Or maybe not so funny. We still have that video that has been banned on Facebook, YouTube, CNN, BBC, and Twitter. It seems that big tech doesn’t like it when people think for themselves and go off the rails of the official narrative.
They’ve apparently never heard of the The Streisand Effect.
Josh sums it up:
Do watch if you have not already – the video is here.
Meanwhile…this study happened.
It’s way past time there are standardised and statutory T&C’s for all social media platforms. Take ‘company policy’ cancellations away from these guys as it’s now clear they’ve abused their positions of authority for political ends.
It should be illegal to cancel any SM account on political grounds, barring proscribed organisations. There also needs to be a clear process of removal, just as there is in employment law.
This left-wing SM dictatorship has to stop.
“Conservation Of Hospital Patients”
“Arizona shows a huge spike in the number of hospitalized patients on July 13.
But there is no corresponding increase in the number of beds being used.”
https://realclimatescience.com/2020/07/conservation-of-hospital-patients/
No doubt helping the US statistics.
Youtube can’t take this down quickly enough.
Meanwhile, they have no problem hosting multiple versions of “Loose Change.”
This is getting ridiculous. This blog has thousands of instances where climate alarmists have misrepresented data, studies, experts etc. who question so-called climate science, but actually believe that this is somehow different.
Tot hose that say there is no evidence that HCQ works when used properly – https://c19study.com/
Congressman Louis Gohmert, Republican from Texas, tested positive for the Wuhan virus today. He says he is going to take the HCQ treatment.
Gohmert says he has no symptoms yet. He was getting ready to fly with President Trump to Texas when he was tested, and of course, he missed the flight after testing positive.
I had a neighbor tell me the other day that she had tested positive for the Wuhan virus, and then they ran another test on her about a week later and she tested negative. So it looks like she had a false positive. Maybe Louis had one, too.
Fauci demon strates how he is good at everything.
Vietnam resistance Chloroquine and Mefloquine
Zero deaths but no one takes chloroquine
New Zealand no one takes chloroquine for malaria but covid well under control
Japan no one takes chloroquine for malaria but covid under control
etc.
https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/travelers/country_table/a.html
https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus
Any doctor that claims a 100% cure rate with 350 sick patients is full of you know what. If Immanuel said 343 out of 350 were cured it might be believable.
Sycomputing, Henry Pool and others, whether you agree with Dr. Immanuel’s assertion that Hydroxychloroquine is beneficial to treating COVID-19 or not. There are studies being conducted in Australia at the Walter and Eliza Institute to scientifically establish that drugs benefits for coronavirus.
Maybe Dr. Immanuel is finding benefits. Perhaps other doctors are not. But that is how science is, finding out the truth, and if it doesn’t work discard that hypotheses and start again. Some noteable figures who are already taking that drug, such as POTUS are treated with disdain may suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome.
We are talking about science here not about people who take HCL or what Dr. Immanuel may think about demons.
Tony, in the field of medicine, what works gets spread among doctors much faster than published studies in reputable journals. Practicing doctors confronted with patients suffocating with the SARS-COVID virus found that rolling their patients over from their back to their stomachs improved their oxygenation levels. Word spread fast among doctors, and now they are all using this (proning) simple technique.
…
All of these doctors are trying a multitude of drugs and treatments. Dexamethasone and remdesivir have proven effective. HCQ has not. If HCQ worked, doctors would all be using it. Doctors will do just about anything to help their patients.
“If HCQ worked, doctors would all be using it.”
There you go again, Henry, employing false logic. Give it up. When you are in a hole, quit digging already.
“If antibiotics cured stomach ulcers, all doctors would be using it.” It took YEARS (and one doctor called every name in the book for his persistence) before ANY doctor used that now standard treatment.
(Wish my Dad had known about that, although it was too early anyway – being a veterinarian, he would have undoubtedly self-medicated and saved himself from a rather hazardous surgical procedure.)
” If HCQ worked, doctors would all be using it. Doctors will do just about anything to help their patients.”
Doctors are being prevented from prescribing HCQ. See my comment below. Forty-four U.S. States have some kind of restriction on prescribing HCQ.
I guess people who have the Wuhan virus will have to find out which six States do not restrict prescribing HCQ and go to a doctor in that State to get a perscription.
The political demonizing of HCQ is costing people their lives. How many? Well, if the “anectdotal” Doctors are correct about the effectiveness of HCQ, then we are looking at a large percentage of deaths that could have been prevented with proper treatment.
This is an interesting study. There are so many studies that all show the same thing.
If something is true there will be more and more evidence to support it. This HCQ triple cocktail treatment for covid is not going away.
There is no drug that reduces hospitalization by 80% and reduces deaths by a factor of Five that is not used..
The HCQ side effects are well known as the same drug has been used for 20 years. The HCQ dosage is low and there is a standard simple test to check for heart issues before prescribing the HCQ.
Logically all people in the at risk group, diabetics, per diabetics, obese, elderly, and so on would start the treatment as soon as they show symptoms before the virus has moved from the throat to lungs.
This is a simple treatment with a known safe drug at low dosages for a week or two. The treatment is most effective if given early which explains why this study got so great results.
The HCQ triple cocktail (Low dosage HCQ, Azithromycin and Zinc) when given to at risk patients early reduced their risk of hospitalization by 80%.
Early HCQ triple cocktail treatment resulted in 5 times less all cause deaths.
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202007.0025/v1
COVID-19 Outpatients – Early Risk-Stratified Treatment with Zinc Plus Low Dose Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin: A Retrospective Case Series Study
Therefore, the odds of hospitalization of treated patients were 84% less than in the untreated group.
Conclusions: Risk stratification-based treatment of COVID-19 outpatients as early as possible after symptom onset with the used triple therapy, including the combination of zinc with low dose hydroxychloroquine, was associated with significantly less hospitalizations and 5 times less all-cause deaths.
Dr. Harvey Risch, Harvard Professor of Epidemiology, said tonight that 44 States had restrictions and limitations on both prescribing and selling HCQ and doctors are intimidated all over the country about this.
This is really criminal. This can all be blamed on the Left and the Leftwing Media. Their hatred of Trump is causing them to distort anything about HCQ.
I think it is time to explore the “Right to Try” law that Trump signed not long ago. It allows people to try medications which might help them but which have not been authorized for that use by the FDA, and even drugs and treatments that have not been authorized by the FDA for any illness can be tried. These treatments usually apply to people who have run out of medical options and they try experimental drugs.
HCQ fits right in this category. So would this law override State restrictions on HCQ? It’s time to find out.
Doctors should get together and file lawsuits for the right to prescribe HCQ. They should do this now as it takes time to work through the courts and people are dying every day that might not have died had they had access to HCQ.
Nations like Turkey, that routinely use HCQ for all those who test positive for Wuhan virus, have a much lower death rate than does the U.S. Maybe the difference is in how HCQ is handled. If it is, somebody has some explaining to do.
Yep, seems like the censors missed one at Newsweek:
https://www.newsweek.com/key-defeating-covid-19-already-exists-we-need-start-using-it-opinion-1519535
If Dr. Immanuel has a 100% cure rate for treating her patients, maybe she should get her butt back down to Texas, and get to work. She’d be doing much better curing Texans than posing for the cameras in front of the SCOTUS.
Good idea, Henry. She needs to get to those counties in Texas run by liberals, after all, they just aren’t doing very well managing the problem:
https://txdshs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/ed483ecd702b4298ab01e8b9cafc8b83
By the way, have you seen how that oddly coincides with the overall death statistics for the U.S.? I remember telling you about it, but you poo-pooed the evidence. The thing is, if you go to worldometers and sort the total deaths in the U.S. by state, the top 7 states for C-19 deaths make up OVER HALF of all deaths in the U.S.
And what do you know? They’re blue states:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
Go figger right?
Well . . . surely I jest. I’M not surprised.
Well I guess come November we will find out if the tech gurus that were questioned today in the HR are truly “the masters of the universe”.
For myself the only evidence I need to believe in the likely efficacy of the HCL, Zpac, zinc protocol, is the fact that big government, big media, big pharma, and big tech, are all working so hard to prevent it’s use and the disiminasion of the results of it’s use.
Can someone get in touch with Dr. Immanuel and find out if having sex with Stormy Daniels (Stephanie Clifford) causes one to need two hands to drink a glass of water and makes one have trouble walking down a ramp?
Look at ya Henry. Now you’ve gone full [snip] [Let’s keep the name calling out of our discussion. -mod]
Ain’t you ashamed?
Well look, anyway I guess I’m off to bed. It was fun intellectually slapping yours and Adrian’s faces repeatedly on both sides till you cried like two red-headed stepchildren stuck in the basement of Stupid.
But I’m sorry. I was in a mean mood this evening.
It WAS still fun though. I won’t lie.
Then I’d be YOU:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/07/29/hump-day-hilarity-banned-by-big-tech/#comment-3043799
You are in it right up over over head Henry Cess Pool.
You are spewing it what a tosser .
“causes one to need two hands to drink a glass of water and makes one have trouble walking down a ramp?”
Henry, you are a serial distorter of the truth when it comes to Donald Trump.
You distort the truth about Trump, then someone explains the actual facts of the matter to you, and then you come back later and tell the same lie over again. I guess you think if you repeat the lie often enough someone will believe it. Or you just like to jerk people’s chains. I think it is probably the latter, as I suspect you don’t really think you are going to convince anyone, especially here.
Hank seems to have a desperate need to have his ego validated.
Since he can’t get this, he responds by trying to pull everyone else down instead.
I got banned from Fakebook for presenting verifiable science. They wanted copy of my drivers’ license, birth certificate or passport to prove who I was. Sure…
Attacking the person and their “faith” and past comments rather than their observational message. Al Gore was never berated for his “Ice gone buy…” 2013 comments.
While BS like this was usually confined within the borders of a country, with instant MSM, social media feeds, this BS spreads global in an instant.
She is a migrant apparently (The first nit-pick), not sure where in Africa she is from, but I am sure she is feeling pain right now.
I am influenced by what I know about ‘experts’ previous pronouncements and actions.
Like Michael Mann, where leaked emails showed he was in cahoots with other ‘experts’ to hide information, trying to silence critics, had presented data in a misleading way etc in furtherance of his beliefs .
When Mann pronounces on a subject, he might actually be right but I prefer to get my evidence from other sources. His previous actions and pronouncements have tainted him in my eyes and I think it absolutely right to take that into account when judging current pronouncements.
I would take that approach with this woman. Cured 350 out of 350 has she? Has she got the proof of this, what is the validity of this proof?
I mean, according to what they say, Singapore cures 1999 out of every 2000 covid patients. Does everyone believe that? Should they?
Alan Millar
Your comparison of Dr. Stella, whom you call “this woman” with dipshit Mann is frankly a retarded one. Try again.
“Dipshit Mann”.
I assume from this epithet that his previous actions have tainted him in your eyes and you therefore will not accept what he says without verification from a source you do trust.
Well I see you agree with me because that is exactly my approach. Though I don’t abandon that approach just because that person might have said something I would hope would eventually be proven to be correct.
The governor of Ohio, DeWine, just announced that he was removing the restrictions on prescribing HCQ and wants to allow doctors to prescribe it if they think it is necessary.
It’s time for all Republican governors to do the same thing.
There are only six States that do not restrict prescribing HCQ so that means a number of these States are run by Repubican governors, and these Republican governors should turn medicine back over to the doctors where it belongs, and take it away from the bureaucrats, where it doesn’t belong.
Censorship is an awfully growing pattern of current life.
It’s very much frustrating for those individual who publish ( or just pass on to other people) posts and videos which are contrary to mainstream « truth ».
The fact checking duty the Gafas took over was extended much to far. WHO is supposed to be a reliable , golden source. If you do not agree you become censored. The Lancet is considered a golden source : you challenge its study concluding against HCL : you become censored.
Gafas have to be blamed and heavily challenged for this: they make enough profits to find proper ways to avoid such things as pedophil videos. Hope that Congress will achieve something, but how likely?
A Big unresolved issue is the impact on media through ad revenue.
Take the exemple of France Soir, the e-daily which in Europe carves out many tough facts against what Authorities tell and gets repeated by MSM: they got many « bad points » from a company such as Newsguard ( which « fact checks » on behalf of Gafas and other ad institutions what media And SM tell ) when they said the Lancet study was corrupted. When the study was fully retracted, they did not recover any bad point whereas they should in fairness be credited for many « good points ». As their Newsguard rating is decreasing, their ad revenue is decreasing as well. Indeed advertisers cannot afford to allocate business to « dubious » media unless they are themselves open to a decrease of their own rating.
This is for me as a citizen a hugely worrying trend , and may explain why no MSM would depart from official authorities’ talk
I agree that even ridiculous quacks like Stella Immanuel should not be censored. The drivel they post online would not be a problem were it not for the credulous half-wits who believe it.
Ahhh, poor 1/2wit, too stupid to think for yourself. Typical leftard.
I don’t care is she believes in voodoo, that the Boy Scouts assassinated JFK, and the moon landing was faked. She provides empirical evidence of the efficacy of hydrocloroquin when used in early stages of the illness. Those who don’t accept that reality have ulterior motives.
In reply to Henry Pool’s comment/
Pool Said …. ” No drug is 100% effective. ”
Let’s See What the Observations Say About Your Hunch.
The HCQ cocktail is 0.14% effective…. Based on the Jewish Doctor’s evidence.
The Jewish doctor is a high reliable source of data. His data has been checked by a Group of professional German medical researchers who are helping him get his data published. His data is simple to analysis.
He did not make up what he is saying. He is real doctor. Odd that BBC did not investigate the Jewish’s doctor and inside decided.. to attack the Black Woman doctor credibility.
The Orthodox Jewish man is treating a community of Orthodox Jews who live in the same community, in New York, in his New York clinic.
The covid positive Orthodox Jews came to the Jewish doctor’s clinic for the covid HCQ cocktail treatment, as soon as they had symptoms. Because they know he has a treatment for covid. And the entire small community of Jews Know that those treated with the HCQ cocktail got better and did not require hospitalization.
The Jewish doctor treated 700 covid positive patients and had one death, a 0.14% death rate or as compared to the US death rate for the general population from covid of 4%.
The effectiveness of the HCQ cocktail is 99.86% when given with the first three days of infection compared to very best vaccines which have never exceeded an effectiveness of 70%.
My point is even if there is a new vaccine, this HCQ cocktail still will be required to save US lives and protect US patients from organ damage.
The virus starts in the throat, spends a week there and moves on the lungs and other organs.
Drug ‘effectiveness’ is also defined as what percentage of the population can take the drug without dangerous side effect.
Fortunately. HCQ, has been used for decades so we know its side effects.
If I, remember correctly, roughly 5% of the population cannot take the HCQ drug due to the patient have other illness and heart issues. There is a standard EKG test to check for heart issues before prescribing the drug which can be done in a clinic.
Here is analysis of the Michigan 6 hospital, 2541 patient HCQ study results to prove that point.
We know in the general US general population that 4% of the population dies from covid.
In the Michigan study 26% of the untreated patients died.
The Michigan study death rate for untreated patients is 4 times the rate in the general population…
We know Those dying from covid are obese, diabetic, asthmatic, and suffer from what is called Metabolic Syndrome…..
Comment: Metabolic syndrome is a fancy name for liver damage that is caused by the super high consumption of sugar which damages the liver in almost an identical matter to alcohol. The liver damage, which causes a host of pathological problems in the body, which the Medical Industry calls ‘Metabolic syndrome’, as opposed to liver damage.
26% of the Michigan study patients who were not treated with the HCQ cocktail died.
Only 13% of the Michigan study patients who were treated with the HCQ cocktail died.
The reason the Jewish doctor only had one fatality out of 700 high risk covid patients where in the Michigan study 26% of the patients died…
13% of the HCQ treated patients died in the Michigan hospital study because the patients did not receive the HCQ treatment within the first two hours of check-in…. It took 24 hours to be 81% of the Michigan patients treated with HCQ.
…and because the patients waited until they were very sick, before they went to the Michigan hospital. Remember 26% of the Michigan patients died.
These are very scared people.
This is a link to the Michigan six hospital study.
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext
Treatment with Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Combination in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19
Overall crude mortality rates were 18.1% in the entire cohort, 13.5% in the hydroxychloroquine alone group, 20.1% among those receiving hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin, 22.4% among the azithromycin alone group, and 26.4% for neither drug (p < 0.001)
Hydroxychloroquine provided a 66% hazard ratio reduction, and hydroxychloroquine+azithromycin 71% compared to neither treatment (p<0.001).
If you can be banned from Twitter for questioning transgenderism, why are accounts openly advocating pedophilia still on the site?
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/496690-maps-paedophillia-twitter-children/
Because NAMBA is protected by the Democrat Party. Got to wonder, if Jack Dorsey will not block pedophiles what exactly is he protecting?