More Play Station science from the University of New South Wales-cr
UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES
The deep ocean circulation that forms around Antarctica could be headed for collapse, say scientists.
Such decline of this ocean circulation will stagnate the bottom of the oceans and generate further impacts affecting climate and marine ecosystems for centuries to come.
The results are detailed in a new study coordinated by Scientia Professor Matthew England, Deputy Director of the ARC Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science (ACEAS) at UNSW Sydney. The work, published today in Nature, includes lead author Dr. Qian Li—formerly from UNSW and now at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)—as well as co-authors from the Australian National University (ANU) and CSIRO.
Cold water that sinks near Antarctica drives the deepest flow of the overturning circulation—a network of currents that spans the world’s oceans. The overturning carries heat, carbon, oxygen and nutrients around the globe. This influences climate, sea level and the productivity of marine ecosystems.
“Our modelling shows that if global carbon emissions continue at the current rate, then the Antarctic overturning will slow by more than 40 per cent in the next 30 years – and on a trajectory that looks headed towards collapse,” says Prof England.
Modelling the deep ocean
About 250 trillion tonnes of cold, salty, oxygen-rich water sinks near Antarctica each year. This water then spreads northwards and carries oxygen into the deep Indian, Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.
“If the oceans had lungs, this would be one of them,” Prof England says.
The international team of scientists modelled the amount of Antarctic deep water produced under the IPCC ‘high emissions scenario’, until 2050.
The model captures detail of the ocean processes that previous models haven’t been able to, including how predictions for meltwater from ice might influence the circulation.
This deep ocean current has remained in a relatively stable state for thousands of years, but with increasing greenhouse gas emissions, Antarctic overturning is predicted to slow down significantly over the next few decades.
Impacts of reduced Antarctic overturning
With a collapse of this deep ocean current, the oceans below 4000 metres would stagnate.
“This would trap nutrients in the deep ocean, reducing the nutrients available to support marine life near the ocean surface,” says Prof England.
Co-author Dr Steve Rintoul of CSIRO and the Australian Antarctic Program Partnership says the model simulations show a slowing of the overturning, which then leads to rapid warming of the deep ocean.
“Direct measurements confirm that warming of the deep ocean is indeed already underway,” says Dr Rintoul.
The study found melting ice around Antarctica makes the nearby ocean waters less dense, which slows the Antarctic overturning circulation. The melt of the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets is expected to continue to accelerate as the planet warms.
“Our study shows that the melting of the ice sheets has a dramatic impact on the overturning circulation that regulates Earth’s climate,” says Dr Adele Morrison, also from ACEAS and the ANU Research School of Earth Sciences.
“We are talking about the possible long-term extinction of an iconic water mass,” says Prof England.
“Such profound changes to the ocean’s overturning of heat, freshwater, oxygen, carbon and nutrients will have a significant adverse impact on the oceans for centuries to come.”
JOURNAL
Nature
DOI
METHOD OF RESEARCH
Computational simulation/modeling
SUBJECT OF RESEARCH
Not applicable
ARTICLE TITLE
Abyssal ocean overturning slowdown and warming driven by Antarctic meltwater
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“Could”, but almost certainly isn’t.
METHOD OF RESEARCHComputational simulation/modeling
————————-
Not real —
Much of this was anticipated by Jean Baudrillard, who in the early 1980s observed the predominance of fiction overwhelming reality. Hyperreality, explained Baudrillard, is a condition in which it becomes ever more difficult to “distinguish reality from a simulation of reality, especially in technologically advanced postmodern societies”.
Can we say that the naked fearmongering that dominates public discussion and precludes debate about climate change is based on anything other than “the generation by models of a real without origin or reality“?
>> The Eco-Hyperreality of Climate Science – The Bellows
The scientists “modelled the amount of Antarctic deep water produced under the IPCC ‘high emissions scenario’, until 2050″
Of course they did, because if they used the scenario that most closely tracked what the climate has actually done in the last 100 years they would have predicted a big nothing burger.
They don’t require drug tests in climate science? That Koolaid ought to be tested.
Years ago I was assailed by one of this site’s serious scientists for saying I’ll take the climate alarmists seriously when they stop using conditional – might, may, could, should and can. He said I was opposing the scientific method and protocols of uncertainty.
I still hold my view on conditionals. Yes, things are uncertain, but after 35 years of intense study and modeling, I feel we should be in the “will”, “shall” and “does: phase, and in some areas “has”. But I don’t see any of that …. except in media and political headlines. You know, the last storm or heat wave was caused/worse because of climate change, while there is no statistical data to support it in even the IPCC reports.
The “conditional” arguments have been shouted loud enough and often enough now that the public and activists don’t recognize the conditional uncertainty that still exists. Yes, they keep saying we have only X mire months before it’s too late, but the warnings are not taken as serious predictions – the “will/shall” type.
Again, their feelings (and financial/political interests) don’t care for our facts.
I invited Prof. England (via both tweet and email) to join this discussion, but he hasn’t responded.