Plasma flow near sun’s surface explains sunspots, other solar phenomena

University of Washington

Sunspots can be seen on this image of solar radiation. Each sunspot lasts a few days to a few months, and the total number peaks every 11 years. The darker spots accompany bright white blotches, called faculae, which increase overall solar radiation. Credit NASA/Goddard/SORCE
Sunspots can be seen on this image of solar radiation. Each sunspot lasts a few days to a few months, and the total number peaks every 11 years. The darker spots accompany bright white blotches, called faculae, which increase overall solar radiation. Credit NASA/Goddard/SORCE

For 400 years people have tracked sunspots, the dark patches that appear for weeks at a time on the sun’s surface. They have observed but been unable to explain why the number of spots peaks every 11 years.

A University of Washington study published this month in the journal Physics of Plasmas proposes a model of plasma motion that would explain the 11-year sunspot cycle and several other previously mysterious properties of the sun.

“Our model is completely different from a normal picture of the sun,” said first author Thomas Jarboe, a UW professor of aeronautics and astronautics. “I really think we’re the first people that are telling you the nature and source of solar magnetic phenomena — how the sun works.”

The authors created a model based on their previous work with fusion energy research. The model shows that a thin layer beneath the sun’s surface is key to many of the features we see from Earth, like sunspots, magnetic reversals and solar flow, and is backed up by comparisons with observations of the sun.

“The observational data are key to confirming our picture of how the sun functions,” Jarboe said.

In the new model, a thin layer of magnetic flux and plasma, or free-floating electrons, moves at different speeds on different parts of the sun. The difference in speed between the flows creates twists of magnetism, known as magnetic helicity, that are similar to what happens in some fusion reactor concepts.

“Every 11 years, the sun grows this layer until it’s too big to be stable, and then it sloughs off,” Jarboe said. Its departure exposes the lower layer of plasma moving in the opposite direction with a flipped magnetic field.

When the circuits in both hemispheres are moving at the same speed, more sunspots appear. When the circuits are different speeds, there is less sunspot activity. That mismatch, Jarboe says, may have happened during the decades of little sunspot activity known as the “Maunder Minimum.”

“If the two hemispheres rotate at different speeds, then the sunspots near the equator won’t match up, and the whole thing will die,” Jarboe said.

“Scientists had thought that a sunspot was generated down at 30 percent of the depth of the sun, and then came up in a twisted rope of plasma that pops out,” Jarboe said. Instead, his model shows that the sunspots are in the “supergranules” that form within the thin, subsurface layer of plasma that the study calculates to be roughly 100 to 300 miles (150 to 450 kilometers) thick, or a fraction of the sun’s 430,000-mile radius.

“The sunspot is an amazing thing. There’s nothing there, and then all of a sudden, you see it in a flash,” Jarboe said.

The group’s previous research has focused on fusion power reactors, which use very high temperatures similar to those inside the sun to separate hydrogen nuclei from their electrons. In both the sun and in fusion reactors the nuclei of two hydrogen atoms fuse together, releasing huge amounts of energy.

The type of reactor Jarboe has focused on, a spheromak, contains the electron plasma within a sphere that causes it to self-organize into certain patterns. When Jarboe began to consider the sun, he saw similarities, and created a model for what might be happening in the celestial body.

“For 100 years people have been researching this,” Jarboe said. “Many of the features we’re seeing are below the resolution of the models, so we can only find them in calculations.”

Other properties explained by the theory, he said, include flow inside the sun, the twisting action that leads to sunspots and the total magnetic structure of the sun. The paper is likely to provoke intense discussion, Jarboe said.

“My hope is that scientists will look at their data in a new light, and the researchers who worked their whole lives to gather that data will have a new tool to understand what it all means,” he said.

###

The research was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy. Co-authors are UW graduate students Thomas Benedett, Christopher Everson, Christopher Hansen, Derek Sutherland, James Penna, UW postdoctoral researchers Aaron Hossack and John Benjamin O’Bryan, UW affiliate faculty member Brian Nelson, and Kyle Morgan, a former UW graduate student now at CTFusion in Seattle.

From EurekAlert!

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

96 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
anna v
September 23, 2019 6:47 am

Please not that electric universe cosmologies are not considered mainstream, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_cosmology that is why it is not headline news. As well expect that flat earth experiments will be headline news https://wiki.tfes.org/Experimental_Evidence .

Also theories that ocnsider special and general relativity wrong can be put in the crackpot column. After all GPS works the world over using special and general relativity corrections http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html .

anna v
Reply to  anna v
September 23, 2019 8:06 am

sorry for the double print, glitch on the net.

ResourceGuy
September 23, 2019 11:42 am

Unprecedented plasma mind you

Jack Okie
September 23, 2019 11:52 am

Anna, Plate Tectonics was not considered “mainstream” until it was. Shouldn’t the test of a theory be how well it explains the observed phenomena? If you will take the time to investigate Plasma Cosmology, you will find that plasma experiments in the lab appear to apply to what we observe in the cosmos. The question is, do they scale up?

The fact that GPS clocks in orbit run faster than clocks on Earth proves that GPS clocks in orbit run faster than clocks on Earth. Relativity is one explanation, but not necessarily the correct one.

I have been looking at Plasma Cosmology and the Electric Universe claims for several years. I have seen a great deal of derision and ad hominems directed their way but have yet to see anyone actually falsify either theory. If you could provide a link to such actual falsification I would appreciate it. You might recall, initially Einstein wasn’t “mainstream” either. Appeals to the “mainstream” or authority are anti-science.

anna v
Reply to  Jack Okie
September 24, 2019 9:31 pm

I am a retired particle physicist. I have used and seen used special relativity in so many thousands of cases and it has never been falsified by the data. A mathematical theory that does not have special relativity incorporated is automatically falsified, i.m.o. If it is successful in mapping some data , it means it should be able to be derived from the SR and GR theories if one took the trouble.

Johann Wundersamer
September 25, 2019 2:26 am

ctm, you must not believe everything.

“The Sun, or Sol[citation needed], is the star at the center of the Solar System. It is a nearly perfect sphere of hot plasma,[15][16] with internal convective motion that generates a magnetic field via a dynamo process.”

“convective motion” like Hadley Cells upon Earth’s surface – lagging Sun’s surface rotation by 11 years, elastic rebounding between surface and Sun’s core the next eleven years.

Johann Wundersamer
September 25, 2019 2:29 am

ctm, you must not believe everything.

“The Sun, or Sol[citation needed], is the star at the center of the Solar System. It is a nearly perfect sphere of hot plasma,[15][16] with internal convective motion that generates a magnetic field via a dynamo process.”

“convective motion” like Hadley Cells upon Earth’s surface – lagging Sun’s surface rotation by 11 years, elastic rebounding between surface and Sun’s core the next eleven years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

Johann Wundersamer
September 25, 2019 3:10 am

Wow. Mass Sun vs. Mass Jupiter:

https://www.google.com/search?q=mass+of+sun+vs+mass+of+jupiter&oq=mass+sun+versus+mass&aqs=chrome.

In reality the back / forth swinging of Sun’s interior mass is as reliable as the dynamo forced by a bicycle’s front wheel.

Other there wouldn’t be reliable 11/22 years cycles.

/ in fact some 11.3/22.6 years /

super computer models.

Super duper lights are gonna blind me, shining like a sun

suppa ppa truppa ppa – ABBA ba

To paraphrase another Swedish modern arts phenomenon.