Guest essay by Eric Worrall
As Russian Arctic towns struggle with an unexpected early hard freeze, and Northern Europe struggles with harsh temperatures, climate scientists have announced that rain will dominate Arctic snow events by 2060.
Rain to replace snow in the Arctic as climate heats, study finds
Climate models show switch will happen decades faster than previously thought, with ‘profound’ implications
Damian Carrington
Environment editor@dpcarrington Wed 1 Dec 2021 03.00 AEDTRain will replace snow as the Arctic’s most common precipitation as the climate crisis heats up the planet’s northern ice cap, according to research.
Today, more snow falls in the Arctic than rain. But this will reverse, the study suggests, with all the region’s land and almost all its seas receiving more rain than snow before the end of the century if the world warms by 3C. Pledges made by nations at the recent Cop26 summit could keep the temperature rise to a still disastrous 2.4C, but only if these promises are met.
Even if the global temperature rise is kept to 1.5C or 2C, the Greenland and Norwegian Sea areas will still become rain dominated. Scientists were shocked in August when rain fell on the summit of Greenland’s huge ice capfor the first time on record.
The research used the latest climate models, which showed the switch from snow to rain will happen decades faster than previously estimated, with autumn showing the most dramatic seasonal changes. For example, it found the central Arctic will become rain dominated in autumn by 2060 or 2070 if carbon emissions are not cut, instead of by 2090 as predicted by earlier models.
…
“What happens in the Arctic doesn’t stay there,” said Michelle McCrystall at the University of Manitoba in Canada, who led the new research. “You might think the Arctic is far removed from your day-to-day life, but in fact temperatures there have warmed up so much that [it] will have an impact further south.
“In the central Arctic, where you would imagine there should be snowfall in the whole of the autumn period, we’re actually seeing an earlier transition to rainfall. That will have huge implications. The Arctic having very strong snowfall is really important for everything in that region and also for the global climate, because it reflects a lot of sunlight.”
…
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/30/rain-replace-snow-arctic-climate-heats-study
The abstract of the study;
New climate models reveal faster and larger increases in Arctic precipitation than previously projected
Michelle R. McCrystall, Julienne Stroeve, Mark Serreze, Bruce C. Forbes & James A. Screen
Nature Communications volume 12, Article number: 6765 (2021) Cite this article
Abstract
As the Arctic continues to warm faster than the rest of the planet, evidence mounts that the region is experiencing unprecedented environmental change. The hydrological cycle is projected to intensify throughout the twenty-first century, with increased evaporation from expanding open water areas and more precipitation. The latest projections from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) point to more rapid Arctic warming and sea-ice loss by the year 2100 than in previous projections, and consequently, larger and faster changes in the hydrological cycle. Arctic precipitation (rainfall) increases more rapidly in CMIP6 than in CMIP5 due to greater global warming and poleward moisture transport, greater Arctic amplification and sea-ice loss and increased sensitivity of precipitation to Arctic warming. The transition from a snow- to rain-dominated Arctic in the summer and autumn is projected to occur decades earlier and at a lower level of global warming, potentially under 1.5 °C, with profound climatic, ecosystem and socio-economic impacts.
Read more: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27031-y
You might think climate modellers are pretty courageous making such a radical prediction, given the long term decline in Holocene temperatures, the history of failed “end of snow” predictions, the long term and statistically significant drop in Antarctic temperatures, and some very snowy recent Northern winters, but there seems to be a prevalent view amongst climate modellers that models are more significant than data.
As John Mitchell, Chief Research Scientist British MET once explained, “People underestimate the power of models. Observational evidence is not very useful”.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The University of Manitoba appears to have forgotten David Viner’s effort…
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/11/12/one-of-the-longest-running-climate-prediction-blunders-has-disappeared-from-the-internet/
Come winter 2021…https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-weather-snow-news-forecast-b1967624.html
Perhaps it should have taken note of the conclusions of an anonymous Dane…” It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future”.
Schadenfreude, epicaricracy or just malicious joy ?
But they don’t know if ECS is 1.5 or 6 degrees per CO2 doubling….so speaking of keeping it to “X degrees” without knowing by a factor of 4, how much CO2 that would entail, is entirely spin doctoring.
Didn’t Damian Carrington used to work for the Grauniad? That says all you need to know about this propaganda.
I read this article and thought it is so shocking a suggestion there must be some massive new evidence based study to support the claim of no more snow post 2060.
This gem from the piece indicated a complete piece of fabrication rather than a scientific breakthrough. vis.
“Even if the global temperature rise is kept to 1.5C or 2C, the Greenland and Norwegian Sea areas will still become rain dominated. Scientists were shocked in August when rain fell on the summit of Greenland’s huge ice capfor the first time on record.”
Well all I can say is, the scientists in shock should get out more often and check their records.
From what I have read, rain has happened at the station on the ice cap in the past. August was not the first time.
Maybe the clue was there all the time? It was all based on computer modelling output, which has so far been shown to be hopelessly wrong.
Then I noticed the source of this piece of futurology was the Guardian. At that point I realised it’s just another for that pile in the corner marked, “fiction”
A couple of days ago that particular weather station (I think it was the PROMICE station) was showing lower than – 50’C. There’s been no data the last couple of days. I always feel better on cold miserable days knowing we’re warmer than Central Greenland.
Climate models show switch will happen decades faster than previously thought, with ‘profound’ implications
Sorry, stopped reading after the words “Climate models show”!!!
Puter models are just like any other models. I recall many years back as a Chartered Structural Engineer working on a domestic/residential project having to try to “justify” a boundary wall adjacent to a public footpath & highway, the computer programme kept telling me it was failing due to exceeding a Factor of Safety of 3, (standard procedure) I spoke to the programme providers about it, & they agreed that trying to achieve that FoS was going to be disproportionately expensive, he told me how to access the programme to reduce the FoS to 2.5, & bingo it calculation worked a treat! He told me that perhaps I should make an “engineering judgement” as a professional. He was absolutely right, sometimes a professional judgement has to be taken. As I have said before, I have often said to young graduates to not simply rely on what the puter print-out says, telling them to develop a feel for the calculation, as in the print out says this or that, but does it “feel” right!!! In discussions with several fellow engineers we all felt that whilst it is proper to be cautious, developing feel was equally important!!! So, whenever I read/hear the words “models show”, I take it with a pinch!!!
It is one of the worlds greatest mysteries as to why these idiotic scientists don’t understand that every stupid forecast they have made over the past 25 years has not come to fruition. Perhaps there is truth in the old saying ‘The absent minded professor!’
“every stupid forecast they have made over the past 25 years has not come to fruition.”
Amazing.
Considering no “forecasts” – projections (by the IPCC) have reached their time as yet.

Projections are for decades into the future.
Bar the idiot Wadhams’ re arctic ice……
“no “forecasts” – projections (by the IPCC) have reached their time as yet.
Projections are for decades into the future.”
Incorrect. The forecasts run for decades, but they include projections for each year of those timeframes. And given CO2 levels of the past 20 years, temperature changes are far lower than projections.
They need to learn the difference between Temperature and Energy
(I scored Big Time t’other day on MSN comments – I was told ‘of course temp and energy are the same‘ and only A Moron would know differently)
High praise indeed – be wary of stupid people, esp in large numbers (also Universities, White Houses and Number 10)
I’ve had similar arguments on YouTube. The arrogance of these imbeciles is astonishing.
Probably never heard of enthalpy!
well Id say send the dude there for some “observation” either nth or to a psych ward
Odd that obviously wrong, overly sensitive climate models like CMIP6 would forecast absurd warming.
You can track the trend in mean daily summer temperature inside the 80th parallel via the Danish Meteorological Institute website. From 1958 to 2021 there has been basically zero upwards trend, despite a slight warming in the mid latitudes. Mean daily summer temperatures have been at or below 2 deg C all the way inside the arctic circle. So basically cold enough for snow rather than rain at sea level all the way 100% of the year, given that snow/sleet can fall at a ground/sea-surface temperature as high as 3 deg C. Projecting the historic summer trend forward suggests no significant summer trend in the future. Winter is always going to be cold up there. So it is unlikely there will be a shortage of snow in the Arctic at any time in the next 80 years.
I defy anyone to distinguish between 1958 and 2021 on the DMI charts.
see above
“You can track the trend in mean daily summer temperature inside the 80th parallel via the Danish Meteorological Institute website. From 1958 to 2021 there has been basically zero upwards trend, despite a slight warming in the mid latitudes”
No …. and there wont be while the majority of the area within the 80th parallel consists of ice !!!
(when it’s gone – is one form of tipping point as excess heat will be added to the climate system and not used to melt the ice)
You cannot get the air temperature to rise much above 0C over an ice surface.
The heat is being drained from the air as latent heat in order to melt the ice!
You will only see the trend in the winter trend, when heat is not being used to melt ice – rather the lack of it in forming it.
Think again. The pattern of warming seen in winter inside the 80th parallel is clearly driven by massive bursts of advection of heat sourced from regions outside of the arctic. This is due to atmospheric circulation and has minimal relation to greenhouse gases and so-called global warming. In the winter the temperature over vast areas of sea-ice changes by 10’s of degrees up and down in a matter of a few days to a couple of weeks. In this region temperature does change over ice and this has little to do with melting or freezing of sea-ice.
In the arctic summer temperature stability is enabled by a massive reduction in advection from outside the region. Basically, a general reduction in severe weather events. This is due to a reduction in the relative difference in temperature between the high and mid latitudes (a lower temperature gradient).
Anyone who has walked over an ice-field or glacier on a nice sunny summer day will appreciate that the air is easily capable of warming way higher than 0C. The higher the angle of the sun the greater the warming. The arctic is kept cool in summer by the angle of incidence of the suns rays, not by the melting of the ice. Such melting as does occur is controlled more by the temperature of the water on the underside than of the air above.
Do these loons not realise that for most of Earth’s history there have been no polar ice caps – and life always carried on its “merry” way!!!!
Were humans on the planet back then? Or are you one of those who believe the earth is only 6000 years old and that humans coexisted with dinosaurs?
John Mitchell: “People underestimate the power of models. Observational evidence is not very useful”
Well, thanks to R. McKitrick, such a statement is no longer a question of opinion.
Science says that the attribution from models into the real world seems flawed since 1999 and John Mitchel should not ignore such knowledge.
Also, he seems to be unburdened by the fact that the recent set of global climate models CMIP6 struggle to implement clouds correctly (older models do not have that problem, they basically ignore cloud details).
As good long term data is missing for many climate relevant parameters and models show questionable results, climate science is left facing huge problems after making lots of bold statements.
This is fake news!
Everyone knows that the Arctic if free of ice since 2013!
Yep you got me 🙂
The dashed red exponential curve shows it was ice free last summer.
So snow reflects a lot of sunshine in the Arctic in autumn? That’s odd, as I seem to recall that the Arctic is famous for not having a lot of sunshine in the autumn.
Massive snowstorm in Danmarks Northjutland led to circulation problems and blackouts. 25 employees and several clients had to stay in an IKEA shop overnight.
Did they sleep on the beds?!
No Allen keys available.
according to the article they did sleep on the bads
I think this prediction is all wet.
Serreze, Serreze.
“As John Mitchell, Chief Research Scientist British MET once explained, “People underestimate the power of models. Observational evidence is not very useful”.
Is today April 1?
In Climate Clownworld, it’s always the 1st of April.
Knowing Manitoba, I think that his is maybe wishful thinking. lol.
If the “Science is settled”, why do they have to keep studying it?
Boiler plate climate “study” language: “faster than previously thought, with ‘profound’ implications”
As Gavin pointed out: Change your models, change your result.
Well, today in Winnipeg,it’s sunny and a balmy -7F. Who needs snow when you have ice.
Arctic sea ice is having it’s best year in 6 or 7 years. Is this the start of our solar minimum little ice age?
Sorry, -7 C
When I first saw the story on CBC about this study I didn’t read it thinking that typical, every story on CBC re climate is alarmist.
I note the young lady has her photo in the CBC article I assume visiting the Arctic. No hat or gloves must by July. Hope she has hat and gloves on next Monday on the way to work when it’s only going to -22C that day.
I note they had to quote her saying: “McCrystall said that increase in carbon creates a negative impact, because carbon emissions contribute to the further warming of the atmosphere.”
There are no signs of less snow appearing during the autumn here in England, let alone the Arctic.
“Observational evidence is not very useful.” … For CliSciFi propaganda and fearmongering.