Placing The Blame for Europe’s Energy and Economic Crisis

From The Manhattan Contrarian

Francis Menton

Over in Europe, things are looking bad for the economy, largely driven by a rapid increase in household and business energy bills. In the UK, average household energy bills have recently risen to about triple where they were just a year ago; and Bloomberg reports that “tens of thousands” of UK businesses are at risk of closure due to soaring energy costs. In Germany, KAKE reports on October 7 that energy costs are “savaging German industry,” with natural gas prices in particular up 400% from January to September 2022.

So how did they get into this mess? You might think, that’s easy to understand. Obviously, they pursued “Net Zero” carbon emissions programs, building weather-dependent wind turbines and solar panels that produce nothing most of the time, while closing reliable coal power plants, banning fracking, and otherwise suppressing fossil fuels, with the sole exception of imports of natural gas. When the gas market spiked, they had no other backup for the wind and sun, and their energy prices soared. For their exit strategy from the mess, they need to diversify reliable supply, start fracking, and get over the idea that intermittent wind and solar can power a modern economy.

On the other hand, if you work for the New York Times, it’s possible to look at the exact same set of facts and draw entirely the opposite conclusions. The lead op-ed in today’s Times is written by a guy named Sam Bright, and has the headline “They Wanted to Blow Up Britain’s Economy, and Liz Truss Let Them.” Read the piece, and you will learn that the UK’s current economic crisis has nothing to do with failed renewable energy schemes or spiking natural gas prices. Instead, it is all the result of the nefarious plot of new PM Liz Truss — in office just one month today — and a shadowy group of “libertarian” think tanks, with a plan to “blow up” the UK economy.

Under Ms. Truss, once nicknamed the “human hand grenade” for her ideological obduracy, the libertarian right has detonated the British economy. The cost, for all but the richest, could be incalculable.

Yes, according to Mr. Bright and the Times, the policies of the last two decades to suppress reliable energy production, subsidize unreliable renewables that don’t work most of the time, and make the UK totally dependent on a volatile international natural gas market, have little or nothing to do with the current troubles. Instead, it’s all the fault of the guys who just came into power a couple of weeks ago — when the crisis was already under way — and who supposedly have been able to ruin everything in a matter of mere days, probably just for their own sadistic amusement.

Most of Bright’s piece devotes itself to identifying the real bad guys, who are a group of shadowy “libertarian” think tanks all based in the Westminster area of London on one short street, Tufton Street:

Set in a maze of streets flanking the Palace of Westminster, the red brick townhouses of Tufton Street are anonymous; no corporate logos attempt to catch the curiosity of passers-by. In fact, the street itself is usually deserted. But this sleepy facade conceals a welter of activity. For the past decade or more, Tufton Street has been the primary command center for libertarian lobbying groups, a free-market ideological workshop cloistered quietly in the heart of power.

It seems that this little street is infested with a “battalion” of “libertarian” shock troops, who have now moved into Downing Street with well thought-out plans to destroy Britain in a matter of days if not hours:

This battalion of free-market thinkers has now been welcomed into 10 Downing Street. Five of the new prime minister’s closest advisers are Tufton Street alumni, including Ms. Truss’s chief economic adviser and her political secretary, and at least nineTufton Street alumni are scattered across other major government departments.

According to this narrative, just by getting “welcomed” at Downing Street, they have been able to “blow up” Britain’s economy almost instantly, before even any new legislation has been passed.

The Times then provides a picture of the nerve center of this nefarious movement, a townhouse on the street in question:

Wait a minute! 55 Tufton Street is the headquarters of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, the organization of which I serve as the President of the American Friends affiliate.

My question is, can anybody really believe this incredible spin, that attempts to absolve people who have been creating this mess for twenty and more years, and shift the blame to the people who have been in the wilderness that whole time?

There isn’t an election currently going on in Britain to enable us to assess the extent to which the public may fall for such spin. But meanwhile over in Germany, there is an election going on, in the state of Lower Saxony. No Tricks Zone reports today in a piece titled “Germany’s Green Party in Dire Straits, Isolates Its Hapless Leader.” It seems that the German public has figured out that the Greens and their renewable energy obsessions are substantially responsible for the energy crisis:

The German Greens, who are partners with the SPD socialists in Germany’s government, are sinking dramatically in the public opinion polls as it becomes clear Green Party leader and Economics Minister Robert Habeck is driving the country’s economy into the ground at a dizzying speed.

NTZ says it has gotten bad enough that the Greens are hiding Habeck from the public during the election, not letting him show his face for campaign events:

Blackout News reports reports that the Greens are “hiding” Habeck from the public in order to control the damage, and so far he has “had only one campaign appearance”. . . . “In the polls, Robert Habeck has already experienced a significant plunge in the popularity of German politicians in recent days. So it’s no wonder that the Greens are literally hiding their once most popular politician ahead of the election in Lower Saxony,” reports Blackout News.

NTZ concludes:

Once the darlings of politics, the German Greens have seen their popularity plummet spectacularly over the recent weeks as Germany’s economy crashes due to excruciating energy shortages and price inflation.

Read the complete article here.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 24 votes
Article Rating
112 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
October 11, 2022 2:15 pm

Carbon Dioxide; Where Does it Come From?
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/carbon-dioxide-where-d

Ian Rutherford Plimer is an Australian geologist, professor emeritus of earth sciences at the University of Melbourne, professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide, and the director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies.

He has published 130 scientific papers, six books and edited the Encyclopedia of Geology.

 

 

Born

12 February 1946 

Residence

Australia

Nationality

Australian

Fields

Earth ScienceGeologyMining Engineering

Institutions

University of New England,University of Newcastle,University of Melbourne,University of Adelaide

Alma mater

University of New South Wales,Macquarie University

Thesis

The pipe deposits of tungsten-molybdenum-bismuth in eastern Australia (1976)

Notable awards

Eureka Prize (1995, 2002),Centenary Medal (2003), Clarke Medal (2004)

 

 Where Does the Carbon Dioxide Really Come From?

 Professor Ian Plimer could not have said it better!

If you’ve read his book you will agree, this is a good summary.

 PLIMER: “Okay, here’s the bombshell: The volcanic eruption in Iceland .

.

 Since its first spewing of volcanic ash, in just FOUR DAYS, it has NEGATED EVERY SINGLE EFFORT you have made in the past FIVE years to control CO2 emissions on our planet – all of you.

.

Of course, you know about this evil carbon dioxide that we are trying to suppress – it’s that vital chemical compound that every plant requires to live and grow and to synthesize into oxygen for us humans and all animal life.

.

I know….it’s very disheartening to realize that all of the carbon emission savings you have accomplished, while:

.

suffering the inconvenience and expense of driving Prius hybrids,

buying fabric grocery bags, 

sitting up till midnight to finish your kids “The Green Revolution” science project,

throwing out all of your non-green cleaning supplies,

using only two squares of toilet paper,

putting a brick in your toilet tank reservoir, 

selling your SUV and speedboat,

vacationing at home instead of abroad, 

nearly getting hit every day on your bicycle,

replacing all of your 50-cent light bulbs with $10.00 light bulbs…..

.

Well, all of those things you have done FOR FIVE YEARS, have all gone down the tubes in just four days.

.

The volcanic ash emitted into the Earth’s atmosphere in just four days – yes, FOUR DAYS – by that volcano in Iceland has totally erased every single effort you have made to reduce the evil beast, carbon.

.

And there are around 200 active volcanoes on the planet spewing out this crud at any one time – EVERY DAY.

.

I don’t really want to rain on your parade too much, but I should mention, when the volcano Mt Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines in 1991, it spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in all its years on earth.

 .

Yes, folks, Mt Pinatubo was active for over one year – think about it.

 .

Of course, I shouldn’t spoil this ‘touchy-feely, tree-hugging, moment, and mention the effect of solar and cosmic activity and the well-recognized 800-year global heating and cooling cycle, which keeps happening despite our completely insignificant efforts to affect climate change.

.

And I do wish I had a silver lining to this volcanic ash cloud, but the fact of the matter is, the bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the NEXT TWO OR THREE YEARS. And those fires are happening every year.

.

Just remember your government just tried to impose a whopping carbon tax on you, on the basis of the bogus ‘human-caused’ climate-change scenario.

.

Hey, isn’t it interesting how they don’t mention ‘Global Warming’ anymore, but just ‘Climate Change’ – you know why?

.

It’s because the planet has COOLED by 0.7 degrees in the past century, and these global warming bull artists got caught with their pants down.

.

And, just keep in mind that you might yet have an Emissions Trading Scheme – that whopping new tax – imposed on you that will achieve absolutely nothing except make you poorer.

.

It won’t stop any volcanoes from erupting, that’s for sure.

 .

But, hey, relax……give the world a hug and have a nice day!”

Geoff Sherrington
Reply to  willem post
October 11, 2022 4:12 pm

Two squares of toilet paper? After eating a contaminated Indian curry?
Australian industry to the rescue. Australians use toilet paper at more than 1,500 miles an hour. Twice the speed of sound in a fighter jet. No sonic boom though, because it is properly managed and hidden from the media.
On the other hand, our national media mobs are highly ignorant about how supply and demand work when they ventilate their lack of wisdom about the destruction of Australian electricity supply. The green ideas that cause the media to clap their hands and sing simple ditties are nothing short of treasonous, as they would be labelled if we were at war. Who is going to toss out this green garbage (in the approved waste bin, of course)? Will it be some politician who finally realises the size of the problem? Can’t see reform starting with the media. Guess it is up to people like Ian Plimer who have studied the problem with abundant experience and ability, not your average green who has yet to learn to spell penecontemporaneous dedelomitisation, let alone know what it means while their knuckles drag in the mud on the way to their next antisocial protest.
Australian society is sick. There are obvious solutions for the major self-inflicted energy problems. Just reverse recent energy supply changes until we are back to the low cost, reliable supply of the pre-2005 era, as good as any in the world. Simples.
Geoff S

H Fan
October 12, 2022 11:09 pm

Yeah, it’s amazing but don’t doubt that the spin will be “we are too reliant on fossil fuels and have to double down on more green energy to save the economy and planet”. Whether voters will be stupid enough to believe it, who knows. But so far they mostly have been.