Summary
Earth has existed for some 4,600 million years. This condensed history sets the current concerns about the level of atmospheric CO2 and the possible recent impact of extra Man-made CO2 affecting global temperature in a rational context.
CO2 in the atmosphere

To understand the context of current concerns about the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere from the Man-made activities, it is useful to review the long-term history of the Earth’s atmosphere.
- as far as the development of life on Earth was concerned the first 4,000 million years were comparatively uneventful. It took evolution all that time to make any advances beyond single cell/algal organisms.
- in those earlier times, ~3,300 million years ago CO2 had reached its maximum level of about 35%, 350,000 ppmv: atmospheric CO2 concentration has progressively diminished ever since.
- it was only when photosynthesis took hold, that the level of atmospheric Oxygen could rise to its current level of ~22% of the atmosphere.
- over the same period CO2 concentrations diminished as plant photosynthesis used the sun’s energy to convert atmospheric CO2 to sugars and thus to generate all other types of organic molecules associated with life.
- CO2 has progressively disappeared from the atmosphere both being absorbed by the Oceans to be sequestered by Ocean life as limestones or later converted into fossil fuels from luxuriant Plant growth.
- as a result atmospheric CO2 has reduced by some thousand fold from its high point of 35%, 350,000ppmv to arrive at the current levels around 400+ppmv.
The Phanerozoic Eon: the most recent 600 million years

It is only in last 600 million years, the Phanerozoic Eon, (meaning, visible life), that Life on earth developed and changed radically:
- throughout much of this period global temperatures were fairly stable. In the main they were significantly higher at ~25°C more than 10°C higher than at present.
- 600 million years ago all life only existed in the Oceans and atmospheric CO2 levels were high at 5000 – 7000 ppmv more than 12 – 15 times current levels.
- about 500 million years ago Plants evolved to populate the land with CO2 levels still at 4000 – 5000 ppmv.
- so, plant evolution took place with CO2 levels at more than 10 times higher than at present.
- by 400 million years ago, Plant life on land had become very successful and productive worldwide at the a CO2 level, (~3000 – 4000ppmv).
- that abundant Plant life was progressively laying down Coal formations and other fossil fuels.
- this abundant period was followed by an extended ice age 320 – 280 million years ago when CO2 levels fell to close to current modern levels, (~500ppmv).
- with higher temperatures again reaching to ~25°C CO2 levels advanced to a maximum of ~ 2500ppmv, ~170 million years ago.
- this was the time of the dinosaurs lasting some 160 million years from 230 – 65 million years ago.
- following the Global catastrophe, probably the Chixulub asteroid impact, when the dinosaurs became extinct 65 million years ago the World was gradually repopulated by mammals, who progressively filled the environmental niches vacated by the dinosaurs.
- from a high CO2 level of ~2200ppmv some 160m years ago, CO2 concentration has declined consistently down to the current levels ranging from 180 – 410 ppmv.
- likewise temperatures have also declined from about 25°C to about 15°C or lower.
The Quaternary Era
About 2,600,000 years ago the World again descended into a true Ice Age with permanent ice sheets at both poles. The world is now living in that Ice Age. There is no indication of how long Planet Eath may remain in its current state of glaciation.

These long-term ice age conditions have generally maintained global temperatures as much as 8°C lower than in the present Interglacial. These long-term Glaciations have resulted in massive Ice sheets covering much of the currently inhabited portion of the land mass of Northern Hemisphere.
During those 100,000 year long glacial periods CO2 levels have repeatedly fallen significantly. This is a result of colder oceans being capable of re-absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere. Once in the Oceans, CO2 can be lost permanently from the atmosphere, it is sequestered by marine life forming protective shells, which eventually sink and progressively form limestone rocks.
Variations in the planetary orbital geometry within the Solar system have meant that this state of glaciation has been punctuated fairly regularly at roughly ~100,000 year intervals by interglacial periods, when temperatures have risen.
Interglacial warming has caused an enormous, positive but temporary change in the habitability of Planet Earth.
These interglacial periods have been very productive for the biosphere and most recently for the development success of Man-kind.
As Oceans warm during Interglacials, they can no longer retain as much dissolved CO2 and as a result they slowly out-gas CO2. Accordingly atmospheric CO2 increases following any temperature increase by about 800 years.
Interglacial periods generally last 10,000 – 15,000 years. The rate of temperature change from full glacial conditions to the benign environment of an interglacial can be sudden in geological terms, as seen here at the end of the Eemian interglacial and in the rapid temperature recovery at the beginning of our own benign Holocene. Most Interglacial periods have been warmer than the present Holocene: in the previous Eemian interglacial Hippopotami thrived in the Rhine delta some 120,000 years ago.
Our Holocene epoch
Our current Holocene epoch is just the most recent of these warm interglacial intervals. Our current warm Holocene interglacial has been beneficial to the Biosphere World wide. The Holocene Epoch has been the enabler of mankind’s civilisation for the last 10,000 years. The congenial climate of the Holocene epoch spans from mankind’s earliest farming to the scientific and technological advances of the last 200 years. The temperature profile of the Holocene interglacial has been remarkable when compared to the previous interglacial periods: the temperatures have been lower and the profile apparently flattened and prolonged.
It is useful to look at climate change from a longer term, century by century and even on a millennial perspective when considering the scale of temperature changes that “Climate Alarmists” anticipate arising from Man-made Global Warming and their view of the disastrous effects of additional Man-made Carbon Dioxide emissions in the second part of the last century. The differences shown by the Greenland Ice core records across the Holocene can be seen to be minor in comparison to the assertions of Climate Alarmists.
From the record of past interglacials in the Quaternary era, our Holocene interglacial is now likely to be short lived on a geological timescale: although as the Earth’s current orbit is less elliptical than in the past this Holocene interglacial may well be extended somewhat.
The Northern Hemisphere Ice Core records from Greenland show:
- for its first 7-8000 years the early Holocene, including its high point, known as “the Holocene Climate Optimum”, had virtually flat temperatures, an average drop of only ~0.007 °C per millennium.
- but the more recent Holocene, since a “tipping point” at ~1000BC, has seen a temperature diminution at more than 20 times that earlier rate at about 0.14 °C per millennium.
- each of the notable high points in the Holocene temperature record:
- Holocene Climate Optimum
- Minoan
- Roman
- Medieval
- Modern.
have been progressively colder than the previous high point.
- the last millennium 1000AD – 2000AD, encompassing the “Little Ice Age”, has been the coldest millennium of the entire Holocene interglacial.
- the Holocene interglacial is already 10 – 11,000 years old and judging from the length of previous interglacial intervals the Holocene epoch should be drawing to its close: in this century, the next century or this millennium.
- the beneficial recent warming, recovering from the Little Ice Age since the 1850s, occurred with two particular 20th century bursts to a Modern high.
- only the latter of these 20th century temperature increases from ~1975 onwards till 2000 could have been influenced by any CO2 emissions from Man-kind’s fossil fuel use.
- This temperature increase has has been “rebranded” as the:
- “Great Man-made Global Warming Alarm”.
- “Catastrophic Man-made Climate Change”.
- “the Climate Emergency”
- however Climate Alarmists seem to expect that because of the brief increase of temperature over the last quarter of the last century, that the warming recovery from the Little Ice Age will continue inexorably upwards.
- meaning that in their view that there will be an immediate and exaggerated precipitous reversal of the long-term temperature trend of the last 3000 years resulting from Man-made CO2 emissions.
- eventually this late 20th century temperature blip may come to be seen as just noise in the system in the longer term progress of comparatively rapid cooling over the past 3000+ years.
- all published Greenland Ice Core records corroborate this finding. They exhibit the same pattern of a prolonged relatively stable early Holocene period followed by a subsequent much more rapid decline in the more recent (3000 year) past.
- however, it would seem more likely than not that the Earth’s temperature will continue its downward course of the past 3000 years, unless it suddenly falls precipitously, as temperature has fallen rapidly terminating other interglacials.
However the much vaunted and much feared political “fatal” tipping point of +2°C would only bring Global temperatures back to the level of the very congenial climate of “the Roman warm period” 2000 years ago. Were possible to reach the “horrendous” level of +4°C postulated by Alarmists, that extreme level of warming would still only bring temperatures to about the level of the previous Eemian maximum, a warm and abundant epoch, when hippopotami thrived in the Rhine delta.
For a more comprehensive views of the decline of the Holocene see:
Climate and Human Civilization over the last 18,000 years
The effect of future growth of CO2 concentration
As well as the out-gassing of CO2 from warmer oceans, atmospheric CO2 concentration has also seen a contribution due to the CO2 emissions from the use of fossil fuels by Man-kind over the past 200 years as the industrial revolution has advanced. The records show that at present atmospheric CO2 is increasing from both these sources in combination is at about 2ppmv / year. About half of any extra CO2 emissions are absorbed virtually immediately by the Oceans and the biosphere.
As life has thrived and as plants evolved with CO2 levels at about 10 times this level, any recent comparatively minor increase of atmospheric CO2 ought not to be of any real concern:
- nonetheless, at its current low level, ~400ppmv, all Life on Earth is still entirely dependent on the CO2 in the atmosphere: it is used by plants via photosynthesis to release oxygen and to thus generate all other organic compounds.
- if atmospheric CO2 concentration falls below 150 ppmv, photosynthesis stops and plants and thus Life on Earth would be extinguished.
- only ~30,000 years ago, in the depths of the last glaciation, all Life on Earth came close to that total annihilation, when atmospheric CO2 concentration fell to 180 ppmv, only ~15% above the terminal CO2 value of 150 ppmv:
- this atmospheric CO2 reduction process is driven by colder Oceans absorbing more atmospheric CO2
- in colder oceans atmospheric CO2 is progressively sequestered over millennia by marine life and eventually deposited as limestone.
- so, as far as plant life is concerned even at ~400 ppmv the World is still in a state of CO2 starvation
- from the point of view of plant life, at least 1200ppmv or more would be preferable: this is well understood by horticulturalists
- in the recent past, (the last 12,000 years,) as the present Holocene interglacial epoch has advanced, the Earth warmed, so warmer Oceans out-gassed CO2 to approach a pre-industrial level of ~300ppmv.
- but when plants evolved on land, atmospheric CO2 levels were very much higher, (3000 – 4000 ppmv), ten fold current values and no runaway Global warming occurred.
- there was very luxuriant plant growth in the Silurian and Devonian eras leading to the laying down of massive Coal deposits.
- in the course of some future glaciation, natural processes with the cold Oceans absorbing atmospheric CO2 will finally extinguish all Life on Earth due to the starvation of Plant life for the of lack of sufficient of CO2 in the atmosphere.
- thus, the interference of Man-kind, emitting extra CO2 into the atmosphere from the use of fossil fuels has the potential to slow these processes and thus probably extend the viability of all Life on Earth.
- slow and deferred CO2 out-gassing process from warming Oceans is continuing and has been supplemented by Man-made CO2 emissions since the 1850s from the use of fossil fuels.
- with these two CO2 sources in combination, CO2 level has now reached ~410ppmv
- plant productivity improves radically with increasing atmospheric CO2 and NASA has already reported ~+15% more green growth worldwide.
- globally over the last 50 years, enhanced agricultural productivity has enabled the growth in food supply for a growing World population.
- plant productivity is hampered in colder weather: any cooling can immediately lead to agricultural losses, as has already been seen in the last two growing seasons, 2020-2021, at the present Solar mnimum.
- with cooling weather gets worse: the temperature difference between the tropics and the poles increases and with that greater energy differential weather deteriorates.
- the only way that atmospheric CO2 levels will ever reduce is by the cooling of the Oceans: as they cool they will once again be able to re-absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, that can only occur in some coming major ~100,000 year glacial period.
The impact of future Man-made CO2 emissions
Climate Sensitivity is defined as the temperature effect of doubling atmospheric CO2 concentration. This is the value assessed by Climate Modellers as their definitive result on which to base international policy.
A simplified estimate of the potency of CO2 as a Greenhouse gas is that its effectiveness diminishes logarithmically as concentration increases. A simple, “back of the envelope calculation”, can thus show the likely temperature effect of doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration from the current 410ppmv up to a future 820ppmv. The calculation takes no account of any possible feedbacks, which might enhance but which are likely to reduce the temperature effect of added CO2.
The assumptions behind the calculations and graphic below are as follows:
- the Earth’s Greenhouse effect sustains Global temperature by about +33°C.
- water vapour and clouds are responsible for approximately 90% of the total Greenhouse effect: the net overall effect is correct but the actual effectiveness of water vapour and clouds is bound to be very variable according to latitude and local environmental conditions.
- other than Water in the atmosphere CO2 is the next most effective greenhouse Gas.
- CO2 and the other minor Greenhouse gases are responsible for roughly 10% of the total effect of about +~3.3°C.
- logarithmic diminution operates for CO2 doubling concentration across the full range of CO2 concentration values: the CO2 warming effect diminishes as its concentration increases.
- so, in effect CO2 is a relatively insignificant “Greenhouse Gas”, and it is only in trace amounts at ~410 parts per million by volume, (ppmv).
- the present ~410ppmv concentration of CO2 is an order of magnitude lower than the CO2 concentration levels existing when plants evolved some 500 million years ago.
- if Plants had the vote they would much prefer higher CO2 levels and they would thrive even more.

The diagram above shows how:
- there is no direct, straight-line relationship between atmospheric CO2 concentration and its influence on temperature.
- the “Greenhouse” warming effectiveness of CO2 diminishes logarithmically as its concentration increases, which implies:
- CO2 at 20ppmv, ~42% of CO2 warming effectiveness is already taken up.
- CO2 at 100ppmv, ~67% of CO2 warming effectiveness is taken up.
- CO2 at 150ppmv, the CO2 level of plant and thus planetary viability, ~72% of CO2 warming effectiveness is taken up.
- CO2 at 300ppmv, the long-term pre-industrial CO2 level, ~82% of CO2 warming effectiveness is taken up.
- CO2 at the current level in the atmosphere at 410ppmv ~88% of the warming effectiveness of CO2 is already taken up.
- the warming capability of CO2 is now so close to saturation because of the logarithmic diminution effect, that doubling concentration from 410ppmv to 820 ppmv results in a temperature effect of about +0.35°C, .
- at the current rate CO2 of emissions growth, ~2.5ppmv/year, the transition to double the present CO2 concentration could take up to ~160 years.
- thus, the minor temperature increase that might be attained from further Man-made CO2 emissions is both miniscule and far in the future.
Recent paper by. W. A. van Wijngaarden and W. Happer. 2020
“Dependence of Earth’s Thermal Radiation on Five Most Abundant Greenhouse Gases”
Abstract:
The atmospheric temperatures and concentrations of Earth’s five most important, greenhouse gases, H2O, CO2, O3, N2O and CH4 control the cloud-free, thermal radiative flux from the Earth to outer space. Over 1/3 million lines having strengths as low as 10−27 cm of the HITRAN database were used to evaluate the dependence of the forcing on the gas concentrations. For a hypothetical, optically thin atmosphere, where there is negligible saturation of the absorption bands, or interference of one type of greenhouse gas with others, the per-molecule forcings are of order 10−22 W for H2O, CO2, O3, N2O and CH4. For current atmospheric concentrations, the per-molecule forcings of the abundant greenhouse gases H2O and CO2 are suppressed by four orders of magnitude. The forcings of the less abundant greenhouse gases, O3, N2O and CH4, are also suppressed, but much less so. For current concentrations, the per-molecule forcings are two to three orders of magnitude greater for O3, N2O and CH4, than those of H2O or CO2. Doubling the current concentrations of CO2, N2O or CH4 increases the forcings by a few per cent. These forcing results are close to previously published values even though the calculations did not utilize either a CO2 or H2O continuum. The change in surface temperature due to CO2 doubling is estimated taking into account radiative-convective equilibrium of the atmosphere as well as water feedback for the cases of fixed absolute and relative humidities as well as the effect of using a pseudoadiabatic lapse rate to model the troposphere temperature. Satellite spectral measurements at various latitudes are in excellent quantitative agreement with modelled intensities.
This paper shows detailed results for all greenhouse Gases and their combined effect on the thermal radiation to space and thus their influence on Earth’s surface temperatures according to ~300,000 frequency bands. It also assesses the the difference in radiation to space of differing concentrations of CO2 from 400 – 800 ppmv.
Further graphs can represent differing environments, at different latitudes with differing climates at differing cloudiness and humidity across the world: nonetheless they all show the same fundamental picture. Other natural feedbacks may on occasions change the parameters nonetheless the basic result remains. At a maximum the value for Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity can not be greater than +0.75°C.
The graphic below summarises those results at temperate latitudes. The effect of added CO2 up to 800ppmv is the difference in area between the red and black curves in other words just 3 Watts / square meter. That amounts to a 1% reduction to the radiation to space and confirms that as an overall estimate of logarithmic diminution of CO2 warming effectiveness is reasonable.

As Will Happer said in a recent lecture
“The important point here is the red line on this chart. It shows what would happen if the concentration of CO2 was doubled. The gap between the black line and the red line shows the extent of the effect of doubling CO2. So, you can see that doubling CO2 now makes virtually no difference.
On the basis of this miniscule difference, we are supposed to give up our liberties, give up the gasoline engines in our automobiles, give up all the benefits of Western Industrial society and submit to dictatorial left-wing Government controls.
The message I want you to understand is: don’t let anyone convince you that is a good bargain: it is in fact a terrible bargain.”
Conclusions
If the true limited future temperature effect of additional atmospheric CO2 is anywhere close to reality this result means that:
- there is no immediate and catastrophic overheating problem arising from the further Man-made emissions of CO2 nor from the continued burning of fossil fuels.
- at the current rates of growth of CO2 comcentrations it will take about 150 years for the effect of doubling CO2 to ~820 ppmv to materialise.
- any Man-made increase in atmospheric CO2 can only beneficial for the Biosphere and for Man-kind.
- more CO2 emitted to the atmosphere is likely to extend the viability of all life on Earth through future glacial periods.
- the whole Global Warming / Climate Change agenda is a fabrication supported only by quasi-religious beliefs in the evils of Western industrial society and a political agenda intended to undermine Western capitalism.
As the undeveloped world advances, seeking the advantages of Western civilisations, atmospheric CO2 levels will continue to increase from their CO2 emissions with cheap coal-firing for electricity generation, for their greater general wellbeing and for their greater personal mobility.
Quantifying Futility: 2020 estimate of future CO2 emissions
Therefore whatever CO2 reductions and sacrifices of wellbeing are made in the Western World will be overtaken and soon exceeded by them. It should be realised that climate change policies in the West are being enacted not on valid scientific evidence but on the basis of quasi religious emotions and active government propaganda.
So, all efforts in the West at CO2 reduction are futile, just inducing massive economic self-harm to Western Nations.


Will a learned person please explain to me how anyone can look at the Phanerozoic Eon chart above and proclaim that it is “Unnatural” for the temperature of the Earth to be increasing back towards its normal 25 C temperature. The chart clearly shows that something, more powerful than CO2 is controlling the temperature of the Earth and stabilizing it for millennia at 25 C.
You dummy, Carbon Fizzics clearly shows that carbon sometimes (like now) can force temperatures to “skyrocket”, but other times (as in, the entire history of the planet) it doesn’t, and in fact, the exact opposite can occur.
Carbon Fizzics. Get some!
CARBON DIOXIDE!
Gas, magic gas!
And the plants say; “I want it! I need it!”
Climastrologists; “ You can’t have it!”
My apologies to Who fans everywhere!
Only two possibilities come mind; intense mind control through indoctrination, or large quantities of assorted drugs! Or both!
May I know what is the source for the logarithmic graph regarding CO2 and temperature rise.
It is all about how emission altitude will increase and the temperature profile of the atmosphere. You can try with modtran, it will give according results.
http://climatemodels.uchicago.edu/modtran/
That is way too simple and the numbers are arbitrary. There is no need for that, because you get pretty low 2xCO2 forcing if you do it correctly.
E. Schaffer
“CO2 and the other minor Greenhouse gases are responsible for roughly 10% of the total effect of about +~3.3°C.”
“That is way too simple and the numbers are arbitrary. There is no need for that, because you get pretty low 2xCO2 forcing if you do it correctly.”
—————————————————————————————
Yes, in a way I will agree with your point.
But still, what is put there stands as a neutral point… as claimed with no challenging… meant as per Radiative theory of climate.
And still pointing out how minor and insignificant GHE of CO2 and other minor GHGs is… even under such a claim.
Remove all the minor GHGs and nothing happens, or nothing expected that could be observed in the earth system and the atmosphere.
I know this is strange, but to move from nominal to maximal point, in a given system, and that to be considered as properly detectable, it takes something like 15-20%.
And another 10% beyond maximal to reach the proper breaking or collapse point.
The thermal collapse point…
A permanent removal of any amount of any minor and major GHGs from the atmospheric system is impossible due to ocean response…
same for any permanent addition, aka artificial man made, it is impossible for the same reason.
cheers
Excellent article setting out the big picture.
Reblogged.
One wonders if any members of extinction rebellion, for instance, have the slightest notion of any of earth’s climate history.
More likely, just some vague woolly notion of garden-of-Eden ideal unchanging climate until 1850.
Does anyone have the actual reference about plant death at 150ppm of CO2? I heard Happer once say it came from a university on the west coast, but no name was given. I understand that at that level, Rubisco takes in oxygen since CO2 is not available. However, I have not been able to verify that.
There is a vast literature on C4 plant response to CO2 levels below 200 ppm. Starvation kicks in around 180 ppm, as during glacial maxima, but that can refer merely to reduced reproduction rather than death and species extinction, which require even lower levels, ie ~150 ppm.
https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03441.x
CAM and C3 plants can survive on remarkably low CO2 levels, but even they don’t flourish at double digit concentrations. But all trees and most crop plants are C4, which require ideally 800 to 1200 ppm, ie double to triple current CO2 levels.
There’s a difference between surviving and thriving. C4 plants manage to survive glacial maxima, gasping for CO2, in moist environments with lots of sunlight, as in the tropics, from which they can recolonize other climatic zones during interglacials, as now.
I think you swapped C3 and C4. About 95% of all green plants use the less efficient C3 pathway. How they managed to survive the glacial maximums is a mystery. CAM plants make up about 1-2% of all green plants. They use the C4 pathway and close their pores during the day to conserve moisture. Corn, sugar cane, pineapple, and cabbage are C4 plants. Most grains, grasses, and trees are C3 plants.
Increased levels of CO2 clearly help C3 plants. It was thought that C4 plants wouldn’t be helped by higher levels of CO2, but it turns out they, too, show improvement–though not as much as C3 plants.
You’re right. I did.
Which is why I asked above how the author can be so certain that “if atmospheric CO2 concentration falls below 150 ppmv, photosynthesis stops and plants and thus Life on Earth would be extinguished.”
A level so low would clearly disrupt many if not most ecosystems, but so will a mile of ice!
Generally a well-constructed argument. The brief discussion on permanent polar ice caps. is wrong. Drilling shows there was little or no ice at Antarctica and similarly at Greenland (NGRIP & Century) as recently as 1 million years ago. The oldest recorded is ‘blue’ ice dated at 3.2 million years at about 2,000 m in Antarctica. The fairly constant ice accumulations at both locations over the last 1 million years transgress the 5 or 6 150,000 year glacial cycles. Given this discrepancy then the biggest question to all of this activity where did the water go if it did not end up at the poles in large volumes as alledged the at the first cycle at 900,000 yrs BP. The simple allegory of temperature being 8C lower than now does not of itself account for the energy required to freeze enough water to lower the current sea levels by 140 or so metres.
What I am missing from this debate is the missing or, ignored by the climate mafia, climate driver. It is changes in air pressure over geological times. I written about this here https://www.coolingnews.com/climate-and-pressure.html
Note: After contact with Ned Nikolov he had calculated the pressure before the KT-boundary to be near 2 atm.
Where did this extra atmosphere come from and where did it go?
Air bubbles in Cretaceous amber show that the atmosphere then was similar to today’s, but with more CO2 and oxygen. At its peak, O2 neared Carboniferous levels,ie almost 35% vs present 21%.
https://geology.com/usgs/amber/
So Cretaceous air was just at most 14% denser than now. CO2 even at up to triple present levels would not greatly increase pressure.
O2 crashed after the K/T impact, due to global fires. The high oxygen of course made vegetation then more combustible.
“O2 crashed after the K/T impact, due to global fires. The high oxygen of course made vegetation then more combustible.”
So the impact caused the O2 levels to go from 35 percent to 21 percent, and that 21 percent has remained constant since that time?
It fluctuated both after the event and subsequently. The link shows those fluctuations. It didn’t immediately fall to 21%.
This is an excellent post on climate. It puts the current state of the climate in true perspective.
For the current precession cycle, perihelion has occurred later than the austral summer solstice since 1585. That marked the onset of the next cycle of glaciation as the northern hemisphere progressively warms. Perihelion is retreating at 15.6 days per millenium and will align with the boreal summer solstice in 12kYrs when the rate of ice accumulation will reach a maximum in the current precession cycle.
Within the current millennium we will see the onset of ice accumulation on the land masses abutting the North Atlantic as evaporation in the tropical North Atlantic overtakes the rate of melting on land at higher latitudes.
Over three or four precession cycles, without intervention, the ice will accumulate until the Gulf of Mexico becomes a puddle at sea level 140m below the present level and melting overtakes evaporation. At the onset of the four or fifth precession cycle after the present, most of the accumulated ice melts over the first 12kYrs from the onset of fast melting.
Note: regarding the comment that “plant evolution took place with CO2 levels at more than 10 times higher than at present”: the entire C4 branch of plants (maize/corn, sugarcane, millet, switchgrass, etc.) evolved in the last 35 million years, and mostly in the last 5 million years (https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.00974.x). So most C4 plants actually evolved in lower CO2 conditions than present-day. While C4 plants only represent about 3% of all plant species, they account for a quarter of primary productivity. Increasing CO2 concentrations may therefore favor a resurgence of C3 plants relative to C4 plants.
Could you show more detail on how you reached this conclusion?
Many thanks!
A lot of anecdotal stuff in the piece to pick on, but take just this one glaring untruth: “at the current rate CO2 of emissions growth, ~2.5ppmv/year, the transition to double the present CO2 concentration could take up to ~160 years.” The data taken since 1959 at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the Mauna Loa Observatory show that the atmospheric CO2 concentration has increased at a steady 1.67% a year (trend R2 = 0.999099), so that the doubling time is about 41.8 years, not 160 years. The increase is exponential, not linear!
Some years ago, having become fed up with the false argument that CO2’s greenhouse influence is “saturated,” I refuted Willis Eschenbach’s insinuation that net downward forcing must therefore decrease due to the logarithmic nature of the CO2 effect: (See image)
I neglected to specify that the 1.67% annual increase applies to the anthropogenic tranche of atmospheric CO2, but that is clearly stated in the image. The non-anthropogenic tranche slows down the doubling, but less and less so as the rapidly growing anthropogenic tranche represents a larger and larger percentage of the total. The important takeaway from all this is that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are significantly increasing net downward forcing.
Crickets.