UN and EU government agencies – and tax-exempt NGOs – have brought a plague of locusts
Paul Driessen
Billions of desert locusts have descended again on East Africa. Crawling first, then sprouting wings and flying in hungry hordes [fixed~cr] of 40-150 million or more, they are devastating crops and threatening tens of millions of people with lost livelihoods and starvation. This latest locust plague, says the United Nations, is the worst in 70 years for Kenya, the worst in 25 years for Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti and Somalia.
Locust swarms can blanket scores or hundreds of square miles at a time, travel 80 miles a day, and consume more than 400 million pounds of vegetation daily, Africa Fighting Malaria cofounder Richard Tren notes. The insects increase their numbers logarithmically, meaning numbers can be 500 times higher in six months. In Ethiopia, on January 9, a massive swarm nearly brought down a Boeing 737 jetliner.
Many fear the voracious insects could soon reach croplands in South Sudan, Uganda, and even Asia. The USA was once plagued by Rocky Mountain locusts, but they are now history – driven to extinction, thanks to active efforts by American farmers.
Despite past history, UN Food and Agricultural Organization officials say this is an “unprecedented threat” to food security, one “of international dimensions.” It’s “a far more serious emergency than we had earlier anticipated,” an African official said. “Please do not wait to act,” FAO Deputy-Director-General Helena Semedo pleaded at a February 7 gathering of “international experts” and African leaders.
Desperate Africans are responding with “time-tested” methods: whistling and shouting loudly, banging on metal buckets, waving blankets and sticks, crushing the bugs – perhaps even roasting and eating them, under UN-approved nutrition programs. In Eritrea, they are using “more advanced” methods: hand-held and truck-mounted sprayers. In Kenya, police are firing machine guns and tear gas into the swarms!
Fenitrothion is a highly effective pesticide against locust swarms. But only in Ethiopia, it seems, are they spraying pesticides from small airplanes. Fenitrothion supplies are extremely limited – and aerial spraying is too expensive for cash-strapped countries, too dangerous in areas wracked by radical Muslim insurgencies, and minimally effective against such massive swarms with so few available aircraft. And it takes days for pesticide-phobic farmers to move cattle and goats out of areas that could be sprayed.
In this era of incredible modern agricultural and insect control technologies, when American farmers get 3-5 times more crop yields per acre than 50 years ago – how is it possible that Africa remains perpetually on the brink of starvation? That Africa faces yet another locust plague of biblical pharaoh proportions? That Africans must rely on absurd “time-tested,” almost totally ineffective locust control methods?
Incredibly, this looming catastrophe is due to policies and programs that have been officially adopted and deliberately implemented by the very UN agencies that are now crying loudest about the horrific situation.
For years now, the FAO, UN Development Programme and UN Environment Programme (UNEP) have been working in cahoots with some of the most radical environmentalist pressure groups on Earth to devise and impose “agroecology” – a perverse combination of socialism, pseudo-ecology and primitive, anti-technology agriculture. The program is financed and advanced by the UN, by European governments via their development agencies and funding of environmentalist NGOs – and even by US taxpayers, who provide 22% of UN funding and underwrite grants to and tax-exempt status for environmentalist groups.
Agroecology is above all political. It rejects virtually everything that has enabled modern agriculture to feed billions more people from less acreage. It rabidly opposes monoculture farming, hybrid seeds, synthetic/non-organic insecticides and fertilizers, biotechnology … and even mechanized equipment like tractors! It claims Dr. Norman Borlaug’s Green Revolution, which saved a billion people from starvation, did little more than put global food production “under the control of a few transnational corporations.”
Acceptance of agroecology tenets and restrictions has become a condition for poor farmers getting seeds, and their countries and local communities getting development loans and food aid. Mid-level bureaucrats get cushy jobs overseeing and propagandizing agroecology campaigns, while ruling elites get more opportunities to siphon off additional millions in international aid money. They still erect roadblocks to Golden Rice, which could save 2 million parents and children a year from blindness and death.
AgroEcology advocates extol “food sovereignty” and the “right to subsistence farming.” They promote “indigenous agricultural knowledge and practices,” to the exclusion of knowledge, practices, technologies and equipment that have been developed in recent decades – and could help end Africa’s perpetual poverty, malnutrition, disease, joblessness and early death. They sow fear about pesticides and GM food.
Instead of transforming and modernizing African agriculture, the UN, FAO, UNEP, and radical groups like Food First, La Via Campesina, Greenpeace and IFOAM Organics International demand “culturally appropriate” food produced through “ecologically sound and sustainable methods,” as only they can twist those terms to serve their sick determination to negate and roll back human progress.
FAO Steering Committee member Miguel Altieri insists that all this will promote “resiliency” in African food production. The locust plague and imminent starvation underscore just how “resilient” agroecology has made East Africa. There’s barely enough food for good times, much less days of droughts and locusts. Modern agriculture could turn much of Africa into a bread basket – but the lunatics won’t allow it.
In 2012, Kenya banned biotech (GM or GMO) food, even as highly successful pilot projects were doubling and tripling crop yields for Kenyan and South African farmers, and ending plant diseases that had devastated papaya and cassava crops. Now, even as locusts wipe out staple food crops, rabid NGOs are pressuring Kenya’s Parliament to ban over 200 pesticides that have been approved as safe for crops, wildlife and people by Kenyan authorities and by regulators in the USA, Canada and other nations.
Meanwhile, well-fed Uhura Kenyatta, president of Kenya since 2013, resorts to the typical cop-out: the locust plague is the result of climate change. And Kenya’s Ministry of Health says, even if there is a severe famine and a threat to loss of life, “every effort” will be made to “source [imported] food from non-GMO sources, failing which emergency GM food may be allowed in.” Shades of Zambia 2002!
Adding to the insanity, in late January the United Nations claimed it needed “more than $70 million from donors” to address the locust crisis. For 2020, the UN budget is $3.1 billion; the FAO’s is $1 billion; the UNEP’s $790 million; and the Green Climate Fund has some $2 billion, plus pledges of some $6 billion.
Surely, these outfits can find a measly $70 million in these bloated treasuries to address a genuine humanitarian crisis – even if they have to claw it away from agroecology and similarly useless programs.
And what about the rights of African farmers who don’t want to practice agroecology, who want to use modern seeds, fertilizers, pesticides and machinery? Do the FAO and UN Human Rights Commission support those rights of self-determination? Why isn’t the HRC blasting the NGOs, EU countries and UN agencies for these human rights violations and the misery, malnutrition, disease and death they cause?
Agroecology burdens African farmers “with systems that my grandfather gave up on 125 years ago,” Indiana farmer and US Ambassador to the FAO and other Rome-based UN agencies Kip Tom told people attending the February 20 USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum dinner. Whereas previous FAO Director-General José Graziano da Silva was deeply involved in the agroecology movement, thankfully his replacement (Qu Dongyu of China) is a scientist who seems “willing to work with” American farmers and the Trump Administration “to feed a growing and hungry world,” Ambassador Tom added.
Agroecology represents eco-imperialism at its worst. Under any fair and balanced application of their own beliefs and standards, today’s “woke” environmental, campus and progressive activists would charge the organizations imposing agroecology on Africa with eco-manslaughter. But that will never happen.
President Trump, the Agriculture Department and Congress should loudly and publicly stigmatize the FAO, UN and EU and their NGOs – and terminate any funding and tax exemptions that support agroecology. US agencies should devote their resources to rooting out this perverse system and helping Africa bring modern agriculture, disease control, health and living standards to its mistreated families.
Paul Driessen is senior policy advisor for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power-black death and articles on environmental and human rights issues.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Agroecology = Eugenics the only difference will be far more deaths. Meanwhile those in charge of creating this mess and milking it keep filling their bank accounts.
I am shocked. Frankly shocked that the UN and everyone else has missed the obvious solution. Solar Power Towers!
Install solar power towers across Africa to supply electricity to the billion plus that have none. And as a bonus you will have air fried locust as a bi-product to feed the starving millions.
A liitle hot sauce and you have “Africa Wings”. Some cold beer made possible by refrigeration from the newly installed electrical grid and overnight you have a massive industry.
An forget unemployment. An army of workers swill be required to go out every night to collect the fried wings. And these same workers will be using their paychecks to buy the Africa Wings and cold beer. So you have a sustainable industry!!
30+ centuries ago, Moses sold locust to a starving people as “mana from heaven”. What he was missing was a great hot sauce and a really cold beer.
Air fried locust and diablo sauce. An instant success. Bite into an Africa Wing and your hand automatically reaches for a cold beer to put out the flames. A few mouthfuls of hot sauce and everything tastes like chicken.
Manna of the Moses desert sojourn epic was mentioned being a small globular sustenance appearing after the night which could be processed (flattened to reduce moisture); however, left fresh & unprocessed spoiled as the day progressed. Someone modern once suggested it was a form of microbial growth enhanced by night time desert moisture flux & thus constantly appearing on surfaces before dismutating.
It was judaic dietary law (I don’t known if Moses formulated this specific rule) that specified locust were permissible to eat. The Israelites might have had some warm mead to drink, but since Mexican’s didn’t get over there until relatively recently they obviously had to scarf their locust without hot sauce.
It’s my understanding, that these hoards of locusts originated from the southeastern Arabian peninsula, a normally dry region, which had been hit by torrential rains and a typhoon in the past year. Too bad they didn’t nip this problem in the bud, by spraying in that area, when the infestation first arose.
I hate to sound like this and i don’t want to see anyone suffer or starve, but until these countries develop a system of personal liberty, followed by a civil society the only thing that improving agricultural infrastructure does is increase an already out of control population. Safe water and food means nothing without liberty. You increase the water supply and the population grows to match it, you increase the food supply and the population grows to match it, then when hard times come all that has happened is the disaster affects that many more people and that much more suffering leads to even more horrible societies.
Right you are. Only modern capitalist development (which would require plentiful, reliable and inexpensive energy – primarily from fossil fuels) will slow the population growth and make them rich enough to deal with events such as this.
Crawling first, then sprouting wings and flying in hungry hoards of 40-150 million or more, they are devastating crops and threatening tens of millions of people with lost livelihoods and starvation. This latest locust plague, says the United Nations, is the worst in 70 years for Kenya, the worst in 25 years for Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti and Somalia.
Locust swarms can blanket scores or hundreds of square miles at a time, travel 80 miles a day, and consume more than 400 million pounds of vegetation daily, Africa Fighting Malaria cofounder Richard Tren notes. The insects increase their numbers logarithmically, meaning numbers can be 500 times higher in six months. In Ethiopia, on January 9, a massive swarm nearly brought down a Boeing 737 jetliner.
Mathematically, that seems sloppy. If 140 million locusts are eating 400 million pounds per day, or more than 2.5 pounds per locust. They are voracious, but an individual can’t eat a pound per day. “500 times” in 6 months would be exponential, 10 doublings of the population in 6 months.
The essay is informative, but seems like an assembly of a lot of irrelevant complaints. Hard to separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak.
10 doublings of the population in 6 months.
oops! 9 doublings
“…hungry hoards of 40-150 million or more..”
Notice that hoards is plural. That would be 40 – 150 million per hoard. There’s no mention of how many hoards there are. I recall reading that there are billions of them.
The only mistake is using the word “logarithmically” instead of “exponentially”.
I wonder if the hoard of hordes is being whored by the hoarder?
“Meanwhile, well-fed Uhura Kenyatta, president of Kenya since 2013, resorts to the typical cop-out: the locust plague is the result of climate change.”
Without naming any names, you’ve gotta thank our trusty American educational system. (Amherst)
Bill Parsons,
I went to Amherst. What does his alma mater have to do with anything? (Or the fact that he’s well-fed, for that matter?)
Naturally, it’s simply assumed that climate change couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the locust problem. Of course not! Because it can’t have anything to do with any problem, or the whole narrative of skeptics starts to crumble.
And, of course, any research done on climate change must be poorly done, based on rotten data, misinterpreted, and most likely politically-driven. Research like this piece of trash, which is necessarily unbelievable and wrong.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321036540_Increasing_frequency_of_extremely_severe_cyclonic_storms_over_the_Arabian_Sea
ABSTRACT
“In 2014 and 2015, post-monsoon extremely severe cyclonic storms (ESCS)—defined by the WMO as tropical storms with lifetime maximum winds greater than 46 m s⁻¹—were first observed over the Arabian Sea (ARB), causing widespread damage. However, it is unknown to what extent this abrupt increase in post-monsoon ESCSs can be linked to anthropogenic warming, natural variability, or stochastic behaviour. Here, using a suite of high-resolution global coupled model experiments that accurately simulate the climatological distribution of ESCSs, we show that anthropogenic forcing has likely increased the probability of late-season ECSCs occurring in the ARB since the preindustrial era. However, the specific timing of observed late-season ESCSs in 2014 and 2015 was likely due to stochastic processes. It is further shown that natural variability played a minimal role in the observed increase of ESCSs. Thus, continued anthropogenic forcing will further amplify the risk of cyclones in the ARB, with corresponding socio-economic implications.”
Kristi Silber,
The reason they still call large swarms of locust “Biblical” – is because the phenomenon has happened before, in fact thousands of times over the thousands of years since that literary “record” was created. The Arabian Peninsula has had storms and droughts as well.
Perhaps you think that extreme weather, or swarms of locust, are ominous signs that something evil this way comes… But don’t you think it’s on you, if you’re on about global warming, to prove that these events are anything out of the ordinary on a millennial scale? I mean a one-off shows nothing. So really, you’ll have to do some historical, archaeological and “deep climate” research to show why a swarm of locust is concerning.
When you come back from your tour of ancient history, you might want to take a look at who Jomo Kenyatta and his son Uhuru (by his fourth wife) are, how their family has stayed in power, how much prime Kenyan real estate they own – and how they came by it, the number of people they’ve bullied, murdered, intimidated and destroyed in Kenya, the fraud, the lying, the stolen elections… but other than that, he’s a wonderful guy.
As for Amherst, my daughter spent four years there, long enough for me to get a pretty good idea of the department to which she chose to devote herself. They seemed to be a coterie of more than a dozen very bright, talented liberals, with one self-avowed conservative, who has subsequently retired.
How “Freedom” Kenyatta came to endorse global warming is likely the same way that any other irredeemably corrupt politician latches onto it. First, he sheds the responsibility for actually developing his county and can frame its current misery deterministically: “My-motherland-as-ongoing-victim-of-those-rich-developed-(white)- nations”. It’s the same schtick his father and he used to transfer 500,000 acres from the Colonial whites to the Kenyatta family for safekeeping. In other words, he smells money. Grants for “researchers” alone have skyrocketed in the last decade – and every one of them will spew “facts”, unsupported by empirical and historical evidence, about Kenya’s destruction at the hands of CO2. Grants will follow.
The criticism of being “well-fed” is mild. Did he become a scumbag at Amherst? Probably not. He just got away with it.
With the Enviros it’s all about the 1840’s, minus the firewood, cows and whale oil of course.
Yep, I have to agree with many here: fricking libs want people to starve. All part of their strategy, and their hatred of humanity, and their socialist plots, and globalism, and indoctrination, and anti-Americanism, and the Deep State, and irrationality, and on and on – they are at heart simply awful people, every dang one of them. Whereas conservatives care about Africans, always ready to support them through aid, expertise, support for groups that innovate to increase economic development of small communities, build micro-grids in villages far from energy sources, working with farmers to increase disaster resilience…yep, conservatives are the nice guys. That’s why they are so disappointed that we pulled out of the Paris Agreement, which had a mandate to help those in the developing world.
Apparently, one problem is that there isn’t enough pesticide to fight the plague. And it’s so huge that the territory simply can’t be covered, especially in dangerous regions.
The idea that Africans could simply shift to modern agricultural methods is laughable. That takes investment. Or would it be better if multinationals came in and took the profits away? We all know (don’t we?) what happened to small farmers when large-scale ag took over in the U.S. – they were SOL. Plus the whole ecosystem is different: many parts of Africa do not have the deep, rich soils that characterize our bread basket.
Agriculture must be tailored to the social, economic, political and environmental conditions in any area.
If it’s true that some NGO is pushing to ban all pesticides in Kenya, that’s wrong of them. However, we don’t have any idea whether they are likely to succeed, anyway. There will always be kooks pushing bad ideas – like converting Africa’s agricultural economy to something that is not at the moment practical or beneficial.
While my previous response seemed to have been caught in a filter – or cut – I composed another, less vituperative, and free of the names Uhuru Kenyatta so richly deserves. I’ll post here in part to address your statements about agriculture in Kenya.
The current President Kenyatta, like his father, is corrupt. He buys and peddles influence, stole the last two presidential elections through gangland intimidation (an election commissioner tying to fix their ballot counting system disappeared mysteriously), and the extended Kenyatta family has managed to misappropriate 500,000 acres of farmland seized from white colonialists and intended for displaced Kenyans.
In one of the most clement climates in Africa, Kenyans are failing to thrive, with 53% living below the poverty line. It has a mild climate and riverine farmland with fertile soils. It’s on the equator, but with ecozones from savana to alpine. Much of its land is ideal for growing profitable, exportable crops and supporting internal “food independence”, yet the country is still dependent on food aid, and a “substantial number” of its people are starving to death each year. (Wiki) The primary limiting factor to crop success is drought, which is actually relieved by the monsoon rains that come twice a year. More rain is better, assuming they can learn to capture it and take advantage of it.
My conclusion is you need look no further than their country’s dynastic leadership to account for this failure to thrive and adapt. Developing a working agricultural system isn’t something you do on a micro-scale. You start at the top where you need to fix the transportation networks, sewage and water systems. You build build schools and electric grids. You empower and support local governments with just, enforceable laws. Every villager for himself won’t work when they are fighting against thieving local tribal governments, quaint as they may seem to tourists.
Results: the right crops get planted, harvested and transported to market; people have real jobs and get paid to do them; there is adequate housing, medical care, etc. In short, you have a working society. Till the dictator goes, there’s not enough trust to do this. If Uhuru Kenyatta didn’t learn his dirty tricks at Amherst (accused by the ICC of crimes against humanity for post-2007 election violence), he most likely did get the tone of anti-colonialism and victimization from his liberal education there.
… some trouble posting. One more time…
this is going to sound really weird, but think about it. get vacumn cleaners that empty into grinders and collect and grind up the bugs, and compose them and use them as fertilizer. when life gives you lemons make lemonade
Same in Australia with aboriginals as the socialist smotherhood complex with their victim/oppressor dichotomous view of the world seem to want to keep the indigenous folk as their totally dependent time warp poodles. The Red/Green man’s burden it seems and the irony of it is completely lost on them.
There is the obvious point: Human population growth in Africa is out of control. If we feed the Africans, they will eventually destroy the entire continent of Africa. Nobody wants that. So the solution is to cut-off their food supplies. Africa is a nature zone. It’s not supposed to have any people at all.
[Might be sarcasm, but the tone is genocidal. Mod]