Apparently, that’s just ignorant, reactionary parochialism though.

Mr.
Reply to  old cocky
July 21, 2023 11:06 pm

Yes, many farmers literally (and tragically) give their lives in commitments of preservation of the health, productivity & legacy of their lands.

I have family historical & contemporary connections as victims of this level of dedication.

July 21, 2023 5:28 pm

Story Tip

The Nora Head community in NSW had a small win and got the wind zone off the Hunter region redefined:
https://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/news/national/central-coast-town-no-longer-included-in-zone-for-offshore-wind-farm/video/93cfa3930c1b6c85f09c051bdc4696c9

The New South Wales Central Coast town of Norah Head will not be included in the area for an offshore wind farm after Sky News reported on the community backlash to the project. The federal government has reduced the size of the wind zone and pushed it further offshore as it moves ahead with the renewable energy project in the Hunter Region.

I believe there is a serious risk with offshore wind farms “stilling” air flow over coastlines. They will reduce the advection of ocean moisture to land. They will cause local temperature rise well above the current level simply by reducing land moisture and the growth of biomass supported by the moisture. Australia is set to create coastal heat zones associated with these wind parks.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  Eric Worrall
July 22, 2023 3:25 am

dan andrOOZE wants the east coast(all the scenic spots) peppered with offshore turbines , be funny if the prime land along there went dry.
luck may be with us and he may get canned after the comm games debacle he shoulda been binned for covid terrorism, but the cityloons and teals kept the mongrel in

July 21, 2023 6:20 pm

I wonder what the impact of wind turbines are compared to mountaintop removal (MTR) coal mining on wildlife and indigenous people?

I wonder why we never see any criticism of fossil fuel mining negatives here at WUWT.

Reply to  TheFinalNail
July 21, 2023 7:36 pm

Far less than the mountaintop removal of tree for huge areas of wind turbines. !

Why are you still using fossil fuels for basically everything, bent nail ?

John Hultquist
Reply to  TheFinalNail
July 21, 2023 7:40 pm
  1. Mining is needed. (What are wind thingys made of?)
  2. Wind facilities have a much greater “footprint” than does mining.
  3. Many mines are recontoured at end of life.
  4. One can’t see mines from 15 miles away.
  5. Wind facilities need subsidies from poor people. Mines are not parasitic.
  6. Living next to a surface coal-cut is easy, and after a short time it is gone.
  7. Wind thingys need a landfill. And replaced. If not – what?
Reply to  John Hultquist
July 21, 2023 9:38 pm

I remember not that long ago, some greenie showing 3 or 4 pictures of picturesque lakes etc in Qld…

… complaining that they would be destroyed by coal mining.

Thing was, at least two of the lakes were of rejuvenated coal mines.

Much mirth was had ! 🙂

Reply to  Eric Worrall
July 21, 2023 9:33 pm

Basically all studies done have shown that “renewables” will need a MASSIVE INCREASE in mining.

Dave Andrews
Reply to  Eric Worrall
July 22, 2023 7:55 am

Replacing the energy output from a single 100MW gas fired turbine, the size of a large house, requires at least 20 wind turbines, each about 500ft tall, spread over 10 square miles.

Moreover the gas turbine would require about 300 tons of iron ore and 2000 tons of concrete while the wind turbines would require c. 30,000 tonnes of iron ore and 50,000 tons of concrete as well as 900 tons of plastic for the blades.

The wind turbines also require 1000 tons of specialty metals and minerals compared to 100 tons for the gas turbine.

‘The Hard Math of Minerals’, Mark Mills, Jan 22nd 2022

https://issues.org/environmental-economic-costs-minerals-solar-wind-batteries-mills/

July 21, 2023 7:10 pm

Here is the problem. It is all a moot point. The debate about the destruction of her ancestral home or the entire AGW debate it self. The group cabal of corrupt policy makers, hypocritical global elites and the entire maniacal tyrannical bunch @&!? don’t care to debate- they have made up their mind and to hell with anybody else.

They are going forward with their plans for a “ benevolent “ dictatorship ship and it’s happening faster than practically any body realizes. It is coming to a head I believe within the next two years. This is getting very serious now because they have shown they are willing to break all the rules and laws and constitutional procedures so how do you counter that while you follow the law and they don’t?

July 21, 2023 9:43 pm

Everyone see things through their own viewpoint but it isn’t just ‘special’ groups whose way of life is being destroyed by this religious crusade. Virtually everyone not plugged into the special monetary benefits is having their life turned inside out and smashed down..

Reply to  AndyHce
July 22, 2023 3:59 pm

I sense a level of anger is building against the religious fanatics.

Geoffrey Williams
July 21, 2023 9:50 pm

Windfarms another Australian disaster . .

sherro01
July 22, 2023 12:21 am

What is this claimed “Australian First Nations Connection to Country”?
First, there is no known Australian First Nation, because there never was a Nation. There were scattered camps with a couple of hundred dialects, with mixing mainly for raiding other camps for fertile women. There was never a Nation in the sense of a body with a common purpose with which an agreement or treaty could be made. Further, there is some evidence that the present people had forebears that might not have been First to settle here.
Now, to the “Connection”. Any person living at a place for a while is plausibly going to make some sort of connection, plausibly of different importance to different people. But, there is not a unified or national record of a connection that was original to, or recorded in any durable way about, the people who were here before European settlement in 1788. There are various soft suggestions that a connection existed and that it has value. There does not seem to be any recorded, credible existence of legends or beliefs that can be traced to pre-1788 history or people. The vast bulk of historical record was and is second hand, by settlers, missionaries, the occasional person who lived with a tribe. It is logical to believe that histories known today were tainted by non-original authors. The extent of that taint tends to be concealed by modern historians and anthros, because a confession that there is next to nothing solid might leave them jobless. Geoff S

old cocky
Reply to  sherro01
July 22, 2023 1:24 am

First, there is no known Australian First Nation, because there never was a Nation. There were scattered camps with a couple of hundred dialects, with mixing mainly for raiding other camps for fertile women.

I’m not sure if you’re being a bit harsh, or if it’s a matter of semantics. Depending on the area, there certainly reasonably loose ties from the level of the individual “band” (more a family or extended family group, up a couple of levels, with get-togethers of various sizes at more or less regular intervals, depending on droughts or floods.
Something like the north American “Indians”, or Bronze Age Italian or Greek city states, but without the cities.
Like Europe, there certainly wasn’t a single Nation, but certainly what could be called nations, for want of a better term.

Raiding between “nations” certainly occurred, often over quite long distances, probably less so within “nations”. See “The Red Chief” (which Ion Idriess almost certainly puffed up, though he tended to be reasonably accurate)

Any person living at a place for a while is plausibly going to make some sort of connection, plausibly of different importance to different people. But, there is not a unified or national record of a connection 

There wouldn’t be – there were lots of “nations”, each of which lived in their own areas with their own conditions.

It is logical to believe that histories known today were tainted by non-original authors. 

That always happens. It happens even more so when snippets of oral history are documented by somebody from a completely different background. Unfortunately, none of the Aboriginal “nations” had a Homer to commit their Iliad or Odyssey to parchment.

ozspeaksup
Reply to  old cocky
July 22, 2023 3:32 am

whats funnier is when 2mobs try to claim the same place;-)
as evidenced by a row over who was going to do welcome/smoking at an opening last week..the fact theyre PAID 400 or so for it might also affect that?

Leslie MacMillan
Reply to  sherro01
July 22, 2023 9:06 am

Echoes of Canada. Indigenous people tend to oppose and obstruct all development, whether a wind farm, a mine, a pipeline, a housing subdivision, or even the city’s efforts to fix a broken sanitary sewer, on made-up “sacred connection to the land” mumbo-jumbo. They don’t believe it and they know we know they don’t believe it, but they know we daren’t call bullshit on it. The purpose of the charade is to increase the economic rents well-placed cronies can extract from the developer in return for their sometimes temporary undertakings not to disrupt the project once work starts. Remember that if their opposition causes the developer to walk away, they aren’t out anything because the national welfare flows to the reserves as before. The modern history of Canada is a long struggle with Dane-geld.

It is not wise to believe that aboriginal resistance to a wind farm is sincerely founded. If you take them as allies, next time they will turn around and oppose something you actually want. You might observe that aboriginal opposition will vastly increase the cost of wind power but best to not say too much about it out loud.

Mr.
Reply to  sherro01
July 22, 2023 4:21 pm

Geoff, I posted a similar comment to yours yesterday with an excerpt from a paper at
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Australian-Aboriginal/Traditional-sociocultural-patterns

Basically saying it’s a huge stretch to depict ancient immigrant / /settler aboriginal bands / tribes as “nations”

My comment didn’t appear, maybe more than 3 links altogether?

old cocky
Reply to  Mr.
July 22, 2023 5:21 pm

That seems to be mostly about the northern third of the country, with very little reference to the more southerly areas.

ozspeaksup
July 22, 2023 3:04 am

funny how bob brown got the tassie one halted cos it upset his views etc
aboriginals aside the area theyre proposing to trash for turbines is pretty special plants n wildlife wise, thought the greenies would be on it faster n louder than they have been. Blushwood is fairly rare and precious for proven anti tumour abilities and Atherton is its only natural spot to grow I gather

July 22, 2023 4:24 am

Watch this construction of a wind “farm” in western Woke-achusetts back in 2011. The had to blast/level the top of the mountain to install these wind machines. It’s a time lapse video- and though I hate wind “farms” I like the video as it’s well done. Really, yuh gotta watch it. It’s mind blowing.

Coach Springer
July 22, 2023 5:00 am

Well, they’re absolutely right about the blight from “the city based politicians.” But the appeal to the vanity of the politicians and their political correctness – invoking an aboriginal specialness of being – is a bit of a reach and can never be applied to enough land in any significant way..

But it sounds about as close as one can get to requiring windfarms in all the U.S. national parks in order to expose their hypocritical green fantasies. Surprised that Australia went for … Oh, never mind. It’s Australia.

joselori
July 22, 2023 9:47 am

I was wandering the back roads of Montana a few days ago when I came across a windfarm. Probably a small one as it had only a few dozen blenders. I stopped my truck and turned off the engine.  I was flabbergasted at all of the noise those things make. 
 
There was nothing in site for miles and, if not for the turbines, you could hear your own heartbeat. Instead, there was a loud howl and swishing noise as the air passed over the blades. The wind velocity was quite low. I would guess at the low end of the turbine’s operational speed. And still, the noise was overwhelming. 
 
I was expecting some very low frequency rumbling and was surprised at how high in frequency some of the noise was. I doubt any livestock could tolerate that noise. Nor could any wildlife and certainly people could not live with it.
 
Of all of the things we have done to the earth’s environment, this, along with solar panels, has to be the most destructive, the most unforgivable. And it Is being done intentionally.

Pretty sure many people are finding these things impossible to live with.

Ian_e
July 22, 2023 10:45 am

How dare they?!

July 22, 2023 4:21 pm

In northern Canada (Nunavut), the Indigenous Inuit have successfully stopped uranium mining as it interferes with the traditional use and sense if land (by 47 hunter-gatherers out of local settlements). While I agree local people have a right to object to how the Nation uses/abuses their “traditional” areas, I wonder how long those who are not economically self sufficient BUT wish the 21st century lifestyle (technology, health care, education, travel, housing etc), will retain the power to deny the others who keep them alive.

I think we are in a transition. How many will want the Hunter gatherer lifestyle in 2 generations? Consider blue-collar White communities: how many sons of bricklayer are adamant that the bricklayer life is for them?