The Progress(ives) War on Reliable and Affordable Electricity

From ClimateREALISM

Guest Post by Geoffrey Pohanka. Originally posted at RealClearEnergy, reposted with permission.

Editors’ Note: Progressive politicians blame grid operators and data centers for rising electricity costs, but they are misleading the public. It is increasingly clear that over-penetration of renewables like wind and solar, while shutting down reliable, affordable electricity sources, all in the name of net-zero, has resulted in climbing electric bills. Climate Realism has discussed this effect both at the state level, as well as internationally.

Progress and Progress(ive)…. two words with somewhat similar spelling but with entirely different meanings. I asked Grok to help identify the distinctions. Progress… a forward movement, advancement, or improvement over time. It’s about actual results or the process of getting better. Progressive…..favoring or promoting reform, change, and new ideas (especially social or political change), happening gradually or in stages…..supporting “progress’ as an ideology.

There may be no better way to illuminate the difference between the two than with energy policies in the State of Maryland. There is not much disagreement that electricity prices are rapidly increasing but there isn’t much agreement as to the causes. Maryland residential electricity rates have risen 50.9% in the past five years. Maryland Governor Wes Moore, as well as other blue state governors, place blame for rising electricity prices on utility profiteering and their ‘double dipping’ on energy infrastructure projects. He blames the PJM grid operator and data centers “as the largest single driver of capacity prices “. The Maryland legislature, in an attempt to slow the rate of increases, has even capped the compensation for utility executives. To give citizens relief, state officials passed the Utility Relief Act which will rebate $150 towards the cost of electricity (which essentially gives the people back their own tax dollars).

Increasing demand for electricity, and including from Data Centers,  is indeed causing a power shortage and rising electricity prices. But are there other important factors that some politicians are conveniently failing to consider, such as state government regulations that are contributing to the shortage of reliable power supply?  What about the impact on supply from decarbonization policies designed combat climate change and the push for an all-electric economy, requiring electric cars, electric buildings, and electric heating. Maryland passed the Climate Solutions Now Act of 2022 mandates a 60% reduction in state greenhouse gas emissions from 2006 levels by 2031 and net-zero emissions by 2045. Other legislation requires all electric heating in larger buildings.

Maryland also wants to phase out natural gas and oil heating and replace them with electric heat pumps. Maryland is also a member of RGGI, the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which is a carbon tax on fossil fuel power plant emissions. According to a Baltimore Sun article, RGGI fees in 2024 were  equivalent to a 44% tax on Maryland fossil fuel plant revenues, a cost which cannot be passed onto utility customers due to MD’s deregulation of the power industry that prevents common ownership of power generation and distribution. The current RGGI auction price of $35 per ton of CO2 emissions is equivalent to an annual tax of $100 million dollars for a 1GW natural gas power plant. The combination of decarbonization policies and RGGI fees have made many fossil fuel power plants (and especially coal power plants) uneconomic to operate and to voluntarily close. Maryland has lost a significant amount of in-state energy generation since 2018 and now imports 43% of its electricity from neighboring Pennsylvania (natural gas, nuclear, and coal) and West Virginia (coal). The imported electricity is equivalent to Maryland’s entire residential electricity consumption. To meet the net-zero emission goal, “many, if not all, of MD fossil fuel power plants may need to retire earlier than planned”. The shortage of in-state energy generation is not limited to Maryland, it is also found in VA, DC, DE, OH, and NJ. All are within the PJM grid.

Maryland has indeed reduced in-state carbon emissions, which is celebrated by progressives, but how can moving these emissions across the state border be considered actual progress?   Imported electricity costs more and often pollutes more. Due to increased demand for electricity, Maryland has expensive plans to import even more power from neighboring states. Three new power lines are in the planning stages, the Mid-Atlantic Resiliency Link, the Piedmont Reliability Project, and the Tri-Country Transmission Upgrade. These lines will cost Maryland utility customers billions and only add to the dependence on neighboring states. In fact, one of the power lines will result in less in-state power generation since the imported electricity is required for the closure of the Brandon Shores (coal) and Wagner (oil) power plants in Baltimore than have a combined capacity of 2.1 GW. Progressives want to close the last Maryland coal fired power plant and have kneecapped the oil fired Wagner power plant, allowing it to operate only up to 5% of the time. This over reliance on imported electricity is one reason why electricity transmission costs are rising significantly faster than the cost of energy generation.….Increasing reliance on imported power incurs higher transmission and congestion fees.

Governor Moore does support an increase in in-state energy generation but his primarily focus is on offshore wind, solar energy, and battery storage. The large offshore wind project off the Maryland Atlantic coastline has faced significant opposition from the shore community and is likely not going to be built anytime soon. Solar energy is only given a less than 7% reliability factor by the PJM grid operator. Wind and solar energy are intermittent power sources and are very unreliable without expensive battery backup. The combination of wind and solar power with battery backup is one of the most expensive sources of electricity generation.  Maryland will have to act soon to find more sources of reliable electricity because utilities are warning that the state could suffer a voltage collapse and rolling blackouts by the Summer of 2027.

Geoffrey Pohanka, Chairman, Pohanka Automotive Group, Capitol Heights MD. 

Originally posted at RealClearEnergy, reposted with permission.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
36 Comments
Nick Stokes
September 9, 2026 6:13 pm

This post is obviously inspired by Maryland politics, and in perticular the election for Governor in November. But Maryland is a poor example. There is a lot about what politicians may say, but very little about what is actually happening. Maryland is not generating a lot of wind or solar energy, so that isn’t the cause of price rise. The places that are generating lots of wind and solar are states like Iowa and Kansas, where prices are not rising.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
September 9, 2026 7:13 pm

Iowa’s clean energy trend reverts to coal power

A new report from the Iowa Environmental Council showed the state’s trend of developing energy from alternative sources is reversing. The state has been among the nation’s leaders in adopting wind power but in 2025, fossil fuels again eclipsed renewables.

USA has a thing called “Tornado Alley” where it is regularly windy..

comment image?v=1698731864

Kansas.. think Wizard of Oz..

Oklahoma.. think the movie of the same name..

Yes, wind can be effective in these states, like hydro can be effective in Tassie.

But it still needs 100% back-up from reliable supplies.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  bnice2000
September 9, 2026 8:10 pm

Iowa’s clean energy trend reverts to coal power
“but in 2025, fossil fuels again eclipsed renewables.”

Just not true. The cited report shows this graph:

comment image

Reply to  Nick Stokes
September 9, 2026 8:41 pm

They are talking about the trends.

 the state’s trend of developing energy from alternative sources is reversing. “

The trend in coal has increased..

The trend in wind decreased.

If that isn’t a reversal, I don’t know what is.

And it still needs 100% back-up from reliable supplies.

joe-Dallas
Reply to  Nick Stokes
September 10, 2026 5:43 am

I drove the I80 corridor between des moines and Iowa city in June. Approx 15% of the turbines were not operational.

starzmom
Reply to  joe-Dallas
September 10, 2026 9:12 am

You are lucky you saw so many turning. We drive often through Missouri, Kansas, Colorado, Illinois and Indiana. Sometimes exactly none of them are turning.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nick Stokes
September 10, 2026 9:34 am

IEC is a climate change site, with emphasis on DEI and EGS and wokeness.
Copying a chart produced by them without a critical review of the data used is not a means to validate your claims.

Iain Reid
Reply to  bnice2000
September 10, 2026 12:07 am

Wind (and solar) are never effective and have no place on a power grid. Totally unsuited both practically and technically and always need the support of conventional generation as well, a duplication of resources. Hydro is the only renewable (Loosely described) source that works.

Reply to  Iain Reid
September 10, 2026 3:16 am

You should tell that china:

China’s clean energy expansion starts to displace fossil fuels across the economy
https://www.review-energy.com/otras-fuentes/china-s-clean-energy-expansion-starts-to-displace-fossil-fuels-across-the-economy

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 10, 2026 5:57 am

China actually uses very little wind and solar, but HUGE amounts of Coal, Oil and Gas.

comment image
.
.
And in 2025 they commissioned FOUR TIMES the number of new large coal fired power stations than the average of the previous 10 years.

comment image

Reply to  bnice2000
September 10, 2026 8:18 am

One comment I see re: China’s coal buildout is that all they are doing is replacing old, out dated plants with new ones and not really expanding their overall fleet of coal power plants. Do you have any info on that assertion?

Dave Andrews
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 10, 2026 8:43 am

True China’s coal consumption was flat in 2025, however the country’s “coal, gas and oil production all increased” that year and “Oil was the second largest source of energy supply growth in 2025”

“Despite record levels of production China was dependent on imports for 37% of its gas needs whilst also being the world’s fourth largest gas producer”

“Chinese refining capacity is the largest in the world whilst being dependent on imports for 73% of its oil”

Energy Institute ‘2026 Statistical Review of World Energy’ (May 2026)

Just a reminder on a worldwide basis the review says

Fossil Fuels continued to expand in absolute terms and retained their dominant position accounting for 86% of total energy supply (TES)”

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 10, 2026 9:32 am

The flame warrior diverts the converstion… again.

starzmom
Reply to  bnice2000
September 10, 2026 9:16 am

The Southwest Power Pool which serves at least parts of all of those states only accredits a little more than 8% of the wind power. It is hard to find out exactly how much wind power (nameplate) there is in the SPP–appears to be about 33,000MW–and the most wind they have ever gotten is about 25,000MW. Often the wind is below 10,000MW. Coal and natural gas cover the shortfalls.

leefor
Reply to  Nick Stokes
September 9, 2026 8:42 pm

You got something right for a change. It is not caused by solar and wind in Maryland, if the report is true. It is the demonisation of in-state fossil fuels and “carbon” taxes.

joe-Dallas
Reply to  Nick Stokes
September 10, 2026 7:31 am

Dont laugh – The latest claim from the WWS advocates is that renewables are more reliable than fossil fuel and nuclear.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Nick Stokes
September 10, 2026 9:25 am

I live in Maryland. You are wrong.

Bob
September 9, 2026 6:29 pm

Government is not suited to control energy production or transmission. They are way out of their league. Get government out of the energy business.

1saveenergy
Reply to  Bob
September 10, 2026 3:24 am

[“Get government out of the energy business.“]

NO !! NO !! NO !!

Get governments out of all business,

Reply to  1saveenergy
September 10, 2026 3:55 am

No worker protection
No consumer protection
No environmental protection

I too love going blind from wine that was made with slave labour.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 10, 2026 6:02 am

Sounds like are describing a communist system. !!

Solar panels from China have a large “slave” manufacturing component. !

September 9, 2026 6:54 pm

“Progressives” in my neck of the woods is just a different name that socialists decided sounded better than “socialism”. Their platforms are identical, so the name change just hides their ideas.

Mr.
September 9, 2026 7:38 pm

Coincidentally, I’m just re-watching the Spinal Tap movie.

Just saw the scene of Nigel promoting the amplifier on which they had modified to turn the control knobs up to 11.
“1 more than the traditional 10” was the main rationale and feature.

Rob Reiner’s question – “why don’t you just make 10 louder?” – so reminded me of the folly of grifters and greenie zealots pushing “alternative energy” instead of the traditional, predictable, abundant, affordable coal-fired sources.

Both Spinal Tap’s and greenies production & outcomes “advancements” totally lack any sensible rationale.

Reply to  Mr.
September 9, 2026 7:55 pm

Both Spinal Tap’s and greenies production & outcomes “advancements” totally lack any sensible rationale.”

Are you saying they were both intended as a JOKE ! 😉

May add a few more cowbells to the greenie crap.. and it will make sense.! 😉

September 9, 2026 8:44 pm

One of my mantras has long been :
A hallmark of the ` Progressive is the nexus of Arrogance and Ignorance .

September 9, 2026 11:36 pm

The conservative way of cheap and plentiful energy:

Roll back fuel economy standards
Wage war on “DEI” bikelanes and alternatives to getting around by car
Increase gas prices with a new forever war
Empty the strategic petroleum reserve to a level not seen in over 40 years without any plan what comes after
Have your energy secretary say “The trick to lowering gas prices is driving less”

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 10, 2026 12:07 am

Wrong on every aspect of your comment. !

Only the manic fuel standards imposed by California to force the use of EVs have been rolled back.

Bike lanes are pointless woke garbage and take up much needed road space.

Not a new war.. Iran started it 48 years ago.. Trump is trying to end it.

Countries all around the world are starting to produce oil. There will be a bit of lead time, then prices will drop.

Lastly, you obviously don’t understand supply and demand.

Reply to  bnice2000
September 10, 2026 5:22 am

Bike lanes are pointless woke garbage and take up much needed road space.

I see you are not a traffic engineer

Not a new war.. Iran started it 48 years ago.. Trump is trying to end it.

Glad he tries to get Hormuz open after 48 years…wait a minute…

Countries all around the world are starting to produce oil. There will be a bit of lead time, then prices will drop.

I would say the’ll drop because of electrified road transport.

Lastly, you obviously don’t understand supply and demand.

If somebody else said that you would be screaming about how they try to take away our cars and rationing.

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 10, 2026 6:07 am

I see you are not a traffic engineer”

Actually , I am a civil engineer, would studied transport engineering… what are your qualifications in that field ??

Electrified road transport in the USA.. You are off your tiny little mind !!!

You don’t even have a car to get taken away…..

No-one is trying to take anyone’s car away, except those trying to force the use of EVs.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  bnice2000
September 10, 2026 9:38 am

He obviously want Iran to have the chance to test the atomic bomb they already have.

starzmom
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 10, 2026 9:20 am

The only people who ride bikes in my area are the professional riders, and yes, we have bike lanes they do not use. Tell me again how much energy/gas they save.

DipChip
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 10, 2026 9:46 am

I would say you outdid yourself with this one, especially freight.

“I would say the’ll drop because of electrified road transport.”

Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 10, 2026 8:30 am

“The conservative way of cheap and plentiful energy: ….
Empty the strategic petroleum reserve to a level not seen in over 40 years without any plan what comes after”

Biden was a conservative!?!
Who knew?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  MyUsernameReloaded
September 10, 2026 9:36 am

The flame warrior diverts yet again.

September 10, 2026 8:23 am

Editors’ Note: Progressive politicians blame grid operators and data centers for rising electricity costs, but they are misleading the public. It is increasingly clear that over-penetration of renewables like wind and solar, while shutting down reliable, affordable electricity sources, all in the name of net-zero, has resulted in climbing electric bills.”

A little trip down memory lane …
https://www.politico.com/story/2012/04/uttered-in-2008-still-haunting-obama-in-2012-074892