First ICESat-2 Global Data Released: Ice, Forests and More

From NASA Global Climate Change

To assess the accuracy of the newly released ICESat-2 data, a NASA team set out to the South Pole. For the second-straight year, the team endured below-freezing temperatures, biting winds, and high altitude to conduct a traverse along the 88 degree south latitude line, taking highly accurate GPS measurements to compare with those from the satellite. Credit: NASA Goddard/Kelly Brunt
To assess the accuracy of the newly released ICESat-2 data, a NASA team set out to the South Pole. For the second-straight year, the team endured below-freezing temperatures, biting winds, and high altitude to conduct a traverse along the 88 degree south latitude line, taking highly accurate GPS measurements to compare with those from the satellite. Credit: NASA Goddard/Kelly Brunt

By Kate Ramsayer,
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

More than a trillion new measurements of Earth’s height – blanketing everything from glaciers in Greenland, to mangrove forests in Florida, to sea ice surrounding Antarctica – are now available to the public. With millions more observations added each day, data from NASA’s Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite-2 is providing a precise global portrait of elevation and will allow scientists to track even the slightest changes in the planet’s polar regions.

“The data from ICESat-2 are really blowing our minds, and I’m really excited to see what people with different perspectives will do with it,” said Lori Magruder, a senior research scientist at the University of Texas, Austin, and the ICESat-2 science team lead.

The long-awaited ICESat-2 mission, launched in September 2018, continues the record of polar height data begun with the first ICESat satellite, which operated from 2003 to 2009. NASA’s airborne Operation IceBridge project bridged the data gap between the two satellites. The new satellite provides far more measurements than its predecessor. ICESat took approximately 2 billion measurements in its lifetime, a figure ICESat-2 surpassed within its first week.

For the second straight year, NASA researchers endured low temperatures, biting winds, and high altitude to conduct another 88-South Traverse. The 470-mile expedition in one of the most barren landscapes on Earth provides the best means of assessment of the accuracy of data collected from space by the Ice Cloud and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2). Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/Ryan Fitzgibbons. This video is available for download at NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio.

When ICESat orbited over a rift in Antarctica’s Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf in October 2008, for example, it recorded a handful of data points indicating a crevasse in the ice. When ICESat-2 passed over 10 years later, it collected hundreds of measurements tracing the sheer walls and jagged floor of the growing rift.

ICESat-2 is taking these measurements in a dense grid across the Arctic as well as Antarctica, recording each spot every season to track both seasonal and annual changes in ice.

ICESat-2’s ability to measure heights beyond the poles is also impressing scientists – Magruder pointed to coastal areas, where in clear waters the satellite can detect the seafloor up to 100 feet (30 m) below the surface. Over forests, the satellite not only detects the top of the canopy, but the forest floor below – which will allow researchers to calculate the mass of vegetation in a given area.

All this is being done with six laser beams from a satellite 310 miles (500 kilometers) in space, noted Tom Neumann, ICESat-2 project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

“Getting the exact latitude, longitude, and elevation of where a photon bounced off Earth is hard – lots of things have to happen and go really, really well,” he said. To make sure everything is working, the science team conducts a series of checks using data from airborne surveys, ground-based campaigns, even the satellite itself.

That includes scientists travelling to Antarctica, where they drove modified snow-groomers along an arc of the 88-degree-south latitude line, taking highly accurate elevation measurements to compare with the data collected by ICESat-2 in space. Magruder compared measurements taken in White Sands, New Mexico, with what the satellite was tracking. In its most recent Antarctic and Arctic campaigns, NASA’s airborne Operation IceBridge flew specific routes designed to take measurements over the same ice, at close to or exactly the same time the satellite flew overhead.

ICESat-2 is designed to precisely measure the height of ice and track how it changes over time. Earth’s melting glaciers cause sea levels to rise globally, and shrinking sea ice can change weather and climate patterns far from the planet’s poles.

Small changes across vast areas like the Greenland ice sheet can have large consequences. ICESat-2 will be able to measure the shift in annual elevation across the ice sheet to within a fraction of an inch. To do this, the satellite uses a laser altimeter – an instrument that times how long it takes light to travel to Earth’s surface and back. With that time – along with the knowledge of where in space ICESat-2 is, and where on Earth the laser is pointing – computer programs create a height data point. The data is originally processed at NASA Goddard, then turned into advanced data products that researchers will be able to use to study elevations across the globe.

ICESat-2 data products are now available for free from the National Snow and Ice Data Center at https://nsidc.org/data/icesat-2.

For more information, visit www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/icesat-2 or https://icesat-2.gsfc.nasa.gov/. For more information on the data products, visit https://earthdata.nasa.gov/icesat-2-data.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

60 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 10, 2019 7:14 pm

Great post. My prediction has been confirmed. anytime any new science or device is featured the comments
will follow the same pattern.

1. Great we need more X
2. I dont believe Y,
3. blah, blah blah, Mike mann
4. blah blah blah… adjustments
5. blah blah… einstein
6. I would have done it this way
7.. blah blah blah, dont trust nasa
8.. when I was kid

Greg Cavanagh
Reply to  steven mosher
June 10, 2019 10:15 pm

You would prefer if we all cheered and congratulated them? Perhaps they do deserve some.

Now since you initiated this snark, I shall continue in kind…

steven mosher’s comments will follow the same pattern.
1. Snark
2. You’re wrong
3. You need to read it
4. Maths error
5. blah blah blah… Snark
6. Anthony still hasn’t published his code.

PeterGB
Reply to  steven mosher
June 11, 2019 3:02 am

May I assist?
9) Godwin point.
Yet to be achieved unless I have missed a comment.

Reply to  steven mosher
June 12, 2019 12:51 am

You forgot another one.

10. CALIBRATION

An un-calibrated instrument is not an instrument at all, it is a Mystery….

Richard A. O'Keefe
June 11, 2019 1:47 am

One slight sadness: they do not record any data for a track segment that only passes over open ocean. So this cannot be used as a cross-check against global sea level assessments. I was hoping that this information might be useful for tracking soil erosion, but from some of the comments the (true) vertical resolution might not be up to it, and the horizontal resolution is not that great. I am a little puzzled: knowing the distance between “ground” and satellite is only going to give you elevation if you know the satellite’s position to the same accuracy; does anyone know how good that is?

Pamela Gray
June 11, 2019 7:16 am

Greeeeat. Gonna track teeny tiny changes. Sounds like the gnat’s ass of ice and snow covering measurements designed to do one thing: Frighten weak minded people.

Look, we are in a warm climate optimum with the slightest of nudges up and down. Why the hell do we need to spend more money likely targeted to make that look like a bad thing?

June 12, 2019 12:41 am

Steven,

Are you a bit credulous? In engineering school we learned about this thing, called Calibration. Huge variables, just what is the altitude of the bird, just what is Earth’s gravity field, just what is the resolution of this laser? Might have some data about the latter, the two formers, not so much.

NASA is claiming 2 cm resolution, but with no evident calibration, and their record from GRACE and the previous ICE-SAT, “Inquiring Minds Want To Know….”

Takes 8 GPS satellites simultaneously to get resolution under an inch. Sure, no one at NASA would take any liberties with this, mining-hating MoFo’s that they are….